Journal List > Nutr Res Pract > v.8(6) > 1051437

Nergiz-Unal, Bilgiç, and Yabancı: High tendency to the substantial concern on body shape and eating disorders risk of the students majoring Nutrition or Sport Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Studies have indicated that university students majoring in nutrition and dietetics or sport sciences may have more obsessions associated with eating attitudes and body shape perception compared to other disciplines i.e. social sciences. Therefore, this study aimed to assess and compare the risk of eating disorders and body shape perception.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Data was collected from 773 undergraduate students at the Departments of Nutrition and Dietetics (NDD) (n = 254), Physical Education and Sports (PESD) (n = 263), and Social Sciences (SOC) (n = 256).A socio-demographic and personal information questionnaire, Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-40), Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ-34), Perceived Figure Rating Scale (FRS) were applied; and body weights and heights were measured.

RESULTS

Mean EAT-40 scores showed that, both male and female students of PESD had the highest scores (17.4 ± 11.6) compared with NDD (14.3 ± 8.3) and SOC (13.0 ± 6.2) (P < 0.05). According to EAT-40 classification, high risk in abnormal eating behavior was more in PESD (10.7%) compared to NDD (2.9%) and SOC (0.4%) students (P < 0.05). Students of PESD, who skipped meal, had higher tendency to the risk of eating disorders (P < 0.05). In parallel, body shape perception was found to be marked with higher scores in NDD (72.0 ± 28.7) and PESD (71.5 ± 32.8) compared with SOC (64.2 ± 27.5) students (P < 0.05). Considering BSQ-34 classification, high concern (moderate and marked) for body shape were more in PESD (7.4 %) compared to NDD (5.2%) and SOC (1.9%) students (P < 0.05). The body size judgement via obtained by the FRS scale were generally correlated with BMI. The Body Mass Index levels were in normal range (Mean BMI: 21.9 ± 2.8 kg/m2) and generally consistent with FRS data.

CONCLUSIONS

Tendency to the abnormal eating behavior and substantial body shape perception were higher in PESD students who have more concern on body shape and were not well-educated about nutrition. In conclusion, substantial concern on physical appearance might affect eating behavior disorders in PESD students.

INTRODUCTION

Diet and physical exercise are global key aspects to develop healthy lifestyle. However, changes over the decade in the attitudes of the young population to the body satisfaction were not toward healthier lifestyle [1,2]. The body dissatisfaction, accompanied with eating disorders and abnormal concern on body image can be achieved by health professionals from nutrition and sport sciences [2]. Since they consult the people about diet and physical activity to shape the body, physical appearance and eating attitudes of these professionals are important as well [3].
Body image with cognitive, affective and behavioral influences, based on two basic components: perception of current body size and body shape. Since high worry on body image found to be a risk factor for eating disorders, researchers currently have focused on individual's body shape and size perceptions and eating attitudes [4,5,6]. Although most of the current studies have concerned about university students' problems associated with eating attitudes only some of them were related to body shape dissatisfaction [1,7,8,9]. Recent estimates indicated that 25% of the university students were binge eating and 24% were dieting at some level [9]. A study from Turkey showed that eating disorders risks are more prevalent among female university students and overweight students were at higher risk of eating disorders [10]. In addition, there was a positive correlation between the abnormal eating attitudes, meal skipping and body size [10,11]. In parallel, the studies shown by others from different countries of the world have indicated that university students generally have problems associated with eating attitudes and body shape perception [11,12,13,14]. However, no data appeared comparing Nutrition and Dietetics or Physical Education and Sports students with Social Sciences.
Due to occupational education, the students of "Nutrition and Dietetics" and "Physical Education and Sports" might have high concern on body shape and size [3,15]. Current data suggest that junior and senior majors may be more affected than freshmen as a result of their amplified exposure to diet and sports related information [3,16]. Notwithstanding, although a few of studies concerned about eating attitudes, there is a lack of knowledge about body shape perception and the interaction with eating attitudes of the students majoring in Nutrition and Dietetics or Physical Education and Sports compared with other disciplines i.e. Social Sciences [3,7,15,16,17]. As a result of occupational education of these students in these disciplines, they program their life to behave and look healthy lifelong which may take them into obsession [7,16]. Because, they have duties such as an educator in the society and as a role model for the family and friends; have a huge affect on the public via media mass; and they are also policy makers in the ministries of health and sports. That is why it is vital to monitor the trends in body image and eating behavior within these groups.
Taken together, students at the departments of nutrition and sport sciences may have a substantial concern on physical appearance and eating attitudes due to their occupation related education [3,15,18]. Since the students will eventually be counseling others professionally about diet and physical fitness, it is important to reveal whether their occupation affect individual behavior to their own body. Therefore, to monitor the trends in behavior about body image, and to understand the factors such as education that might impact on the uptake of the eating habit and perception on body image in the students at the nutrition and dietetics, and sport sciences departments are important issues. Hence, this survey aimed to assess (i) the abnormal eating behaviors; (ii) perception of body shape and relationship between eating attitude and body shape perception; and lastly (iii); the difference between current body size and subjective ideal body size judgement among these students. This unique data set from Turkey is vital, because international comparisons are valuable, since they delineate variations in behavioral risk in different cultures, point to common determinants, and help to highlight good practice in preventive medicine.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Participants

