Journal List > J Korean Acad Nurs > v.47(6) > 1003289

Kang, Kim, Kim, Jeong, and Han: Factors Affecting Early School-Age Children's Subjective Happiness: Using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model of Parental Variables

Abstract

Purpose

The present study is a descriptive cross-sectional study of cause-and-effect relationship, which used the 7th year data of the Panel Study on Korean Children, to investigate the effects of parenting stress, depression, and family interactions of the parents of early school-age children on children's subjective happiness.

Methods

The present study included data of 1419 pairs of parents who participated in the mother and father survey of the Panel Study on Korean Children. The effects of parenting stress, depression, and parental family interactions on children's subjective happiness were analyzed as actor and partner effects using path analysis.

Results

Parenting stress had an actor effect on depression; maternal parenting stress (b=-.21, p<.001) and depression (b=-.30, p<.001) had an actor effect on maternal family interaction; and paternal parenting stress (b=-.18, p<.001) and depression (b=-.17, p<.001) had a partner effect on maternal family interaction. Paternal parenting stress was found to have an actor effect on paternal family interaction (b=-.30, p<.001), and parental depression was found to have actor effect (b=-.23, p<.001) and maternal depression had a partner effect on paternal family interactions (b=-.22, p<.001). Children's subjective happiness was found to have a statistically significant relationship with maternal family interaction (b=.40, p<.001).

Conclusion

The significance of the study is in its provision of basic data for adjusting parents’ family interactions that are closely related to the growth and development of children by confirming the effect of parents’ parenting stress, depression, and family interaction on children's subjective happiness.

References

1. Choi HY, Shin HY, Choi MS, Cho SY. Development of a happiness scale for school-aged Korean children (HSSKC). Journal of the Korean Home Management Association. 2009; 27(5):1–11.
2. Vitrano C. The structure of happiness [dissertation]. New York: The City University of New York;2006. p. 1–210.
3. Youm YS. 2016 8th international comparative research on children and adolescents' happiness. Seoul: The Korea Bang Jeong-hwan Foundation;2016. p. 11.
4. Bae JA, Do HS, Park BK, Kim MJ. The effects of attachment and shared time between mother and child and self-esteem on subjective well-being in late childhood. Korean Journal of Child Studies. 2016; 37(2):111–125. https://doi.org/10.5723/kjcs.2016.37.2.111.
crossref
5. Jeong HS, Kim YH. Determinants of happiness perceived by school children: Focusing of psychological characteristics, social activity, and relationship factors. Korean Journal of Youth Studies. 2014; 21(7):89–118.
6. Kim MY, Park MS. Interaction effects of social determinants affecting school-aged children’s health. Family and Environment Research. 2016; 54(5):515–527. https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2016.040.
crossref
7. Jung ES, Cho HI. The effects of parental care and overprotection on subjective well-being and depression: The roles of hardiness as mediators. Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2009; 21(1):209–227.
8. Hwang YJ, Min HY. The effect of parental attachment on school adjustment perceived by school-age children: Self-perceived competence as a mediating variable. Journal of the Korean Home Management Association. 2012; 30(2):65–73. https://doi.org/10.7466/JKHMA.2012.30.2.065.
crossref
9. Kim JH, Shin HY. The effect of maternal parenting stress, peer relationship and teacher-student relationship on children's daily hassles. Journal of Life-Span Studies. 2015; 5(3):1–15.
10. Deater-Deckard K. Parenting stress and child adjustment: Some old hypotheses and new questions. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 1998; 5(3):314–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.1998.tb00152.x.
crossref
11. Gerdes AC, Hoza B, Arnold LE, Pelham WE, Swanson JM, Wigal T, et al. Maternal depressive symptomatology and parenting behavior: Exploration of possible mediators. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2007; 35(5):705–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9134-3.
crossref
12. Huang CY, Costeines J, Ayala C, Kaufman JS. Parenting stress, social support, and depression for ethnic minority adolescent mothers: Impact on child development. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2014; 23(2):255–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9807-1.
crossref
13. Kim SS, Jeong JH. The effects of parent’s life satisfaction and depression on the children’ suicidal ideation. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2016; 16(2):257–267. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.02.257.
crossref
14. Choi HS, Yoon HO, Yeon EM. The longitudinal mediation effects of mothers’ positive parenting attitude and depression in the influence of mothers’ parenting stress to infants’ emotional temperament. The Korean Society for Early Childhood Teacher Education. 2015; 19(3):119–142.
15. Byeon HS, Choi JK. The associations among poor single mothers’ economic hardship, depressive symptoms, parenting stress, child abuse and neglect, and their children’s development. Journal of the Korean Society of Child Welfare. 2016; 53:1–23.
16. Abidin RR. The determinants of parenting behavior. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology. 1992; 21(4):407–412. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp2104_12.
crossref
17. Park KJ, Kwon YH. Maternal behavior during mother-child problem solving: Effect of marital satisfaction, parenting stress, and attachment security. Korean Journal of Child Studies. 2002; 23(4):53–70.
18. Cramer B. Are postpartum depressions a mother‐in-fant relationship disorder? Infant Mental Health Journal. 1993; 14(4):283–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0355. (199324)14:4<283::AID-IMHJ2280140404>3.0.CO;2-I.
crossref
19. Marchand JF, Hock E. Mothers’ and fathers’ depressive symptoms and conflict-resolution strategies in the marriage and children’s externalizing and internalizing behaviors. The Journal of Genetic Psychology. 2003; 164(2):227–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221320309597979.
crossref
20. Yeon EM, Choi HS. Actor and partner effect of infant-parents’ emotional value of children, parenting stress, and marital satisfaction. Korean Journal of Child Care and Education. 2015; 90(90):79–108.
21. Kenny, DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford;2006. p. 1–24.
22. Kim KH, Kang HK. Development of the parenting stress scale. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association. 1997; 35(5):141–150.
23. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SL, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine. 2002; 32(6):959–976. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291702006074.
crossref
24. Olson DH, Barnes H. Family communication. Minneapolis (MN): Life Innovations;2004. p. 5.
25. Lyubomirsky S, Lepper HS. A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research. 1999; 46(2):137–155. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006824100041.
26. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Education;2010. p. 1–8.
27. Choi HS, Yoon HO, Yeon EM. The relationship between the perceptive gap about paternal involvement and interactive peer play of children: Mediating effects of mother’s marital conflict, depression, and parenting attitude. Journal of Early Childhood Education. 2015; 35(1):153–174.
28. Choi HJ, Choi SN, Im HJ. The effects of mother’s parenting behavior, infant’s social and emotional behavior, and father’s participation in child care on infant’s adjustment in child care center: Structural equation approach. Korean Journal of Child Care and Education. 2013; 76(76):49–72.
29. Kim EJ, Jeon KY. The influence of perception gap of dual-income parents about paternal involvement on marital conflict: Mediating effects of maternal self-efficacy and depression. Family and Environment Research. 2016; 54(5):487–498. https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2016.038.
crossref
30. Kang BJ. The effect of family interaction, children’s peer interaction, and social force on the children’s problematic behavior. The Korean Journal of Child Education. 2010; 19(4):93–110.

