Journal List > J Korean Med Sci > v.36(19) > 1146974

Cho, Ju, Hyun, Lee, Sung, Koo, Lim, and Yoo: Conditioning with 10 Gy Total Body Irradiation, Cyclophosphamide, and Fludarabine without ATG Is Associated with Improved Outcome of Cord Blood Transplantation in Children with Acute Leukemia

Abstract

Background

The optimal conditioning regimen in cord blood transplantation (CBT) needs to be determined. This study aimed to identify the impact of conditioning regimen on the outcome of CBT in children with acute leukemia.

Methods

Medical records of patients with acute leukemia who received CBT were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

A total of 71 patients were allocated into 2 groups; patients who received total body irradiation 10 Gy, cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg, and fludarabine 75 mg/m2 were named as TCF group (n = 18), while the non-TCF group (n = 53) included patients conditioned with regimens other than the TCF regimen. All patients in the TCF group were successfully engrafted, while 22.6% in the non-TCF group (n = 12) failed to achieve donor-origin hematopoiesis (P = 0.028). The incidence of cytomegalovirus diseases was 5.6% in the TCF group and 30.2% in the non-TCF group (P = 0.029). The 5-year overall survival rates of the TCF and non-TCF groups were 77.8% and 44.2%, respectively (P = 0.017).

Conclusion

Patients conditioned with the TCF regimen achieved better engraftment and survival rates, less suffering from cytomegalovirus disease. Our data suggest that the TCF regimen is a preferred option for CBT in children with acute leukemia.

Graphical Abstract

jkms-36-e128-abf001.jpg

INTRODUCTION

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a potentially curative option for various malignant and nonmalignant diseases. Among several donor options, umbilical cord blood has been emerged as an established alternative source of hematopoietic stem cells, especially for patients lacking a suitable human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched related or unrelated donor. Multiple studies have demonstrated similar survival in children and adults receiving cord blood transplantation (CBT) to a standard unrelated donor HSCT.123
Total body irradiation (TBI) has traditionally been included in the standard myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens, since it enables both irreversible elimination of malignant cells and strong immune-suppression.4 Especially in CBT, TBI has been reported to do an important role in successful neutrophil engraftment.5 However, its long-term complications have emerged as a major challenge, and no-TBI regimens were introduced and preferred by many centers.
Although conditioning regimens comprise a principal element of HSCT, studies analyzing the impact of different conditioning regimens on CBT outcomes are scarce, especially in pediatric population. Recently, a study by Eapen et al.6 demonstrated that total body irradiation 10 Gy, cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg, and fludarabine 75 mg/m2 (TCF) regimen consisting of TBI 13.2 Gy, cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg, and fludarabine 75 mg/m2 were associated with improved survival, compared to other regimens in CBT for children with acute leukemia. This type of TCF conditioning regimen excluded anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG).
In this study, we aimed to identify the impact of conditioning regimens on the outcome of CBT in children with acute leukemia, by comparing outcomes of the TCF with 10 Gy TBI versus non-TCF regimens.

METHODS

Study population

A retrospective chart review was performed on patients with acute leukemia who received CBT between 2002 and 2015, at Samsung Medical Center. The subjects were retrospectively identified through a survey of our institutional database. All patients were diagnosed with acute leukemia and were candidates for allogeneic HSCT. CBT was performed if no suitable HLA-matched related or unrelated donor was available. Patients who had received prior allogeneic transplantation were excluded. Before March 2005, the HLA disparity between the recipient and the graft was determined at the 6-loci antigen level only (i.e., HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR). After March 2005, the cord blood grafts were matched with at least 4–6 HLA-A and HLA-B at antigen level and HLA-DRB1 at the allele level to the recipient. When two cord blood units were transplanted, transplantation was performed in the same level of match between each unit. Double unit CBT was performed in patients who lack a single cord blood unit with adequate cell dose. All patients received MAC regimens, either TBI-based or intravenous busulfan-based.7 The type of conditioning regimens was selected based on the patient's diagnosis, disease status, and the availability of drugs and TBI. TBI to a total dose of 10 Gy in 3 daily fractions was given (3.33 Gy/day for 3 days). Busulfan was given intravenously at a dose of 3.2 mg/kg/day for 4 days. ATG (Thymoglobulin; Genzyme, Cambridge, MA, USA) was administered at a dose of 2.5 mg/kg for 3 consecutive days. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporin A combined with mycophenolate mofetil or methylprednisolone. All patients received antimicrobial prophylaxis with acyclovir and micafungin.
Patients were allocated into 2 groups; the TCF and the non-TCF group. The TCF group included patients conditioned with the TCF regimen, while the non-TCF group included those who received MAC regimens other than the TCF regimen. For TCF regimen, TBI 10 Gy was given as 3.33 Gy/day (without fractionation) for 3 days (d-7 to d-5), cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg/day for 2 days (d-3, d-2), and fludarabine 25 mg/m2/day for 3 days (d-4 to d-2). The conditioning regimen was mainly TCF in AML after 2008, but other regimens which exclude TBI were selected in patients under 2 years of age. In the case of ALL, TCF has been used as the main conditioning regimen since 2013.

