Journal List > Korean J Urol > v.52(6) > 1005655

Ji, Cheon, Lee, Moon, Kim, Park, and Park: Solitary Penile Neurofibroma with Erectile Dysfunction

Abstract

Neurofibromas of the penis, although very rare, are often associated with neurofibromatosis type 1. Primary solitary neurofibromas of the penis are extremely rare. We describe a 37-year-old man with a solitary neurofibroma in the dorsum of the penis. The patient reported difficulty with sexual intercourse owing to a penile mass and erectile dysfunction. After surgical excision of the neurofibroma, he had no pain and a normal sensation of the penile glans, and his erectile dysfunction improved. At the present time, 26 months after surgery, there has been no evidence of tumor recurrence.

Neurofibromas of the penis are rare, but can involve the bladder, breasts in males, palatine tonsils, and colon or may be intercostal lesions [1-3]. Neurofibromas are often associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) or Von Recklinghausen disease, and a plexiform neurofibroma of the penis associated with erectile dysfunction has been described [4]. Primary neurofibromas of the penis are extremely rare; to our knowledge, only about 20 patients with primary neurofibromas associated with penile neurofibromatosis have been described to date [4-8]. We describe here a patient with a solitary penile neurofibroma, without NF1, that was associated with erectile dysfunction.

CASE REPORT

A 37-year-old Korean man was referred to our hospital for evaluation of a solitary nodule on his penile shaft. He had been aware of a slow-growing, asymptomatic nodule for the previous 10 years. More recently, however, he experienced pain, tenderness, increased size, and difficulties during sexual intercourse and erectile dysfunction. His preoperative International Index of Erectile Function-5 score was 7.
There was nothing notable in the patient's past medical history or family history, and he was generally in good health. A physical examination revealed a 2 cm-sized, ovoid, movable lesion on the dorsum of the penile shaft. The inguinal lymph node was not enlarged. He had no café au lait spots or auxiliary or inguinal freckling. An ophthalmologic examination revealed no glioma or iris (Lisch) nodules. The results of a complete blood count, electrolyte battery, liver function, renal function, and urine tests were all within normal limits. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a 2 cm-sized ovoid mass abutting the right corpus cavernosum (Fig. 1).
Local excision was performed with local anesthesia. The mass located between the corpus cavernosum and Buck's fascia was removed completely (Fig. 2). There was no neurovascular injury. The macroscopic appearance of the removed specimen was a 2 cm sized ovoid and bright reddish white mass such as a bean shape. Microscopic examination revealed spindle-shaped cells with wavy nuclei in fascicles (Fig. 3). Immunohistochemically, the cytoplasm of these cells was positive for S-100 protein (Fig. 4) and the vessels were positive for CD34. These results were consistent with a neurofibroma. After surgery, he had no pain, a normal sensation of the penile glans, and his erectile dysfunction had improved. At the present time, 26 months after surgery, the patient has experienced no signs of symptoms or recurrence.

DISCUSSION

NF1 is much more uncommon in the genitourinary tract than in other systems, with the bladder being the most commonly involved organ of the genitourinary tract [1]. Only one patient with primary neurofibromas associated with penile neurofibromatosis has been described to date in Korea [6]. Neurofibromatosis typically presents as genital masses or edema in males and clitoral hypertrophy, mimicking intersex condition, in females [9].
Although a penile neurofibroma involves continuity of the dorsal neurovascular bundle with the mass, the latter can be excised completely and safely, while preserving the dorsal bundle [4,10]. Although partial excision may be successful, complete resection is necessary not only for cosmetic and functional reasons but also to prevent recurrent problems and to prevent malignant degeneration [5]. Therefore, optimal timing of surgery is necessary to allow complete resection without organ impairment [7]. In our patient, the mass did not involve the dorsal neurovascular bundle and could therefore be resected.
Compromised penile function is caused by two major mechanisms. Difficulties in sexual intercourse may include an inability to penetrate due to the mass, despite experiencing normal sensation and erection, as well as erectile dysfunction, due to arterial stealing by the neurofibroma. A bilateral selective pudendal arteriogram showed that both arteries were hypertrophied and supplied the neurofibroma [4,7]. Thus, the erectile dysfunction in our patient was probably caused by a mass effect and psychological influence. The mass effect resulted in pain during sexual intercourse despite normal penile sensation. The patient gradually became more reluctant to have sexual intercourse and expressed low levels of self-esteem. After surgery, all his symptoms improved and there was no evidence of recurrence. In patients with functional impairment of the penis, resection of the lesion is associated with good outcomes.

Figures and Tables

FIG. 1
T2-weighted MR image showing an ovoid mass with a high signal intensity rim and a surrounding dark signal intensity rim.
kju-52-428-g001
FIG. 2
Gross appearance of the exposed neurofibroma on the penile shaft.
kju-52-428-g002
FIG. 3
Microphotography showing spindle-shaped cells with wavy nuclei in fascicles (H&E, ×400).
kju-52-428-g003
FIG. 4
Tumor cells are uniformly reactive for S-100 protein (×100).
kju-52-428-g004

Notes

The authors have nothing to disclose.

References

1. Cabrera Castillo PM, Alonso y Gregorio S, Cansino Alcaide JR, Aguilera Basan A, De La Peña Barthel JJ. Bladder neurofibroma: case report and bibliographic review. Arch Esp Urol. 2006. 59:899–901.
2. Madhumita K, Nambiar A, Prathapan P. Solitary neurofibroma of the palatine tonsil: a case report. Ear Nose Throat J. 2007. 86:756–758.
3. Nakashima K, Yamada N, Yoshida Y, Yamamoto O. Solitary sclerotic neurofibroma of the skin. Am J Dermatopathol. 2008. 30:278–280.
4. Garaffa G, Bettocchi C, Christopher N, Ralph D. Plexiform neurofibroma of the penis associated with erectile dysfunction due to arterial steeling. J Sex Med. 2008. 5:234–236.
5. Kousseff BG, Hoover DL. Penile neurofibromas. Am J Med Genet. 1999. 87:1–5.
6. Kim HJ, Park YK. A case of neurofibromatosis in penis. Korean J Urol. 1988. 29:321–323.
7. Barros R, Cavalcanti AG, Favorito LA. Plexiforme neurofibroma with compromising of the penile function. Urology. 2008. 71:546.
8. Pascual-Castroviejo I, Lopez-Pereira P, Savasta S, Lopez-Gutierrez JC, Lago CM, Cisternino M. Neurofibromatosis type 1 with external genitalia involvement presentation of 4 patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2008. 43:1998–2003.
9. Rink RC, Mitchell ME. Genitourinary neurofibromatosis in childhood. J Urol. 1983. 130:1176–1179.
10. Littlejohn JO, Belman AB, Selby D. Plexiform neurofibroma of the penis in a child. Urology. 2000. 56:669.
TOOLS
Similar articles