Journal List > Korean J Urol > v.49(2) > 1005219

Kim, Kim, and Park: Caveolin-1 and Ki-67 Expression as Prognostic Factors in Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Kidney

Abstract

Purpose

Caveolin-1 is proposed to represent a novel tumor suppressor protein and expression of recombinant caveolin-1 is sufficient to restrict the growth potential of transformed cells isolated from primary tumors of the breast, lung, and ovaries. We examined the relationship of caveolin-1 and Ki-67 expression to clinicopathological variables in patients with clear cell carcinomas of the kidney.

Materials and Methods

We examined caveolin-1 and Ki-67 expression in 119 clear cell carcinomas of the kidney using immunohistochemistry, and analyzed its relationship with tumor size, nuclear grade, TNM stage, vascular invasion, capsular invasion, metastasis, and metachronous metastasis were investigated.

Results

Of the 119 tumors analyzed, lymph node and distant metastasis (synchronous metastasis: 7, metachronous metastasis: 15) occurred in 3 and 22 cases, respectively. Caveolin-1 expression correlated with the T stage (p=0.004), TNM stage (p=0.013), metastasis (p=0.013), and metachronous metastasis (p=0.001). Ki-67 expression correlated with the T stage (p=0.041), nuclear grade (p=0.011), and vascular invasion (p=0.043). Caveo-lin-1 and Ki-67 expression showed similar changes, but there was no statistical significance (p=0.050).

Conclusions

Caveolin-1 is expressed frequently in patients with metachronous metastasis, and may predict metastasis after surgery for clear cell carcinoma of the kidney.