Definitions

Neutrophil engraftment was defined as the first of three consecutive days for absolute neutrophil count greater than 0.5 × 109/L. For post-transplant monitoring of donor engraftment, chimerism testing was routinely performed on peripheral blood and bone marrow samples, via polymerase chain reaction amplification of short tandem repeat loci. Mixed chimerism was defined as the presence of ≥ 1% recipient-derived cells. Diagnosis and grading for acute GVHD was based on the standard criteria. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease was defined as a positive CMV antigenemia assay and any of the following: the presence of relevant symptoms, signs, the presence of retinitis on ophthalmologic examination, or a tissue biopsy specimen that was CMV positive by either culture or immunohistochemical staining.89 Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was defined as death from any cause other than disease relapse or progression. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of transplant to death from any cause or last contact if the patient remained alive. Event-free survival (EFS) was calculated from the date of transplant to the date of relapse or progression, graft failure, death, or last contact if the patient remained event-free.

Statistical analysis

Patient and transplant characteristics of the 2 groups were compared using the χ2 test or the Fisher's exact test for the categorical variables. Continuous variables were compared using the Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. The 5-year probabilities of EFS and OS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate comparisons between survival curves were performed using the log-rank test. All statistical analyses were performed by R version 3.6.1 and SPSS version 25.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethics statement

This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Samsung Medical Center (IRB No. 2018-06-112). The need for informed consent was waived by the board.

RESULTS

Patient and transplant characteristics

A total of 71 patients were included in this study. Tables 1 and 2 illustrates the characteristics of these 71 patients (46 males and 25 females). The TCF group included 18 patients and the non-TCF group included 53 patients. The median age and body weight of the total patients at the time of CBT were 7.3 years (range, 0.6–18.5) and 26.0 kg (range, 6.2–72.0), respectively. The median numbers of infused total nucleated cells (TNCs) and CD34+ cells were 4.4 × 107/kg (range, 1.2–13.2) and 1.6 × 105/kg (range 0.5-8.3), respectively. In terms of the median age (P = 0.810), body weight (P = 0.413), and numbers of infused TNCs (P = 0.084) and CD34+ cells (P = 0.078), no significant differences were noted between the 2 groups. The proportion of the types of leukemia was also not statistically different between the 2 groups (P = 0.088). Of the total 71 patients, 48 (67.6%) were in CR1 at transplant. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the disease status at transplant (P = 0.904).
Table 1

Patient and transplant characteristics

jkms-36-e128-i001
Characteristics Values (n = 71)
M:F ratio 1.84:1
Age at CBT, yr 7.3 (0.6–18.5)
Body weight, kg 26.0 (6.0–72.0)
Total nucleated cells, × 107/kg 4.4 (1.2–13.2)
CD34+ cells, × 105/kg 1.6 (0.5–8.3)
No. of transplanted cord blood unit
Single 38 (53.5)
Double 33 (46.5)
GVHD prophylaxis
CSA plus steroid 20 (28.2)
CSA plus MMF 51 (71.8)
Values are presented as median (range) or number (%).
M:F = ratio male-to-female ratio, CBT = cord blood transplantation, GVHD = graft-versus-host disease, CSA = cyclosporin A, MMF = mycophenolate mofetil.
Table 2

