Abstract
Background
The large caliber catheter used in the treatment of pneumothorax causes great damage to the chest wall and organs. The purpose of this study was to prove that the use of a smaller caliber catheter is effective in treating pneumothorax with decreasing admission period and that the recurrence rate of spontaneous pneumothorax is low.
Methods
Patients who had been admitted for treatment of first time occurrence of pneumothorax between May, 2004 and December, 2008 were included in the study. The caliber of catheter used this study is 18 Guage (1.2 mm). The efficacy of treatment, admission period and recurrence rate of treating pneumothorax with small caliber catheter were compared to the control group using a tube thoracostomy for treatment.
Results
The admission period for primary spontaneous pneumothorax was 10.8±3.6 days for the group (n=68) using tube thoracostomy compared to 4.5±1.3 days for the group (n=31) using the small caliber catheter (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in recurrence rate between the two groups.
Figures and Tables
References
1. Kang SY. Review: management of spontaneous pneumothorax. Korean J Intern Med. 1963. 6:677–682.
2. Oh TY, Jang UH, Bae SI. The management of spontaneous pneumothorax clinical review in 451 cases. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998. 31:374–379.
3. Collins CD, Lopez A, Mathie A, Wood V, Jackson JE, Roddie ME. Quantification of pneumothorax in chest radiographs using interpleural distance: regression analysis based on volume measurement from helical CT. Am J Roentgenol. 1995. 165:1127–1130.
4. Margolis M, Gharagozloo F, Tempesta B, Trachiotis GD, Katz NM, Alexander EP. Video-assisted thoracic surgical treatment of initial spontaneous pneumothorax in young patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003. 76:1661–1663.
5. Kim YS, Sohn DS. Anaylsis of high-resolution CT findings in patients with spontaneous pneumothorax. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999. 32:383–387.
6. Baumann MH, Strange C. Treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax: a more aggressive approach? Chest. 1997. 112:789–804.
7. Oh SW, Hyun SY, Yang HJ, Lim YS, Kim JK, Lee G. Comparison of simple manual aspiration and chest tube drainage in the first occurrence of a primary spontaneous pneumothorax. J Korean Soc Emerg Med. 2003. 14:403–408.
8. Liu CM, Hang LW, Chen WK, Hsia TC, Hsu WH. Pigtail tube drainage in the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax. Am J Emerg Med. 2003. 21:241–244.
9. Conces DJ, Tarver RD, Gray WC, Pearcy EA. Treatment of pneumothoraces utilizing small caliber chest tubes. Chest. 1988. 94:55–57.
10. Sargent EN, Turner AF. Emergency treatment of pneumothorax: a simple catheter technique for use in the radiology department. Am J Roentgenol. 1970. 109:531–535.
11. Peters J, Kubitschek KR. Clinical evaluation of a percutaneous pneumothorax catheter. Chest. 1984. 86:714–717.
12. Minami H, Saka H, Senda K, Horio Y, Iwahara T, Nomura F, et al. Small caliber catheter drainage for spontaneous pneumothorax. Am J Med Sci. 1992. 404:345–347.
13. Ong ME, Chan YH, Kee TY, Chew HC, Koh MS. Spontaneous pneumothorax outcome study (SPOT phase I): a 2-year review. Eur J Emerg Med. 2004. 11:89–94.
14. Baumann MH, Strange C, Heffner JE, Light R, Kirby TJ, Klein J. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: an American college of chest physicians delphi consensus statement. Chest. 2001. 119:590–602.