REFERENCES

1. Anderson RG. Caveolae: where incoming and outgoing messengers meet. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993; 90:10909–13.
crossref
2. Yang G, Truong LD, Timme TL, Ren C, Wheeler TM, Park SH, et al. Elevated expression of caveolin is associated with prostate and breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 1998; 4:1873–80.
3. Kato K, Hida Y, Miyamoto M, Hashida H, Shinohara T, Itoh T, et al. Overexpression of caveolin-1 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma correlates with lymph node metastasis and pathologic stage. Cancer. 2002; 94:929–33.
crossref
4. Guinan P, Sobin LH, Algaba F, Badellino F, Kameyama S, MacLennan G, et al. TNM staging of renal cell carcinoma: Workgroup No. 3. Union International Contre le Cancer (UICC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Cancer. 1997; 80:992–3.
5. Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1982; 6:655–63.
crossref
6. Anderson RG. The caveolae membrane system. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998; 67:199–225.
crossref
7. Scherer PE, Lewis RY, Volonte D, Engelman JA, Galbiati F, Couet J, et al. Cell-type and tissue-specific expression of caveolin-2. Caveolin 1 and 2 co-localize and form a stable hetero-oligomeric complex in vivo. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272:29337–46.
8. Song KS, Scherer PE, Tang Z, Okamoto T, Li S, Chafel M, et al. Expression of caveolin-3 in skeletal, cardiac, and smooth muscle cells. Caveolin-3 is a component of the sarcolemma and co-fractionates with dystrophin and dystrophin-associated glycoproteins. J Biol Chem. 1996; 271:15160–5.
9. Okamoto T, Schlegel A, Scherer PE, Lisanti MP. Caveolins, a family of scaffolding proteins for organizing “preassembled signaling complexes” at the plasma membrane. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273:5419–22.
crossref
10. Davidson B, Nesland JM, Goldberg I, Kopolovic J, Gotlieb WH, Bryne M, et al. Caveolin-1 expression in advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma-a clinicopathologic study. Gynecol Oncol. 2001; 81:166–71.
11. Lee SW, Reimer CL, Oh P, Campbell DB, Schnitzer JE. Tumor cell growth inhibition by caveolin re-expression in human breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 1998; 16:1391–7.
crossref
12. Smart EJ, Graf GA, McNiven MA, Sessa WC, Engelman JA, Scherer PE, et al. Caveolins, liquid-ordered domains, and signal transduction. Mol Cell Biol. 1999; 19:7289–304.
crossref
13. Wiechen K, Sers C, Agoulnik A, Arlt K, Dietel M, Schlag PM, et al. Down-regulation of caveolin-1, a candidate tumor suppressor gene, in sarcomas. Am J Pathol. 2001; 158:833–9.
crossref
14. Galbiati F, Volonte D, Engelman JA, Watanabe G, Burk R, Pestell RG, et al. Targeted downregulation of caveolin-1 is sufficient to drive cell transformation and hyperactivate the p42/44 MAP kinase cascade. EMBO J. 1998; 17:6633–48.
crossref
15. Bender FC, Reymond MA, Bron C, Quest AF. Caveolin-1 levels are down-regulated in human colon tumors, and ectopic expression of caveolin-1 in colon carcinoma cell lines reduces cell tumorigenicity. Cancer Res. 2000; 60:5870–8.
16. Fiucci G, Ravid D, Reich R, Liscovitch M. Caveolin-1 inhibits anchorage-independent growth, anoikis and invasiveness in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2002; 21:2365–75.
crossref
17. van Deurs B, Roepstorff K, Hommelgaard AM, Sandvig K. Caveolae: anchored, multifunctional platforms in the lipid ocean. Trends Cell Biol. 2003; 13:92–100.
18. Yang G, Truong LD, Wheeler TM, Thompson TC. Caveolin-1 expression in clinically confined human prostate cancer: a novel prognostic marker. Cancer Res. 1999; 59:5719–23.
19. Rajjayabun PH, Garg S, Durkan GC, Charlton R, Robinson MC, Mellon JK. Caveolin-1 expression is associated with high-grade bladder cancer. Urology. 2001; 58:811–4.
crossref
20. Fine SW, Lisanti MP, Galbiati F, Li M. Elevated expression of caveolin-1 in adenocarcinoma of the colon. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001; 115:719–24.
crossref
21. Oh W, Bae EK, Youn SS, Ahn KS, Choi HY. Increased expression of caveolin-1 in renal cell carcinoma. Korean J Urol. 2000; 41:602–8.
22. Joo HJ, Oh DK, Kim YS, Lee KB, Kim SJ. Increased expression of caveolin-1 and microvessel density correlates with metastasis and poor prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 2004; 93:291–6.
crossref
23. Campbell L, Gumbleton M, Griffiths DF. Caveolin-1 overex-pression predicts poor disease-free survival of patients with clinically confined renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2003; 89:1909–13.
crossref
24. Shim HY, Choi HY. Correlation between up-regulation of caveolin-1 gene in human renal cell carcinoma and multi-drug resistance. Korean J Urol. 2003; 44:446–51.
25. Carrion R, Morgan BE, Tannenbaum M, Salup R, Morgan MB. Caveolin expression in adult renal tumors. Urol Oncol. 2003; 21:191–6.
crossref
26. Won YY, Joo HJ, Cho DS, Seo KS, Ahn BC, Kim KH, et al. Correlation of caveolin-1 expression on tissue microarray with prognosis in renal cell carcinoma. Korean J Urol. 2006; 47:607–6.
crossref
27. Mellon K, Neal DE, Robinson MC, Marsh C, Wright C. Cell cycling in bladder carcinoma determinated by monoclonal antibody Ki67. Br J Urol. 1990; 66:281–5.
28. Papadopoulos I, Weichert-Jacobsen K, Wacker HH, Sprenger E. Correlation between DNA ploidy, proliferation marker Ki-67 and early tumor progression in renal cell carcinoma. A prospective study. Eur Urol. 1997; 31:49–53.
29. Delahunt B, Bethwaite PB, Thornton A, Ribas JL. Proliferation of renal cell carcinoma assessed by fixation-resistant poly-clonal Ki-67 antibody labeling. Correlation with clinical outcome. Cancer. 1995; 75:2714–9.
crossref
30. Tannapfel A, Hahn HA, Katalinic A, Fietkau RJ, Kühn R, Wittekind CW. Prognostic value of ploidy and proliferation markers in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 1996; 77:164–71.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Immunohistochemical staining for caveolin-1 is based on the presence of cytoplasmic (A) and/or membranous (B) staining.
kju-49-99f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Immunohistochemical staining for Ki-67 is based on the presence of nuclear staining. Grade I: nuclear staining detected in less than 5% of tumor cells. Grade II: nuclear staining observed in more than 5% and less than 15% of tumor cells. Grade III: nuclear staining observed in more than 15% of tumor cells.
kju-49-99f2.tif
Table 1.
Relationship between caveolin-1 and Ki-67 expression and T-stage
Grade T-stage p-value
1 (%) 2 (%) 3 (%) 4 (%)
Caveolin-1 0.004
   I (31) 15 (48.4) 8 (25.9) 6 (19.4) 2 (6.5)
   II (54) 39 (72.2) 8 (14.8) 7 (13.0) 0 (0)
   III (34) 12 (35.3) 9 (26.5) 13 (38.2) 0 (0)
Ki-67 0.041
   I (43) 25 (58.1) 8 (18.6) 9 (20.9) 1 (2.3)
   II (58) 37 (63.8) 11 (19.0) 9 (15.5) 1 (1.7)
   III (18) 4 (22.2) 6 (33.3) 8 (44.4) 0 (0)

