Journal List > Korean J Urol > v.49(3) > 1005077

Paick, Lee, Yoon, Baek, Kim, Song, Lyoo, and Lho: Electroejaculation in the Male Rat

Abstract

Purpose

We examined the possibility of electroejaculation for the evaluation of fertility in the male rat.

Materials and Methods

Ten 8-week-old Sprague-Dawley male rats that underwent seminal vesiculectomy were used for semen collection by electroejaculation. With a transrectal probe (60Hz, 3V, 0.5A), sign wave electric stimulation was applied to an anesthetized rat. Ejaculated semen was collected by a pipette and the volume and sperm density of the ejaculate were analyzed. Two weeks later, a second electroejaculation was performed under the same conditions with the same rats.

Results

At the first attempt, all 10 rats ejaculated following electric stimulation. The mean semen volume was 8.9μl (range, 3.0-28.5μl) and the mean sperm density was 6,428/ml (range, 320-20,997/ml). At the second attempt, only 7 of 10 rats (70%) ejaculated. The mean semen volume was 5.6μl (range, 3.3-8.6μl) and the mean sperm density was 2,801/ml (range, 227-12,555/ml).

Conclusions

These results indicated that electroejaculation has the possibility of being a useful method for evaluation of fertility in the male rat.

REFERENCES

1. Park NC, Park YS, Hwang KH, Chung MK, Yoon JB. Male infertility: the clinicostatistical analysis of recent 10 years cumulative data. Korean J Urol. 1996; 37:939–46.
2. Hassan MA, Killick SR. Negative lifestyle is associated with a significant reduction in fecundity. Fertil Steril. 2004; 81:384–92.
crossref
3. Magnusdottir EV, Thorsteinsson T, Thorsteinsdottir S, Hei-misdottir M, Olafsdottir K. Persistent organochlorines, sedentary occupation, obesity and human male subfertility. Hum Reprod. 2005; 20:208–15.
crossref
4. Carballada R, Esponda P. Role of fluid from seminal vesicles and coagulating glands in sperm transport into the uterus and fertility in rats. J Reprod Fertil. 1992; 95:639–48.
crossref
5. Kutzler MA. Semen collection in the dog. Theriogenology. 2005; 64:747–54.
crossref
6. Zambelli D, Cunto M. Semen collection in cats: techniques and analysis. Theriogenology. 2006; 66:159–65.
crossref
7. Evans LE, Ko JC. Electroejaculation and artificial insemination in Vietnamese potbellied miniature pigs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1990; 197:1366–7.
8. Kozdrowski R, Dubiel A, Siemieniuch M. Preliminary studies on cryopreservation of hare (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 2006; 93:379–82.
crossref
9. Ryan PC, Whelan CA, Fitzpatrick JM. The vas deferens count: a new accurate method for experimental measurement of testicular exocrine function. Eur Urol. 1988; 14:156–9.
10. Hib J. The in vivo effects of autonomic drugs and electroejaculation on prostate gland contractility in the rat. Andrologia. 1988; 20:289–94.
11. Scarano WR, Messias AG, Oliva SU, Klinefelter GR, Kem-pinas WG. Sexual behaviour, sperm quantity and quality after short-term streptozotocin-induced hyperglycaemia in rats. Int J Androl. 2006; 29:482–8.
crossref
12. Lim DJ, Hong SK, Jeong SJ, Choi H. The mechanism of damage to the contralateral testis following testicular torsion and detorsion in rats and the effect of allopurinol administration. Korean J Urol. 2006; 47:180–8.
crossref
13. Axner E, Linde Forsberg C. Sperm morphology in the domestic cat, and its relation with fertility: a retrospective study. Reprod Domest Anim. 2007; 42:282–91.
crossref
14. Kafetsoulis A, Brackett NL, Ibrahim E, Attia GR, Lynne CM. Current trends in the treatment of infertility in men with spinal cord injury. Fertil Steril. 2006; 86:781–9.
crossref

Fig. 1.
The transrectal probe (hand-made) for electroejaculation in the male rat.
kju-49-266f1.tif
Fig. 2.
The electrical stimulator for electroejaculation in the male rat.
kju-49-266f2.tif
Fig. 3.
Changes of sperm density for the first and second attempts for electroejaculation.
kju-49-266f3.tif
Table 1.
Volume and sperm concentration of semen obtained with electroejaculation
Rat 1st try 2nd try
Volume (μl) Sperm density (/ml) Volume (μl) Sperm density (/ml)
1 9.9 862 0 0
2 9.8 320 5.8 1,130
3 4.4 14,465 8.6 2,044
4 3.3 20,997 0 0
5 3.0 1,546 7.8 723
6 28.5 682 0 0
7 15.3 1,003 6.2 227
8 5.4 7,284 4.0 12,555
9 3.0 530 3.5 2,446
10 6.2 16,588 3.3 485
Mean 8.9 6,428 5.6 2,801
TOOLS
Similar articles