PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the legal features of sexual offenders with mental disorders without paraphilia. Patients admitted to Korea Forensic Hospital from 1994 to 2012 (n = 193) were reviewed for diagnosis, crime, legal responsibility, readmission (number of admissions), hospitalizations, criminal record, and education level. Psychotic subjects were often declared not guilty because of insanity and avoided legal responsibility, but had long admission periods and fewer criminal records. Mentally retarded subjects also had long admission periods and fewer criminal records, but commited more sexual offenses against victims aged 13 and younger. The substance abuse group had extensive criminal records, shorter admission periods, and frequent admissions. Subjects with personality disorders and others committed relatively more violent crime with injuries, rather than simple sexual offenses. Treatment and social concerns suitable to each diagnosis are required to address sexual offenses associated with diverse legal characteristics.
Figures and Tables
References
1. Coxe R, Holmes W. A comparative study of two groups of sex offenders identified as high and low risk on the static-99. J Child Sex Abus. 2009. 18:137–153.
2. Lee SJ, Ko RJ, Park HR. Development of the Korean Sex Offender Risk Assessement Scale (KSORAS) and its Validity Evidence. Korean Criminol Rev. 2008. 19:1–37.
3. Hanson RK, Gordon A, Harris AJ, et al. First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sex Abuse. 2002. 14:169–194.
4. Schober JM, Kuhn PJ, Kovacs PG, Earle JH, Byrne PM, Fries RA. Leuprolide acetate suppresses pedophilic urges and arousability. Arch Sex Behav. 2005. 34:691–705.
5. Harsch S, Bergk JE, Steinert T, Keller F, Jockusch U. Prevalence of mental disorders among sexual offenders in forensic psychiatry and prison. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006. 29:443–449.
6. Kwon JH, Choi SS, Lyu MK, Rhee MS, Ahn BH. The Preliminary Research for Making Judgment on Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity and Guilty but Mentally Ill. Korean J Leg Med. 2008. 32:111–117.
7. Lee SJ, Kim KO. Correct understanding on recidivism rate of sex offences and searching for the preventive strategies of recidivism. Korean J Soc Psychol. 2005. 19:83–89.
8. Mejlvang P, Boujida V. Sexual assaults in Greenland: Characteristics of police reported rapes and attempted rapes. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2007. 66:257–263.
9. Oliveira PA, Oliveira CC, Rocca CC, Costa AP, Scivoletto S. The importance of multidisciplinary evaluation for differentiating between mental retardation and antisocial behavior in sex offenders: a case study. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011. 66:1847–1848.
10. Gannon TA, Collie RM, Ward T, Thakker J. Rape: psychopathology, theory and treatment. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008. 28:982–1008.
11. DeLisi M, Vaughn MG, Beaver KM, et al. Juvenile sex offenders and institutional misconduct: the role of thought psychopathology. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2008. 18:292–305.
12. Zang YI, Lee JW, Ryu MK, Kim SB, Shin SH. The Characteristics of Recidivism in Sex Offenders by STATIC-99 and KSORAS. Korean J Leg Med. 2011. 35:42–48.
13. Hanson RK, Bussière MT. Predicting relapse: a meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998. 66:348–362.
14. Choi YJ, Cho JH, Kwon JW. Characteristics of the patients subjected to the mental disability evaluation and legal decisions. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 1998. 37:903–912.
XML Download