: statistical analysis by chi-square test

Table 2.
Relationship between caveolin-1 and Ki-67 expression and N-stage
  Grade  N-stage p-value
0 (%) 1 (%) 2 (%)
Caveolin-1 I (31) 28 (90.3) 2 (6.5) 1 (3.2) 0.203
II (54) 53 (98.1) 1 (1.9) 0 (0)
III (34) 31 (91.2) 3 (8.8) 0 (0)
Ki-67 I (43) 42 (97.7) 1 (2.2) 0 (0) 0.460
II (58) 54 (93.1) 3 (5.2) 1 (1.7)
III (18) 16 (88.9) 2 (11.1) 0 (0)

: statistical analysis by chi-square test

Table 3.
Relationship between caveolin-1 and Ki-67 expression and M-stage
  Grade M-stage p-value
0 (%) 1 (%)
Caveolin-1 I (31) 27 (87.1) 4 (12.9) 0.250
II (54) 52 (96.3) 2 (3.7)
III (34) 33 (97.1) 1 (2.9)
Ki-67 I (43) 42 (97.7) 1 (2.3) 0.378
II (58) 53 (91.4) 5 (8.6)
III (18) 17 (94.4) 1 (5.6)

: statistical analysis by chi-square test

Table 4.
Relationship between caveolin-1 and Ki-67 expression and TNM stage
Grade  TNM stage p-value
I (%) II (%) III (%) IV (%)
Caveolin-1 0.013
   I (31) 14 (45.2) 6 (19.4) 6 (19.4) 5 (16.1)
   II (54) 37 (68.5) 8 (14.8) 7 (13.0) 2 (3.7)
   III (34) 12 (35.3) 9 (26.5) 12 (35.3) 1 (2.9)
Ki-67 0.106
   I (43) 25 (58.1) 8 (18.6) 8 (18.6) 2 (4.7)
   II (58) 34 (58.6) 9 (15.5) 10 (17.2) 5 (8.6)
   III (18) 4 (22.2) 6 (33.3) 7 (38.9) 1 (5.6)

: statistical analysis by chi-square test

Table 5.
Relationship between caveolin-1 and Ki-67 expression and nucleus grade
Grade  Nucleus grade p-value
1 (%) 2 (%) 3 (%) 4 (%)
Caveolin-1 0.191
   I (31) 2 (6.5) 18 (58.1) 9 (29.0) 2 (6.5)
   II (54) 1 (1.9) 30 (55.6) 18 (33.3) 5 (9.3)
   III (34) 0 (0) 12 (35.3) 16 (47.1) 6 (17.6)
Ki-67 0.011
   I (43) 1 (2.3) 22 (51.2) 16 (37.2) 4 (9.3)
   II (58) 2 (3.4) 33 (56.9) 21 (36.2) 2 (3.4)
   III (18) 0 (0) 5 (27.8) 6 (33.3) 7 (38.9)

: statistical analysis by chi-square test

Table 6.
Relationship between caveolin-1 and Ki-67 expression and vessel invasion
Grade Vessel invasion (%) p-value
Caveolin-1 I (31) 1 (3.2) 0.101
II (54) 3 (5.6)
III (34) 6 (17.6)
Ki-67 I (43) 4 (9.3) 0.043
II (58) 2 (3.4)
III (18) 4 (22.2)

: statistical analysis by chi-square test

Table 7.
Relationship between caveolin-1 and Ki-67 expression and capsule invasion
Grade Capsule invasion (%) p-value
Caveolin-1 I (31) 6 (19.4) 0.572
II (54) 7 (13.0)
III (34) 7 (20.6)
Ki-67 I (43) 8 (18.6) 0.263
II (58) 7 (12.1)
III (18) 5 (27.8)

: statistical analysis by chi-square test

Table 8.
Relationship between caveolin-1 and Ki-67 expression and metastasis
Grade Metastasis (%) p-value
Caveolin-1 I (31) 5 (16.1) 0.013
II (54) 7 (13.0)
III (34) 13 (38.2)
Ki-67 I (43) 6 (14.0) 0.092
II (58) 12 (20.7)
III (18) 7 (38.9)

: statistical analysis by chi-square test

Table 9.
Relationship between caveolin-1 and Ki-67 expression and post operation metastasis
Grade Post operation metastasis (%) p-value
Caveolin-1 I (31) 0 (0) 0.001
II (54) 5 (9.3)
III (34) 10 (29.4)
Ki-67 I (43) 4 (9.3) 0.137
II (58) 6 (10.3)
III (18) 5 (27.8)

: statistical analysis by chi-square test

Table 10.
Relationship between caveolin-1 and Ki-67 expression and survival
Grade Survival (%) p-value
Caveolin-1 I (31) 27 (87.1) 0.073
II (54) 46 (85.2)
III (34) 23 (67.6)
Ki-67 I (43) 37 (86.0) 0.214
II (58) 47 (81.0)
III (18) 12 (66.7)

: statistical analysis by chi-square test

TOOLS
Similar articles