The subjects of this study were chosen from the universities (Hacettepe, Ankara, Gazi, and Başkent Universities) consisting of Nutrition and Dietetics Departments in the capital city of Turkey. All of the undergraduate senior and junior students from the departments of Nutrition and Dietetics, Physical Education and Sport Sciences were enrolled to the study (n = 614). Participants with metabolic, chronic or psychological diseases, current dieters, students not to volunteer were excluded from the study. The response rate was 84% (n = 517). For comparison, students from Social Sciences i.e. the Departments of History, Law, and Political Sciences, without any health and psychology/behavior theme related education, with the same excluding criteria and similar mean body mass indexes for each gender were chosen randomly. Consequently, the total subjects of this study was 870 undergraduate seniors and juniors in which left participants conducted to this study were 773 studentsfromthe Departments of Nutrition and Dietetics (NDD) (n = 254), Physical Education and Sports (PESD) (n = 263), and Social Sciences (SOC) (n = 256).

Instruments and data collection

A sample of 773 students (62% male and 38% female) aged 22 ± 1.9 years participated to this cross-sectional survey performed in Spring Semester of 2013. Students who agreed to participate voluntarily in this study, approved by Ethics Board (IRB: 2013-12), were asked to sign a written consent form according to the Helsinki Declaration. A demographic and personal information questionnaire, Eating Attitudes Test, Body Shape Questionnaire, and Perceived Figure Rating Scale were enrolled individually by interview; then body weights and heights were measured.

Eating attitues test (EAT-40)

The test was originally developed by Garner and Garfinkel [19]. It contains 40 items in which the frequencies of attitudes and beliefs are rated using 6-point likert-type scale. In the EAT-40 scale, the score is ranging between 0-120 points. Higher scores point to an increased abnormal eating behavior. A score of 30 and above is used as a cut-off point to identify individuals with high risk.The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of EAT-40 were conducted by Savaşır and Erol [20].

Body shape questionnaire (BSQ-34)

The test was originally developed by Cooper [21] which measures individuals' degree of concern on their body shape. The items are rated on a Likert-type scale. Briefly, in the scale, the score is ranging between 34-204 points. Higher scores point to an increased level of concern on body shape. Score from 110 to 140 refer to moderate and more than140 refer to marked concern with body shape. The reliability and validity studies of the Turkish version of BSQ were conducted by Akdemir et al. [22].

