Abstract
Purpose
We evaluated the effect of tamsulosin on upper and lower ureteral stones that were smaller than 10mm to identify the patient groups for which tamsulosin was most applicable.
Materials and Methods
85 patients who were diagnosed with ureteral stones smaller than 10mm in size were enrolled in this randomized prospective study. The patients were diagnosed via intravenous pyelography and then they were followed with weekly plain abdomen films for 4 weeks. The control group (Group 1) was given an nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) for pain medication, and they were instructed to ingest at least 2l of fluids daily. For the treatment group (Group 2) once daily 0.2mg tamsulosin was added. Both groups were compared for the size of stone and the days to expulsion and pain control, based upon the number of emergency room (ER) visits. The proximal and distal ureteral stones were separately evaluated, and the patients' gender, age, stone size and stone position were analyzed to identify treatment efficacy.
Results
The average stone size was 5.2±2.6mm in group 1 and 4.7±1.5mm in group 2 (p=0.344). The success rate was 42.9% in group 1 and 76.5% in group 2 (p=0.005). Group 2 showed a significant reduction for the time to stone expulsion at 12.7±6.6 days compared to 18.5±6.9 days for group 1 (p=0.008). Among the subset of patients, those with distal ureteral stones smaller than 5mm alone showed a significant increase in the expulsion rate (100%, p=0.047) and a decrease of the days to expulsion (12.1±5.1 days, p=0.018).
References
3. Carstensen HE, Hansen TS. Stones in ureter. Acta Chir Scand. 1973; 433(Suppl):66–71.
4. Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Dretler SP, Kahn RI, Lingeman JE, et al. Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. The American Urological Association. J Urol. 1997; 158:1915–21.
6. Miller OF, Kane CJ. Time to stone passage for observed ureteral calculi: a guide to patient education. J Urol. 1999; 162:688–90.
7. Tiselius HG, Ackermann D, Alken P, Buck C, Conort P, Gallucci M, et al. Guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2001; 40:362–71.
8. Malin JM Jr, Deane RF, Boyarsky S. Characterisation of adrenergic receptors in human ureter. Br J Urol. 1970; 42:171–4.
9. Porpiglia F, Destefanis P, Fiori C, Fontana D. Effectiveness of nifedipine and deflazacort in the management of distal ureter stones. Urology. 2000; 56:579–82.
10. Saita A, Bonaccorsi A, Marchese F, Condorelli SV, Motta M. Our experience with nifedipine and prednisolone as expulsive therapy for ureteral stones. Urol Int. 2004; 72:43–5.
11. Dellabella M, Milanese G, Muzzonigro G. Medical-expulsive therapy for distal ureterolithiasis: randomized prospective study on role of corticosteroids used in combination with tamsulosin-simplified treatment regimen and health-related quality of life. Urology. 2005; 66:712–5.
12. Dellabella M, Milanese G, Muzzonigro G. Efficacy of tamsulosin in the medical management of juxtavesical ureteral stones. J Urol. 2003; 170:2202–5.
13. Porpiglia F, Ghignone G, Fiori C, Fontana D, Scarpa RM. Nifedipine versus tamsulosin for the management of lower ureteral stones. J Urol. 2004; 172:568–71.
14. Kim HH, Noh JH. Comparison of cost and clinical outcome for ureteral stones larger than 1cm; extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Korean J Urol. 2005; 46:1141–6.
15. Lotan Y, Gettman MT, Roehrborn CG, Cadeddu JA, Pearle MS. Management of ureteral calculi: a cost comparison and decision making analysis. J Urol. 2002; 167:1621–9.
16. Ahmad M, Chaughtai MN, Khan FA. Role of prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors in the passage of ureteric calculus. J Pak Med Assoc. 1991; 41:268–70.
17. Hussain Z, Inman RD, Elves AW, Shipstone DP, Ghiblawi S, Coppinger SW. Use of glyceryl trinitrate patches in patients with ureteral stones: a randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled study. Urology. 2001; 58:521–5.
18. Lang RJ, Exintaris B, Teele ME, Harvey J, Klemm MF. Electrical basis of peristalsis in the mammalian upper urinary tract. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1998; 25:310–21.
19. Morita T, Wada I, Saeki H, Tsuchida S, Weiss RM. Ureteral urine transport: changes in bolus volume, peristaltic frequency, intraluminal pressure and volume of flow resulting from autonomic drugs. J Urol. 1987; 137:132–5.
20. Lennon GM, Thornhill JA, Grainger R, McDermott TE, Butler MR. Double pigtail ureteric stent versus percutaneous nephrostomy: effects on stone transit and ureteric motility. Eur Urol. 1997; 31:24–9.
21. Lee JZ, Tillig B, Perkash I, Constantinou CE. Effect of alpha 1 adrenoceptor antagonist on the urodynamics of the upper and lower urinary tract of the male rat. Neurourol Urodyn. 1998; 17:213–29.
22. Sigala S, Dellabella M, Milanese G, Fornari S, Faccoli S, Palazzolo F, et al. Evidence for the presence of alpha 1 adrenoceptor subtypes in the human ureter. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005; 24:142–8.
23. Davenport K, Timoney AG, Keeley FX. A comparative in vitro study to determine the beneficial effect of calcium-channel and alpha 1 adrenoceptor antagonism on human ureteric activity. BJU Int. 2006; 98:651–5.
24. Cervenakov I, Fillo J, Mardiak J, Kopecny M, Smirala J, Lepies P. Speedy elimination of ureterolithiasis in lower part of ureters with the alpha 1-blocker tamsulosin. Int Urol Nephrol. 2002; 34:25–9.
Table 1.
Group | p-value | ||
---|---|---|---|
Control (n=42) | Tamsulosin (n=34) | ||
Age (years) | |||
Overall | 45.7±13.8 | 40.7±11.1 | 0.089 |
Proximal | 47.2±16.4 | 36.5±14.0 | 0.051 |
Distal | 44.2±10.4 | 43.3±8.1 | 0.767 |
Men/Women (number)∗ | |||
Overall | 24/18 | 24/10 | 0.224 |
Proximal | 13/9 | 11/2 | 0.150 |
Distal | 11/9 | 13/8 | 0.756 |
Stone location∗ | |||
Rt/Lt | 23/19 | 15/19 | 0.489 |
Proximal/Distal | 22/20 | 13/21 | 0.253 |
Stone size (mm) | |||
Overall | 5.2±2.9 | 4.7±1.5 | 0.344 |
Proximal | 4.6±2.8 | 4.6±1.3 | 0.972 |
Distal | 5.9±2.9 | 4.8±1.6 | 0.150 |