Patient and transplantation characteristics according to treatment group

jkms-36-e128-i002
Characteristics Group 1 (TCF) (n = 18) Group 2 (non-TCF) (n = 53) P value
Age at CBT, yr 6.9 (2.1–15.9) 8.3 (0.6–18.5) 0.810
Body weight, kg 20.6 (11.6–57.1) 27.2 (6.2–72.0) 0.413
Diagnosis 0.088
AML 13 (72.2) 26 (49.1)
ALL/MPAL 5 (27.8) 27 (50.9)
Year of transplantation < 0.001
2002–2005 0 (0.0) 20 (37.7)
2005–2009 7 (38.9) 25 (47.2)
2010–2013 11 (61.1) 8 (15.1)
TBI in conditioning regimen 18 (100.0) 17 (32.1) < 0.001
ATG in conditioning regimen 0 (0.0) 51 (96.2) < 0.001
Fludarabine in conditioning regimen 18 (100.0) 21 (40.4) < 0.001
Total nucleated cells, × 107/kg 5.15 (1.72–13.19) 4.24 (1.20–10.80) 0.084
CD34+ cells, × 105/kg 1.70 (0.71–8.26) 1.54 (0.49–4.37) 0.078
Disease status prior to CBT 0.904
CR1 13 (72.2) 35 (66.0)
CR2 4 (22.2) 14 (26.4)
> CR3 or persistent 1 (5.6) 4 (7.5)
Values are presented as median (range) or number (%).
TCF = total body irradiation 10 Gy, cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg, and fludarabine 75 mg/m2, CBT = cord blood transplantation, AML = acute myelogenous leukemia, ALL = acute lymphoblastic leukemia, MPAL = mixed-phenotype acute leukemia, TBI = total body irradiation, ATG = anti-thymocyte globulin, CR = complete remission.
Marked differences were noted in the composition of conditioning regimens. All patients in the TCF group used TBI, while 17 (32.1%) out of 53 patients in the non-TCF group included TBI in their conditioning regimen (P < 0.001). No patient (0%) in the TCF group used ATG, while 51 (96.2%) of 53 patients in the non-TCF group included ATG in their conditioning regimens (P < 0.001).

Patients' outcomes

Engraftment

The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 17 days (range, 12–44) for the total patients, 16 days (range, 12–27) for the TCF group, and 18 days (range, 12–44) for the non-TCF group. Compared to the non-TCF group, the probability of neutrophil recovery was significantly higher in the TCF group (P = 0.014) (Fig. 1). Whereas all patients in TCF group achieved donor-origin hematopoiesis, 12 patients among 53 patients (22.6%) in non-TCF group failed, resulting in significant difference (P = 0.029). In the non-TCF group, causes of failure to achieve donor-origin hematopoiesis included early transplant-related mortality (n = 4), primary (n = 6) or secondary (n = 1) graft failure, and autologous recovery (n = 1).
Fig. 1

Probabilities of neutrophil recovery.

HSCT = hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, TCF = total body irradiation 10 Gy, cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg, and fludarabine 75 mg/m2.
jkms-36-e128-g001

GVHD

In the TCF group, grade II to IV and grade III to IV acute GVHD occurred in 15 (83.3%) and 3 (16.7%) patients, respectively. In the non-TCF group, grade II to IV and grade III to IV acute GVHD occurred in 25 (47.2%) and 6 (11.3%) patients, respectively. With regard to the incidences of grade II to IV acute GVHD, patients in the TCF group experienced a significantly higher incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD (P = 0.003). However, when compared in terms of the incidence of grade III to IV acute GVHD, no significant difference was noted between the two groups (P = 0.236) (Table 3). Cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 83.3% (15 of 18 patients) in the TCF group and 43.6% (23 of 53 patients) in the non-TCF group (P < 0.001).
Table 3

Incidence of acute GVHD

jkms-36-e128-i003
Grade Group 1 (TCF) (n = 18) Group 2 (non-TCF) (n = 53) P value
Grade 0–I 3 (16.7) 28 (52.8) -
Grade II–IV 15 (83.3) 25 (47.2) 0.008
Grade III–IV 3 (16.7) 6 (11.3) 0.683
Values are presented as number of patients (%).
GVHD = graft-versus-host disease, TCF = total body irradiation 10 Gy, cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg, and fludarabine 75 mg/m2.

