Abstract
Purpose
We wanted to investigate outcomes after midurethral sling (MUS) operations for treating women with mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) and we wanted to identify the factors for achieving a favorable outcome.
Materials and Methods
The retrospective data was collected for 279 women with MUI and who underwent a MUS operation with at least 2 years follow up. The following measures were recorded before MUS: a disease-specific validated questionnaire, 1-hour pad tests, standardized stress tests and urodynamic study. The patients were divided as followed; a predominance of bothering symptoms (stress-predominance, urgency-predominance) and the presence of detrusor overactivity (DO). The patients with DO were further classified into the high detrusor pressure (HPDO) group and the low pressure (LPDO) group with a reference level of 15cmH2O of maximum detusor pressure at which involuntary contraction occurred during filling cystometry. The patient's postoperative global impression of improvement, the Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (BFLUTS) score, improvement of stress incontinence (SUI) and urgency were analyzed.
Results
The overall success rate of SUI was 96.4%. The predominance of bothering symptoms or the presence of DO did not influence the over all SUI success rate. In a subgroup of women with DO, those women with LPDO showed a significantly higher SUI cure rate than those with HPDO. Urge incontinence resolved in 176 (63.1%) and it improved in 60 (21.5%), while it was aggravated or it persisted in 43 (15.4%). Women with stress-predominant MUI, DO and LPDO experienced better resolution of urgency incontinence, an improved quality of life (QoL) and a higher global impression of improvement.
References
1. Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varos G. An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996; 7:81–6.
2. Delorme E, Droupy S, de Tayrac R, Delmas V. Transobturator tape (Uratape): a new minimally-invasive procedure to treat female urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2004; 45:203–7.
3. de Leval J. Novel surgical technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: transobturator vaginal tape inside-out. Eur Urol. 2003; 44:724–30.
4. Tsivian A, Mogutin B, Kessler O, Korczak D, Levin S, Sidi AA. Tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: longterm results. J Urol. 2004; 172:998–1000.
5. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardization Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002; 21:167–78.
6. Karram MM, Bhatia NN. Management if coexistent stress and urge urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 73:4–7.
7. Stanton SL. Female stress incontinence. Treatment options and indications. Urologe A. 1991; 30:239–43.
8. Cucchi A. A possible link between stress urinary incontinence and detrusor instability in the female-urodynamic (pressure/flow) data and speculative considerations. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1998; 9:3–8.
9. Rezapour M, Ulmsten U. Tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) in women with mixed urinary incontinence-a longterm followup. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001; 12(Suppl 2):S15–8.
10. Artibani W. Difficult to manage patient populations-mixed symptomatology. BJU Int. 2000; 85(Suppl 3):53–4.
11. Scotti JJ, Angell G, Flora R, Greston WM. Antecedent history as a predictor of surgical cure of urgency symptoms in mixed incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 91:51–4.
12. Oh SJ, Park HG, Paick SH, Park WH, Choo MS. Translation and linguistic validation of Korean version of the bristol female lower urinary tract symptom instrument. J Korean Continence Soc. 2004; 8:89–113.
13. Oh BS, Park SH, Park SS. The effect of anticholinergic drug treatment before a midurethral sling operation in mixed urinary incontinence. Korean J Urol. 2007; 48:1075–81.
14. Koonings P, Bergman A, Ballard CA. Combined detrusor instability and stress urinary incontinence: Where is the primary pathology? Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1988; 26:250–6.
15. Jeffry L, Deval B, Birsan A, Soriano D, Darai E. Objective and subjective cure rates after tension-free vaginal tape for treatment of urinary incontinence. Urology. 2001; 58:702–6.
16. Sinha D, Blackwell A, Moran PA. Outcome measures after TVT for mixed urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008; 19:927–31.
17. Schrepferman CG, Griebling TL, Nygaard IE, Kreder KJ. Resolution of urge symptoms following sling cystourethro-pexy. J Urol. 2000; 164:1628–31.
18. Segal JL, Vassallo B, Kleeman S, Silva WA, Karram MM. Prevalence of persistent and de novo overactive bladder symptoms after the tension-free vaginal tape. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 104:1263–9.
19. Ku JH, Shin JW, Son H, Oh SJ, Kim SW, Paick JS. Predictive factors for persistent urgency or urge incontinence after tension-free vaginal tape procedure in mixed urinary incontinence. Korean J Urol. 2004; 45:330–6.
Table 1.
Table 2.
Table 3.
Table 4.
BFLUTS: Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptom, SMUI: stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence, UMUI: urgency predominant mixed urinary incontinence, BFLUTS-FS: filling factor, BFLUTS-VS: voiding factor, BFLUTS-IS: incontinent factor BFLUTS-sex: sexual factor, BFLUTS-QoL: quality of life factor, ∗: statistically significant (p<0.05)