Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac rhythm disturbance observed in clinical practice, and has numerous potential complications; of these, stroke is the most serious and life threatening. Prevalence of AF increases with age, up to 15% in octogenerians, and continues to grow rapidly due to the increasing proportion of aging in the population. Moreover, the elderly population of today has a higher prevalence of predisposing conditions for AF, such as diabetes, heart failure, hypertension, and coronary heart disease.1-6) Lifetime risk for development of AF is 1 in 4 for men and women 40 years of age and older.7)

Absence of a regular contraction of the fibrillating atria leads to an increase of atrial pressure and dilatation, which, together with hemoconcentration,8)9) endothelial dysfunction, and a prothrombotic state, is prerequisite for thrombus formation.10) Echocardiography and autopsy studies have shown that more than 90% of all thrombi in patients with AF originating in the left atrium form in the left atrial appendage (LAA).11-15) Consequently, LA thrombi are responsible for at least one fourth of ischemic stroke, which is more frequently associated with persistent and severe disability, compared to ischemic events attributable to vascular disease.16-19) Associated mortality is 27% in 12 months, and a five year recurrence rate of up to 34%.6) Socio-economical dimensions of this disease, therefore, are relevant.

The main risk of an embolic event in patients with atrial fibrillation is lack of adequate oral anticoagulation (OAC). Vitamin-K-antagonists (VKA) are highly effective for stroke prevention in patients with AF, but a substantial number of patients are not eligible for chronic therapy with coumadines due to their narrow therapeutic range and bleeding complications that are potentially fatal. Even eligible patients may have reservations about long-term OAC with VKA, due to the need for continuous laboratory monitoring and possible interactions with food, drugs, and individual lifestyle. Patients at high risk of embolic stroke, but with contraindications for OAC are in a need of an alternative approach that is not associated with long-term risk of hemorrhage or other attendant circumstances. This is particularly true for those who have survived intracranial hemorrhage but remain at high risk for cardiogenic embolism. A reasonable alternative may be exclusion of the LAA cavity from circulation, using either surgical or percutaneous catheter-based procedures. Currently, excision of the LAA at the time of mitral valve surgery is recommended for reduction of future stroke risk.20) Efficacy of LAA exclusion in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery was shown in the LAA Occlusion Study (LAAOS).21)

In this review, we discuss pathophysiology of thrombogenesis in the LAA, and its consequential role in AF-related embolic stroke. Further emphasis is put on technical and clinical data from different percutaneous transcatheter devices for occlusion of the LAA for protection of cardiogenic embolism.

The LAA is a long, tubular, often multilobed and trabeculated stucture, a remnant of the embryonic left atrium (LA), whereas the smooth LA cavity is derived from an outgrowth of the pulmonary veins.22) The orifice of the LAA is oval in shape, located between the left ventricle and the left upper pulmonary vein. The body of the appendage extends over the atrioventricular groove and the surface of the left ventricle, towards the left circumflex artery and the great cardiac vein in an anterior direction.23-25) LAA structure was initially characterized from 1,842 autopsy hearts.26) Anatomy of the LAA is complex and varies considerably in terms of volume (0.7-19.2 mL), length (16-51 mm), and size of the orifice (5-40 mm).25)27)28) The structure of the cardiac muscle cells of the LAA appears similar to that of the surrounding myocardium.29) The muscular mass of the LAA contains the majority of cardiac atrial natriuretic factor (ANF).30) ANF increases sodium excretion, diuresis, and natriuresis, and, thus, opposes the sodium-conserving actions of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.31) Tabata et al.32) found that the most important factor increasing plasma concentration of ANF in patients with left-sided cardiac dysfunction is distension of the LAA wall. Moreover, stretch sensitive receptors within the LAA are involved in regulation of heart rate.33)

After primary ex vivo characterization of LAA anatomy, use of transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) has made clear in vivo imaging of the LAA possible, so that its size, shape, flow patterns, and content can be assessed in health and disease.34-37) However, due to its variable and complex anatomy, standard definitions of tomographic imaging planes are nearly impossible. On the other hand, assessment of LAA function by Doppler echocardiography and detection of LAA spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (SEC) is of considerable clinical relevance. New insights into LAA anatomy, in terms of angulation and motility, have recently been provided by computed tomography, which also confirmed the echocardiographic finding of a broad interindividual variation in LAA morphology.38-40) Also, using magnetic resonance imaging, three dimensional analysis of the LAA is possible and will be of considerable interest in the future, due to avoidance of radiation for the patient.41)

