Journal List > J Korean Acad Nurs > v.44(6) > 1003031

TOOLS
Shin, Oh, Youn, and Shin: Effect of School-based Peer Leader Centered Smoking Prevention Program
Original Article

Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2014; 44(6): 649-659.

Published online: 31 December 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2014.44.6.649

Effect of School-based Peer Leader Centered Smoking Prevention Program

Sung Rae Shin1, Pok Ja Oh1, Hye Kyung Youn2, Sun Hwa Shin3

1Department of Nursing, Sahmyook University, Seoul, Korea.

2Graduate School of Health Science & Social Welfare, Sahmyook University, Seoul, Korea.

3Graduate School of Division of Nursing Science, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.

Address reprint requests to: Shin, Sun Hwa. Department of Nursing, Sahmyook University, 815 Hwarang-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 139-742, Korea. Tel: +82-2-3399-1593, Fax: +82-2-3399-1594, ffssh@hanmail.net

Received 10 June 2014       Revised 30 June 2014       Accepted 17 October 2014

© 2014 Korean Society of Nursing Science

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs License. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) If the original work is properly cited and retained without any modification or reproduction, it can be used and re-distributed in any format and medium.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a school-based peer leader centered smoking prevention program.

Methods

Non-equivalent control group with a pre/post-test design was used. Students (n=174) in two boys' junior high schools located in D city, Korea participated with 85 being selected for the experimental group and 89 for the control group. Five sessions were given to the experimental group and a 50 minute lecture to the control group. Knowledge, attitude, non-smoking intention, and non-smoking efficacy were measured for the both experimental and control group at two weeks before the program and one month after the program was completed. Data were analyzed using χ2-test, Fisher's exact test, independent t-test and paired t-test with the SPSS 21.0 program.

Results

The experimental group showed higher overall knowledge, negative attitude toward smoking, and higher non-smoking intention and efficacy. After receiving the school based peer leader centered smoking prevention program scores for attitude toward smoking and non-smoking efficacy increased in the experimental group were higher than in the control group.

Conclusion

The school-based peer leader centered smoking prevention program needs longitudinal evaluation, but from this study, there is an indication that this program can be used with junior high school students and effectively change students' attitude toward smoking and promote non-smoking efficacy.

Keywords: Smoking, Program development, Adolescent, Peer group

Figures and Tables

Table 1
Research Design
jkan-44-649-i001

O1=General characteristics, knowledge of smoking, attitude toward smoking, non-smoking intention, non-smoking efficacy; X1=School based peer leader centered smoking prevention program; X2=Lecture on smoking prevention for 50 minutes; O2=Knowledge of smoking, attitude toward smoking, non-smoking intention, non-smoking efficacy.

Table 2
School based Peer Leader Centered Smoking Prevention Program
jkan-44-649-i002
Table 3
Homogeneity Test between Experimental and Control Group (N=174)
jkan-44-649-i003

*Fisher's exact test; Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group.

Table 4
Baseline Outcome Measures between Experimental and Control Group (N=174)
jkan-44-649-i004

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group.

Table 5
Differences of Variables between Experimental and Control Group (N=174)
jkan-44-649-i005

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group.

Notes

This study was supported by Sahmyook University Research Fund in 2014.

