Abstract
Purpose
In this study an examination was done of the effect of self-efficacy promoting vestibular rehabilitation (S-VR) on dizziness, exercise selfefficacy, adherence to vestibular rehabilitation (VR), subjective and objective vestibular function, vestibular compensation and the recurrence of dizziness in patients with vestibular hypofunction.
Methods
This was a randomized controlled study. Data were collected 3 times at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks after beginning the intervention. Outcome measures were level of dizziness, exercise self-efficacy, and level of adherence to VR. Subjective and objective vestibular function, vestibular compensation and the recurrence of dizziness were also obtained. Data were analyzed using Windows SPSS 21.0 program.
Results
After 4 weeks of S-VR, there was no difference between the groups for dizziness, subjective and objective vestibular functions. However, exercise self-efficacy and adherence to VR were higher in the experimental group than in the control group. After 8 weeks of S-VR, dizziness (p =.018) exercise self-efficacy (p <.001), adherence to VR (p <.001), total-dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) (p =.012), vision analysis ratio (p =.046) in the experimental group differ significantly from that of the control group. The number of patients with recurring dizziness were higher in the control group than in the experimental group (p <.001).
Conclusion
The results indicate that continuous 8 weeks of S-VR is effective in reducing dizziness, and improving exercise self-efficacy, subjective vestibular function and adherence to VR. Objective vestibular function and vestibular compensation were also improved in the experimental group at the end of 8 weeks of S-VR.
Figures and Tables
Table 4
*Fisher's exact test; Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group; DHI=dizziness handicap inventory; DHI-E=dizziness handicap inventory-emotion; DHI-F=dizziness handicap inventory function, DHI-P=dizziness handicap inventory-physical; VOR=vestibular ocular reflex; VIS=vision; SOM=somatosensory; VEST=vestibular; T0=pre test; T1=after 4 weeks of intervention; T2=after 8 weeks of intervention.
Notes
References
1. Brevern M, Neuhauser H. Epidemiological evidence for a link between vertigo and migraine. J Vestib Res. 2011; 21(6):299–304. DOI: 10.3233/ves-2011-0423.
2. Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. Cause of dizziness [Internet]. Wonju: Author;2013. cited 2015 MAR 10. Available from: http://www.hira.or.kr/dummy.do?pgmid=HIRAA020041000000&cmsurl=/cms/notice/02/1214308_13390.html.
3. Oh SY. Diagnosis and treatment of chronic dizziness. Res Vestib Sci. 2010; 9:Suppl 1. S65–S71.
4. Sun DQ, Ward BK, Semenov YR, Carey JP, Della Santina CC. Bilateral vestibular deficiency: Quality of life and economic implications. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014; 140(6):527–534. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.490.
5. Kim JI. Diagnosis and treatment of chronic dizziness. J Korean Bal Soc. 2007; 6(1):93–99.
6. McDonnell MN, Hillier SL. Vestibular rehabilitation for unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 1:CD005397. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005397.pub4.
7. Kao CL, Chen LK, Chern CM, Hsu LC, Chen CC, Hwang SJ. Rehabilitation outcome in home-based versus supervised exercise programs for chronically dizzy patients. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2010; 51(3):264–267. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2009.11.014.
8. Lee DJ, Rhee CK, Suh MW. Rehabilitation of vestibular hypofunction. Res Vestib Sci. 2011; 10:Suppl 1. S32–S37.
9. Balci BD, Akdal G, Yaka E, Angin S. Vestibular rehabilitation in acute central vestibulopathy: A randomized controlled trial. J Vestib Res. 2013; 23(4-5):259–267. DOI: 10.3233/ves-130491.
10. Lee HJ, Choi-Kwon S. Factors influencing adherence to vestibular rehabilitation exercise program in patients with dizziness. Korean J Adult Nurs. 2014; 26(4):434–443. DOI: 10.7475/kjan.2014.26.4.434.
11. Yang JS. Effect of vestibular rehabilitation therapy in peripheral vestibular dysfunction [master's thesis]. Chuncheon: Hallym University;2007. 1–70.
12. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman;1997. p. 1–604.
13. Hamid MA. Vestibular rehabilitation. Adv Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 1992; 6:27–36.
14. Rhee CK. Vestibular rehabilitation. Audiology. 2010; 6(1):1–9.
15. Toupet M, Ferrary E, Grayeli AB. Visual analog scale to assess vertigo and dizziness after repositioning maneuvers for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. J Vestib Res. 2011; 21(4):235–241. DOI: 10.3233/ves-2011-0420.
16. Kim HH. The relationship between the therapeutic exercise practice, health beliefs and self-efficacy in patients with restricted shoulder range of motion [master's thesis]. Seoul: Yonsei University;2007. 1–58.
17. Jacobson GP, Newman CW. The development of the dizziness handicap inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990; 116(4):424–427. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1990.01870040046011.
18. Han GC, Lee EJ, Lee JH, Park SN, Lee HY, Jeon EJ, et al. The study of standardization for a Korean adaptation of self-report measures of dizziness. J Korean Bal Soc. 2004; 3(2):307–325.
19. Kim DH, Lee JH, Kim BJ, Rhee CK, Jung JY. Analysis of clinical features in patients showing bilateral vestibulopathy with vestibular function test. Res Vestib Sci. 2014; 13(2):47–52.
20. Song SH, Park UY. The effects of figure skating training on equilibrium sensory organization and vestibular-ocular reflex. Exerc Sci. 2013; 22(4):319–327.
21. Murray K, Carroll S, Hill K. Relationship between change in balance and self-reported handicap after vestibular rehabilitation therapy. Physiother Res Int. 2001; 6(4):251–263. DOI: 10.1002/pri.232.