In sinus rhythm, the LAA shortens to a greater extent than the rest of the left atrium and has a distinct pattern of contraction,34) although this seems to be of minor importance for overall cardiac performance.42) Considering emptying and filling waves, TOE Doppler flow within the LAA was described as quadriphasic in the majority of healthy subjects with sinus rhythm.43)44) In AF without thrombus, the LAA appears to empty passively and fill with multiple small fibrillatory contractions that do not contribute to LV filling. LA pressure is the essential determinant of LAA flow. Hence, the magnitude of LAA filling and emptying is influenced primarily by both left ventricular function and heart rate.43)44) Therefore, in a heart disease state with both increased atrial and left ventricular end diastolic pressure, the LAA may compensate for consequent volume overload due to its distensibility.45)46)

The LAA is the site most commonly associated with thrombus formation, particularly in patients with non-valvular AF.11-15)47)48) A multivariable analysis of cohorts followed prospectively in clinical trials and other care settings revealed that thrombi have been identified using TOE in 15-20% of patients with AF who have clinical risk factors for ischemic stroke.12)48) Pathogenesis of LAA thrombus formation has not been fully elucidated, but the precondition is likely to result from a hypercoagulable state explained by Virchow's triad of thrombogenesis i. e., abnormal changes of the vessel wall, blood flow, and blood constituents.49)50) Nowadays, this is translated as follows: "Abnormal blood flow" refers to reduced flow up to stasis due to lack of contraction in combination with increased volume and size of the LAA; "abnormal blood constituents" are represented by activated coagulation factors and platelets, and "abnormal vessel wall" in this case refers to structural and functional changes of endothelial or endocardial cells.

Risk of stroke varies considerably among patients with AF. On the one hand, individual risk for stroke must be considered prior to prescription of VKA for anticoagulation; on the other hand, risk of stroke must be outweighted against the risk of bleeding and burden on the patient due to the need for continuous laboratory INR monitoring or possible interactions associated with food, drugs, and individual lifestyle or preferences.121) Several stroke risk stratification schemes are available to help clinicians with this decision.68)122-125) Two useful resources stand out in clinical practice: The Framingham risk score, derived by Wang et al.,68) and the CHADS₂ score published by Gage et al.123) Both use a five step calculation to predict the risk for stroke in patients with AF. The former considers age, gender, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, and prior stroke or TIA. Each category is assigned different grading, and predicts 5-year stroke risk in the absence of anticoagulation. Concerning the latter, the C stands for recent congestive heart failure, the H for hypertension, the A for age 75 or older, the D for diabetes, and the S for prior stroke or TIA. Each category is assigned one point, except for stroke or TIA, which receives two points due to high association with subsequent stroke. A high score on this index correlates with raised annual stroke rate. The CHADS₂ score may be easier to use, but is less precise.126)

One of the theoretic benefits of cardioversion in patients with AF is the assumption that restoring normal atrial electromechanical activity may diminish the risk of cardiogenic thromboembolism and, therefore, spare the need for anticoagulation. However, there is a body of evidence to demonstrate that a temporary worsening of LAA function ("stunning") after cardioversion is responsible for development of new clots.127)128) The hallmark of LAA stunning is reduction of post cardioversion LAA flow velocity in sinus rhythm compared to those in AF, regardless of iatrogenic (electrical or pharmocological) or spontaneous cardioversion.129)130) Even after succesful restoration of sinus rhythm, SEC can be seen in up to 37% of patients after 3 months,131) indicating the persistence of a hypercoagulable state after cardioversion.78)132) The strategy of rhythm control has been directly compared with simple rate control in several randomized clinical trials. In a pooled analysis, frequency of ischemic stroke in the group of patients assigned to rate control was comparable to that of patients assigned to rhythm control.133) It is amazing, therefore, that Cox et al.134) reported on 306 patients who underwent the maze procedure for treatment of medically refractory atrial fibrillation. Only 2 perioperative strokes occurred, and in 265 patients followed up to 11.5 years after the maze procedure, there was only one late minor stroke, which has since been completely resolved. On the one hand, this good result may be explained by predominance of sinus rhythm, and, on the other hand, by the absence of the LAA and restoration of left atrial mechanical function.135)

Hypothetically, restoring mechanical activity to the LAA with cardioversion may also result in systemic embolism due to wash out of pre-existing LAA thrombi, which may explain the occurence of stroke shortly after treatment.136)137) The Assessment of Cardioversion Using Transesophageal Echocardiography (ACUTE) trial138) compared a TOE-guided strategy combined with short-term anticoagulation using a conventional 3-week oral anticoagulation pre cardioversion strategy. Although there was significant difference in the composite end point of major and minor bleeding and a shorter time to cardioversion, there was no difference in the composite end point of stroke, transient ischemic attack, and peripheral embolism. Therefore, current guidelines for cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation lasting longer than 48 hours recommend coumadin treatment for at least three weeks prior to cardioversion, and for a minimum of four weeks afterward. Alternatively, performance of a cardioversion without anticoagulation is justifiable if direct previous TOE shows no thrombi present in the LAA.121)

During the past thirty years, TOE has become a valuable tool for diagnosis of thrombus within the appendage by allowing semi-invasive, highly accurate imaging of the LAA.139) It is, therefore, an essential part of the guidelines for management of AF,121) and the modality of choice for detecting LA or LAA thrombi with a sensitivity and specificity of approximately 95% to 100%.127) Nevertheless, detection of LAA thrombus is prone to misdiagnosis because clots may remain hidden due to the three-dimensional complexity of the LAA, and a false-positive diagnosis of thrombus may stem from false interpretation of a prominent pectinate muscle. The aforementioned sensitivity and specificity regarding thrombus detection by TOE was found in comparison with intraoperative observations;13) however, no comparison has been made using direct left atrial angiography. Sensitivity for thrombus detection during the left ventricular phase of pulmonary angiogram was found to be 100% compared to later surgical inspection.140) In our own experience with transcatheter LAA occlusion and by means of direct angiography, we detected LAA thrombi not seen with simultaneously performed TOE in approximately 10% of patients (Fig. 1).141) Furthermore, we revealed additional LAA lobes in some patients during repeated LAA angiography. The "collapsed" lobes seem to be "blown up" by contrast injections into the LAA. Consequently, in these cases, the procedure was halted and postponed, causing inconvenience and additional risk for patients, as well as increased overall treatment costs. Furthermore, this finding strengthens the hypothesis of cardiac embolism due to wash out of pre-existing LAA thrombi after successful cardioversion. Hence, an imaging modality with higher accuracy of preprocedural LAA thrombus detection would be very helpful for planning of LAA occlusion procedures. Further technical development of echocardiography seems promising. Recent introduction of an RT-m3D TOE transducer permits virtually instantaneous 3D imaging while preserving spatial and temporal resolution, thereby significantly enhancing visualization of complex 3D structures such as the LAA.142) Further improvement of B-mode image quality of 3D-TOE will be available in the near future. The combination of tissue doppler imaging and use of contrast agents may help to better characterize thrombogenic structures within the LAA.58) Also, with respect to LAA imaging, few studies using MRI and spiral CT scan have been reported on detection of thrombus and SEC.38)39)143-146) Regarding LAA occlusion procedures, the advantages of cardiac CT/MRA include the following: 1) preprocedural imaging of the anatomical characteristics of the LAA and neighbouring atrial structures; 2) assessment of the anatomical relationship of the LA, esophagus, and adjacent vascular structures; 3) postprocedural detection of structural and functional changes of the LA and LAA.147)

