Journal List > J Korean Acad Nurs > v.43(5) > 1002950

Oh and Han: Meta- analysis of Psychosocial Interventions to Reduce Pain in Patients with Cancer

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of psychosocial interventions on pain in cancer patients.

Methods

Eight studies published between 1980 and 2012 in Korean and ten studies published between 2002 and 2012 in English met the inclusion criteria with a total of 1539 participants. Methodological quality assessed by Cochrane's Risk of Bias for randomized studies and Risk of Bias Assessment tool for non randomized studies. The data were analyzed by the RevMan 5.2 program of Cochrane library.

Results

Overall, study quality was moderate to high. Effect sizes were heterogeneous and subgroup analysis was done. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) were effective for pain (ES= -0.35; 95% CI= -0.56, -0.13). Pain education studies measured with NRS and VAS were effective for pain (ES= -0.77; 95% CI= -1.01, -0.52). Publication bias was not detected.

Conclusion

This study support the use of psychosocial interventions administered to cancer patients for their pain management. However, more well-designed studies are needed.

References

Cohen J. 1998. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science. 2nd ed.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
crossref
Devine E C. 2003. Meta-analysis of the effect of psychoeducational interventions on pain in adults with cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum. 30(1):75–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1188/03.onf.75-89.
crossref
Egger M., Smith G D., Schneider M &., Minder C. 1997. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 315(7109):629–634.
crossref
Fawzy F I., Fawzy N W., Arndt L A &., Pasnau R O. 1995. Critical review of psychosocial interventions in cancer care. Archives of General Psychiatry. 52(2):100–113.
crossref
Galway K., Black A., Cantwell M., Cardwell C R., Mills M &., Donnelly M. 2012. Psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life and emotional wellbeing for recently diagnosed cancer patients. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 11:CD007064. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1465 1858.CD007064.pub2.
crossref
Golden R N. 2004. Making advances where it matters: Improving outcomes in mood and anxiety disorders. CNS Spectrums. 9(6 Suppl 4):14–22.
crossref
Gorin S S., Krebs P., Badr H., Janke E A., Jim H S., Spring B. . 2012. Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions to reduce pain in patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 30(5):539–547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2011.37.0437.
Higgins J P., Thompson S G., Deeks J J &., Altman D G. 2003. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 327(7414):557–560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.
crossref
Hodges L J., Walker J., Kleiboer A M., Ramirez A J., Richardson A., Ve-likova G. . 2011. What is a psychological intervention? A metareview and practical proposal. Psycho-Oncology. 20(5):p. 470–478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.1780.
crossref
Jang S Y &., Park J S. 2011. The meta-analysis of the effect of acupressure for nausea and vomiting in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Journal of Korean Oncology Nursing. 11(2):116–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.5388/jkon.2011.11.2.116.
crossref
Jassim G A., Whitford D L &., Grey I M. 2010. Psychological interventions for women with non-metastatic breast cancer (Protocol). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 10:CD008729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008729.
Kim J N &., I R. 2008. A review of research on the psychosocial interventions for the cancer patients. The Korean Journal of Psychology. 13(2):329–357.
