PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate and compare the rate and etiologies of second trimester pregnancy loss in monochorionic (MC) or dichorionic (DC) twins, and natural or assisted reproductive technology (ART) twins.
Methods
Between January 1997 and December 2008, there were 146 cases of second trimester twin pregnancy losses (between 12 and 24 weeks gestation) from 2,467 twin pregnancies. They were divided into four groups according to chorionicity and fertilization. Chorionicity was established by ultrasound at early gestation and confirmed by histologic examination after delivery. From a total of 2,467 twin deliveries, 392 MC, 2058 DC, and 17 unknown chorionicity were observed. Fertilization methods were classified as 736 natural, 1,590 ART, and 141 unknown conceptions. The pregnancy loss rate and possible mechanisms were compared in each group.
Results
During the study period, there were 43 MC, 86 DC, and 17 unknown chorionicities and 45 natural, 78 ART, and 23 unknown fertilizations. Total twin pregnancy loss rate was 5.9% (146/2,467), with 11.0% (43/392) and 4.2% (86/2,058) for MC twin group and DC twin group, respectively. Likewise, it was 6.1% (45/736) and 4.9% (78/1,590) for natural twin group and ART twin group. The most common cause was intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) in 22 (51.2%) in MC twin group and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) in 40 (46.5%) in DC twin group, followed by preterm labor (PTL) in 37 (43%). In natural pregnancy, IUFD was the most common etiology in 20 (44.5%) and for ART twin group, it was PTL in 35 (44.9%).
Conclusion
Twin pregnancy loss rate was higher in MC twin group compared with DC twin group in the second trimester. MC twin group had a higher incidence of IUFD as a cause of second trimester pregnancy loss. The etiologies in DC twin group were PPROM and PTL. It is suggested that antenatal care in twin pregnancy should be explored for preventing fetal loss and promoting neonatal well-being.
Figures and Tables
Table 4
Causes of twin loss in second trimester (Natural vs ART)
ART: assisted reproductive technology, IUFD: intrauterine fetal death, PPROM: preterm labor and preterm premature rupture of membranes, IIOC: incompetence internal os of cervix.
*Fisher's exact test.
†Twin twin transfusion syndrome.
‡Twin twin transfusion syndrome, termination because of maternal colon cancer.
References
1. American College of Obstericians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Educational bulletin 253: special problems of multiple gestation. 1998. Washington: ACOG.
2. Lewi L, Van Schoubroeck D, Gratacos E, Witters I, Timmerman D, Deprest J. Monochorionic diamniotic twins: complications and management options. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003. 15:177–194.
3. MRC Working Party on Children Conceived by In Vitro Fertilisation. Births in Great Britain resulting from assisted conception, 1978-87. BMJ. 1990. 300:1229–1233.
4. Tan SL, Royston P, Campbell S, Jacobs HS, Betts J, Mason B, et al. Cumulative conception and livebirth rates after in-vitro fertilisation. Lancet. 1992. 339:1390–1394.
5. Sebire NJ, Snijders RJ, Hughes K, Sepulveda W, Nicolides KH. The hidden mortality of monochorionic twin pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997. 104:1203–1207.
6. Dube J, Dodds L, Armson BA. Does chorionicity or zygosity predict adverse perinatal outcomes in twins? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002. 186:579–583.
7. Denbow ML, Cox P, Taylor M, Hammal DM, Fisk NM. Placental angioarchitecture in monochorionic twin pregnancies: relationship to fetal growth, fetofetal transfusion syndrome, and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000. 182:417–426.
10. Olivennes F, Kadhel P, Rufat P, Fanchin R, Fernandez H, Frydman R. Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies obtained after in vitro fertilization: comparison with twin pregnancies obtained spontaneously or after ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril. 1996. 66:105–109.
11. Sperling L, Tabor A. Twin pregnancy: the role of ultrasound in management. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001. 80:287–299.
12. Tan SL, Royston P, Campbell S, Jacobs HS, Betts J, Mason B, et al. Cumulative conception and livebirth rates after in-vitro fertilisation. Lancet. 1992. 339:1390–1394.
13. Staessen C, Camus M, Bollen N, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. The relationship between embryo quality and the occurrence of multiple pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 1992. 57:626–630.
14. American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1993 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil Steril. 1995. 64:13–21.
15. Doyle PE, Beral V, Botting B, Wale CJ. Congenital malformations in twins in England and Wales. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991. 45:43–48.
16. Mercer BM, Crocker LG, Pierce WF, Sibai BM. Clinical characteristics and outcome of twin gestation complicated by preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993. 168:1467–1473.
17. Bernasko J, Lynch L, Lapinski R, Berkowitz RL. Twin pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive techniques: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 1997. 89:368–372.
18. Doyle P, Beral V, Maconochie N. Preterm delivery, low birthweight and small-for-gestational-age in live-born singleton babies resulting from in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1992. 7:425–428.
19. Reubinoff BE, Samueloff A, Ben-Haim M, Friedler S, Schenker JG, Lewin A. Is the obstetric outcome of in vitro fertilized singleton gestations different from natural ones? A controlled study. Fertil Steril. 1997. 67:1077–1083.
20. Saunders DM, Mathews M, Lancaster PA. The Australian Register: current research and future role. A preliminary report. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988. 541:7–21.
21. Ghazi HA, Spielberger C, Kallen B. Delivery outcome after infertility: a registry study. Fertil Steril. 1991. 55:726–732.
22. Li TC, MacLeod I, Singhal V, Duncan SL. The obstetric and neonatal outcome of pregnancy in women with a previous history of infertility: a prospective study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991. 98:1087–1092.
24. Fitzsimmons BP, Bebbington MW, Fluker MR. Perinatal and neonatal outcomes in multiple gestations: assisted reproduction versus spontaneous conception. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998. 179:1162–1167.
25. FIVNAT (French In Vitro National). Pregnancies and births resulting from in vitro fertilization: French national registry, analysis of data 1986 to 1990. Fertil Steril. 1995. 64:746–756.
26. Incerpi MH, Miller DA, Samadi R, Settlage RH, Goodwin TM. Stillbirth evaluation: what tests are needed? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998. 178:1121–1125.
27. Petersson K, Bremme K, Bottinga R, Hofsjö A, Hulthén-Varli I, Kublickas M, et al. Diagnostic evaluation of intrauterine fetal deaths in Stockholm 1998-99. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002. 81:284–292.
28. Dhont M, De Sutter P, Ruyssinck G, Martens G, Bekaert A. Perinatal outcome of pregnancies after assisted reproduction: a case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999. 181:688–695.
29. Rizk B, Doyle P, Tan SL, Rainsbury P, Betts J, Brinsden P, et al. Perinatal outcome and congenital malformations in in-vitro fertilization babies from the Bourn-Hallam group. Hum Reprod. 1991. 6:1259–1264.
XML Download