Perceived figure rating scale (FRS)

The Stunkard Figure Rating Scale is based on subjective self-selection of body image figures. In this scale study participants were asked to rate how they perceived their current body shape by choosing an image that corresponded to their figure from the scale. Gender-specific body images range from 1 to 9, with 1 being the thinnest body type and 9 being the largest. Images 1 and 2 represent being underweight, 3 and 4 appropriate weight, 5 slightly overweight, 6 and 7 moderately overweight, 8 and 9 very overweight body size [23,24].

Anthropometric measurements

The body weights of participants, wearing minimal clothing without shoes, were measured with a portable scale. The heights were measured with a flexible body measuring tape. All measurements were obtained as previously described [25]. Body Mass Index (BMI: weight/height2, kg/m2) was calculated for each subject. The BMI classified according to the World Health Organization Classification [2].

Statistical analysis

Results were expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Data analysis and significance of differences were determined with a one-way ANNOVA followed by post-hoc Tukey HSD test and parametric t test, as required. To exclude the gender inference ANCOVA analysis was also performed. All the analyses were carried out using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS version 19.0, Chicago IL, USA).

RESULTS

Characteristics of the participants

In order to discuss the body shape perception and eating attitudes of the students the descriptive characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1. Males and females were comparable in the groups except the students in NDD. Since there was quite less male students in Nutrition and Dietetics Departments, retrieved amount of the male students of NDD was the least in all groups. Mean age was 21.5 ± 1.4, 22.7 ± 2.1, and 21.6 ± 1.9 in NDD, PESD, and SOC students respectively. The Body Mass Index levels were in normal range (Mean BMI: 21.9 ± 2.8 kg/m2) and comparable for all groups (Table 1).
Meal skipping was frequent in PESD (70.7%) students who were mainly living with their family (66.9%). The students of NDD skipped meals less (52.4%) that were living with their friends (40.6%). The most skipped meal was breakfast followed by lunch in all groups. The frequent reason for meal skipping of students at NDD was "lack of time" whereas at SOC was "no habit". Multivitamin and mineral complex usage was frequent at SOC students, while 25.9% of PESD students were taking protein/amino acid powder to increase muscular appearance. Thus, regular exercisers were the highest in PESD students (77.2%) as expected (Table 1). Taken together these results might give a supportive explanation about nutrition education may affect eating habits.

Eating attitudes and body shape perception

We sought to determine body image dissatisfaction among the university students educated for nutrition and sports compared with social sciences. Higher scores at EAT-40 test estimated increased abnormal eating behavior. As presented in Table 2, mean EAT-40 scores showed that, both male and female students of PESD had the highest scores (17.4 ± 11.6) compared with NDD (14.3 ± 8.3) and SOC (13.0 ± 6.2) (P < 0.05). Although, low risk of abnormal eating behavior was detected in all groups, it was shown that the females had the highest mean scores which might be a predictor of having extra predisposition to abnormal eating behavior than males (Table 2). The comparison of the participants in terms of EAT-40 classification according to the cut offs showed that, high risk in abnormal eating behavior was higher in PESD (10.7%) compared to NDD (2.9%) and SOC (0.4%) students (P < 0.05). Thereby, tendency to the eating disorders was higher in PESD than NDD or SOC students (Fig. 1A, B). In the high risk of abnormal eating behavior group, it was determined that 6.2% were meal-skippers and 4.2% werenon-skippers.The further comparison of the meal skippers showed that students of PESD, who skipped meal, had higher tendency to the risk of eating disorders (P < 0.05). Briefly, 5.9% of females (mean score: 37.3 ± 9.3) and 0.0% of males in NDD; 14.0% of females (mean score: 41.7 ± 10.7) and 9.3% (mean score: 44.8 ± 14.1) of males in PESD; 1.3% of females (mean score: 31.0 ± 0.0) and 0.0% of males in SOC had high risk of abnormal eating behavior (Fig. 1C, D).
To predict the concern on the body shape among participants, BSQ-34 score was calculated. In parallel, body shape perception was found to be marked with higher scores in NDD (72.0 ± 28.7) and PESD (71.5 ± 32.8) compared with SOC (64.2 ± 27.5) students (P < 0.05). In male students of PESD (71.9 ± 32.6) showed the highest perception on body shape and the least of SOC students (64.2 ± 27.5) (Table 2). Since, mean scores predicted that none of the group showed marked concern with body shape; we also compared the groups with the classifications made according to the cut-off points (Fig. 1). Considering BSQ-34 classification, high concern (moderate and marked) for body shape were more in PESD (7.4%) (mean score: 133.8 ± 25.3 compared to NDD (5.2%) (mean score: 133.2 ± 23.3) and SOC (1.9%) students (mean score: 135.8 ± 27.5) with higher scores in females (P < 0.05) (Fig, 1C, D).
Therefore, from the idea that a questionnaire that measures eating attitudes would most likely correlate with a questionnaire that measures body shape perception. Since abnormal eating behavior risk and body shape perception were higher in students at PESD, Spearman's rho correlation was performed between BMI and EAT-40 or BSQ-34.Thereafter, weak correlation between the BMI value and EAT-40 or BSQ-34 suggested that other components such as body shape, muscle/fat content of the body, and social pressure etc. might be responsible for the eating behavior and body perception apart from body weight in healthy university students (Table 3).

Figure rating scale versus body mass index

Body fat is often estimated by an objective surrogate measure of BMI which is determined by weight and height measurement. Body fat also can be subjectively assessed by FRS which utilizes gender-specific body figures [24]. Both types of measurements are useful to assess the relationship of body weight to body shape perception. Thus, to determine the relation between BMI and FRS, the Spearman's rho correlation was performed. Positive correlation between the BMI value and FRS indicated that the students in each group had real self-perception of body image and subjective estimation of body fat (Table 3). The strong correlation (r > 0.50) was detected in FRS comparison with BMI in all groups.
Body dissatisfaction is situated in the evaluative and effective components of eating attitudes. From the idea that body dissatisfaction related to the difference between current body size and subjective ideal body size, we were interested to distinguish the real body size compared with subjective body size judgement. As presented in Fig. 2, the body size judgements obtained by the scale were generally correlated with BMI. However, only female PESD students subjectively estimated their body size as moderately overweight (body images of 6 and 7 in Fig. 2), although their BMI was approximately 21 kg/m2. Other students estimated their body shape comparable with BMI (Fig. 2).

DISCUSSION

The study of European university students from 13 countries indicated that changes over the decade in the attitudes of the young population to the body satisfaction were not toward healthier lifestyles [1]. Accordingly, the students of "NDD" and "PESD" might have high concern on body shape and size due to the education related to their occupation [3,15]. The findings published by others imply that junior and senior majors may be more affected than freshmen as a result of their increased exposure to information about diet and body shape [3,16]. Hence, in this study, juniors and seniors were chosen to reveal the effect of the knowledge exposure on the body shape perception and eating attitudes.
In a study from Turkey, about eating patterns of university students, determined that breakfast and the lunch were the most frequent skipped meals, 48% and 25%, respectively [26]. In parallel, in our study, skipping of breakfast and lunch were two times more frequent in PESD compared with NDD. Since eating attitude is related to the meal skipping, risk of eating disorders was estimated in meal skippers. Students, who skipped meals, of PESD showed higher tendency to the risk of eating disorders. In comparison, Japanese students reported that they eat three main meals regularly as in Turkey, whereas Korean students eat only two main meals [12]. As in Korean students these students skip mostly breakfast [12]. Multivitamin and mineral complex usage was frequent at SOC students, while one third of PESD students were taking protein/amino acid powder to increase muscular body shape. Thus, these results might give a supportive explanation about nutrition education might affect eating attitudes and concern on body shape.
In the NDD students, choosing leaner ideal women figures and larger self-images were the factors that could predict high EAT scale scores [17]. To answer about the question of how prevalent the risk of abnormal eating behavior in NDD and PESD students in Turkey, EAT scores were evaluated. Although, mean scores determined that low risk of abnormal eating behavior was detected in our study, it was shown that the females had the highest scores which might be a predictor of having extra predisposition to abnormal eating behavior than males in this study. Comparable with our results, there was a low risk of eating disorder development among the students from Portuguese. Nevertheless, concerning eating behavior, there was no significant differences between students from NDD and social sciences shown by others [7]. Results of the study from Basque Country showed that, Nutrition knowledge of NDD students affected their food practice, but this was not enough to achieve a healthy diet and to reduce their body dissatisfaction [14]. Therefore, the students of PESD might have high concern on body shape and size due to lack of nutrition knowledge compared to NDD.
To predict the concern on body shape among participants, BSQ score was calculated in this study. Although mean scores predicted that none of the group showed marked concern with body shape, questionnaire classification indicated that, especially PESD showed the highest perception on body shape. As in our study, BSQ scores indicated that the majority of students from Lebanon were not worried about their body image perception [13]. In a study, in which the EAT, BSQ and anthropometry parameters determined, 22% of the NDD students were found to be at high risk in terms of eating disorders, and 14% declared dissatisfaction with their body image [18]. Taken together due to the lack of knowledge about body shape perception of nutrition and sport students, our data establishes a unique data set of showing the high concern on body shape were established in PESD followed by NDD compared to SOC students.
From the idea that body dissatisfaction related to the difference between current body size and subjective ideal body size, the real body size was compared with subjective body size judgement. Positive correlation between the BMI and FRS indicated that the students in each group had real self-perception of body image and subjective estimation of body fat in this study. One study determining relation of dissatisfaction of body shape with unhealthy behaviors among university students reported that students choose silhouettes that were underweight to represent their current or desired body sizes and to engage in dieting behaviors [27]. Recent studies estimated the BMI associated with FRS figures, subjective perception of the own body image scale, establishing normative data for adults [4,24,28]. This is an important feature of the scale, since it can now be used to estimate the BMI in situations where weight and height are not available and also to empirically evaluate if a person distorted body image [28,29,30].
With another point of view, it is important to note that body dissatisfaction differences might be related to the cultural values in healthy young population. In a study comparing American and Bosnian women revealed that American women demonstrated more body dissatisfaction and chose smaller cultural ideal body sizes than Bosnian women [29]. In a study of university students from Korea and Japan, significant differences were observed in eating patterns and body shape perception [12]. Study, in which students from Korea were explored, showed that those university students had a desire for a thinner figure similar to that observed in western society as in our study. Since, additional research is needed to further elaborate the body dissatisfaction differences as they relate to cultural values, our results are important to show the data of young people from Turkey as already shown in Korea, China and Japan.
In conclusion, lifestyles and health beliefs appear to be established early in life, setting the pattern for later years [1]. It is important, therefore, to monitor the trends in eating attitudes in young people, and to understand the factors that might impact on the body size dissatisfaction to estimate the risk of eating disorders such as anorexia, blumia or orthorexia nervosa. Body size or shape dissatisfaction is situated in the evaluative and affective components of eating attitudes of sport sciences and nutrition students. Hence, these students need more nutritional information about healthy nutritional habits and ideal body sizes to protect them having obsession.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
High risk in abnormal eating behavior and high concern with body shape were estimated in the students of Sport Sciences followed by Nutrition. Comparison of the eating disorders risk estimated from Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-40) (A, B) and concern on body shape estimated from Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ-34) (C, D). The students showing high risk of eating disorders predicted via EAT-40 (B), high concern on body shape predicted via BSQ-34. Data is presented as percentage (%) of the participants according to the classification with cut offs (*P < 0.05). NDD, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics; PESD, Department of Physical Education and Sports; SOC, Department of Social Sciences.
nrp-8-713-g001
Fig. 2
The Body Mass Index levels were in normal range and consistent with Figure Rating Scale. Mean BMI values (kg/m2) were calculated and presented for each body imagechosen by participants as they feel about their body sizeand shape [23,24]. Data are for females (A) and males (B). Images 1&2 represent underweight; images 3&4 appropriate weight; images 5&6 slightly overweight; images 7&8 moderately overweight and image 9 very overweight body size. NDD, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics; PESD, Department of Physical Education and Sports; SOC, Department of Social Sciences; EAT-40, Eating Attitudes Test; BSQ-34, Body Shape Questionnaire; FRS, Perceived Figure Rating Scale; BMI, Body Mass Index; ND, Not Defined.
nrp-8-713-g002
Table 1
Descriptive characteristics of the participants
nrp-8-713-i001

NDD, department of nutrition and dietetics; PESD, department of physical education and sports; SOC, department of social sciences.

Table 2
Comparison of the three groups in terms of Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-40) and Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ-34) scores
nrp-8-713-i002

NDD, department of nutrition and dietetics; PESD, department of physical education and sports; SOC, department of social sciences.

Data is expressed as in Mean ± SD, *P < 0.05compared with SOC group.

Significance was calculated by one way ANOVA analysis followed by post-hoc test called Tukey HSD.

Table 3
Relationship between Body Mass Index and EAT-40, BSQ-34, or FRS.
nrp-8-713-i003

Correlation between body mass index and other variables (EAT-40, BSQ-34, FRS) presented for each group expressed as Spearman's rho or Pearson correlation coefficients (r) as required.

NDD, department of nutrition and dietetics; PESD, department of physical education and sports; SOC, department of social sciences; EAT-40, eating attitudes test, BSQ-34, body shape questionnaire; FRS, figure rating scale.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We thank to the students of Nutrition and Dietetics Department of Hacettepe University (Elvan Ak, Hülya Akko, Şükrü Arman Aksoy, Şeyma Nur Ece, Durmuş Küçük, Meryem Saban, İbrahim Salman, İbrahim Tatlı, Gönül Tolan, GamzeTurhal) for assistance in the data collection, and all students who cooperated to this study.

References

1. Steptoe A, Wardle J, Cui W, Bellisle F, Zotti AM, Baranyai R, Sanderman R. Trends in smoking, diet, physical exercise, and attitudes toward health in European university students from 13 countries, 1990-2000. Prev Med. 2002; 35:97–104.
crossref
2. World Health Organisation (CH). Global prevalence and secular trends in obesity. WHO Technical Report Series 894. Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Geneva: World Health Organisation;2000. p. 16–34.
3. Korinth A, Schiess S, Westenhoefer J. Eating behaviour and eating disorders in students of nutrition sciences. Public Health Nutr. 2010; 13:32–37.
crossref
4. Forestell CA, Humphrey TM, Stewart SH. Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Effects of weight and shape on attractiveness ratings of female line drawings by restrained and nonrestrained eaters. Eat Behav. 2004; 5:89–101.
5. Pook M, Tuschen-Caffier B, Brähler E. Evaluation and comparison of different versions of the Body Shape Questionnaire. Psychiatry Res. 2008; 158:67–73.
crossref
6. Elal G, Altug A, Slade P, Tekcan A. Factor structure of the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT) in a Turkish university sample. Eat Weight Disord. 2000; 5:46–50.
crossref
7. Mealha V, Ferreira C, Guerra I, Ravasco P. Students of dietetics & nutrition; a high risk group for eating disorders? Nutr Hosp. 2013; 28:1558–1566.
8. Cain AS, Epler AJ, Steinley D, Sher KJ. Concerns related to eating, weight, and shape: typologies and transitions in men during the college years. Int J Eat Disord. 2012; 45:768–775.
crossref
9. Lavender JM, De Young KP, Anderson DA. Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q): norms for undergraduate men. Eat Behav. 2010; 11:119–121.
crossref
10. Sanlier N, Yabanci N, Alyakut O. An evaluation of eating disorders among a group of Turkish university students. Appetite. 2008; 51:641–645.
crossref
11. Aşçi FH, Tüzün M, Koca C. An examination of eating attitudes and physical activity levels of Turkish university students with regard to self-presentational concern. Eat Behav. 2006; 7:362–367.
crossref
12. Sakamaki R, Amamoto R, Mochida Y, Shinfuku N, Toyama K. A comparative study of food habits and body shape perception of university students in Japan and Korea. Nutr J. 2005; 4:31.
crossref
13. Yahia N, El-Ghazale H, Achkar A, Rizk S. Dieting practices and body image perception among Lebanese university students. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2011; 20:21–28.
14. Amaral Alves D, Hernández Regidor N, Basabe Baraño N, Rocandio Pablo AM, Arroyo Izaga M. Body satisfaction and diet quality in female university students from the Basque Country. Endocrinol Nutr. 2012; 59:239–245.
crossref
15. Thomas DT, McArthur L, Corbett RW. Nutrition knowledge and attitudes of allied health and fitness students. J Allied Health. 2006; 35:e37–e58.
16. Ozdoğan Y, Ozcelik AO. Evaluation of the nutrition knowledge of sports department students of universities. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2011; 8:11.
crossref
17. Gonidakis F, Sigala A, Varsou E, Papadimitriou G. A study of eating attitudes and related factors in a sample of first-year female nutrition and dietetics students of Harokopion University in Athens, Greece. Eat Weight Disord. 2009; 14:e121–e127.
crossref
18. Silva JD, Silva AB, de Oliveira AV, Nemer AS. Influence of the nutritional status in the risk of eating disorders among female university students of nutrition: eating patterns and nutritional status. Cien Saude Colet. 2012; 17:3399–3406.
19. Garner DM, Garfinkel PE. The eating attitudes test: an index of the symptoms of anorexia nervosa. Psychol Med. 1979; 9:273–279.
crossref
20. Savaşır I, Erol N. Yeme tutum testi: Anoreksiya Nervoza Belirtileri İndeksi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi. 1989; 7:19–25.
21. Cooper PJ, Taylor MJ, Cooper Z, Fairburn CG. The development and validation of the body shape questionnaire. Int J Eat Disord. 1987; 6:485–494.
crossref
22. Akdemir A, Inandi T, Akbas D, Karaoglan Kahilogullari A, Eren M, Canpolat BI. Validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the body shape questionnaire among female high school students: preliminary examination. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2012; 20:e114–e115.
crossref
23. Stunkard AJ, Sørensen T, Schulsinger F. Use of the Danish Adoption Register for the study of obesity and thinness. Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis. 1983; 60:115–120.
24. Bays HE, Bazata DD, Fox KM, Grandy S, Gavin JR 3rd. SHIELD Study Group. Perceived body image in men and women with type 2 diabetes mellitus: correlation of body mass index with the figure rating scale. Nutr J. 2009; 8:57.
crossref
25. Lohmann TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics Books;1988.
26. Neslişah R, Emine AY. Energy and nutrient intake and food patterns among Turkish university students. Nutr Res Pract. 2011; 5:117–123.
crossref
27. Nichols SD, Dookeran SS, Ragbir KK, Dalrymple N. Body image perception and the risk of unhealthy behaviours among university students. West Indian Med J. 2009; 58:465–471.
28. Bulik CM, Wade TD, Heath AC, Martin NG, Stunkard AJ, Eaves LJ. Relating body mass index to figural stimuli: population-based normative data for Caucasians. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001; 25:1517–1524.
crossref
29. Serifović S, Dinnel DL, Sinanović O. Body dissatisfaction: how is it related to stress and one's perception of individual and cultural ideal body? A comparison of Bosnian and American university students. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2005; 5:27–33.
crossref
30. Must A, Phillips SM, Stunkard AJ, Naumova EN. Expert opinion on body mass index percentiles for figure drawings at menarche. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002; 26:876–879.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles