Journal List > J Korean Acad Nurs > v.38(5) > 1002476

Choi, Lim, Lee, and Kim: Development of Nursing Key Performance Indicators for an Intensive Care Unit by using a Balanced Scorecard

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to develop visions of nursing service, nursing strategies and key performance indicators (KPIs) for an intensive care unit (ICU) based on a Balanced Scorecard (BSC).

Methods

This study was undertaken by using methodological research. The development process consisted of four phases; the first phase was to develop the vision of nursing in ICUs. The second phase was to develop strategies according to 4 perspectives of a BSC. The third phase was to develop KPIs according to the 4 perspectives of BSC and the final phase was to combine the nursing visions, strategies and KPIs of ICUs.

Results

Two main visions of nursing service for ICUs were established. These were ‘realization of harmonized professional nursing with human respect’ and ‘recovery of health through specialized nursing’ respectively. In order to reach the aim of developing nursing visions, thirteen practical strategies and nineteen KPIs were developed by four perspectives of the BSC.

Conclusion

The results will be used as objective fundamental data to attain business outcomes for the achievement of nursing visions and strategies of ICUs.

References

American Association of Critical Care Nurses. 2005. AACN standards for establishing and sustaining healthy work environments: A journey to excellence. American Journal of Critical Care. 14:187–197.
Bak W.S. 2002. The relationship between leadership, empowerment, and nursing performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Kyunghee University;Seoul:
Chern I. P.., Jeng H.J. 2000. Translating strategy into action. Accounting Research Monthly. 183:44–73.
Choi, B. H., & Korean BSC Research Association. 2006. BSC: Strategic performance management system. Seoul: Hangook Hak-sul Jungbo Co.
Chow C. W.., Ganulin D.., Teknica O.., Haddad K.., Williamson, J. 1998. The balanced scorecard: A potent tool for energizing and focusing health care organization management. Journal of Healthcare Management. 43:263–280.
Dixon, S. 2001. What will be the costs of a quality emergency service? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 94:54–56.
Drucker P.., Eccles R. G.., Ness J. A.., Cucuzza T.., Simons R.., Dabila A., et al2007. Measuring corporate performance. Seoul: 21 Century Books.
Forgione D.A. 1997. Health care financial and quality measures: International call for a ‘‘balanced scorecard’’ approach. Journal of Health Care Finance. 24:55–58.
Griffith J. R.., King J.G. 2000. Championship management for health care organizations. Journal of Emergency Medicine Taiwan. 22:34–38.
Holt, T. 2001. Developing an activity-based management system for the army medical department. Journal of Health Care Finance. 27:41–46.
Hong Y. M.., Hwang K. J.., Kim M. J.., Park C.G. 2008. Balanced scorecard for performance measurement of a nursing organization in a Korean hospital. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 38:45–54.
crossref
Huang S. H.., Chen P. L.., Yang M. C.., Chang W. Y.., Lee H.J. 2004. Using a balanced scorecard to improve the performance of an emergency department. Nursing Economics. 22:140–146.
Jang B.H. 2000. A study on critical care nursing practice and development of standard for critical care nursing practice. Unpublished master’s thesis. Yonsei University;Seoul:
Jones M. L.., Filip S.J. 2000. Implementation and outcomes of a balanced scorecard model in women’s services in an academic health care institution. Quality Management in Health Care. 8:40–51.
crossref
Kang K.H. 2003. Development of performance measure indicators on hospital nursing units. Unpublished doctoral’s dissertation. Yonsei University;Seoul:
Kang S.S. 2005. A study on collaborating balanced scorecard with enterprise resource planning for hospital management performance evaluation. Unpublished doctoral’s dissertation. Dongguk University;Seoul:
