Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.55(4) > 1006649

Hong: Diagnosis and Management of Esophageal Chest Pain

Abstract

Esophageal pain that manifests as heartburn or chest pain, is a prevalent problem. Esophageal chest pain is most often caused by gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but can also result from inflammatory processes, infections involving the esophagus, and contractions of the esophageal muscle. The mechanisms and pathways of esophageal chest pain are poorly understood. Vagal and spinal afferent pathways carry sensory information from the esophagus. Recently, esophageal hypersensitivity is identified as an important factor in the development of esophageal pain. A number of techniques are available to evaluate esophageal chest pain such as endoscopy and/or proton-pump inhibitor trial, esophageal manometry, a combined impedance-pH study, and esophageal ultrasound imaging. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have the huge success in the treatment of GERD. Other drugs such as imipramine, trazadone, sertraline, tricyclics, and theophylline have been introduced for the control of esophageal chest pain in partial responders to PPI and the patients with esophageal hypersensitivity. Novel drugs which act on different targets are anticipated to treat esophageal pain in the future.

REFERENCES

1. Fass R, Dickman R. Non-cardiac chest pain: an update. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2006; 18:408–417.
crossref
2. Kim JH, Rhee PL, Park EH, Son HJ, Kim JJ, Rhee JC. Clinical usefulness of subgrouping of patients with non-cardiac chest pain according to characteristic symptoms in Korea. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007; 22:320–325.
crossref
3. Kim JH, Sinn DH, Son HJ, Kim JJ, Rhee JC, Rhee PL. Comparison of one-week and two-week empirical trial with a high-dose rabeprazole in non-cardiac chest pain patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009; 24:1504–1509.
crossref
4. Balaban DH, Yamamoto Y, Liu J, et al. Sustained esophageal contraction: a marker of esophageal chest pain identified by intraluminal ultrasonography. Gastroenterology. 1999; 116:29–37.
crossref
5. Fruergaard P, Launbjerg J, Hesse B, et al. The diagnoses of patients admitted with acute chest pain but without myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1996; 17:1028–1034.
crossref
6. Martinez SD, Malagon IB, Garewal HS, Fass R. Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD)–acid reflux and symptom patterns. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003; 17:537–545.
7. Douglas A Drossman. Rome III: The Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders. 3rd ed.McLean, Va: Degnon Associates, Inc.;2006.
8. Fass R, Tougas G. Functional heartburn: the stimulus, the pain and the brain. Gut. 2002; 51:885–892.
crossref
9. Rodriguez-Stanley S, Robinson M, Earnest DL, Greenwood- Van Meerveld B, Miner PB Jr. Esophageal hypersensitivity may be a major cause of heartburn. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999; 94:628–631.
crossref
10. Mayer EA. Spinal and supraspinal modulation of visceral sensation. Gut. 2000; 47(suppl 4):iv69–72.
crossref
11. Tack J, Koek G, Demedts I, Sifrim D, Janssens J. Gastroesophageal reflux disease poorly responsive to single-dose proton pump inhibitors in patients without Barrett's esophagus: acid reflux, bile reflux, or both? Am J Gastroenterol. 2004; 99:981–989.
crossref
12. Ang D, Sifrim D, Tack J. Mechanisms of heartburn. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008; 5:383–392.
crossref
13. Blackshaw LA, Grundy D. Effects of 5-hydroxytryptamine on discharge of vagal mucosal afferent fibres from the upper gastrointestinal tract of the ferret. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1993; 45:41–50.
crossref
14. Cervero F. Sensory innervationsof the viscera: peripheral ba-sis of visceral pain. Physiol Rev. 1994; 74:95–138.
15. Page AJ, O'Donnell TA, Blackshaw LA. P2X purinoceptor- induced sensitization of ferret vagal mechanoreceptors in oesophageal inflammation. J Physiol. 2000; 523:403–411.
16. Sengupta JN, Saha JK, Goyal RK. Differential sensitivity to brakykinin of esophageal distension-sensitive mechanoreceptors in vagal and sympathetic afferents of the opossum. J Neurophysiol. 1992; 68:1053–1067.
17. Slattery JA, Page AJ, Dorian DL, Brierley SM, Blackshaw LA. Potentiation of mouse vagal afferent mechanosensitivity by ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors. J Physiol. 2006; 577:295–306.
crossref
18. Matthews PJ, Aziz Q, Facer P, Davis JB, Thompson DG, Anand P. Increased capsaicin receptor TRPV1 nerve fibres in the inflamed human oesophagus. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004; 16:897–902.
crossref
19. Bhat YM, Bielefeldt K. Capsaicin receptor (TRPV1) and non-erosive reflux disease. Eur J Gastroeterol Hepatol. 2006; 18:263–270.
crossref
20. Page AJ, Blackshaw LA. GABA(B) receptors inhibit mechanosensitivity of primary afferent endings. J Neurosci. 1999; 19:8597–8602.
21. Partosoedarso ER, Young RL, Blackshaw LA. GABA(B) receptors on vagal afferent pathways: peripheral and central inhibition. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001; 280:G658–668.
crossref
22. Page AJ, Slattery JA, Brierley SM, Jacoby AS, Blackshaw LA. Involvement of galanin receptors 1 and 2 in the modulation of mouse vagal afferent mechanosensitivity. J Physiol. 2007; 583:675–684.
crossref
23. Page AJ, Young RL, Martin CM, et al. Metabotropic glutamate receptors inhibit mechanosensitivity in vagal sensory neurons. Gastroenterology. 2005; 128:402–410.
crossref
24. Page AJ, O'Donnell TA, Blackshaw LA. Opioid modulation of ferret vagal afferent mechanosensitivity. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2008; 294:G963–970.
crossref
25. Dray A. Inflammatory mediators of pain. Br J Anaesth. 1995; 75:125–131.
crossref
26. Armstrong D, Marshall JK, Chiba N, et al. Canadian Consensus Conference on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults-update 2004. Can J Gastroenterol. 2005; 19:15–35.
27. Vakil N, Moayyedi P, Fennerty MB, Talley NJ. Limited value of alarm features in the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal malignance: systematic review and metaanalysis. Gastroenterology. 2006; 131:390–401.
28. Gonsalves N, Policarpio-Nicolas M, Zhang Q, Rao MS, Hirano I. Histopathologic variability and endoscopic correlates in adults with eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 64:313–319.
crossref
29. Williams D, Thompson DG, Heggie L, Bancewicz J. Res-ponses of the human esophagus to experimental intraluminal distension. Am J Physiol. 1993; 265:G196–203.
crossref
30. Balaban DH, Yamamoto Y, Liu J, et al. Sustained esophageal contraction: a marker of esophageal chest pain identified by intraluminal ultrasonography. Gastroenterology. 1999; 116:29–37.
crossref
31. Fass R, Fennerty MB, Ofman JJ, et al. The clinical and eco-nomic value of a short course of omeprazole in patients with noncardiac chest pain. Gastroenterology. 1998; 115:42–49.
crossref
32. Balaban D, Yamamoto Y, Liu J, et al. Sustained esophageal contraction: a marker of esophageal chest pain identified by intraluminal ultrasonography. Gastroenterology. 1999; 116:29–37.
crossref
33. Richter JE, Dalton CB, Bradley LA, Castell DO. Oral nifedipine in the treatment of noncardiac chest pain in patients with nutcracker esophagus. Gastroenterology. 1987; 93:21–28.
34. Kikendall JW, Mellow MH. Effect of sublingual nitroglycerin and lon-acting nitrate preparations on esophageal motility. Gastroenterology. 1980; 79:703–706.
35. Miller LS, Pullela SV, Parkman HP, et al. Treatment of chest pain in patients with noncardiac, nonreflux, nonachalasia spastic esophageal motor disorders using botulinum toxin injection into the gastroesophageal junction. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002; 97:1640–1646.
crossref
36. Patti MG, Gorodner MV, Galvani C. Spectrum of esophageal motility disorders: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Arch Surg. 2005; 140:442–448.
37. Cannon RO 3rd, Quyyumi AA, Mincemoyer R, et al. Imipramine in patients with chest pain despite normal coronary angiograms. N Engl J Med. 1994; 330:1411–1417.
crossref
38. Clouse RE, Lustman PJ, Eckert TC, Ferney DM, Griffith LS. Low dose trazadone for symptomatic patients with esophageal contaction abnormalities. A double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 1987; 92:1027–1036.
39. Varia I, Logue E, O'Conner C, et al. Randomized trial of sertraline in patients with unexplained chest pain of non-cardiac origin. Am Heart J. 2000; 140:367–372.
crossref
40. Prakash C, Clouse RE. Longterm outcome from tricyclic an-ti-depressant therapy of functional chest pain. Dig Dis Sci. 1999; 44:2373–2379.
41. Rao SS, Mudipalli RS, Mujica V, Utech CL, Zhao X, Conklin JL. An open-label trial of theophylline for functional chest pain. Dig Dis Sci. 2002; 47:2763–2768.
42. Rao SS, Mudipalli RS, Remes-Troche JM, Utech CL, Zimmerman B. Theophylline improves esophageal chest pain-a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007; 102:930–938.
crossref
44. Jones H, Cooper P, Miller V, Brooks N, Whorwell PJ. Treatment of non-cardiac chest pain: a controlled trial of hyp-notherapy. Gut. 2006; 55:1403–1408.
crossref
43. Remes-Troche JM, Chahal P, Mudipalli R, Rao SS. Adeno-sine modulates oesophageal sensorimotor function in humans. Gut. 2009; 58:1049–1055.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Diagnostic and treatment strategy of esophageal chest pain. GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease; TLESR, transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation.
kjg-55-217f1.tif
Table 1.
Receptors of Esophageal Afferents
Names Locations Related substances Causes of activation Actions
Excitatory
P2X, P2Y15 Dorsal root ATP (adenosine Cell damage after or Direct activation or
Nodose ganglia triphosphate) during inflammation sensitization of
Neurons esophageal afferents
Bradykinin Vagal and spinal Bradykinin Tissue damage Contractile response
Receptors esophageal of smooth muscle
(B1-B5)16 afferents
iGluRs Vagal afferents Glutamate Peripheral excitatory
(inotropic glutamate modulation of vagal
receptors)17 afferent mechano-
sensitivity
Vanilloid recptor1 Vagal and spinal Vanilloids Noxious heat and Rise to a burning
(VR1 or TRPV1)18,19 esophageal low pH sensation
afferents
Inhibitory
GABA B,20,21 Variable to species GABA (gamma- - Inhibit mechanosensory
Guinea pig- amino butyrinc acid) stimulus response
nodose ganglia relationships
Ferret-
vagal afferents
GALR1, GALR322 Vagal afferents Galanin - Inhibit mechanosensory
stimulus response
relationships
mGluR2-4,6-8 Vagal afferents Glutamate - Inhibit mecahnosensory
(metabotropic Nodose ganglia stimulus response
glutamate receptors)23 relationships
Opioid receptors Vagal afferents Opioids - Reduce the sensitivity of
(μ and κ)24 esophageal vagal tension
receptors
Table 2.
Efficacy and Safety of Therapeutic Trials in Esophageal Chest Pain
Drugs Study design S siz Study ze (n) Mean age F/M Duration Outcome measure Results Safety analysis
Clonidine Double-blind, 60 50 40/20 10 weeks Frequency Imipramine Imipramine:
0.01 mg BID placebo of chest pain decreased prolonged
or controlled (CPF) CPF QT interval
imipramine crossover (p=0.03)
50 mg QHS clonidine
or placebo no effect on
BID37 CPF
Nifedipine Double-blind 20 50 8/12 14 weeks Distal esophageal Nifedipine Nifedipine
10-30 mg placebo contraction (DEC), decreased > placebo:
TID33 controlled CPF, severity, DEC amplitude facial
crossover index (p<0.005), flushing,
Daily CPF, edema,
severity, index headache
similar to lightheaded-
placebo ness,
nervousness
Botulinum Open-label 29 61 24/5 1-18 CPF Botulinu toxin Not reported
toxin 100U prospective months reduced chest
Injection35 pain in 62%
(p<0.0001),
regurgitation
and dysphagia
Trazadone Double-blind, 29 47.5 21/8 6 weeks Global index Trazadone Sedation
100-150 mg placebo of health (GIH), increased GIH
QD or controlled residual distress, (p=0.02),
placebo QD38 manometric decreased
changes residual effect
on manometry
Amitriptyline, Open-label 21 49.7 14/7 Mean 2.7 Chest pain Tricyclic Sedation,
imipramine, retrospective years (0.8-8. .6) index (CPI), antidepressants anticholinergic
nortriptyline, review dstress (TCA) symptoms
desipramine40 decreased CPI
(varying dose s) and distress
(p<0.01) at
follow-up
Sertraline Double-blind 30 - - 8 weeks Daily pain Sertraline Sertraline:
50-200 mg placebo daries (DPD) decreased nausea,
QD or controlled Beck Depression daily pain restlessness,
placebo39 Inventory (BDI), (p<0.02), decreased
SF36 no effect libido,
on BDI delayed
or SF36 ejaculation
(all mild)
Theopylline Double-blind 25 46 18/7 8 weeks CPF, CPI Theophylline Theophylline:
SR 200 mg placebo decreased nausea,
BID or controlled CPF (p<0.05) insomnia,
placebo and CPI tremor, and
lightheaded-
ness;
Placebo:
palpitations,
insomnia
TOOLS
Similar articles