PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
Purpose
Management of concealed penis continues to evolve, with several manuscripts having been published over the last several decades. Each describes a novel surgical approach, but little has been written concerning long-term results. We conducted a parental survey to assess long-term satisfaction with the surgical correction of concealed penis.
Materials and Methods
We reviewed 31 medical records of patients treated for concealed penis between 2000 and 2005. The parental survey was performed via telephone interview. The mean follow-up duration was 26.3 months (range 14 to 84 months). The questionnaire addressed the appearance and accessibility of the penis, hygiene care, severity of concealment, negative concerns about the appearance of the penis, and parent satisfaction. Parental satisfaction was also analyzed according to age, phimosis, method of correction, and body mass index (BMI).
Results
The mean patient age was 7.3±6.5 years (range 14 month to 14 years). Before surgery, 67.7% of parents complained of difficulty with hygiene care, 80.6% complained of a completely hidden penis, and 83.3% complained of negative feelings about the appearance of the penis. However, most of these complaints resolved after surgical correction. On the telephone interview, 93.5% of parents said there was improvement in the accessibility of the penis, 80.6% said there was improvement in the length of the penis, and 87.1% said they would recommend the surgery to another boy with the same problem. There were no significant differences in parental satisfaction with respect to age, phimosis, method of correction, or BMI.
REFERENCES
1.Maizels M., Zaontz M., Donovan J., Bushnick PN., Firlit CF. Surgical correction of the buried penis: description of a classification system and a technique to correct the disorder. J Urol. 1986. 136:268–71.
2.Elder JS. Abnormalities of the genitalia in boys and their surgical management. Kavoussi LR, Novik AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, Wein AJ, editors. editors.Campbell-Walsh urology. 9th ed.Philadelphia: Saunders;2007. 3745-60.
3.Liang C., Wang K., Chen J. Epidemiological study of external genital diseases in 5172 adolescents. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1997. 77:15–7.
4.Lim DJ., Barraza MA., Stevens PS. Correction of retractile concealed penis. J Urol. 1995. 153:1668–70.
5.Casale AJ., Beck SD., Cain MP., Adams MC., Rink RC. Concealed penis in childhood: a spectrum of etiology and treatment. J Urol. 1999. 162:1165–8.
6.Herndon CD., Casale AJ., Cain MP., Rink RC. Long-term outcome of the surgical treatment of concealed penis. J Urol. 2003. 170:1695–7.
7.Shapiro SR. Surgical treatment of the "buried" penis. Urology. 1987. 30:554–9.
8.Chuang JH., Chen LY., Shieh CS., Lee SY. Surgical correction of buried penis: a review of 60 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2001. 36:426–9.
9.Brisson P., Patel H., Chan M., Feins N. Penoplasty for buried penis in children: report of 50 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2001. 36:421–5.
10.Radhakrishnan J., Razzaq A., Manickam K. Concealed penis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2002. 18:668–72.
11.Crawford BS. Buried penis. Br J Plast Surg. 1977. 30:96–9.
12.Cromie WJ., Ritchey ML., Smith RC., Zagaja GP. Anatomical alignment for the correction of buried penis. J Urol. 1998. 160:1482–4.
13.Lee T., Suh HJ., Han JU. Correcting congenital concealed penis: new pediatric surgical technique. Urology. 2005. 65:789–92.
14.Boemers TM., De Jong TP. The surgical correction of buried penis: a new technique. J Urol. 1995. 154:550–2.
15.Adham MN., Teimourian B., Mosca P. Buried penis release in adults with suction lipectomy and abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000. 106:840–4.
16.Frenkl TL., Agarwal S., Caldamone AA. Results of a simplified technique for buried penis repair. J Urol. 2004. 171:826–8.
17.Alter GJ., Ehrlich RM. A new technique for correction of the hidden penis in children and adults. J Urol. 1999. 161:455–9.
Table 1.
Questionnaire results and comparative analysis
XML Download