Of the VKAs, warfarin is the most widely used and investigated coumarin derivative, exerting its anticoagulant effect through modulation of c-carboxylation of glutamic acid (GLA) residues of the vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors II, VII, IX, and X, resulting in production of coagulation factors with reduced coagulant capacity.148)149) Dose adjusted (INR 2.0-3.0) OAC is well established in patients with nonvalvular AF, and has been associated with a decreased risk of cardioembolic events of greater than 60%.150)151) Effectiveness of OAC depends on intensity of treatment,77) in that insufficient doses of anticoagulants reduce the therapeutic benefit, while excessive anticoagulation increases the risk of bleeding.152) The benefit of dose adjusted OAC is confirmed by a significant decrease of markers of coagulation activation,72)79) whereas fixed low-dose warfarin or aspirin-warfarin combination treatment did not substantially reduce markers of thrombogenesis.153) Despite the proven benefit, OAC with warfarin or other VKA remains underused in clinical practice,154) although underutilization implies that a decision not to use warfarin is reached after assessment of the balance between benefit (prevention of thromboembolic stroke) and risk (bleeding), which suggests a net benefit. With regard to anti-thrombotic therapy, there are two groups of AF patients: Those with no contraindications for therapy who never received warfarin, and those who are on therapy, but with an INR below or above the range of 2.0-3.0, having increased risk for either stroke or bleeding. Overall, 55% of warfarin-eligible patients actually use the drug, with the lowest rates seen in the oldest patients-those at highest risk of stroke.155)156) In the United States, AF patients on warfarin spend only about one-half of the time within therapeutic INR range,157-159) and of those patients admitted to hospital with a stroke while receiving warfarin therapy, most have subtherapeutic international normalized ratios.160)161) Leckey et al.162) found that only 13% of patients with ischemic stroke and known AF before stroke were taking warfarin. Considering the worst case scenario, that half of patients are untreated and the other half are out of range 50 percent of the time, only one fourth receive optimal treatment.

Review of the literature has identified several barriers to prescription of VKA, which are related to the patient, the physician, and the health care system.163) One of the strongest patient related predictors of warfarin withholding is age. Warfarin use increases with a history of ischemic stroke, and decreases with age >80 years. The most important physician related reasons not to anticoagulate include 1) the perception of benefit vs. risk of therapy, insofar as the risk for embolism, relative to hemorrhage, is judged to be lower, and 2) the relative contraindication to therapy due to lack of patient reliability or patient noncompliance as a reason for difficulties in monitoring the prothrombin ratio.163)

Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, Aspirin) as an anticoagulant has some advantages over warfarin. These include substantially less potential for drug-drug or drug-diet interactions, a wider therapeutic index, and no need for INR-monitoring. For AF patients with increased risk of bleeding, it is often prescribed instead of warfarin on the presumption that it is safer. A meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials suggests that ASA does reduce the risk for ischemic stroke in AF (22% relative risk reduction for ASA compared with placebo).12)164) It is noteworthy that only one of these trials {the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (SPAF) study165)} reported a statistically significant difference. Recently, the Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged Study, BAFTA,166) reaffirmed that warfarin is superior to ASA in stroke prevention. On the other hand, the risk of major hemorrhage, including hemorrhagic stroke, was similar in both aspirin (2.0% per year) and warfarin (1.9% per year) treated patients. The authors recommended use of anticoagulation (warfarin) for all people over 75 years who have atrial fibrillation, unless there are contraindications, or the patient decides that the size of the benefit is not worth the inconvenience of the treatment.165)