Kim M Y &., Oh P J. 2011. Meta-analysis of the effectiveness on foot-re-flexo-massage for cancer patients. Journal of Korean Oncology Nursing. 11(2):127–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.5388/jkon.2011.11.2.127.
crossref
Kim S Y., Park J E., Seo H J., Seo H S., Song H J., Shin C M. . 2011. NECA's guidance for undertaking systematic reviews and meta-analyses for intervention. Seoul: National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency.
Kim Y H., Kwon I K., Kim J H., Seol M E., Jun M H., Ham Y H. . 2011. ). Cancer symptom management. Seoul: Hyunmoonsa.
Korean Society Pharmacoepidemiology and Risk Management. 2011. Pharmacoepidemiology. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.
Kwon I G. 2004, June 1. Psychosocial care for pain in cancer patients. Paper presented at the Korean oncology nursing society continuing education. Spring 2004. Seoul:
Min Y C &., Oh P J. 2011. A meta-analysis of intervention studies on cancer pain. Journal of Korean Oncology Nursing. 11(1):83–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.5388/jkon.2011.11.1.83.
crossref
Montgomery G H &., Bovbjerg D H. 2004. Presurgery distress and specific response expectancies predict postsurgery outcomes in surgery patients confronting breast cancer. Health Psychology. 23(4):381–387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.23.4.381.
crossref
National Cancer Information Center. 2013. Survival rate: Five-year cancer relative survival rates. Retrieved January 30 2013, from. http://www.cancer.go.kr/mbs/cancer/subview.jsp?id=cancer_040302000000.
Oh P J &., Choi H J. 2012. The effect of patient education interventions on distress, self-care knowledge and self-care behavior of oncology patients: A meta-analysis. Asian Oncology Nursing. 12(4):257–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.5388/aon.2012.12.4.257.
crossref
Oh P J &., Kim Y H. 2012. Meta-analysis of spiritual intervention studies on biological, psychological, and spiritual outcomes. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 42(6):833–842. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2012.42.6.833.
crossref
Oh S S. 2009. Meta-analysis: Theory and practice. Seoul: Konkuk University Press.
Osborn R L., Demoncada A C &., Feuerstein M. 2006. Psychosocial interventions for depression, anxiety, and quality of life in cancer survivors: Meta-analyses. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine. 36(1):13–34.
crossref
Raingruber B. 2011. The effectiveness of psychosocial interventions with cancer patients: An integrative review of the literature (2006-2011). ISRN Nursing, 2011. 638218:http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/638218.
crossref
Ranchor A V., Fleer J., Sanderman R., van der Ploeg K M., Coyne J C &., Schroevers M. 2012. Psychological interventions for cancer survivors and cancer patients in the palliative phase (Protocol). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 1:CD009511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009511.
Rehse B &., Pukrop R. 2003. Effects of psychosocial interventions on quality of life in adult cancer patients: Meta analysis of 37 published controlled outcome studies. Patient Education and Counseling. 50(2):179–186.
crossref
Schwarzer G. 2013. Meta: Meta-analysis with R. Version 3.0-1. Retrieved March 20 2013, from. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/meta/index.html.
Sutton A J., Duval S J., Tweedie R L., Abrams K R &., Jones D R. 2000. Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 320(7249):1574–1577.
crossref
Tatrow K &., Montgomery G H. 2006. Cognitive behavioral therapy techniques for distress and pain in breast cancer patients: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 29(1):17–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-005-9036-1.
crossref

