Journal List > Korean J Urol > v.49(11) > 1005019

Jang and Hong: The Efficacy of Furosemide-based Medical Expulsive Therapy with Tamsulosin and Deflazacort for Symptomatic Distal Ureter Stones

Abstract

Purpose

We prospectively evaluated the efficacy of administering tamsulosin with or without deflazacort, combined with furosemide, for treating distal ureteral stones.

Materials and Methods

A total of 241 patients with symptomatic distal ureteral stones were enrolled in this study between January 2004 and September 2007. They were divided into three treatment groups: group A (n=42) who received furosemide (40mg/day), group B (n=66) who received furosemide and tamsulosin (0.4mg/day) and group C (n=72) who received furosemide and tamsulosin plus deflazacort (24mg/day) for a maximum of 2 weeks. Follow-up visits were made at the 1st and the 2nd week after all the medication had been administered. The efficacy was evaluated in terms of the success rate and the time for achieving expulsion after administering the medication, according to the stone size.

Results

The three groups were comparable in terms of age, gender and stone size. The stone diameter was 4.90±0.47mm for group A, 5.08±0.30mm for group B and 5.04±0.36mm for group C. The overall success rate was 64.3%, 80.3% and 91.7%, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (p=0.001). The mean expulsion time for the smaller stones (<5mm) was 9.13 days, 6.25 days and 5.43 days for each group, respectively, while that for the larger stones (≥5mm) was 10.25 days, 8.93 days and 7.32 days, respectively, and the values for both sized stones showed statistically significant differences (p=0.027 for the smaller stones, 0.018 for the larger stones). There was no serious adverse event associated with the medication.

Conclusions

Medical expulsive therapy with tamsulosin and deflazacort combined with furosemide is a time saving, safe and effective method for treating distal ureter stone.

Figures and Tables

Table 1
Comparison of the patients' characteristics (expressed as mean values and ranges for age)
kju-49-1013-i001

Group A: furosemide only, Group B: furosemide and tamsulosin, Group C: furosemide, tamsulosin and deflazacort. The mean age of each group showed no significant difference (p>0.05)

Table 2
Stone size and the stone free rate for each group
kju-49-1013-i002

Group A: furosemide only, Group B: furosemide and tamsulosin, Group C: furosemide, tamsulosin and deflazacort, SR: success rate (stone free rate), ET: stone expulsion time

Table 3
Success rate for each group with each diameter of stone
kju-49-1013-i003

Group A: furosemide only, Group B: furosemide and tamsulosin, Group C: furosemide, tamsulosin and deflazacort

References

1. Tiselius HG. Epidemiology and medical management of stone disease. BJU Int. 2003. 91:758–767.
2. Tiselius HG. Stone incidence and prevention. Braz J Urol. 2000. 26:452–462.
3. Leusmann DB, Blaschke R, Schmandt W. Results of 5,035 stone analyses: a contribution to epidemiology of urinary stone disease. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1990. 24:205–210.
4. Pearle MS, Calhoun EA, Curhan GC. Urologic diseases in America project: urolithiasis. J Urol. 2005. 173:848–857.
5. Miller OF, Kane CJ. Time to stone passage for observed ureteral calculi: a guide for patient education. J Urol. 1999. 162:688–691.
6. Morse RM, Resnick MI. Ureteral calculi: natural history and treatment in an era of advanced technology. J Urol. 1991. 145:263–265.
7. Segura JW, Preminger G, Assimos DG, Dretler SP, Kahn RI, Lingeman JE, et al. Ureteral stones clinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1997. 158:1915–1921.
8. Porpiglia F, Vaccino D, Billia M, Renard J, Cracco C, Ghignone G, et al. Corticosteroids and tamsulosin in the medical expulsive therapy for symptomatic distal ureter stones: single drug or association? Eur Urol. 2006. 50:339–344.
9. Lee HN, Yoon HN, Shim BS. The trend change of incidence and treatment of urolithiasis between the 1980s and 2000s. Korean J Urol. 2007. 48:40–44.
10. Lingeman JE, Kim SC, Kuo RL, McAteer JA, Evan AP. Shockwave lithotripsy: anecdotes and insights. J Endourol. 2003. 17:687–693.
11. Peschel R, Janetschek G, Bartsch G. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: a prospective randomized study. J Urol. 1999. 162:1909–1912.
12. Laird JM, Roza C, Cervero F. Effects of artificial calculosis on rat ureter motility: peripheral contribution to the pain of ureteric colic. Am J Physiol. 1997. 272:R1409–R1416.
13. Singh A, Alter HJ, Littlepage A. A systematic review of medical therapy to facilitate passage of ureteral calculi. Ann Emerg Med. 2007. 50:552–563.
14. Gravas S, Tzortzis V, Karatzas A, Oeconomou A, Melekos MD. The use of tamsulozin as adjunctive treatment after ESWL in patients with distal ureteral stone: do we really need it? Results from a randomised study. Urol Res. 2007. 35:231–235.
15. Dellabella M, Milanese G, Muzzonigro G. Medical-expulsive therapy for distal ureterolithiasis: randomized prospective study on role of corticosteroids used in combination with tamsulosin-simplified treatment regimen and health-related quality of life. Urology. 2005. 66:712–715.
16. Salehi M, Fouladi MM, Shier H. Does methylprednisolone acetate increase the success rate of medical therapy for patients with distal ureteral stones. Eur Urol. 2005. 4(Suppl 3):25.
17. Azm TA, Higazy H. Effect of diuresis on extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment of ureteric calculi. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2002. 36:209–212.
TOOLS
Similar articles