The emphasis on avoidance of hemorrhagic stroke or traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and other iatrogenic events may cause physicians and patients to choose therapy that minimizes side effects, rather than therapy that maximizes benefit. In association with anticoagulation, bleeding is the complication of greatest concern; therefore, selection of appropriate therapy should weigh advantages and disadvantages carefully.167) In anticoagulated patients, annual risk of major bleeding, meaning a hemorrhage requiring >2 units of blood or requiring hospitalization, ranges between 1.1-1.7% and 0.3-0.6% for intracranial hemorrhage.124)168) However, this low level of risk has rarely been replicated in contemporary studies, and then, perhaps, only in patients who are stable on long-term anticoagulation. Higher rates of hemorrhage were found in the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation II Study, which consisted of 2 parallel trials of patients aged >75 years and ≤75 years.169) Annual rates of major bleeding were 4.2% and 1.7%, respectively. Hylek and coworkers170) studied a cohort of 472 patients of whom one third were ≥80 years of age, compared with a total of 20 patients >75 years in the pooled analysis of 5 randomized trials that proved efficacy of anticoagulation,150) and 91% had ≥1 stroke risk factor. Cumulative incidence of major hemorrhage for patients ≥80 years of age was 13.1 per 100 person-years and 4.7 for those <80 years of age (p=0.009). Thus, the increasing risk of bleeding with increasing age is clearly demonstrated in this study. Moreover, during the first 90 days of warfarin treatment, age ≥80 years and international normalized ratio (INR) ≥4.0 were associated with increased risk, despite trial-level anticoagulation control. Within the first year, 26% of patients who were ≥80 years of age stopped taking warfarin. Perceived safety issues accounted for 81% of them. The most obvious results to be emphasized from this study are that the risk of major hemorrhage increases by a factor of 10-fold between CHADS₂ scores of 0 and ≥4, and also that warfarin termination was highest among patients with CHADS₂ scores ≥3.170) The finding that bleeding risk is highest within the first year of therapy was confirmed by results from the ACTIVE-W study: annual risk of major hemorrhage over the duration of the study is quoted as 2.6% and 2.0% for warfarin-naive and warfarin-experienced patients, respectively. In contrast, the risks are more like 6% to 7% and 4%, respectively, in the first year.171) Moreover, an ancillary analysis from the ACTIVE-W trial reports that risk of major bleeding during OAC was lower among patients with a CHADS₂ score of 1 (1.36% per year) compared with CHADS₂ >1 (2.75% per year).172)

The following patient characteristics are considered risk factors for anticoagulation-related bleeding complications: Advanced age, uncontrolled hypertension, history of myocardial infarction or ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, anemia or a history of bleeding, and concomittant use of other drugs, such as antiplatelet agents.173) Moreover, primary clinical and health-related problems associated with typical geriatric syndrome in older adults, and which make the decision regarding use VKA more complex, include functional decline, frailty and falls, polypharmacy, nutritional deficiencies, and cognitive dysfunction.167) All of these conditions are often cited as reasons to preclude the elderly from anticoagulation.174) A prospective observational study of 207 AF patients in an acute-care setting hospital, assessing frail and non-frail patients, demonstrated that frail patients were less likely to receive warfarin, both on hospital admission and on discharge. Notably, such patients at the same time were at greater risk of experiencing embolic stroke (12.3% vs. 3.9% in frail and non-frail patients). Aronow et al.175) described 312 AF patients with an average age of 84 years residing in a chronic care facility. Rates of stroke over three years in those not anticoagulated were 56% in those with no prior history of thromboembolism and 81% in those with prior history of thromboembolism. These frail patients also had a tendency to sustain a greater risk of major/severe hemorrhage, as well as greater mortality.176)

Comparable to existing stroke risk stratification schemes, there are bleeding risk models:177-182) Beyth and coworkers178) identified four independent risk factors for bleeding: Age ≥65 years, history of GI bleeding, history of stroke, and one or more of four specific comorbid conditions. They found a cumulative incidence of major bleeding at 48 months of 53% in high-risk paitients (three or four risk factors), 12% in middle-risk patients (one or two risk factors), and 3% in low-risk patients (no risk factors). Kuijer and colleagues179) developed another prediction model based on age, gender, and presence of malignancy. In patients classified at high, middle, and low risk, frequency of major bleeding was 7%, 4%, and 1%, respectively, after 3 months of therapy. Comparable bleeding rates for comparable risk classes were found by Shireman et al.181) (5.4%, 2.0%, and 0.9%, respectively, after 90 days of treatment) using the following criteria: Age >70 years, gender, remote bleeding, recent bleeding, alcohol/drug abuse, diabetes, anemia, and antiplatelet use. Gage et al.182) gave 2 points for a prior bleed and 1 point for each of 10 further stroke risk factors, and claimed the highest accuracy of all other bleed prediction schemes. Nevertheless, none of these risk prediction schemes has been fully validated in large prospective AF patient cohorts.

The outlined clinical complexity of pathophysiology and prevention of thromboembolism in AF patients is most impressively illustrated by the fact that those at highest risk of stroke, and, therefore with the greatest need for antithrombotic therapy, also experience the most bleeding. Thus, an alternative that combines high efficacy in stroke prevention with low risk of bleeding is warranted.