Figure 1.
Flow of studies included from database search.
jkan-43-658f1.tif
Figure 2.
Forest plot of effect size and 95% CI by cognitive behavioral therapy on pain & funnel plot of effective sizes by standard error for pain.
jkan-43-658f2.tif
Figure 3.
Forest plot of effect size and 95% CI by education interventions on pain & funnel plot of effective sizes by standard error for pain.
jkan-43-658f3.tif
Figure 4.
Forest plot of effect size and 95% CI by psychosocial intervention on pain & funnel plot of effective sizes by standard error for pain.
jkan-43-658f4.tif
Table 1.
Characteristics of Included Studies (N=18)
References Sources Designs Subjects (stage/analgesic) Sample sizes Interventions Outcomes (Timing of measurement) Scale Direction of effect
Exp. (n) Cont. (n) Name/type Weeks/Number of Sessions/Min
Bordeleau (2003)* Journal (non-nursing) RCT Metastatic breast cancer (unclear/unclear) 80 36 Supportive-expressive therapy/ group 48/48/90 Pain severity (4,8,12 min) Symptom subscales of EORTC QLQ-C30 No diff.
Chujo et al. (2005) Journal (non-nursing) ) NRCCT Breast cancer patient (recurrence/unclear) ) 19 9 Psychosocial group intervention/ group 6/6/90 Pain severity (immediately, 3,6 min) EORTC QLQ-C30/ Br23 No diff.
Dolbeaul (2009)* § Journal (non-nursing) RCT) Cancer patient (ealry/unclear) 81 87 Psycho-educational group/group 8/8/120 Pain severity (immediately) EORTC QLQ-Br23
Goung (2003) # Master's (nursing) NRCCT Stomach cancer (terminal/narcotics) 32 32 Pain control education/ individual 1/1/30-40 Worst/Least/mean/ present pain (1 wk) BPI-K −/No diff./ -/No diff.
Hong (2010) # Master's (nursing) NRCCT Colon cancer patient (unclear/PCA) 21 21 Recovery nursing intervention/ individual 4/4/30-40 Pain severity (immediately) NRS
Jeong (2011) # Master's (psychology) NRCCT Cancer patient (unclear/no 8 8 MBSR/group 8/8/90 Pain severity (immediately) PPI/VAS −/-
analgesics)
Kim (2009) ** Master's (nursing) NRCCT Cancer patients (3,4/narcotics) 23 23 Pain management education/group unclear/9/30 Analgesic use/ pain severity(1 wk) BPI-K/NRS +/-
Kroenke et al. (2010)ठJournal (non-nursing) ) RCT ( Cancer patient (unclear/analgesics) ) 137 137 Telecare management 12/3/ unclear(phone) Pain severity (1,3,6,12 min) BPI
Kwon, Whang, & Kim (2002) ** Journal (nursing) NRCCT Home cancer patient (terminal/unclear) 16 16 Pain management education/ individual 1/1/30 Pain severity (2-3 wks) Patients Outcome Questionnaire
Lai et al. (2004)§ Journal (nursing) RCT Cancer patient (2-4/unclear) 15 15 Brief pain education/group 1/5/10-15 Pain severity (immediately) BPI-T
Lee (2008) ** Master's (nursing) NRCCT Gastric Cancer Patient (unclear/PCA) 40 40 Structured PCA education/ individual 1/1/20 Analgesic use/ pain severity (1 wk) VAS
Lengacher et al. (2010) Journal (nursing) RCT Breast cancer patient (0-4/unclear) 40 42 MBSR/group 6/6/120 Pain severity (within 2 wks) MDASI
Shin & Lee (2003) # Journal (nursing) NRCCT Cancer patient (unclear/no drug) 25 25 Cancer pain management education/ Individual unclear/unclear/ 20-30 Pain severity (2 wks) VAS No diff.
Thomas et al. (2012)* †‡ Journal (nursing) RCT Cancer patient (unclear/unclear) Coach: 64 Education: 75 : 88 Education or motivational-interviewing–based coaching/group 6/4/30(coaching, education-video) ,) Body pain (6 wks) BPI No diff.
van der Peet et al. (2009)§ Journal (nursing) RCT Cancer patient(unclear/pain score of 4 or higher) 39 n 44 Intensive nursing-based pain education program/ individual / 3/3/60-90 Pain severity (4, 8 wks) Ferrell's pain questionnaire −/No diff.
Yates et al. (2004)†§ Journal (nursing) RCT Cancer patient (unclear/unclear) 87 79 Pain management intervention/ Individual 1/2/30 Pain severity (1, 8 wks) BPI
Yildirim & Cicek (2009)§ Journal (nursing) RCT Cancer patient (unclear/unclear) 20 20 Pain education program/ individual 3&7days/ unclear/ 30-40 Present pain/worst pain/least pain (2, 4, 8 wks) MPQ/NRS −/No diff./-
Yoo (2005)¶# Doctoral (nursing) NRCCT Lung cancer patient (unclear/unclear) 30 34 Web based education program/ individual 1/1/15 / Pain severity (3 wks) NRS

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group; diff.=difference; RCT=Randomized controlled trials; NRCCT=Non-randomized controlled clinical trial; EORTC QLQ-C30=European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30; EORTC QLQ-BR23=European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Breast cancer module 23; VAS=Visual Analog Scale; NRS=Numeric Rating Scale; PPI=Present Pain Inventory; BPI-K=Korean Version of Brief Pain Inventory; PMI=Pain Management Index; BPI=Brief Pain Inventory; BPI-T=Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form Taiwanese version; MDASI=M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory; MBSR=Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction; SF-36=Short Form-36; MPQ=McGill Pain Questionnaire; BQ-r=Barrier Questionnaire-Revised; BQ-K=Barriers Questionnaire Korean version; *Allocation concealment;

Blinding(performance);

Blinding(detection);

§ Low risk of attrition;

Low risk of selection bias;

# High risk of performance bias; **Low risk of detection bias.

TOOLS
Similar articles