CMV antigenemia and CMV diseases

In terms of the incidence of CMV antigenemia, no statistical differences were noted between the TCF (61.1%) and non-TCF (60.4%) groups (P = 0.956). However, CMV diseases occurred in 1 patient (5.6%) in the TCF group and 16 patients (30.2%) in the non-TCF group, demonstrating a significantly lower incidence of CMV diseases in the TCF group (P = 0.029).

Early bloodstream bacterial infection

Early bloodstream bacterial infection in the first 30 days occurred in 6 among 18 patients (33.3%) in the TCF group and 19 of 53 patients (35.8%) in the non-TCF group, with no significant difference (P = 0.862).

Survival, NRM and relapse

The median follow-up period of the total survivors was 117 months (range, 45-188). The 5-year EFS and OS of the total 71 patients were 49.8% and 52.5%, respectively. Among the TCF group, 4 out of 18 patients died at the time of analysis; 3 died of relapse after CBT, and 1 died of transplant-related mortality (infection and grade IV acute GVHD). Among the non-TCF group, 30 out of 53 patients died; 15 died of relapse, and 15 died of non-relapse causes, most of which were transplant-related mortality. The 5-year EFS for patients in the TCF and non-TCF groups were 77.8% and 40.4%, respectively (**P = 0.008) (Fig. 2A). The 5-year OS in the TCF and non-TCF group were 77.8% and 44.2%, respectively (*P = 0.017) (Fig. 2B), demonstrating significantly higher survival rates in the TCF group.
Fig. 2

Comparison of 5-year survival rates of the 2 groups. (A) The 5-year EFS. (B) The 5-year OS.

EFS = event-free survival, TCF = total body irradiation 10 Gy, cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg, and fludarabine 75 mg/m2, OS = overall survival.
jkms-36-e128-g002
The cumulative incidences of relapse at 5 years were 16.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8% to 37.2%) for the TCF group and 28.3% (95% CI, 16.8% to 40.9%) for the non-TCF group, with no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.192). Meanwhile, the cumulative incidences of 5-year NRM were 5.6% (95% CI, 3.8% to 37.2%) for the TCF group and 28.3% (95% CI, 16.9% to 40.9%) for the non-TCF group (P = 0.059) (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

The Cumulative incidences of the 5-year relapse and non-relapse mortality.

TCF = total body irradiation 10 Gy, cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg, and fludarabine 75 mg/m2.
jkms-36-e128-g003

Survival according to the use or non-use of TBI and ATG

To determine the outcome of each treatment methods, 71 patients were additionally divided into 3 groups according to the use of TBI and ATG. Group 1 included patients who received TBI, but not ATG (TBI+ ATG−), group 2 included those who received ATG, but not TBI (TBI− ATG+), and group 3 included those who received both TBI and ATG (TBI+ ATG+).
The 5-year EFS for patients in group 1 (n = 20), 2 (n = 36) and 3 (n = 15) was 75.0%, 42.9% and 33.3%, respectively. In survival comparisons, the 5-year EFS in group 1 was significantly higher than in groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.018) (Fig. 4A). The 5-year OS in group 1 was also significantly higher than in groups 2 and 3: the 5-year OS for patients in group 1, 2 and 3 was 79.7%, 48.4% and 33.3% (P = 0.022) (Fig. 4B).
Fig. 4

The 5-year EFS and OS of the 3-group analysis. (A) The 5-year EFS. (B) The 5-year OS.

EFS = event-free survival, TBI = total body irradiation, ATG = anti-thymocyte globulin, OS = overall survival.
jkms-36-e128-g004

DISCUSSION

CBT offers a chance of cure for patients with serious hematological malignancies, especially for those who lack suitable donors. Since CBT is characterized by a relatively lower cell dose and less stringent HLA matching criteria,1011 graft failure and delayed immune recovery are of major concern.121314151617 Conditioning regimens can have a substantial impact on the overall outcomes, but in most centers, the choice of conditioning regimen has been mainly based on experts' opinion, rather than universal criteria. A desirable MAC regimen should exert potent antitumor activity and sufficient immunosuppression, while avoiding excessive toxicity. In this study, we introduce a modified type of TCF regimen consisting of myeloablative TBI (10 Gy), cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg) and fludarabine (75 mg/m2).
In this study, better survival outcomes were observed in patients conditioned with the TCF regimen, compared to the non-TCF regimen, in line with previous study be Eapen and collegues.6 The TCF group showed a higher probability of neutrophil recovery, a higher rate of achieving donor-origin hematopoiesis, a lower rate of CMV diseases, and higher 5-year OS and EFS. Because of the limited number of patients, statistical significance in relapse rate and NRM was not observed. But borderline trend of lower TRM incidence in TCF group was observed (P = 0.059).
TBI has been the traditional backbone of MAC regimen. Especially in the setting of CBT, several studies highlight the role of TBI. According to a Japanese registry-based study, neutrophil engraftment was superior in the TBI group regardless of the conditioning regimen, even in the presence of HLA mismatch or anti-HLA antibodies.5 This finding may indicate the potent immunosuppressive role of TBI in the milieu of an active immune interaction between donor and recipient. In addition, a part of data by Eapen et al.6 suggested the role of TBI in reducing leukemia recurrence. A significant higher relapse risk was observed in patients with non-trial, chemotherapy-only conditioning regimens, suggesting potent antitumor activity of TBI.
Nevertheless, TBI is avoided by many centers nowadays, owing to its various toxicities and the need for special facilities. Especially in children, there is a great concern about the late effects of radiation therapy. Of note, the major distinction between our TCF regimen and that used in the study by Eapen et al.6 is the dose of TBI. While a total of 13.2 Gy TBI was uniformly used both in trial- (BMT CTN 0501) and non-trial-based setting in the study by Eapen et al.,6 our strategy was to reduce the dose of TBI by 10 Gy.
Range of TBI practices are applied with a common target dose of 12 to 13.2 Gy in 6 to 8 fractions.18 However, due to the lack of resources, it was difficult to fractionate radiation therapy in our center. Because it was difficult to reduce the dose per fraction, limiting the total cumulative radiation dose to 10 Gy was necessary to prevent excessive toxicity. Despite discrepancies in patient numbers, our study demonstrated a comparable outcome to that reported from BMT CTN 0501; the 5-year OS of patients enrolled in the BMT CTN 0501 trial was 70%,6 while the 5-year OS of our TCF group patients was 77.8%. Considering the need for a less-toxic MAC regimen in CBT, reducing the dose of TBI may help reducing regimen-related toxicities in pediatric patients, while maintaining antitumor activity and myeloablative property. Given the outcome was satisfactory with TCF regimen containing 10 Gy TBI, our study suggests that TCF regimens with 10 Gy TBI could serve as a realistic alternative in areas with limited resources. In the future, late effects of patients who underwent CBT with 10 Gy of TBI should also be investigated.
Another major difference between the TCF and non-TCF group in this study was the use of ATG. The TCF group uniformly omitted ATG and showed better 5-year EFS and OS compared to the non-TCF group. In the 3-group analysis, group 1 (TBI+ ATG−) showed the highest 5-year EFS and OS as well. ATG has been shown to reduce the risk of graft failure and GVHD in allogeneic HSCT,19 but the use of ATG prior to CBT is an ongoing debate nowadays. While delayed immune recovery is an inherent property of CBT, ATG tends to aggravate this phenomenon, as demonstrated by several other reports.202122 The non-TCF group showed slower neutrophil recovery, a lower rate of donor-origin hematopoiesis, and a higher incidence of CMV diseases. Our study showed that group 3 (TBI+ ATG+) resulted in the lowest survival rate with high relapse rate. ATG has an immunomodulation effect on T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, as well as dendritic cells.23 The level of antigen exposure is increased after TBI, which may enforce the immunomodulation effect of ATG. As a result, the graft-versus-leukemia effect may decrease and disease relapse may increase. The results of this study suggest that ATG should not be administered when using TBI as conditioning regimen.
Notably, the TCF group in this study showed a significantly lower incidence of CMV diseases, and this may be closely associated with the omission of ATG. Due to a high CMV seropositivity (94.1%) among Koreans in all population,24 most donors and recipients are seropositive (D+/R+) in Korea. Indeed, the incidence of CMV antigenemia was even higher in this study exceeding 60% in both TCF and non-TCF groups. Herein lies the clinical significance of the lower incidence of CMV diseases, especially in regions with high CMV seroprevalence, such as Korea.
In this study, a higher incidence of grade II to IV acute GHVD was observed in patients conditioned with the TCF regimen, and this can also be ascribed to the omission of ATG. However, no significant difference was observed in terms of grade III to IV acute GVHD, and even better survival outcomes were observed in the TCF group. Lindemans et al.22 also showed that without ATG, the incidence of NRM was not high even though the acute GVHD incidence was high. Altogether, these findings may suggest that the benefit of a rapid engraftment and immune recovery outweighs the harm associated with acute GVHD.
This study has several limitations, including its retrospective nature. In our institution, as in many CBT-performing centers, the choice of conditioning regimens was largely based on clinical factors and experts' experience. Moreover, since many patients in the TCF group were transplanted in more recent years, better supportive care in these patients may have affected the outcomes. The difference in treatment era and number of patients between both groups could have affected the difference in treatment outcomes. Nonetheless, this study is valuable in that it compared conditioning regimens in a relatively large number of pediatric patients undergoing CBT.
Overall, our findings demonstrated that children conditioned with myeloablative TBI (10 Gy), cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg), fludarabine (75 mg/m2) and omitting ATG achieved better engraftment and survival rates, while less suffering from CMV diseases. We suggest that our modified type of TCF regimen can be a preferred option for pediatric patients with acute leukemia undergoing CBT.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge the contribution of our patients and clinical staff working at Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Samsung Medical Center.

Notes

Disclosure: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author Contributions:

  • Conceptualization: Yoo KH, Koo HH.

  • Data curation: Cho HW, Hyun JK, Lee JW, Sung KW, Lim DH.

  • Formal analysis: Cho HW, Ju HY.

  • Investigation: Cho HW.

  • Software: Cho HW.

  • Validation: Ju HY, Yoo KH.

  • Writing - original draft: Cho HW, Ju HY.

  • Writing - review & editing: Cho HW, Ju HY, Hyun JK, Lee JW, Sung KW, Koo HH, Lim DH, Yoo KH.

References

1. Eapen M, Rubinstein P, Zhang MJ, Stevens C, Kurtzberg J, Scaradavou A, et al. Outcomes of transplantation of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood and bone marrow in children with acute leukaemia: a comparison study. Lancet. 2007; 369(9577):1947–1954. PMID: 17560447.
crossref
2. Rocha V, Cornish J, Sievers EL, Filipovich A, Locatelli F, Peters C, et al. Comparison of outcomes of unrelated bone marrow and umbilical cord blood transplants in children with acute leukemia. Blood. 2001; 97(10):2962–2971. PMID: 11342418.
crossref
3. Rocha V, Labopin M, Sanz G, Arcese W, Schwerdtfeger R, Bosi A, et al. Transplants of umbilical-cord blood or bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with acute leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(22):2276–2285. PMID: 15564544.
crossref
4. Gyurkocza B, Sandmaier BM. Conditioning regimens for hematopoietic cell transplantation: one size does not fit all. Blood. 2014; 124(3):344–353. PMID: 24914142.
crossref
5. Nakasone H, Fuji S, Yakushijin K, Onizuka M, Shinohara A, Ohashi K, et al. Impact of total body irradiation on successful neutrophil engraftment in unrelated bone marrow or cord blood transplantation. Am J Hematol. 2017; 92(2):171–178. PMID: 27880980.
crossref
6. Eapen M, Kurtzberg J, Zhang MJ, Hattersely G, Fei M, Mendizabal A, et al. Umbilical cord blood transplantation in children with acute leukemia: impact of conditioning on transplantation outcomes. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017; 23(10):1714–1721. PMID: 28684372.
crossref
7. Rodriguez-Galindo C, Friedrich P, Alcasabas P, Antillon F, Banavali S, Castillo L, et al. Toward the cure of all children with cancer through collaborative efforts: pediatric oncology as a global challenge. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33(27):3065–3073. PMID: 26304881.
crossref
8. Caliendo AM, St George K, Allega J, Bullotta AC, Gilbane L, Rinaldo CR. Distinguishing cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease with CMV nucleic acid assays. J Clin Microbiol. 2002; 40(5):1581–1586. PMID: 11980925.
crossref
9. Ljungman P, Boeckh M, Hirsch HH, Josephson F, Lundgren J, Nichols G, et al. Definitions of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in transplant patients for use in clinical trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2017; 64(1):87–91. PMID: 27682069.
10. Querol S, Rubinstein P, Marsh SG, Goldman J, Madrigal JA. Cord blood banking: ‘providing cord blood banking for a nation’. Br J Haematol. 2009; 147(2):227–235. PMID: 19796272.
crossref
11. Gluckman E. Hematopoietic stem-cell transplants using umbilical-cord blood. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344(24):1860–1861. PMID: 11407350.
crossref
12. Rubinstein P, Carrier C, Scaradavou A, Kurtzberg J, Adamson J, Migliaccio AR, et al. Outcomes among 562 recipients of placental-blood transplants from unrelated donors. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339(22):1565–1577. PMID: 9828244.
crossref
13. Gluckman E, Rocha V, Boyer-Chammard A, Locatelli F, Arcese W, Pasquini R, et al. Outcome of cord-blood transplantation from related and unrelated donors. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337(6):373–381. PMID: 9241126.
crossref
14. Komanduri KV, St John LS, de Lima M, McMannis J, Rosinski S, McNiece I, et al. Delayed immune reconstitution after cord blood transplantation is characterized by impaired thymopoiesis and late memory T-cell skewing. Blood. 2007; 110(13):4543–4551. PMID: 17671230.
crossref
15. Delaney C, Gutman JA, Appelbaum FR. Cord blood transplantation for haematological malignancies: conditioning regimens, double cord transplant and infectious complications. Br J Haematol. 2009; 147(2):207–216. PMID: 19796270.
crossref
16. Jacobson CA, Turki AT, McDonough SM, Stevenson KE, Kim HT, Kao G, et al. Immune reconstitution after double umbilical cord blood stem cell transplantation: comparison with unrelated peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012; 18(4):565–574. PMID: 21875503.
crossref
17. Szabolcs P, Niedzwiecki D. Immune reconstitution after unrelated cord blood transplantation. Cytotherapy. 2007; 9(2):111–122. PMID: 17453963.
crossref
18. Esiashvili N, Lu X, Ulin K, Laurie F, Kessel S, Kalapurakal JA, et al. Higher reported lung dose received during total body irradiation for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia is associated with inferior survival: a report from the children's oncology group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019; 104(3):513–521. PMID: 30807822.
crossref
19. Mohty M. Mechanisms of action of antithymocyte globulin: T-cell depletion and beyond. Leukemia. 2007; 21(7):1387–1394. PMID: 17410187.
crossref
20. Admiraal R, Lindemans CA, van Kesteren C, Bierings MB, Versluijs AB, Nierkens S, et al. Excellent T-cell reconstitution and survival depend on low ATG exposure after pediatric cord blood transplantation. Blood. 2016; 128(23):2734–2741. PMID: 27702800.
crossref
21. Admiraal R, van Kesteren C, Jol-van der Zijde CM, Lankester AC, Bierings MB, Egberts TC, et al. Association between anti-thymocyte globulin exposure and CD4+ immune reconstitution in paediatric haemopoietic cell transplantation: a multicentre, retrospective pharmacodynamic cohort analysis. Lancet Haematol. 2015; 2(5):e194–203. PMID: 26688094.
crossref
22. Lindemans CA, Chiesa R, Amrolia PJ, Rao K, Nikolajeva O, de Wildt A, et al. Impact of thymoglobulin prior to pediatric unrelated umbilical cord blood transplantation on immune reconstitution and clinical outcome. Blood. 2014; 123(1):126–132. PMID: 24184682.
crossref
23. Mohty M, Gaugler B. Advances in umbilical cord transplantation: the role of thymoglobulin/ATG in cord blood transplantation. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2010; 23(2):275–282. PMID: 20837339.
crossref
24. Choi SR, Kim KR, Kim DS, Kang JM, Kim SJ, Kim JM, et al. Changes in cytomegalovirus seroprevalence in Korea for 21 years: a single center study. Pediatr Infect Vaccine. 2018; 25(3):123.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles