Journal List > J Korean Rheum Assoc > v.16(3) > 1003670

Kang, Lee, Cho, Kim, Kwon, Kim, Kim, and Hwang: Assessing the Myocardial Function of Postmenopausal Women with Fibromyalgia

Abstract

Background

Aberrations of cardiovascular regulation have been reported in patients who suffer with fibromyalgia (FM). Abnormalities of the cardiovascular autonomic regulation, as well as the correlation between coronary heart disease and depression, have been considered to be the causative factors. The clinical features of transient left apical ballooning syndrome with the patients under acute stress have been clearly described, but the effect of chronic stress such as FM on the myocardium is unknown. We investigated the cardiac strain in FM patients by strain imaging with using the 2D grayscale images, and we quantified the regional myocardial deformation properties.

Methods

We investigated 30 consecutive postmenopausal women (mean age: 48±8 years) who satisfied the criteria for fibromyalgia with atypical chest pain by performing standard and 2-dimensional strain echocardiography (2DS). Those patients with hypertension, coronary heart disease or diabetes were excluded. The global and segmental longitudinal deformation parameters of the LV from 3 apical views were analyzed, and the patients underwent a manual tender point survey for determining the number of tender points and tender point counts, and the patients completed the fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (FIQ), the brief fatigue inventory (BFI), and Beck depression inventory (BDI).

Results

The global longitudinal LV strain was significantly reduced in the FM patients with a high FIQ score (>40) as compared to the patients with a low FIQ score (−18.61% vs. −22.72%). Also, both the global and segmental longitudinal LV strains were negatively associated with fatigue or the tender point counts. However, there was no significant association between depression and the LV strain.

Conclusion

This study showed the reduced myocardial longitudinal deformation in FM patients. This suggested that strain imaging is a feasible approach to assess the regional ventricular function in FM patients.

References

1. Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, Bennett RM, Bombardier C, Goldenberg DL, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 Criteria for the Classification of Fibromyalgia. Report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum. 1990; 33:160–72.
2. Pongratx DE, Sievers M. Fibromyalgia-symptom or diagnosis: a definition of the position. Scans J Rheumatol Suppl. 2000; 113:3–7.
3. Bradely LA. Pathophysiologic mechanisms of fibromyalgia and its related disoders. J clin psychiatry. 2008; 69(Suppl 2):6–13.
4. Furlan R, Colombo S, Perego F, Atzeni F, Diana A, Barbic F, et al. Abnormalities of cardiovascular neural control and reduced orthostatic tolerance in patients with primary fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol. 2005; 32:1787–93.
5. Naschitz JE, Rozenbaum M, Rosner I, Sabo E, Priselac RM, Shaviv N, et al. Cardiovascular response to upright tilt in fibromyalgia differs from that in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Rheumatol. 2001; 28:1356–60.
6. Naschitz JE, Rozenbaum M, Fields MC, Enis S, Manor H, Dreyfuss D, et al. Cardiovascular reactivity in fibromyalgia: evidence for pathogenic heterogeneity. J Rheumatol. 2005; 32:335–9.
7. Patten SB, Beck CA, Kassam A, Williams JV, Barbui C, Metz LM. Long-term medical conditions and major depression: strength of association for specific conditions in the general population. Can J Psychiatry. 2005; 50:195–202.
crossref
8. McEwen BS. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators: central role of the brain. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2006; 8:367–81.
crossref
9. Wittstein IS. Acute stress cardiomyopathy. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2008; 5:61–8.
crossref
10. Pavin D, Le Breton H, Daubert C. Human stress cardiomyopathy mimicking acute myocardial syndrome. Heart. 1997; 78:509–11.
crossref
11. Prasad A, Lerman A, Rihal CS. Apical ballooning syndrome (Tako-Tsubo or stress cardiomyopathy): a mimic of acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2008; 155:408–17.
crossref
12. Ablin JN, Beilinson N, Aloush V, Elkayam O, Finkelstein A. Association between fibromylagia and coronary heart disease and coronary catheterization. Clin Cardiol. 2009; 32:7–11.
13. Burckhardt CS, clark SR, Bennett RM. The fibromyalgia impact questionnaire: development and validation. J Rheumatol. 1991; 18:728–33.
14. Kim YA, Lee SS, Park K. Validation of a Korean version of the fibromyagia impact questionnaire. J Korean Med Sci. 2002; 17:220–4.
15. Mendoza TR, Wang XS, Cleeland CS, Morrissey M, Johnson BA, Wendt JK, et al. The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients: use of the brief fatigue inventory. Cancer. 1999; 85:1186–96.
16. Richter P, Werner J, Heerlein A, Kraus A, Sauer H. On the validity of the beck depression inventory. Psychopathology. 1998; 31:160–8.
crossref
17. Buskila D, Neumann L, Vaisberg G, Alkalay D, Wolfe F. Increased rates of fibromyalgia following cervical spine injury. A controlled study of 161 cases of traumatic injury. Arthritis Rheum. 1997; 40:446–52.
crossref
18. Adak B, Tekeoğlu I, Ediz L, Budancamanak M, Yazgan T, Karahocagil K, et al. Fibromyalgia frequency in hepatitis B carriers. A. J Clin Rheumatol. 2005; 11:157–9.
19. Ablin JN, Cohen H, Buskila D. Mechanisms of disease: genetics of fibromyalgia. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2006; 2:671–8.
crossref
20. Blumenthal JA, Babyak MA, Moore KA, Craighead WE, Herman S, Khatri P, et al. Effects of exercise training on older patients with major depression. Arch Intern Med. 1999; 159:2349–56.
crossref
21. Rozanski A, Blumenthal JA, Davidson KW, Saab PG, Kubzansky L. The epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of psychosocial risk factors in cardiac practice: the emerging field of behavioral cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45:637–51.
22. Pislaru C, Abraham TP, Belohlavek M. Strain and strain rate echocardiography. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2002; 17:443–54.
crossref
23. Gilman G, Khandheria BK, Hagen ME, Abraham TP, Seward JB, Belohlavek M. Strain rate and strain: a step-by-step approach to image and data acquisition. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004; 17:1011–20.
crossref
24. D'hooge J, Heimdal A, Jamal F, Kukulski T, Bijnens B, Rademakers F, et al. Regional strain and strain rate measurements by cardiac ultrasound: principles, implementation and limitations. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2000; 1:154–70.
25. Pislaru C, Abraham TP, Belohavek M. Strain and strain rate echocardiography. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2002; 17:443–54.
crossref
26. Lee YA, Lee BH, Kang HS, Park JY, Choue CW, Song JS, et al. The change of tissue velocity and strain rate after exercise in patients with coronary artery disease. Korean Circ J. 2003; 33:590–8.
27. Ghiadoni L, Donald AE, Cropley M, Mullen MJ, Oakley G, Taylor M, et al. Mental stress induces transient endothelial dysfunction in humans. Circulation. 2000; 102:2473–8.
crossref
28. Rozanski A, Blumenthal JA, Kaplan J. Impact of psychological factors on the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and implications for therapy. Circulation. 1999; 99:2192–217.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Longitudinal strain was obtained from the 3 apical chamber views by 2-dimensional speckle tracking strain analysis.
jkra-16-189f1.tif
Table 1.
Baseline demographic characteristics of the FMS patients and the controls
  Group A (n=20) Group B (n=10) Control (n=20)
Age (years) 46 50 48
(9.75) (10.5) (11.25)
BMI (kg/m2) 23.18 21.63 22.14
(3.6275) (1.95) (3.125)
Systolic BP (mmHg) 125.5 126.5 125
(15.5) (10.25) (15.25)
Diastolic BP (mmHg) 79.5 80 78.5
(10.25) (15) (12.75)
HR (bpm) 72 74 74
(6.6) (5.325) (14.5)
Disease duration after diagnosis (years) 11 5 0
(9.25) (4.75)  

All the values are described as medians (interquartile range), Group A: (FIQ≥40), Group B: (FIQ<40), FMS: fibromyalgia syndrome, FIQ: fibromyalgia impact questionnaire, BMI: body mass index, BP: blood pressure, HR: heart rate

Table 2.
Comparisons of the clinical variables between the FMS patients
  Group A (n=20) Group B (n=10) p
FIQ 70.01 34.15 0.0026
(10.11) (5.645)  
Physical impairment subscale 11.5 5 0.1147
(12.75) (3.5)  
Feel good subscale 9.295 4.29 0.0203
(2.86) (1.43)  
Work missed subscale 52 26 0.0026
(15.5) (3.5)  
Number of tender point 14 14 0.8897
(2) (3.5)  
Tender point counts 32.5 25 0.0366
(7.75) (5.5)  
Fatigue subscale (BFI) 59.5 30 0.0095
(17.5) (17.5)  
Depression subscale (BDI) 40 30 0.0254
(13.75) (6.25)  

All the values are described as median (interquartile range), Group A: (FIQ≥40), Group B: (FIQ<40), FMS: fibromyalgia syndrome, FIQ: fibromyalgia impact questionnaire, ∗p<0.05 vs. group B

Table 3.
Parameters of the 2-dimensional echocardiography between the FMS patients and the controls
  Group A (n=20) Group B (n=10) Control (n=20)
LVEDd (mm) 45.45 (4.875) 44.2 (1.85) 45.34 (3.125)
FS 35.5 (4) 35 (1.75) 34.5 (3.5)
EF (%) 65 (5) 65 (1.75) 67 (3)
RWT 0.42 (0.065) 0.42 (0.035) 0.41 (0.04)
LVMI (g/m2) 97.5 (23.75) 90 (11.5) 92.5 (15.25)
LAD (mm) 37.8 (2.9) 34.8 (0.9) 36.8 (1.8)

All the values are described as medians (interquartile range), Group A: (FIQ≥40), Group B: (FIQ<40), FMS: fibromyalgia syndrome, LVEDd: left ventricular end diastolic dimension, FS: fractional shortening, EF: ejection fraction, RWT: relative wall thickness, LVMI: left ventricular mass index, LAD: left atrial dimension, ∗p<0.05 vs. group B, ∗∗p<0.05 vs. control

Table 4.
Parameters of the mitral inflow pattern and strain between the FMS patients
  Group A (n=20) Group B (n=10) Control (n=20)
E velocity (cm/sec) 75 (20) 72 (19.5) 74 (14.5)
A velocity (cm/sec) 68.5 (10.75) 68 (9.75) 68 (12.5)
E/Ea 8.15 (1.97) 8.66 (1.365) 8.05 (2.13)
Peak systolic strain, LAX (%) –18.65 (4.2),∗∗ –23.5 (2.975) –22.5 (3.125)
Peak systolic strain, A4C (%) –19 (2.925),∗∗ –23.2 (1.575) –23.5 (1.225)
Peak early diastoic strain, A2C (%) –18.75 (3.6),∗∗ –23 (1.375) –24 (2.8)
Global LV strain (%) –18.8 (3.45),∗∗ –23.2 (2.125) –23.5 (1.875)

All the values are described as medians (interquartile range), Group A: (FIQ≥40), Group B: (FIQ<40): FMS: fibromyalgia syndrome, E: peak early velocity, A: peak atrial velocity, Ea: early diastolic mitral annular velocity, LAX: apical long axis view, A4C: apical 4-chamber view, A2C: apical 2-chamber view,

p<0.05 vs. group B,

∗∗ p<0.05 vs. control

Table 5.
Correlation analysis of the parameters between the patients with FMS; Spearman's correlation coefficient (r)
Global LV strain of patients with FMS
  r p
FIQ score 0.59900∗∗ 0.0016
Physical score 0.47016 0.0177
Feel score 0.57395∗∗ 0.0027
Work miss 0.40389 0.0453
Number of tender point 0.05635 0.7890
Depression (BDI) 0.28197 0.1721
Fatigue (BFI) 0.46102 0.0204
E/Ea 0.32338 0.1148

FMS: fibromyalgia syndrome, BDI: beck depression inventory, BFI: brief fatigue inventory, FIQ: fibromyalgia impact questionnaire, E: peak early velocity, Ea: early diastolic mitral annular velocity,

p<0.05,

∗∗ p<0.01

TOOLS
Similar articles