Abstract
Case summary
An 8-month-old male infant presented to the emergency room with decreased consciousness and epileptic seiz-ures that the parents attributed to a fall from a chair. He had no external wounds or fractures to the skull or elsewhere. However, computerized tomography of the brain revealed an acute subdural hematoma in the right cranial convexity and diffuse cerebral edema, leading to a midline shift to the left and effacement of the right lateral ventricle and basal cistern. The attending neuro-surgeon promptly administered a decompressive craniectomy. Immediately after the emergency surgery, a fundus examination revealed numerous multilayered retinal hemorrhages in the posterior pole extending to the periphery in each eye. He also had white retinal ridges with cherry hemorrhages in both eyes. We acquired retinal photographs using the native camera of a smartphone in video mode. The photographer held the smartphone with one hand, facing the patient's eye at 15–20 cm, and held a 20 diopter condensing lens at 5 cm from the eye in the other hand. Our documentation using a smartphone led to a diagnosis of abusive head trauma and to obtain the criminal's confession, because the findings were specific for repetitive acceleration-deceleration forces to an infant's eye with a strong vitreoretinal attachment.
References
2. Pierre-Kahn V, Roche O, Dureau P, et al. Ophthalmologic findings in suspected child abuse victims with subdural hematomas. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110:1718–23.
3. Maguire SA, Watts PO, Shaw AD, et al. Retinal haemorrhages and related fi ndings in abusive and non-abusive head trauma: a abdominal review. Eye (Lond). 2013; 27:28–36.
4. Ng WS, Watts P, Lawson Z, et al. Development and validation of a standardized tool for reporting retinal findings in abusive head trauma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012; 154:333–9.e5.
5. Ryan ME, Rajalakshmi R, Prathiba V, et al. Comparison among methods of retinopathy assessment (CAMRA) Study: smartphone, nonmydriatic, and mydriatic photography. Ophthalmology. 2015; 122:2038–43.
6. Maguire S, Pickerd N, Farewell D, et al. Which clinical features distinguish in fl icted from non-in fl icted brain injury? A systematic review. Arch Dis Child. 2009; 94:860–7.
7. Bhardwaj G, Jacobs MB, Martin FJ, et al. Photographic assessment of retinal hemorrhages in infant head injury: the Childhood Hemorrhagic Retinopathy Study. J AAPOS. 2017; 21:28–33.e2.
8. Breazzano MP, Unkrich KH, Barker-Griffith AE. Clinicopathological findings in abusive head trauma: analysis of 110 infant autopsy eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014; 158:1146–54.e2.
9. Muni RH, Kohly RP, Sohn EH, Lee TC. Hand-held spectral abdominal optical coherence tomography finding in shaken-baby syndrome. Retina. 2010; 30:S45–50.
10. Yusuf IH, Barnes JK, Fung TH, et al. Non-contact abdominalfield retinal imaging of infants with suspected abusive head trauma. Eye (Lond). 2017; 31:353–63.