Journal List > J Korean Rheum Assoc > v.17(4) > 1003770

Kim, Oh, and Lee: Differential Diagnosis for the Cause of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Using Musculoskeletal Ultrasound

REFERENCES

1). Bickel KD. Carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2010. 35:147–52.
crossref
2). Keith MW., Masear V., Chung K., Maupin K., Andary M., Amadio PC, et al. Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009. 17:389–96.
crossref
3). Bianchi S., Montet X., Martinoli C., Bonvin F., Fasel J. High-resolution sonography of compressive neuropathies of the wrist. J Clin Ultrasound. 2004. 32:451–61.
crossref
4). SarriAa L., Cabada T., Cozcolluela R., MartiAnez-Berganza T., GarciAa S. Carpal tunnel syndrome: usefulness of sonography. Eur Radiol. 2000. 10:1920–5.
5). Beekman R., Visser LH. Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a critical review of the literature. Muscle Nerve. 2003. 27:26–33.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Ultrasonography shows (A) 12×6 mm sized oval shaped hyperechoic mass (∗) in the carpal tunnel compressing the median nerve (arrows) in longitudinal scan, (B) increased cross-sectional area of medial nerve in the tunnel inlet, and (C) the flattening of median nerve (arrow heads) near the hyperechoic mass (∗) in mid-tunnel in transverse scans.
jkra-17-454f1.tif
Fig. 2.
(A) Sagittal fast spin echo (FSE) T2 weighted magnetic resonance image shows 12×12×6 mm sized oval shaped calcific deposition in the carpal tunnel (∗), and (B) axial FSE T2 weighted magnetic resonance image shows diffuse swelling and enhancement of median nerve (arrow).
jkra-17-454f2.tif
TOOLS
Similar articles