Kaplan R. S.., Norton D.P. 1992. The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review. 70:71–79.
Kim H.J. 2006. A study on indicator development to evaluate hospital system: Based on balanced scorecard method. Unpublished master’s thesis. Yonsei University;Seoul:
Kim H. K.., Sung E.S. 2006. Strategic performance management BSC (Balanced scorecard). Seoul: Sigma Insight Com.
Kim Y.S. 2005. Development of performance measurement indicators for nursing on delivery units. Unpublished master’s thesis. Yonsei University;Seoul:
Ko Y. K.., Lee T. W.., Lim J.Y. 2007. Development of a performance measurement scale for hospital nurses. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 37:286–294.
crossref
Luttman R.J. 1998. Next generation quality, part 2: Balanced scorecards and organizational improvements. Topics in Health Information Management. 19:22–29.
Niven P.R. 2002. Balanced scorecard step by step: Maximizing and maintaining result. Seoul: Sigma Insight Com.
Oliveira, J. 2001. The balanced scorecard: An integrative approach to performance evaluation. Healthcare Financial Management. 55:42–45.
Pink G. H.., McKillop I.., Schraa E. G.., Preyra C.., Mongomery C.., Baker G.R. 2001. Creating a balanced scorecard for a hospital system. Journal of Health Care Finance. 27:1–20.
Sahney V.K. 1998. Balanced scorecard as a framework for driving performance in managed care organization. Managed Care Quarterly. 6:1–8.
Sung Y.., Song M. S.., Park, J. 2007. Estimation of nursing cost by a patient classification system(PCS) in ICU. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 37:373–380.
Voelker K. E.., Rakich J. S.., French G.R. 2001. The balanced scorecard in healthcare organization: A performance measurement and strategic planing methodology. Hospital Topics. 79.
Sung Y.., Song M. S.., Park, J. 2007. Estimation of nursing cost by a patient classification system(PCS) in ICU. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 37:373–380.
Voelker K. E.., Rakich J. S.., French G.R. 2001. The balanced scorecard in healthcare organization: A performance measurement and strategic planing methodology. Hospital Topics. 79:13–24.
Yang M. C.., Tung Y. C.2006. Using path analysis to examine causal relationships among balanced scorecard performance indicators for general hospitals: The case of a public hospital system in Taiwan. Health Care Management Review. 31:280–288.
Yoo J.I. 2001. Development of a performance measurement system for the perioperative nursing using the balanced scorecard (BSC). Unpublished maser’s thesis. Yonsei University;Seoul:
Yang M. C.., Tung Y.C. 2006. Using path analysis to examine causal relationships among balanced scorecard performance indicators for general hospitals: The case of a public hospital system in Taiwan. Health Care Management Review. 31:280–288.
Yoo J.I. 2001. Development of a performance measurement system for the perioperative nursing using the balanced scorecard (BSC). Unpublished maser’s thesis. Yonsei University;Seoul:
Sahney V.K. 1998. Balanced scorecard as a framework for driving performance in managed care organization. Managed Care Quarterly. 6:1–8.
Sung Y.., Song M. S.., Park, J. 2007. Estimation of nursing cost by a patient classification system(PCS) in ICU. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 37:373–380.
Voelker K. E.., Rakich J. S.., French G.R. 2001. The balanced scorecard in healthcare organization: A performance measurement and strategic planing methodology. Hospital Topics. 79:13–24.
Yang M. C.., Tung Y.C. 2006. Using path analysis to examine causal relationships among balanced scorecard performance indicators for general hospitals: The case of a public hospital system in Taiwan. Health Care Management Review. 31:280–288.
Yoo J.I. 2001. Development of a performance measurement system for the perioperative nursing using the balanced scorecard (BSC). Unpublished maser’s thesis. Yonsei University;Seoul:

Figure 1.
Research process of this study.
jkan-38-656f1.tif
Table 1.
Nursing Visions of ICUs
Nursing Vision Statement of ICUs Validity score M (SD)
Preliminary 11 nursing visions of ICUs
 Differential nursing care based on teamworks 2.76 (0.36)
 Professional nursing related to patient’s recovery 2.93 (0.27)
 Scientific & professional nursing role player according to patient’s characteristics 3.23 (0.27)
 Support patients & their families’ quality of life based on human respect 3.03 (0.27)
 Leading domestic nursing cares of ICU based on creative educations & researches 3.10 (0.34)
 Serving specialized optimum level of nursing cares for patient’s health promotions 3.20 (0.39)
 ICUs based on trust between the staffs & patients and their families 3.10 (0.34)
 Realization of professional nursing with human respect 3.13 (0.61)
 Nursing with vitality 1.93 (0.25)
 Energetic nursing 2.00 (0.35)
 Nursing with clients 2.26 (0.48)
Final 2 nursing visions of ICUs
 Realization of harmonized professional nursing with human respect 4.00 (0.00)
 Recovery of health through specialized nursing 4.00 (0.00)
Table 2.
Nursing Practical Strategies of ICUs based on BSC
Perspective Practical Strategies Agreement rate (%)* Agreement rate (%)† Validity score M (SD)
Finance Offering and maintaining safe environment to prevent an accident/infection 100.0 100.0 3.44 (0.71)
Managing ward through efficient decision making 83.3 66.6 3.16 (0.80)
Improving outcome through participation in policy making on critical patient’s treatment 100.0 100.0 3.44 (0.51)
Customer Observation of ethic code/ethical nursing 100.0 6.6 3.40 (0.65)
Technical and smooth communication 100.0 6.6 3.56 (0.51)
Nursing with critical patient’s family 83.3 100.0 3.36 (0.64)
Creation of healing environment - 100.0 3.52 (0.51)
Internal business process Nursing provision using a nursing process 83.3 66.6 3.48 (0.51)
Improvement and accomplishment of evidence based nursing through the research/QI 100.0 100.0 3.48 (0.59)
Standardization and accomplishment of critical nursing principle/practice 100.0 66.6 3.68 (0.48)
Learning & Growth Development of nurse’s ability and career 100.0 100.0 3.64 (0.49)
Standardization of nurse’s skillful process and evaluation of practice ability 83.3 100.0 3.76 (0.44)
Completion of special nursing program/continuous education 83.3 100.0 3.44 (0.51)

* Rate of agreement for content validity of nursing practical strategies to achieve nursing visions of ICUs;

Rate of agreement for classification validity of nursing practical strategies according to 4 perspectives of BSC.

Table 3.
Nursing KPIs of ICUs based on BSC
Perspective Key performance indicators Agreement rate (%)* Validity score M (SD)
Finance Application rate of an article, instrument and equipment 83.3 3.24 (0.52)
Maintenance rate of an adequate stock quantity 66.7 3.24 (0.52)
Reduction rate of prescription omission 83.3 3.25 (0.61)
Turn over rate of career nurse 66.7 3.08 (0.64)
Customer Performance rate of patient’s right 66.7 3.20 (0.65)
Patient/family’s satisfaction 100.0 3.56 (0.71)
Rate of hospital infection 66.7 3.42 (0.78)
Rate of medication error 83.3 3.44 (0.71)
Length of stay 66.7 3.20 (0.65)
N/A, not applicable Internal business process Number of problem solving using a nursing process 83.3 3.17 (0.64)
Number of nursing accident occurrence 83.3 3.42 (0.50)
Hours of direct nursing care 66.7 3.54 (0.59)
Number of standard development of nursing process 83.3 3.42 (0.65)
Number of patient accident occurrence 66.7 3.38 (0.58)
Rate of bed circulation 66.7 2.75 (0.79)
Error rate of malfunction of medical devices 83.3 2.87 (0.87)
Number of error and omission on nursing record 100.0 3.39 (0.58)
Learning & Growth Rate of in-service education participation 100.0 3.44 (0.64)
Rate of research participation 83.3 3.21 (0.59)
Nurse’s educational satisfaction 66.7 3.33 (0.82)
Hours of continuing education 66.7 3.00 (0.76)

* Rate of Agreement for classification validity of nursing KPIs according to 4 perspectives of BSC; KPIs=key performance indicators.

TOOLS
Similar articles