The frequency of thrombus formation in the LAA of patients with AF and its suspected role as a source of embolism led to the hypothesis that resection or obliteration of the LAA might reduce the risk of stroke. Hellerstein et al.183) was the first to show the feasibility of LAA resection in dogs. The first resection of the LAA for prophylaxis of recurrent arterial embolism in men was performed in 1949 by Madden,184) followed by Beal et al.185) in 1950. Johnson and coworkers performed atrial appendectomies in 437 patients during cardiac surgery. No strokes were attributed to AF, and no patients were found to have atrial clots on TOE during follow-up.4) Odell and coworkers186) demonstrated in dogs and human cadavers that thoracoscopic exclusion of the LAA using either a stapler or an endoloop is also feasible and effective; Blackshear and colleagues187) evaluated left atrial appendage obliteration in 14 high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation who had clinical risk factors for stroke and an absolute contraindication to or failure of prior thrombosis prevention with warfarin. One fatal stroke occurred 55 months after surgery, and one non-disabling stroke occurred three months after surgery. For the LAA Occlusion Study,21)188) 77 patients with risk factors for stroke were randomized to either LAA occlusion or control (52 patients for LAA occlusion, 25 patients in the control group) at the time of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Two patients (2.6%), both randomized to the LAA occlusion group, had perioperative thromboembolic events: One had an intraoperative ischemic stroke, and the other a TIA occurring on the third postoperative day. The former patient was in AF and had echocardiographic evidence of a patent foramen ovale and bilateral carotid stenoses. After a mean follow-up of 13±7 months, no further strokes or TIAs occured in the LAA occlusion group.21) Nonetheless, surgical or thoracoscopic LAA closure, other than as an adjunctive procedure, as recommended by ACC guidelines20) in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery, has not been enthusiastically accepted due to its invasive nature. Thus, based on surgical experience, development of a less invasive percutaneous approach to close the LAA by implantation of a mechanical device was a logical consequence.189)190)

Controversy persists in regard to the risks and benefits of LAA occlusion for prevention of embolic stroke. Adverse hemodynamic and physiological effects may result from LAA obliteration.205) Fluid retention is a potential late complication of LAA occlusion. Human atrial appendages contain 30% of total cardiac ANF.30) Experimental data have shown that bilateral appendagectomy in dogs eliminates ANF release and blunts renal excretion of sodium and water during acute volume load.206) Clinically evident postoperative fluid retention after the maze procedure with bilateral appendagectomy has been reported.207) Another study of the maze procedure reported on diminished ANF secretion accompanied by increased need for postoperative diuretics and dopamine.208) However, this effect was abolished when the right atrial appendage was preserved.209) There are clues, however, that in the natural course of permanent atrial fibrillation, atrial degeneration may at least lead to decreased ANF secretion.210) However, to date, many cases of surgical LAA exclusion with long term follow-up have not shown deleterious results. Pathophysiological consequences of implanting a foreign body into the LAA remain to be fully elucidated. Small iatrogenic atrial septal defects can be created after transseptal puncture. They usually disappear within 6 months of the procedure. Furthermore, every implanted foreign material bears the risk of infection.211)

AF is known to confer a risk of stroke; however, this risk is not homogeneous. Chronic oral anticoagulation as the prophylactic measure of choice has a number of major limitations associated with its narrow therapeutic range. A great deal of overlap evidently exists in thromboembolic stroke risk and risk of bleeding. Such overlapping risk creates a difficult management problem. Given the demonstrated risk of major bleeding, there is reason to be skeptical about net benefit when warfarin is used in some elderly patients with AF. Whether or not the needs of high-risk patients can be met by newer pharmacological and nonpharmacological antithrombotic/antiembolic therapies remains to be determined. It would seem that risk stratification schemes must be refined to incorporate data available from imaging studies that enhance predictive value for ischemic events and risk factors for bleeding. Occlusion of the LAA orifice, therefore, offers a theoretically appealing way to reduce incidence of stroke in patients who cannot be anticoagulated, or who developed stroke despite being on OAC. Nevertheless, there are limitations to this approach in that it cannot be easily applied prophylactically to large numbers of patients. Concerns about procedural safety and need for long-term follow up should be addressed before this potentially important technology is widely deployed.