Journal List > Nutr Res Pract > v.17(6) > 1516086227

Kim, Kim, Rajaguru, Lee, and Kim: Association between body shape misperception and unhealthy eating behaviors among Korean adolescents

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Body shape misperception (BSM) is the disagreement between the subjectively perceived body size and body mass index. This study investigated the association between BSM and unhealthy eating behaviors (UEB) among Korean adolescents.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

This cross-sectional study used data from the 2019 Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey with 55,748 participants. UEB were measured according to the weekly consumption frequency of caffeinated energy drinks, fast food, carbonated beverages, and sugar-sweetened beverages. The covariates included demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and health-related factors. Multiple logistic regression analysis determined the association between BSM and UEB.

RESULTS

Among the participants, 37,607 (67.5%) reported UEB. The gap between UEB among those with BSM was the largest between the underestimated and accurately estimated groups. Participants who underestimated their body shape were likelier to engage in UEB (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11–1.25). Both sexes with underestimation of body size showed an association with UEB compared to those with accurate estimations (girls: AOR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.09–1.30; boys: AOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.08–1.26).

CONCLUSIONS

Underestimating body shape can provoke UEB among Korean adolescents. The need for appropriate school health interventional programs to prevent underestimating body shape is emphasized to avoid UEB.

INTRODUCTION

Adolescents’ eating behaviors have become nutritionally unhealthy [12]. With physical and mental growth, adolescence is essential for creating lifestyles and habitual routines that strongly influence adult health and life [3]. Unhealthy eating behaviors (UEB) can increase the risk of metabolic diseases, such as obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease [456]. In particular, a high consumption of caffeine, fast food, carbonated beverages, and sugar-sweetened beverages is positively associated with metabolic diseases [789].
Body shape misperception (BSM) is the disagreement between the subjectively perceived body size and body mass index (BMI), which indicates the actual body size [10]. BSM is negatively associated with mental health [11]. As a critical aspect of evaluating oneself and others in social interactions, adolescents are incredibly conscious of their body image [1213]. Some public health studies have reported that correcting BSM is imperative for motivating adolescents to reduce their unhealthy eating habits [14151617].
A previous study found that an accurate perception of one’s body shape contributes to healthy eating behaviors. A direct association was observed between the weight underestimation group and the consumption pattern of pickled meat or sugar-sweetened beverages, and an inverse association was observed between weight overestimation and a healthy dietary pattern [1718]. Some studies have examined the association between BSM and eating behaviors; however, most examined eating disorders, such as fasting, loss of control over eating, and purging [1519].
Many studies have reported factors associated with adolescents’ perceived body shape, including socioeconomic status, sex, and health habits [202122]. Girls overestimate their body size because their image of an ideal female body shape tends to be thinner [2324]. However, boys often underestimate their body size, as bulky and muscular physiques are ideal male body shapes [252627].
Changes in BSM and related health behaviors during adolescence can play a critical role in future outcomes of obesity and psychosocial burden. Therefore, it is essential to ensure adolescents engage in appropriate eating behaviors. Previous studies show that accurate body shape recognition is related to appropriate eating behaviors [13141516171819]. Although studies have been conducted on weight perception and related factors among Korean adolescents [1628], only a few have determined the relationship between BSM and dietary patterns [142930]. However, these studies did not examine associations with UEB using the latest Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey (KYRBWS). Accordingly, more research needs to be conducted to understand better the complex relationship between BSM and UEB using recently available data, indicating the need for further study of the target factors.
This study aimed to examine the association between BSM and UEB among Korean adolescents using recently available 2019 data. These findings may contribute to developing Korean adolescents’ health and health education policies.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Study population

This study used data from the 2019 KYRBWS, which provides statistics on youth health behaviors, to establish and evaluate youth healthcare plans in Korea [31]. The KYRBWS has been conducted annually since 2005 under the supervision of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Agency. The KYRBWS uses a multistage cluster sampling design to obtain a nationally representative sample of Korean students from 800 schools (400 middle and 400 high schools) comprising all public and private middle- and high-school students from 17 provinces in Korea [3132]. This study did not require approval or prior consent from an Institutional Review Board, as KYRBWS is a secondary dataset available in the public domain with de-identified data.

Eating behaviors

Adolescents’ eating behaviors were classified based on the frequency of caffeinated energy drinks, fast food, carbonated beverages, and sugar-sweetened beverages in the last 7 days.
Adolescents’ eating behaviors were assessed using four questions: a) During the last week, how often did you drink caffeinated energy drinks such as HOT6, Red Bull, or Bacchus? b) How often did you eat fast food, such as breakfast or fried chicken, during the last week? c) How often did you drink carbonated beverages, other than sparkling water, in the previous week? d) How often did you drink sugar-sweetened beverages, such as sports, canned fruit, or coffee, during the last week? Each item had 5 response options per week: 1) not at all, 2) 1 or 2 times, 3) 3 or 4 times, 4) 5 or 6 times, or 5) more than 7 times.
If participants responded with “more than 3 times per week” (options: 3 to 5) to at least one of the items, they were classified into the “unhealthy eating behavior” group. If they responded with “less than 3 times per week (options:1 and 2)” to all items, they were classified into the “healthy eating behavior” group [33].

Variables

BSM

BSM is determined by the difference between BMI and body weight perception (BWP). The BSM was categorized into 3 estimation groups: the “underestimation”, “accurate estimation”, and “overestimation” groups. Participants with BWP that was lower than their actual BMI were classified in the “underestimation” group. Those who perceived their BWP as normal and had a normal range in BMI were classified in the “accurate estimation” group, and those who perceived it to be above their actual BMI were classified in the “overestimation” group (i.e., if participants whose BMI was a normal weight perceived their body weight as obese, they were placed in the “overestimation” group) [2930].
BMI values were calculated using self-reported height and weight. BMI percentiles for age and sex were calculated according to the 2017 Standard Growth Charts created by the Korean Pediatric Society for Korean children and adolescents. Four categories were created: underweight (≤ 15th percentile), normal weight (16th to 84th percentile), overweight (85th to 95th percentile), and obese (≥ 95th percentile or BMI ≥ 25) [34]. The overweight and obese groups were considered a single group when performing BWP comparisons. BWP was measured using responses to the question: “How do you describe your weight?” This question had 5 response options: very underweight, underweight, normal weight, overweight, or very overweight. Each option was regrouped into 3 categories: thin, normal, and obese.

Covariates

The covariates included demographic and socioeconomic characteristics and health-related factors. Demographic and sociodemographic characteristics included sex, age, grade, residential area, and household economic status. Residential areas were classified as “metropolitan”, “urban”, or “rural.” Household economic status was classified as “low (very low and low)”, “middle”, and “high (high and very high)”.
Health-related factors included current smoking status, alcohol consumption, subjective stress status, depressive symptoms, and weight control attempts. Current smoking status was classified into “yes (not zero)” or “no (zero)” options in response to the following question: “In the last 30 days, how many cigarettes have you smoked?” Current alcohol consumption was classified into “yes (not zero)” or “no (zero)” options in response to the following question: “In the last 30 days, how many days have you had more than one drink?” Subjective stress status was based on the answers describing a person’s daily level of stress; answers such as “high stress”, “very stressed”, and “stressed” were classified as “high”, “a little stressed” was classified as “low”, and “not stressed” was classified as “none” stress categories. Depressive symptoms were defined as feelings of sadness or despair in the past year leading to disruptions in daily life for 2 whole weeks and were classified into “yes” or “no” responses. Weight control attempts were classified into “yes” or “no” options in response to the following question: “In the last 30 days, have you ever tried to control your weight?”

Statistical analysis

A frequency analysis was conducted to identify the general characteristics of the study participants. The χ2 test was used to evaluate and compare the general characteristics of the study participants. Multiple logistic regression analysis examined the associations between BMI, BSM, and UEB. Additionally, a subgroup analysis using BSM was conducted to determine whether sex led to differences in the association between BSM and UEB. All analyses were conducted using SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), and statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. The relevant primary sampling units, sample weights, and stratifications were considered in the analysis because the KYRBWS was designed as a complex sample.

RESULTS

Study participants and general characteristics

The study population comprised 57,303 participants. We excluded those who answered, “I do not know”, refused to respond to the questions, and had missing data on the questions included in this study. Finally, 55,748 participants were included in this study (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Population selection process flow chart.

nrp-17-1143-g001
The demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of the participants are summarized in Table 1. In total, 32.5% (n = 18,141) of the healthy eating behaviors and 67.5% (n = 37,607) of UEB were analyzed. Most of the study participants (60.8%) accurately estimated their body shape. In the underestimation group, the proportion of UEB was the largest (8,248, 71.3%) to the BSM shown in Fig. 2. The gap between UEB among the BSM was the largest at 5.0%p between the underestimation and accurate estimation groups.
Table 1

General characteristics of the study population

nrp-17-1143-i001
Variables Eating behaviors
Total Healthy Unhealthy P-value1)
BSM 55,748 (100.0) 18,141 (32.5) 37,607 (67.5) < 0.001
Accurate estimation 33,870 (60.8) 11,408 (33.7) 22,462 (66.3)
Underestimation 11,566 (20.8) 3,318 (28.7) 8,248 (71.3)
Overestimation 10,312 (18.4) 3,415 (33.1) 6,897 (66.9)
BMI 0.021
Normal weight 40,183 (72.0) 12,966 (32.3) 27,217 (67.7)
Underweight 3,878 (7.0) 1,247 (32.2) 2,631 (67.8)
Overweight 11,687 (21.0) 3,928 (33.6) 7,759 (66.4)
Age < 0.001
12 4,760 (8.5) 1,856 (39.0) 2,904 (61.0)
13 9,328 (16.7) 3,356 (36.0) 5,972 (64.0)
14 9,637 (17.3) 3,179 (33.0) 6,458 (67.0)
15 9,433 (16.9) 2,901 (30.8) 6,532 (69.3)
16 8,896 (16.0) 2,767 (31.1) 6,129 (68.9)
17 9,208 (16.5) 2,733 (29.7) 6,475 (70.3)
18 4,486 (8.1) 1,349 (30.1) 3,137 (69.9)
Sex < 0.001
Girls 26,689 (47.9) 9,824 (36.8) 16,865 (63.2)
Boys 29,059 (52.1) 8,317 (28.6) 20,742 (71.4)
Grade < 0.001
7 9,528 (17.1) 3,666 (38.5) 5,862 (61.5)
8 9,426 (16.9) 3,145 (33.4) 6,281 (66.6)
9 9,721 (17.4) 3,098 (31.9) 6,623 (68.1)
10 9,022 (16.3) 2,768 (30.7) 6,254 (69.3)
11 8,774 (15.7) 2,708 (30.9) 6,066 (69.1)
12 9,277 (16.6) 2,756 (29.7) 6,521 (70.3)
Residential area < 0.001
Rural 3,453 (6.2) 1,238 (35.9) 2,215 (64.2)
Urban 23,697 (42.5) 7,631 (32.2) 16,066 (67.8)
Metropolitan 28,598 (51.3) 9,272 (32.4) 19,326 (67.6)
Household economic status 0.084
High 21,898 (39.3) 7,185 (32.8) 14,713 (67.2)
Middle 26,856 (48.2) 8,760 (32.6) 18,096 (67.4)
Low 6,994 (12.5) 2,196 (31.4) 4,798 (68.6)
Current smoking < 0.001
No 52,273 (93.8) 17,549 (33.6) 34,724 (66.4)
Yes 3,475 (6.2) 592 (17.0) 2,883 (83.0)
Current alcohol consumption < 0.001
No 47,762 (85.7) 16,377 (34.3) 31,385 (65.7)
Yes 7,986 (14.3) 1,764 (22.1) 6,222 (77.9)
Stress status < 0.001
None 2,139 (3.8) 823 (38.5) 1,316 (61.5)
Low 31,623 (56.7) 10,887 (34.4) 20,736 (65.6)
High 21,986 (39.5) 6,431 (29.3) 15,555 (70.8)
Depression < 0.001
No 40,265 (72.2) 13,850 (34.4) 26,415 (65.6)
Yes 15,483 (27.8) 4,291 (27.7) 11,192 (72.3)
Weight control attempt < 0.001
No 26,466 (47.5) 8,234 (31.1) 18,232 (68.9)
Yes 29,282 (52.5) 9,907 (33.8) 19,375 (66.2)
Values are presented as number (%).
BSM, body shape misperception; BMI, body mass index.
1)P-values for the χ2 test to evaluate and compare the general characteristics of the study participants.
Fig. 2

Comparison of eating behaviors by BSM among Korean adolescents.

BSM, body shape misperception.
nrp-17-1143-g002
The study results revealed that most of the study participants were boys (29,059, 52.1%), aged 14 years (9,637, 17.3%), in 9th grade (9,721, 17.4%), residing in a metropolitan area (28,598, 51.3%), and belonging to a middle socioeconomic status (26,856, 48.2%). The distribution of UEB was found among boys (20,742, 71.4%), 17-year-olds (6,475, 70.3%), and 12th-grade students (6,521, 70.3%). Regarding health habits, adolescents who smoked (2, 883, 83.0%), consumed alcohol (6,222, 77.9%), had higher stress (15,555, 70.8%) and depression (11,192, 72.3%), and did not attempt weight control (18,232, 68.9%) showed UEB. All demographic and socioeconomic characteristics were statistically associated (P < 0.001), except for household income (P = 0.084).

Multivariate logistic regression analysis for association between BSM and UEB

The association between BSM and UEB is shown in Table 2. Compared to the accurate estimation group, the underestimation group was likelier to have UEB (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11–1.25). Boys (AOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.45–1.58) and age group of 17 years (AOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.02–1.57) are likelier to have UEB than girls and other age groups. Regarding health habits, adolescents with current smoking (AOR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.47–1.83), consumed alcohol (AOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.38–1.59), high-level stress (AOR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.43–1.77) and depression showed more likely to have UEB and statistically significant (P < 0.001). Conversely, adolescents who were overweight (AOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.89–0.99) and had not attempted weight control (AOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.85–0.92) were less likely to have UEB and statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Table 2

Factors associated with UEB

nrp-17-1143-i002
Variables UEB
AOR 95% CI P-value
BSM
Accurate estimation 1.00
Underestimation 1.18 1.11–1.25 < 0.001
Overestimation 1.04 0.98–1.10 0.170
BMI
Normal 1.00
Underweight 1.03 0.95–1.12 0.454
Overweight 0.94 0.89–0.99 0.013
Age
12 1.00
13 1.04 0.95–1.14 0.385
14 1.11 0.98–1.26 0.110
15 1.22 1.03–1.43 0.021
16 1.18 0.98–1.43 0.088
17 1.27 1.02–1.57 0.030
18 1.21 0.97–1.52 0.096
Sex
Girls 1.00
Boys 1.51 1.45–1.58 < 0.001
Grade
7 1.00
8 1.15 1.04–1.27 0.005
9 1.14 0.99–1.31 0.077
10 1.14 0.96–1.36 0.130
11 1.06 0.87–1.29 0.563
12 1.07 0.87–1.32 0.514
Residential area
Rural 1.00
Urban 1.12 1.00–1.25 0.056
Metropolitan 1.12 1.00–1.25 0.055
Household economic status
High 1.00
Middle 1.00 0.96–1.04 0.995
Low 0.94 0.88–1.01 0.088
Current smoking
No 1.00
Yes 1.64 1.47–1.83 < 0.001
Current alcohol consumption
No 1.00
Yes 1.48 1.38–1.59 < 0.001
Stress status
None 1.00
Low 1.28 1.16–1.42 < 0.001
High 1.59 1.43–1.77 < 0.001
Depression
No 1.00
Yes 1.29 1.23–1.36 < 0.001
Weight control attempt
No 1.00
Yes 0.89 0.85–0.92 < 0.001
UEB, unhealthy eating behaviors; BSM, body shape misperception; BMI, body mass index; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Subgroup analysis for the sex-based association between BSM and UEB

A subgroup analysis of the association between BSM and UEB according to sex is presented in Table 3. The underestimation group of boys showed a higher likelihood of UEB (AOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.08–1.26) than the accurate estimation group. Similarly, girls who underestimated their body shape were likelier to have UEB (AOR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.09–1.30) than the accurate estimation group (P < 0.001).
Table 3

Subgroup analysis of the association between BSM and UEB by sex

nrp-17-1143-i003
Variables UEB
Boys Girls
AOR 95% CI P-value AOR 95% CI P-value
BSM
Accurate estimation 1.00 1.00
Underestimation 1.16 1.08–1.26 0.000 1.19 1.09–1.30 0.001
Overestimation 1.07 0.98–1.17 0.135 1.03 0.95–1.10 0.511
BMI
Normal 1.00 1.00
Underweight 0.99 0.88–1.11 0.829 1.07 0.96–1.20 0.211
Overweight 0.91 0.85–0.97 0.005 0.96 0.89–1.04 0.323
Age
12 1.00 1.00
13 1.02 0.90–1.16 0.771 1.06 0.93–1.22 0.373
14 1.04 0.87–1.24 0.674 1.19 0.98–1.45 0.084
15 1.08 0.87–1.35 0.479 1.36 1.07–1.74 0.014
16 0.92 0.71–1.19 0.539 1.50 1.13–1.98 0.005
17 1.05 0.79–1.39 0.748 1.52 1.10–2.11 0.011
18 0.97 0.71–1.32 0.845 1.51 1.07–2.14 0.019
Grade
7 1.00 1.00
8 1.28 1.11–1.48 0.001 1.03 0.90–1.18 0.691
9 1.42 1.17–1.73 0.001 0.92 0.75–1.12 0.390
10 1.45 1.14–1.84 0.002 0.91 0.71–1.17 0.472
11 1.37 1.05–1.79 0.022 0.82 0.62–1.09 0.178
12 1.35 1.02–1.79 0.038 0.85 0.62–1.18 0.333
Residential area
Rural 1.00 1.00
Urban 1.01 0.86–1.20 0.867 1.23 1.07–1.41 0.004
Metropolitan 1.00 0.85–1.18 0.982 1.25 1.09–1.43 0.002
Household economic status
High 1.00 1.00
Middle 0.88 0.79–0.96 0.007 1.02 0.94–1.12 0.614
Low 0.96 0.90–1.02 0.162 1.05 0.99–1.12 0.114
Current smoking
No 1.00 1.00
Yes 1.67 1.47–1.89 < 0.001 1.59 1.26–2.01 0.000
Current alcohol consumption
No 1.00 1.00
Yes 1.51 1.37–1.66 < 0.001 1.45 1.32–1.61 < 0.001
Stress status
None 1.00 1.00
Low 1.27 1.13–1.42 < 0.001 1.39 1.13–1.71 0.002
High 1.50 1.33–1.70 < 0.001 1.78 1.45–2.20 < 0.001
Depression
No 1.00 1.00
Yes 1.28 1.18–1.38 < 0.001 1.29 1.21–1.38 < 0.001
Weight control attempt
No 1.00 1.00
Yes 0.90 0.85–0.96 0.001 0.88 0.83–0.93 < 0.001
UEB, unhealthy eating behaviors; BSM, body shape misperception; BMI, body mass index; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

DISCUSSION

This study aimed to identify the association between BSM and UEB among Korean adolescents. Approximately 70% of the participants exhibited UEB, regardless of their BSM group. The age group of 17 years and adolescents who experienced stress showed a higher likelihood of UEB. Girls were more likely to underestimate their body shape than boys.
Most are busy because of excessive competition for entrance exams, resulting in irregular and unhealthy dietary habits [3]. Furthermore, a new eating pattern denoted “mukbang” started trending globally in 2014 [35]. The word “mukbang” (also stylized as muk-bang or meokbang) has been described as a virtual substitute for socialization involving eating one’s own food; it has also been called a stress buster. During this Korean “eating show”, the host consumes large amounts of food, typically unhealthy dishes such as fast food or instant ramen noodles, and streams or posts their video on an online video platform [36]. The main viewers of mukbang are singles or individuals living alone, especially adolescents who spend most of their time alone at study cafés or gaming at computer centers; thus, this population is more inclined toward imitating UEB [37]. Kim et al. [38] reported that adolescents who frequently watched mukbang were likelier to engage in UEB.
This study found that the underestimation group was likelier to consume unhealthy foods than the precise estimation group. Individuals who perceived themselves as skinny might have consumed unhealthy foods because they thought their metabolism was faster and burned more calories than those who did not [39]. Similarly, adolescents who undervalue their body size might lack the motivation to adopt healthy habits [40]. This finding partly supported previous results, as the associations in previous studies differed according to the food type consumed. The underestimation group was more likely to consume fast food, and the overestimation group was less likely to drink sugar-sweetened beverages [1435]. However, this study used different standards of UEB from the present study.
We also found that health habits and psychological problems such as smoking, alcohol consumption, high stress, and depression with improper weight control increased the probability of UEB among adolescents, consistent with other relevant studies [2830344041]. Furthermore, our findings revealed that students with excessive BMI and lack of weight control were negatively associated with UEB. Studies have shown that obese children and adolescents are more likely to experience an underestimation of body shape and are linked to UEB [303940414243]. Generally, adolescents are constantly exposed to unrealistic body norms depicted by the media and are accepted as the benchmark of society's ideas of beauty. Additionally, Silva et al. [17] reported that black and brown adolescent girls had 58% more BSM than White adolescent girls, indicating that race plays a significant role in BSM. Overestimation of body weight among Korean girls must be empowered to rectify their perceptions and obtain appropriate instructions focusing on changing eating patterns while considering their growth and development.
Among girls, those who underestimated their body shape showed a stronger association with UEB than those who accurately estimated their body shape. Lim et al. [14] reported similar findings; girls who underestimate their weight usually have unhealthy eating patterns, adopt inappropriate weight-loss strategies, and do not have proper eating behaviors to maintain weight control. Adolescents spend more than an hour daily on social media [42], and girls spend more time on appearance-focused social media, such as Facebook and Instagram [43]. Due to the increase in mass media and commercial advertisements that idealize skinny body shapes for women and muscular body shapes for men, girls tend to overestimate their body shape. In contrast, boys tend to underestimate it [4445].
Thus, boys tended to engage in UEB more than girls. After stratification by sex, both sexes showed a similar association with the underestimation of body shape and UEB compared with the accurate estimation group. Specifically, future studies on adolescents who underestimate their body shape should be designed regardless of sex. Most studies have attempted to find a relationship between exaggerated body size and mental problems or disordered eating while focusing on girls. Therefore, further studies are needed to determine sex-based associations between underestimating body shape and food consumption (unhealthy eating habits), regardless of current outcomes. Moreover, adolescents need to acquire the correct knowledge regarding physical activity to minimize their chances of harm. Therefore, the government requires additional large-scale prospective studies to evaluate the dietary patterns of adolescents. Consequently, parents need to promote a healthy lifestyle.
This study had several limitations. First, the cross-sectional design precludes discussions of the causal relationships between BSM and UEB. Second, self-reported weights tended to be lower than actual weights. Finally, we did not address the frequency of consumption of fruits and vegetables, healthy fats, etc., because of the lack of data regarding the quantity of food consumed and the number of servings in the KYRBWS. Nevertheless, this study analyzed the association between BSM and UEB using nationally representative school-based data. Unlike previous studies that mainly focused on the association between overestimation and mental diseases, this study analyzed the dietary patterns related to various health problems. In addition, the present study included variables of UEB with the same standards as those of food overdoses.
In conclusion, our findings suggest that underestimating body shape may increase UEB among Korean adolescents. These findings support the notion that educating adolescents on their body shape and teaching them not to underestimate their figure aids them in forming suitable eating behaviors. Ultimately, preventing noncommunicable diseases must be integral to school nutrition education. Longitudinal studies are needed to verify whether accurate body shape perception during adolescence can help form healthy eating behaviors and lifestyles in adulthood.

Notes

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interests.

Author Contributions:

  • Conceptualization: Kim Y, Kim B, Kim TH.

  • Data curation: Kim Y, Kim B, Kim TH.

  • Formal analysis: Kim Y, Kim B, Rajaguru V.

  • Funding acquisition: Kim TH.

  • Methodology: Kim Y, Kim B, Kim TH.

  • Supervision: Lee SG, Kim TH.

  • Validation: Lee SG, Kim TH.

  • Writing - original draft: Kim Y, Kim B, Rajaguru V.

  • Writing - review & editing: Lee SG, Kim TH.

References

1. Eisenmann JC. Secular trends in variables associated with the metabolic syndrome of North American children and adolescents: a review and synthesis. Am J Hum Biol. 2003; 15:786–794. PMID: 14595870.
2. Moreno LA, Rodriguez G, Fleta J, Bueno-Lozano M, Lazaro A, Bueno G. Trends of dietary habits in adolescents. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2010; 50:106–112. PMID: 20112152.
3. Hong CH. Current health issues in Korean adolescents. Korean J Pediatr. 2011; 54:395–400. PMID: 22232620.
4. Bucher Della Torre S, Keller A, Laure Depeyre J, Kruseman M. Sugar-sweetened beverages and obesity risk in children and adolescents: a systematic analysis on how methodological quality may influence conclusions. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016; 116:638–659. PMID: 26194333.
5. Sami W, Ansari T, Butt NS, Hamid MRA. Effect of diet on type 2 diabetes mellitus: a review. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2017; 11:65–71.
6. Park E, Ko Y. Trends in obesity and obesity-related risk factors among adolescents in Korea from 2009 to 2019. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19:5672. PMID: 35565066.
7. Pereira MA, Kartashov AI, Ebbeling CB, Van Horn L, Slattery ML, Jacobs DR Jr, Ludwig DS. Fast-food habits, weight gain, and insulin resistance (the CARDIA study): 15-year prospective analysis. Lancet. 2005; 365:36–42. PMID: 15639678.
8. Martin-Calvo N, Martínez-González MA, Bes-Rastrollo M, Gea A, Ochoa MC, Marti A. GENOI Members. Sugar-sweetened carbonated beverage consumption and childhood/adolescent obesity: a case-control study. Public Health Nutr. 2014; 17:2185–2193. PMID: 24485091.
9. van Dam RM, Hu FB, Willett WC. Coffee, caffeine, and health. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383:369–378. PMID: 32706535.
10. Liechty JM, Lee MJ. Body size estimation and other psychosocial risk factors for obesity onset among US adolescents: findings from a longitudinal population level study. Int J Obes. 2015; 39:601–607.
11. Ali MM, Fang H, Rizzo JA. Body weight, self-perception and mental health outcomes among adolescents. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2010; 13:53–63. PMID: 20919592.
12. Phelps L, Johnston LS, Jimenez DP, Wilczenski FL, Andrea RK, Healy RW. Figure preference, body dissatisfaction, and body distortion in adolescence. J Adolesc Res. 1993; 8:297–310.
13. Kim DS, Kim HS, Cho Y, Cho SI. The effects of actual and perceived body weight on unhealthy weight control behaviors and depressed mood among adult women in Seoul, Korea. J Prev Med Public Health. 2008; 41:323–330. PMID: 18827500.
14. Lim H, Wang Y. Body weight misperception patterns and their association with health-related factors among adolescents in South Korea. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013; 21:2596–2603. PMID: 23512737.
15. Sonneville KR, Thurston IB, Milliren CE, Gooding HC, Richmond TK. Weight misperception among young adults with overweight/obesity associated with disordered eating behaviors. Int J Eat Disord. 2016; 49:937–946. PMID: 27218865.
16. Lee JH, Lee HS, Kim H, Kwon YJ, Shin J, Lee JW. Association between nutrition education, dietary habits, and body image misperception in adolescents. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2021; 30:512–521. PMID: 34587711.
17. Silva SUD, Alves MA, Vasconcelos FAG, Gonçalves VSS, Barufaldi LA, Carvalho KMB. Association between body weight misperception and dietary patterns in Brazilian adolescents: cross-sectional study using ERICA data. PLoS One. 2021; 16:e0257603. PMID: 34555063.
18. Yan H, Wu Y, Oniffrey T, Brinkley J, Zhang R, Zhang X, Wang Y, Chen G, Li R, Moore JB. Body weight misperception and its association with unhealthy eating behaviors among adolescents in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15:936. PMID: 29738429.
19. Verzijl CL, Ahlich E, Lang B, Rancourt D. Body mass index as a moderator of the association between weight status misperception and disordered eating behaviors. Eat Behav. 2018; 30:98–103. PMID: 29990654.
20. Story M, French SA, Resnick MD, Blum RW. Ethnic/racial and socioeconomic differences in dieting behaviors and body image perceptions in adolescents. Int J Eat Disord. 1995; 18:173–179. PMID: 7581420.
21. Heiman T, Olenik-Shemesh D. Perceived body appearance and eating habits: the voice of young and adult students attending higher education. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16:451. PMID: 30720728.
22. Fischetti F, Latino F, Cataldi S, Greco G. Gender differences in body image dissatisfaction: the role of physical education and sport. J Hum Sport Exerc. 2020; 15:241–250.
23. Bovet J. The evolution of feminine beauty. Exploring Transdisciplinarity in art and sciences. 2018; 327–357.
24. Sadowska J, Dziaduch I, Bruszkowska M, Ziółkowska K. BMI, body perception, and approach to eating and diet in adolescent girls. SAGE Open. 2020; 10:215824402096281.
25. Pope HG Jr, Khalsa JH, Bhasin S. Body image disorders and abuse of anabolic-androgenic steroids among men. JAMA. 2017; 317:23–24. PMID: 27930760.
26. Murray SB, Accurso EC, Griffiths S, Nagata JM. Boys, biceps, and bradycardia: the hidden dangers of muscularity-oriented disordered eating. J Adolesc Health. 2018; 62:352–355. PMID: 29241987.
27. Nagata JM, Bibbins-Domingo K, Garber AK, Griffiths S, Vittinghoff E, Murray SB. Boys, bulk, and body ideals: sex differences in weight-gain attempts among adolescents in the United States. J Adolesc Health. 2019; 64:450–453. PMID: 30482658.
28. Joeng EH, Lee IS. Multilevel analysis of factors associated with subjective weight perception among normal body weight adolescents based on the 2017 Korean Youth’s Risk Behavior Survey (KYRBS). J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2018; 29:476–487.
29. Shin J, Choi Y, Han KT, Cheon SY, Kim JH, Lee SG, Park EC. The combined effect of subjective body image and body mass index (distorted body weight perception) on suicidal ideation. J Prev Med Public Health. 2015; 48:94–104. PMID: 25857647.
30. Lee SA, Jang SY, Shin J, Ju YJ, Nam JY, Park EC. The association between inappropriate weight control behaviors and suicide ideation and attempt among Korean adolescents. J Korean Med Sci. 2016; 31:1529–1537. PMID: 27550479.
31. Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Ministry of Education. Statistics from the fifteenth Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey [Internet]. Cheongju: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;2019. cited 2022 April 7. Available from: https://www.kdca.go.kr/yhs/.
32. Kim Y, Choi S, Chun C, Park S, Khang YH, Oh K. Data resource profile: the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey (KYRBS). Int J Epidemiol. 2016; 45:1076–1076e. PMID: 27380796.
33. Lee Y, Jeon YJ, Shim JS, Jung SJ. Association between dietary and suicidal behaviors based on the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (2015–2020). Epidemiol Health. 2022; 44:e2022033. PMID: 35381168.
34. Kim JH. Overview of pediatric obesity: diagnosis, epidemiology, and significance. J Korean Med Assoc. 2021; 64:401–409.
35. Google. Google trends 2018 [Internet]. Mountain View: Google;2019. cited 2022 June 3. Available from: https://trends.google.com.
36. Strand M, Gustafsson SA. Mukbang and disordered eating: a netnographic analysis of online eating broadcasts. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2020; 44:586–609. PMID: 32277331.
37. An S, Lim Y, Lee H. A content analysis of eating show (Mukbang) programs on television and online program content in South Korea. Korean J Broadcast Telecommun Stud. 2020; 34:39–79.
38. Kim SK, Kim J, Kim H, An S, Lim Y, Park H. Association between food-related media program watching and dietary behaviors in Korean adolescents. Korean Public Health Res. 2020; 46:31–46.
39. Gaylis JB, Levy SS, Hong MY. Relationships between body weight perception, body mass index, physical activity, and food choices in Southern California male and female adolescents. Int J Adolesc Youth. 2020; 25:264–275.
40. Hernández Camacho JD, Rodríguez Lazo M, Bolaños Ríos P, Ruiz Prieto I, Jáuregui-Lobera I. Eating habits, excess weight and weight self-perception at school. Nutr Hosp. 2015; 32:1334–1343. PMID: 26319858.
41. Lu J, Tan C, Zhou J, Sha M, Xu Y, Qiu J, Liu N. Compared with girls, boys’ psychological symptoms are more likely to be influenced by lifestyle in Chinese middle school students. Front Psychol. 2022; 13:899273. PMID: 35874346.
42. Rideout V, Robb M. The common sense census: media use by tweens and teens [Internet]. San Francisco: Common Sense Media;2019. cited 2022 June 17. Available from: https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/research/report/2019-census-8-to-18-full-report-updated.pdf.
43. Mingoia J, Hutchinson AD, Gleaves DH, Wilson C. The relationship between posting and photo manipulation activities on social networking sites and internalization of a tanned ideal among Australian adolescents and young adults. Social Media + Society. 2019; 5:2056305118820419.
44. Pope HG Jr, Gruber AJ, Choi P, Olivardia R, Phillips KA. Muscle dysmorphia. An underrecognized form of body dysmorphic disorder. Psychosomatics. 1997; 38:548–557. PMID: 9427852.
45. Thompson JK, Heinberg LJ. The media’s influence on body image disturbance and eating disorders: we’ve reviled them, now can we rehabilitate them? J Soc Issues. 1999; 55:339–353.
TOOLS
Similar articles