PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
Objective
Aim of this study is to evaluate the pregnancy and implantation rates in fresh-embryo transfer (ET) and frozen-thawed ET cycles in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS).
Methods
PCOS was diagnosed by the Rotterdam criteria. In 4 cases of 72 stimulation cycles, ET was not conducted due to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Sixty eight cycles of fresh-ET and 40 cycles of frozen-thawed ET were included in this retrospective study. Age, gravidity, body mass index, infertility duration were compared between two groups. Number of embryos transferred, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and multiple pregnancy rate were compared between two groups by using chi-square test and student's t-test.
Results
Number of embryos transferred showed significant difference between two groups. Fresh-ET group was 4.7 and frozen-thawed ET group was 2.8 (P<0.001). However, overall clinical outcomes with fresh-ET and frozen-thawed ET cycles were similar. Implantation rates were 8.3% vs 11.5%, clinical pregnancy rates were 27.9% vs 25.0% and multiple pregnancy rates were 36.8% vs 20.0%.
Conclusion
Although more number of embryos were transferred in fresh-ET cycles, the clinical outcomes were similar between fresh-ET and frozen-thawed ET cycles. It may be due to decreased uterine receptivity in fresh-ET cycles. Frozen-thawed ET may be used as alternative plan for cases of severe OHSS and decreased uterine receptivity expected.
Figures and Tables
References
1. Clark AM, Ledger W, Galletly C, Tomlinson L, Blaney F, Wang X, et al. Weight loss results in significant improvement in pregnancy and ovulation rates in anovulatory obese women. Hum Reprod. 1995. 10:2705–2712.
2. Clark AM, Thornley B, Tomlinson L, Galletley C, Norman RJ. Weight loss in obese infertile women results in improvement in reproductive outcome for all forms of fertility treatment. Hum Reprod. 1998. 13:1502–1505.
3. Cummins JM, Breen TM, Harrison KL, Shaw JM, Wilson LM, Hennessey JF. A formula for scoring human embryo growth rates in in vitro fertilization: its value in predicting pregnancy and in comparison with visual estimates of embryo quality. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1986. 3:284–295.
4. Calle EE, Kaaks R. Overweight, obesity and cancer: epidemiological evidence and proposed mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004. 4:579–591.
5. Balen AH, Braat DD, West C, Patel A, Jacobs HS. Cumulative conception and live birth rates after the treatment of anovulatory infertility: safety and efficacy of ovulation induction in 200 patients. Hum Reprod. 1994. 9:1563–1570.
6. Shoham Z, Conway GS, Patel A, Jacobs HS. Polycystic ovaries in patients with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: similarity of ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Fertil Steril. 1992. 58:37–45.
7. Dor J, Shulman A, Levran D, Ben-Rafael Z, Rudak E, Mashiach S. The treatment of patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome by in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a comparison of results with those of patients with tubal infertility. Hum Reprod. 1990. 5:816–818.
8. MacDougall MJ, Tan SL, Balen A, Jacobs HS. A controlled study comparing patients with and without polycystic ovaries undergoing in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1993. 8:233–237.
9. Kodama H, Fukuda J, Karube H, Matsui T, Shimizu Y, Tanaka T. High incidence of embryo transfer cancellations in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Hum Reprod. 1995. 10:1962–1967.
10. Urman B, Fluker MR, Yuen BH, Fleige-Zahradka BG, Zouves CG, Moon YS. The outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in women with polycystic ovary syndrome failing to conceive after ovulation induction with exogenous gonadotropins. Fertil Steril. 1992. 57:1269–1273.
11. Andreani CL, Pierro E, Lazzarin N, Lanzone A, Caruso A, Mancuso S. Effect of follicular fluid on granulosa luteal cells from polycystic ovary. Hum Reprod. 1996. 11:2107–2113.
12. Kosmas IP, Kolibianakis EM, Devroey P. Association of estradiol levels on the day of hCG administration and pregnancy achievement in IVF: a systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2004. 19:2446–2453.
13. Papageorgiou T, Guibert J, Goffinet F, Patrat C, Fulla Y, Janssens Y, et al. Percentile curves of serum estradiol levels during controlled ovarian stimulation in 905 cycles stimulated with recombinant FSH show that high estradiol is not detrimental to IVF outcome. Hum Reprod. 2002. 17:2846–2850.
14. Frederick JL, Ord T, Kettel LM, Stone SC, Balmaceda JP, Asch RH. Successful pregnancy outcome after cryopreservation of all fresh embryos with subsequent transfer into an unstimulated cycle. Fertil Steril. 1995. 64:987–990.
15. Vyjayanthi S, Tang T, Fattah A, Deivanayagam M, Bardis N, Balen AH. Elective cryopreservation of embryos at the pronucleate stage in women at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome may affect the overall pregnancy rate. Fertil Steril. 2006. 86:1773–1775.
16. Check JH, Katsoff D, Brittingham D, Summers-Chase D, Wilson C. Comparable implantation rates with fresh vs frozen embryo transfer suggests that controlled ovarian hyperstimulation has an adverse effect on conception outcome. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2000. 27:173–175.
17. Zhou F, Lin XN, Tong XM, Li C, Liu L, Jin XY, et al. A frozen-thawed embryo transfer program improves the embryo utilization rate. Chin Med J. 2009. 122:1974–1978.
18. Urman B, Balaban B, Yakin K. Impact of fresh-cycle variables on the implantation potential of cryopreserved-thawed human embryos. Fertil Steril. 2007. 87:310–315.
19. Gabrielsen A, Fedder J, Agerholm I. Parameters predicting the implantation rate of thawed IVF/ICSI embryos: a retrospective study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006. 12:70–76.
20. El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Al-Darazi K, O'Mahony F, Wharf E, Taylor A, et al. Cryo-thawed embryos obtained from conception cycles have double the implantation and pregnancy potential of those from unsuccessful cycles. Hum Reprod. 2003. 18:1313–1318.
21. Ubaldi F, Rienzi L, Baroni E, Ferrero S, Iacobelli M, Minasi MG, et al. Cumulative pregnancy rates after transfer of fresh and thawed embryos. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004. 115:Suppl 1. S106–S109.
XML Download