References

1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: A report of the surgeon general, 2012. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health;2012.
2. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Community health survey, 2012 [Internet]. Chungcheongbuk-do: Author;2013. cited 2013 August 24. Available from: http://www.cdc.go.kr/CDC/intro/CdcKrIntro0201.jsp?menuIds=HOME001-MNU0005-MNU0011&cid=20522.
3. Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The 2012 Korean youth risk behavior web-based survey [Internet]. Chungcheongbuk-do: Ministry of Education and Science Technology, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;2012. cited 2013 July 22. Available from: http://stat.mw.go.kr/front/statData/publicationView.jsp?bbsSeq=13&nttSeq=20652&menuId=47.
4. Park E. School-based smoking prevention programs for adolescents in South Korea: A systematic review. Health Educ Res. 2006; 21(3):407–415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/her/cyl038.
5. Dobbins M, DeCorby K, Manske S, Goldblatt E. Effective practices for school-based tobacco use prevention. Prev Med. 2008; 46(4):289–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.10.003.
6. Botvin GJ. Life skills training: Promoting health and personal development level 2. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Health Press;2000.
7. Sussman S, Dent CW, Stacy AW, Sun P, Craig S, Simon TR, et al. Project towards no tobacco use: 1-year behavior outcomes. Am J Public Health. 1993; 83(9):1245–1250.
8. Sussman S, Miyano J, Rohrbach LA, Dent CW, Sun P. Six-month and one-year effects of project EX-4: A classroom-based smoking prevention and cessation intervention program. Addict Behav. 2007; 32(12):3005–3014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.06.016.
9. Park SW, Lee JY, Park JH. Evaluation of the effects of a smoking prevention program for Korean high school students. J Korean Soc Health Educ Promot. 2004; 21(1):153–170.
10. Bosi S, Gorini G, Tamelli M, Monti C, Storani S, Carreras G, et al. A school-based peer-led smoking prevention intervention with extracurricular activities: The LILT-LdP cluster randomized controlled trial design and study population. Tumori. 2013; 99(5):572–577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1700/1377.15304.
11. Kim Y, Park I, Park JS. Meta-analysis of effects on adolescent smoking cessation programs in Korea. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2008; 38(2):204–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2008.38.2.204.
12. Chun JS, Kim J. A review of research on smoking prevention and cessation programs for adolescents. J Adolesc Welf. 2014; 16(1):305–326.
13. Kim IH. The effect of smoking prevention program on changing the knowledge and attitude about smoking behavior of middle school boy's. J Korean Community Nurs. 2003; 14(2):242–252.
14. Kim YS, Jeong BR. An analysis of articles related to smoking and smoking cessation of Korean adolescents. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2010; 21(1):53–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2010.21.1.53.
15. Kim HO. A study on the smoking related social influence, refusal skill and nonsmoking related self-efficacy among adolescents. Korean J Child Health Nurs. 2003; 9(3):237–249.
16. Maxwell KA. Friends: The role of peer influence across adolescent risk behaviors. J Youth Adolesc. 2002; 31(4):267–277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015493316865.
17. Kremers SP, Mudde AN, de Vries H. Subtypes within the precontemplation stage of adolescent smoking acquisition. Addict Behav. 2001; 26(2):237–251.
18. Jee YO. Testing the theory of planned behavior in the prediction of smoking cessation behavior among military smokers [dissertation]. Seoul: Yonsei University;1994.
19. Plummer BA, Velicer WF, Redding CA, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS, Pallonen UE, et al. Stage of change, decisional balance, and temptations for smoking: measurement and validation in a large, school-based population of adolescents. Addict Behav. 2001; 26(4):551–571.
20. Sohn EJ. The comparison of family environment, smoking experience and psychosocial characteristics of middle school student [master's thesis]. Seoul: Sahmyook University;2006.
21. Paek KS. The effects of smoking prevention education on the smoking cessation intention and knowledge and attitude toward smoking among male middle school students. J Korean Community Nurs. 2005; 16(1):32–39.
22. Ewles L, Simnett I. Promoting health: A practical guide. 5th ed. London, UK: Ballierre Tindall;2009.
23. Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. Nico free school project. Seoul: Korean Association on Smoking and Health;2007.
24. Choi YM. The effect of the educational program based upon experiment to prevent smoking in middle school students [master's thesis]. Seoul: Kyung Hee University;2004.
25. Park IH, Park JS, Kim YK. Meta-analysis of effects on smoking prevention programs for the adolescent in Korea. J Korean Soc Health Educ Promot. 2006; 23(3):1–16.
26. Vartiainen E, Pennanen M, Haukkala A, Dijk F, Lehtovuori R, De Vries H. The effects of a three-year smoking prevention programme in secondary schools in Helsinki. Eur J Public Health. 2007; 17(3):249–256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckl107.
27. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall;1980.
28. Shin SR, Jeong GC. Predictive variables on intention to stay as a nonsmoker based on educational environment related factors. Health Soc Sci. 2007; 21:5–24.
29. Oh H, Jeong H, Seo W. Integrative smoking cessation stage model for Chinese students studying in Korea. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2013; 7(4):182–190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2013.09.001.
30. Shin SR, Shin SH, Lee BK, Yang JH. Influence of experiences of witnessing tobacco advertising and preferences of tobacco companies' social responsibility on current and future smoking intentions in adolescents. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2014; 25(1):33–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2014.25.1.33.
TOOLS
Similar articles