Abstract
Methods
For data, 1099 articles were collected, with 365 keywords as a Noun phrase extracted from the articles and standardized for analyzing. Co-occurrence matrix were generated via a cosine similarity measure, and then the network analysis and visualization using PFNet and NodeXL were applied to visualize intellectual interchanges among keywords.
Results
According to the result of the content analysis and the cluster analysis of author keywords from cancer survivors articles, keywords such as 'quality of life', 'breast neoplasms', 'cancer survivors', 'neoplasms', 'exercise' had a high degree centrality. The 9 most important research topics concerning cancer survivors were 'cancer-related symptoms and nursing', 'cancer treatment-related issues', 'late effects', 'psychosocial issues', 'healthy living managements', 'social supports', 'palliative cares', 'research methodology', and 'research participants'.
Conclusion
Through this study, the knowledge structure of cancer survivors was identified. The 9 topics identified in this study can provide useful research direction for the development of nursing in cancer survivor research areas. The Network analysis used in this study will be useful for identifying the knowledge structure and identifying general views and current cancer survivor research trends.
Figures and Tables
References
1. Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Oh CM, Cho H, Lee DH, et al. Cancer statistics in Korea: Incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2012. Cancer Res Treat. 2015; 47(2):127–141. DOI: 10.4143/crt.2015.060.
2. Seo HG, Park JH. Cancer survivorship. Goyang: National Cancer Center;2013.
3. Lee JE, Shin DW, Cho BL. The current status of cancer survivorship care and a consideration of appropriate care model in Korea. Korean J Clin Oncol. 2014; 10(2):58–62. DOI: 10.14216/kjco.14012.
4. Kim SH. Understanding cancer survivorship and its new perspectives. J Korean Oncol Nurs. 2010; 10(1):19–29.
5. Molassiotis A, Gibson F, Kelly D, Richardson A, Dabbour R, Ahmad AM, et al. A systematic review of worldwide cancer nursing research: 1994 to 2003. Cancer Nurs. 2006; 29(6):431–440. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.10.020.
6. López-Illescas C, de Moya-Anegó F, Moed HF. The actual citation impact of European oncological research. Eur J Cancer. 2008; 44(2):228–236. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.10.020.
7. Lim SO, Hong EY. An integrative review and meta-analysis of oncology nursing research: 1985-1997.2. J Nurs Acad Soc. 1997; 27(4):857–870.
8. Choi SH, Nam YH, Ryu EJ, Baek MW, Suh DH, Suh SR, et al. An integrative review of oncology nursing research: 1980-1998. J Korean Acad Nurs. 1998; 28(3):786–800.
9. Oh PJ. An integrative review of oncology nursing research In Korea:1998-2003. J Korean Oncol Nurs. 2003; 3(2):112–121.
10. Oh PJ. An integrative review of oncology nursing research in Korea: 2003-2008. J Korean Oncol Nurs. 2010; 10(1):80–87.
11. Lee EH, Park HB, Kim MW, Kang S, Lee HJ, Lee WH, et al. Analyses of the studies on cancer-related quality of life published in Korea. J Korean Soc Ther Radiol Oncol. 2002; 20(4):359–366.
12. Hong MS, Yom YH, Kim GM. The analysis of trends and contents of nursing intervention research for cancer patients in Korea. Asian Oncol Nurs. 2012; 12(4):247–256. DOI: 10.5388/aon.2012.12.4.247.
13. Sohn SK, Han YI, Kim KH, Youn SJ. Analysis of cancer nursing research in digestive system in Korea. J Korean Oncol Nurs. 2005; 5(1):52–62.
14. Choi KS, Kim MS, Lee IJ, Han SY, Park JA, Lee J. Analysis of nursing intervention studies on patients with breast cancer in Korea. J Korean Oncol Nurs. 2011; 11(1):74–82. DOI: 10.5388/jkon.2011.11.1.74.
15. Kim H, Ban JY, Yoon JY, Na YH, Jeon JY, Yeo SM, et al. Analysis of research on the nursing of hematology in Korea. J Korean Oncol Nurs. 2010; 10(2):146–155. DOI: 10.5388/jkon.2010.10.2.146.
16. Small H. Visualizing science by citation mapping. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1999; 50(9):799–813. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(1999)50:9<799::aidasi9>3.3.co;2-7.
17. He Q. Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Libr Trends. 1999; 48(1):133–159.
18. Kwon SY. A study on the factors influencing semantic relation in building a structured glossary. J Korean Libr Inf Sci Soc. 2014; 48(2):353–378. DOI: 10.4275/kslis.2014.48.2.353.
19. Sohn DK. General and analysis of the research network for colorectal neoplasms [dissertation]. Cheongju: Chungbuk National University;2011.
20. Jang HL, Kang GW, Lee EJ, Kim SR, Lee YS. Analysis of research subject network in the field of oncogene. J Korea Technol Innov Soc. 2012; 15(2):369–399.
21. Lee HS. The social network analysis for research of the cancer patients' health-related quality of life [dissertation]. Seoul: Chung-Ang University;2014.
22. Chung BY, Yi MS, Choi EH. Trends of nursing research in the journal of oncology nursing. J Korean Oncol Nurs. 2008; 8(1):61–66.
23. Kim SJ, Kim KB, Yi MS, Lee KJ, Ahn YH, Kim HS, et al. The trends of nursing research in the journals of seven branches of the Korean academy of nursing. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2002; 32(1):114–130.
24. Bae YM, Kim YA, Hong SH, Koo JH, Yun YH. Public attitudes toward development of national program for cancer survivorship. Korean J Hosp Palliat Care. 2011; 14(4):218–226.
25. Korean Breast Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts & figures 2014. Seoul: Author;2014.
26. Byun HS, Park HJ, Kim JY. A conceptual analysis of cancer survivorship. Asian Oncol Nurs. 2012; 12(3):237–245. DOI: 10.5388/aon.2012.12.3.237.
27. Hahm BJ, Shim EJ, Kim HK, Kim JH. History and current status of psycho-oncology. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2007; 46(5):413–420.
28. Jacobsen PB, Jim HS. Psychosocial interventions for anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients: Achievements and challenges. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008; 58(4):214–230. DOI: 10.3322/ca.2008.0003.
29. Lee IJ. A systematic review of posttraumatic growth in cancer. Soc Work Pract Res. 2009; 6:81–113.