Figure 1.
The path diagram for the hypothetical model.
jkan-47-854f1.tif
Table 1.
Mean Scores of the Factors
Variables Mean Standard deviation Skewness Kurtosis
Mothers’ parenting stress 2.57 0.61 0.14 0.15
Fathers’ parenting stress 2.31 0.74 0.04 0.22
Mothers’ depression 1.92 0.53 0.73 0.44
Fathers’ depression 1.87 0.60 1.00 1.55
Maternal family interaction 3.78 0.74 0.82 1.44
Paternal family interaction 3.81 0.52 0.59 1.28
Happiness of children 3.64 0.55 1.01 1.59
Table 2.
Correlation Coefficients among Variables (N=1,419 dyads)
Variables X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7
X1: Mothers’ parenting stress 1
X2: Fathers’ parenting stress .37* 1
X3: Mothers’ depression .56* .30* 1
X4: Fathers’ depression .23* .51* .38* 1
X5: Maternal family interaction −.41* −.38* −.45* −.37* 1
X6: Paternal family interaction −.37* −.46* −.32* −.43* .56* 1
X7: Happiness of children −.24* −.27* −.21* −.27* .40* .32* 1

M=Mean; SD=Standard deviation.

*p<.05.

Table 3.
Estimates of Variables for the Hypothetical Model (N=1,419 dyads)
Independent variables Dependent variables β B S.E C.R p
Mothers’ parenting stress Mothers’ depression .56 .67 .02 25.45 <.001
Fathers’ parenting stress Fathers’ depression .51 .62 .02 22.02 <.001
Mothers’ parenting stress Maternal family interaction −.21 −.18 .02 −7.19 <.001
Fathers’ parenting stress Maternal family interaction −.18 −.17 .02 −3.03 <.001
Mothers’ depression Maternal family interaction −.30 −.20 .02 −9.72 <.001
Fathers’ depression Maternal family interaction −.17 −.15 .02 −2.75 <.001
Mothers’ parenting stress Paternal family interaction −.14 −.13 .02 −1.55 .120
Fathers’ parenting stress Paternal family interaction −.30 −.25 .02 −10.77 <.001
Mothers’ depression Paternal family interaction −.22 −.18 .02 −4.24 <.001
Fathers’ depression Paternal family interaction −.23 −.16 .02 −8.34 <.001
Maternal family interaction Happiness of children .40 .41 .03 13.41 <.001
Paternal family interaction Happiness of children .10 .10 .03 −0.32 .746

CR=Critical ratio, S.E=Standard error.

Table 4.
Standardized Direct, Indirect and Total Effect of the Model (N=1,419 dyads)
Independent variables Dependent variables Direct effect (p) Indirect effect (p) Total effect (p)
Mothers’ parenting stress Maternal family interaction −.21 (<.001) −.16 (.010) −.37 (.010)
Fathers’ parenting stress Maternal family interaction −.18 (<.001) −.14 (.010) −.32 (.010)
Mothers’ depression Maternal family interaction −.30 (<.001) −.30 (<.001)
Fathers’ depression Maternal family interaction −.17 (<.001) −.17 (<.001)
Mothers’ parenting stress Paternal family interaction −.14 (.120) −.17 (.010) −.31 (.010)
Fathers’ parenting stress Paternal family interaction −.30 (<.001) −.12 (.010) −.42 (.010)
Mothers’ depression Paternal family interaction −.22 (<.001) −.22 (<.001)
Fathers’ depression Paternal family interaction −.23 (<.001) −.23 (<.001)
Mothers’ parenting stress Happiness of children −.24 (.010) −.24 (.010)
Fathers’ parenting stress Happiness of children −.14 (.015) −.14 (.015)
Mothers’ depression Happiness of children −.21 (.010) −.21 (.010)
Fathers’ depression Happiness of children −.03 (.070) −.03 (.070)
Maternal family interaction Happiness of children .40 (<.001) .40 (<.001)
Paternal family interaction Happiness of children .10 (.746) .10 (.746)
TOOLS
Similar articles