Journal List > Korean J Leg Med > v.37(3) > 1004705

Korean J Leg Med. 2013 Aug;37(3):145-152. Korean.
Published online August 29, 2013.  https://doi.org/10.7580/kjlm.2013.37.3.145
© Copyright 2013 by the Korean Society for Legal Medicine
Effect of CORE Program on Cognitive, Social and Emotional Characteristics of Sex Offenders
Jin-Hyuk Park,1 Jae-Woo Lee,1 Mi-Kyung Ryu,1 So-Young Jang,1 and Jong-Kyun Kim2
1Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Forensic Psychiatry, Ministry of Justice, Gongju-si, Chungcheongnam, Korea.
2Solmaeum Psychiatric Clinic, Daejeon, Korea.

Corresponding author (Email: doctorpj@hanmail.net )
Received July 29, 2013; Revised August 15, 2013; Accepted August 23, 2013.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop the CORE Program for sex offenders and to determine its effectiveness. The CORE Program was designed with an aim to achieve cognitive restructuring, improve the ability to empathize in interpersonal relationships, and enhance self-esteem and intimacy. We conducted this program over 48 sessions for 28 sex offenders. The effectiveness of the program was evaluated using the Interpersonal Responsiveness Index (IRI), Self-esteem Questionnaire (SEQ), UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLALS), Coping Using Sex Inventory (CUSI), Rape Myth Acceptance Scale (RMAS), and Wilson's Sex Fantasy Questionnaire (WSFQ). The data were analyzed using paired t-tests. Our results showed no significant changes in the SEQ, UCLALS, and IRI scores after the treatment program. However, the scores for the CUSI, RMAS, and WSFQ significantly improved after this program. In this paper, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the CORE Program for sex offenders. We also discuss the limitations of our study and provide suggestions for future research. Our findings indicate that this treatment program should be provided to sex offenders for preventing recidivism.

Keywords: Sex offender; Paraphilia; CORE Program; Recidivism

Tables


Table 1
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Subjects
Click for larger image


Table 2
Characteristics of Sex Offenses
Click for larger image


Table 3
Effect of Core Program
Click for larger image


Table 4
Diagnostic Distribution of Patients admitted to National Institute of Forensic Psychiatry with Sex Offense
Click for larger image

References
1. Shim JY. In: Policy data of parliamentory inspection of the administration. Volume 1. Seoul: National Assembly Research Service; 2011. pp. 57.
2. Kwon JH, Choi SS, Lyu MK, et al. The preliminary research for making judgement on not guilty by reason of insanity and guilty but mentally ill. Korean J Leg Med 2008;32:111–117.
3. The collection of resources on the 3rd meeting of the policy committee. Seoul: Protection bureau of the ministry of justice; 2006.
4. Lee SK, editor. The collection of resources on the audit and inspection on state affairs. Seoul: Legislation and judiciary committee of the national assembly; 2006.
5. Marshall WL, Anderson D, Fernandez YM. In: Cognitive behavioral treatment of sexual offenders. Chichester: Wiley; 1999.
6. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder. 4th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
(DSM-IV-TR).
7. Wechsler D, editor. WAIS-R manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation; 1981.
8. Yeom TH, Park YS, Oh KJ, et al. In: Korean version of Wechsler adult intelligence scale (K-WAIS). Seoul: Korean Clinical Psychology Association; 1992.
9. Lee SJ, Ko RJ, Park HR. Development of the Korean sex offender risk assessement scale (KSORAS) and its validity evidence. Korean Criminol Rev 2008;19:309–345.
10. Hanson RK, Morton-Bourgon KE. The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of recidivism studies. J Consult Clin Psychol 2005;73:1154–1163.
11. Davis MH. Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 1983;44:113–126.
12. Rosenberg M. In: Society and the adolescent self-image. New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1965. pp. 326.
13. Russell D, Peplau LA, Cutrona CE. The revised UCLA loneliness scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol 1980;39:472–480.
14. Cortoni F, Marshall WL. Sex as a coping strategy and its relationship to juvenile sexual history and intimacy in sexual offenders. Sex Abuse 2001;13:27–43.
15. Burt MR. Cultural myths and supports for rape. J Pers Soc psychol 1980;38:217–230.
16. Lee SJ, Choi SJ. Rape myths acceptance and violent sexual behaviors. Korean J Soc Psychol 2001;15:97–116.
17. Wilson GD. Measurement of sex fantasy. Sex Marital Ther 1988;3:45–55.
18. Shin YJ. In: A Study on the development of rehabilitation programs for sex offenders in correctional facilities: a report commissioned by the Ministry of Justice. Seoul: Institute of Behavioral Science in Medicine, Yonsei University; 2006. pp. 3-4.
19. Marshall WL. A combined treatment method for certain sexual deviations. Behav Res Ther 1971;9:293–294.
20. Abel GG, Mittleman MS, Becker JV. Sex offenders: Result of assessment and recommendations for treatment. In: Ben-Aron MH, Hucker SJ, Webster CD, editors. Clinical criminology: The assessment and treatment of criminal behavior. Toronto: M & M Graphics; 1985. pp. 191-205.
21. Malamuth NM. Rape proclivity among males. J Soc Issues 1981;37:138–157.
22. Chiroro P, Bohner G, Viki GT, et al. Rape myth acceptance and rape proclivity: expected dominance versus expected arousal as mediators in acquaintance-rape situations. J Interpers Violence 2004;19:427–444.
23. Burgess AW, Hartman CR, Ressler RK, et al. Sexual homicide: a motivational model. J Interpers Violence 1986;1:251–272.
24. Marshall WL, Marshall LE, Serran GA, et al. Self-esteem, shame, cognitive distortions and empathy in sexual offenders: their integration and treatment implications. Psychol Crime Law 2009;15:217–234.