Journal List > Korean J Obstet Gynecol > v.53(12) > 1006375

Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec;53(12):1118-1123. Korean.
Published online December 21, 2010.  https://doi.org/10.5468/kjog.2010.53.12.1118
Copyright © 2010 Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Comparative study of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy
Keon Jin, M.D.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.

Corresponding author (Email: keonjin@dankook.ac.kr )
Received October 06, 2010; Revised November 25, 2010; Accepted December 01, 2010.

Abstract

Objective

To compare the clinical results between laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) in women with uterine leiomyoma.

Methods

One hundred four women underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy for the treatment of uterine leiomyoma between July 2008 and December 2009. A total of 60 women decided to undergo complete hysterectomy with removal of uterine cervix (LAVH group) and 44 women wished to preserve the uterine cervix (LSH group). Outcome measures including patient's characteristics, operating time, blood loss, rate of complications, were assessed and compared between groups.

Results

The women in the LAVH group were significantly older as compared with the LSH group, 45.16±0.84 years versus 42.41±0.62 years respectively. There were no significant differences in patient's characteristics (body mass index, parity, prior surgery) between the two groups. The mean operating time was 64.07±2.37 min. for LAVH group and 69.76±2.01 min. for LSH group; the mean hemoglobin change was 1.62±0.13 g/dL for LAVH group, 1.83±0.14 g/dL for LSH group, no significant differences were noted between two groups respect to the mean operating time and the mean hemoglobin change. There is no post-operative complications in both LAVH and LSH group.

Conclusion

Based on our results, in women with uterine leiomyoma, LAVH and LSH seem to be the preferred hysterectomy techniques. The mean age was younger in LSH group, but did not appear to offer any significant benefits over LAVH. LAVH proved to be a valid alternative to LSH, and appropriate method for laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Keywords: Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy; Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy

Tables


Table 1
Patient's characteristics
Click for larger image


Table 3
Hemoglobin change
Click for larger image

References
1. Reich H, DeCaprio J, McGlynn F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg 1989;5:213–216.
2. Liu CY. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: a review of 72 cases. J Reprod Med 1992;37:351–354.
3. Johns DA, Diamond MP. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. J Reprod Med 1994;39:424–428.
4. Lieng M, Qvigstad E, Istre O, Langebrekke A, Ballard K. Long-term outcomes following laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. BJOG 2008;115:1605–1610.
5. Lyons T. Laparoscopic supracervical versus total hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007;14:275–277.
6. Hilger WS, Pizarro AR, Magrina JF. Removal of the retained cervical stump. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:2117–2121.
7. Lyons TL. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. A comparison of morbidity and mortality results with laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. J Reprod Med 1993;38:763–767.
8. Lalonde CJ, Daniell JF. Early outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1996;3:251–256.
9. Schwartz RO. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Supracervical vs. assisted vaginal. J Reprod Med 1994;39:625–630.
10. Benrubi GI. History of hysterectomy. J Fla Med Assoc 1988;75:533–538.
11. Vara P, Kinnunen O. Total versus subtotal abdominal hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 1951;31:1–43.
12. Lyons TL. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2000;27:441–450.
ix.
13. Semm K. Hysterectomy via laparotomy or pelviscopy. A new CASH method without colpotomy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1991;51:996–1003.
14. Olive DL, Parker WH, Cooper JM, Levine RL. The AAGL classification system for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Classification committee of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2000;7:9–15.
15. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006:CD003677.
16. Donnez J, Nisolle M, Smets M, Polet R, Bassil S. Laparoscopic supracervical (subtotal) hysterectomy: a first series of 500 cases. Gynaecol Endosc 1997;6:73–76.
17. Kilkku P, Gronroos M. Peroperative electrocoagulation of endocervical mucosa and later carcinoma of the cervical stump. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982;61:265–267.
18. Munro MG. Supracervical hysterectomy: a time for reappraisal. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:133–139.
19. El-Mowafi D, Madkour W, Lall C, Wenger JM. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2004;11:175–180.
20. Milad MP, Morrison K, Sokol A, Miller D, Kirkpatrick L. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Surg Endosc 2001;15:286–288.
21. Mueller A, Renner SP, Haeberle L, Lermann J, Oppelt P, Beckmann MW, et al. Comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and laparoscopy-assisted supracervical hysterectomy (LASH) in women with uterine leiomyoma. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;144:76–79.
22. van Evert JS, Smeenk JM, Dijkhuizen FP, de Kruif JH, Kluivers KB. Laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy versus laparoscopic total hysterectomy: a decade of experience. Gynecol Surg 2010;7:9–12.
23. Jenkins TR. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:1875–1884.
24. Falcone T, Walters MD. Hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:753–767.
25. Ghomi A, Hantes J, Lotze EC. Incidence of cyclical bleeding after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005;12:201–205.
26. Nezhat CH, Nezhat F, Seidman DS, Nezhat C. Vaginal vault evisceration after total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:868–870.
27. Shen CC, Wu MP, Kung FT, Huang FJ, Hsieh CH, Lan KC, et al. Major complications associated with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: ten-year experience. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003;10:147–153.
28. Altman D, Falconer C, Cnattingius S, Granath F. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery following hysterectomy on benign indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:572.e1–572.e6.