Journal List > Korean J Physiol Pharmacol > v.24(5) > 1145590

Nguyen, Jang, Rijal, Park, and Han: Inhibitory actions of borneol on the substantia gelatinosa neurons of the trigeminal subnucleus caudalis in mice

Abstract

The substantia gelatinosa (SG) of the trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (Vc) is the first relay site for the orofacial nociceptive inputs via the thin myelinated Aδ and unmyelinated C primary afferent fibers. Borneol, one of the valuable time-honored herbal ingredients in traditional Chinese medicine, is a popular treatment for anxiety, anesthesia, and antinociception. However, to date, little is known as to how borneol acts on the SG neurons of the Vc. To close this gap, the whole-cell patch-clamp technique was applied to elucidate the antinociceptive mechanism responding for the actions of borneol on the SG neurons of the Vc in mice. In the voltage-clamp mode, holding at –60 mV, the borneol-induced non-desensitizing inward currents were not affected by tetrodotoxin, a voltage-gated Na+ channel blocker, 6-cyano-7-nitro-quinoxaline-2,3-dione, a non-N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor antagonist and DL-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid, an NMDA receptor antagonist. However, borneol-induced inward currents were partially decreased in the presence of picrotoxin, a γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A receptor antagonist, or strychnine, a glycine receptor antagonist, and was almost suppressed in the presence of picrotoxin and strychnine. Though borneol did not show any effect on the glycine-induced inward currents, borneol enhanced GABA-mediated responses. Beside, borneol enhanced the GABA-induced hyperpolarization under the current-clamp mode. Altogether, we suggest that borneol contributes in part toward mediating the inhibitory GABA and glycine transmission on the SG neurons of the Vc and may serve as an herbal therapeutic for orofacial pain ailments.

INTRODUCTION

Orofacial pain complaints are highly frequent and debilitating conditions concerning the neck, face, and head. These disorders are the responsibility of the clinician because the trigeminal nociceptive system is complex [1]. According to the gate-control theory proposed by Melzack and Wall [2] in 1965, the substaintia gelatinosa (SG) neurons or lamina II of the spinal cord are demonstrated as a fundamental section in regulation of nociceptive inputs from the periphery to the central nervous system (CNS). The trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (Vc), also referred to the medullary dorsal horn as a result of the considerable cytoarchitectural similarities with the spinal dorsal horn, is first-order relayed for the pain and temperature information from the dental and craniofacial regions [3,4]. It is generally accepted that the SG neurons of the Vc play a key role in receiving and modulating the painful stimuli from the orofacial pain through myelinated Aδ and unmyelinated C primary afferent fibers [5].
Borneol (L-borneol; C10H18O; Fig. 1), also known as Bing Pian and derived from several species of Artemisia and Dipterocarpaceae, is popularly used in food, fragrance, and folk medicine in Asian countries such as China, India, and Vietnam [6]. Borneol was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a generally regarded as safe (GRAS) food flavoring [7]. With an acrid, bitter taste and cool properties, borneol is a fragrance ingredient in decorative cosmetics, shampoos, household cleaners, and detergents. Also, borneol has a broad range of traditional Chinese medical implications, particularly, in analgesia and antinociception [8]. In recent decades, this compound has gained the attention of neuroscientists in illuminating its empirical application based on scientific authority. It is reported that borneol alleviates mechanical hyperalgesia in the model of neuropathic pain [9], and attenuates oxaliplatin-induced neuropathic hyperalgesia [10]. This monoterpene was also evaluated for anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory activities in mice with the reduction of nociceptive behavior and inflammatory response [7]. Though borneol has been applied in traditional Chinese medicine for thousands of years and has also been the focus of attention in recent studies for its nociceptive effect [11,12], the relationship between borneol and orofacial pain treatment has not been completely reported yet. Thus, this study is focused on experiencing the actions of borneol on the SG neurons of the Vc and indicating relevant receptors using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique in mice.

METHODS

Animals and brain slice preparation

Experiments were performed under permission from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Jeonbuk National University (CBNU 2018-072, CBNU 2019-090). The experimental procedure has been described in detail in our previous studies [13]. After being decapitated, the brains of ICR mice were promptly exposed and drowned in ice-cold artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) comprising chemical compounds (in mM): 126 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 2.4 CaCl2, 1.2 MgCl2, 11 D-(+)-glucose, 1.4 NaH2PO4, and 25 NaHCO3 (pH 7.3 to 7.4, bubbled with 95% O2 and 5% CO2). The brainstem was glued to an agar block and submerged in ice-cold ACSF. The coronal slices (180 to 220 μm in thickness) with the rostral part of Vc were excised by a vibratome (VT1200S; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). These brain slices were stored in the condition of oxygenated ACSF for at least one hour prior to electrophysiological recording.

Whole-cell patch-clamp recording

The coronal slices were delivered to the recording chamber ACSF submerged and constantly perfused at the rate of 4 to 5 ml/min. Visualization was performed from an upright microscope (BX51W1; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with differential interference contrast optics. The SG neurons of the Vc were discernible as a translucent band, just medial to the spinal trigeminal nucleus traveling across the lateral edge of the coronal slices.
Patch pipettes were prepared from the borosilicate glass capillary tubes (PG52151-4; WPI, Sarasota Bay, FL, USA) using a Flaming Brown puller (P-97; Sutter Instruments Co., Novato, CA, USA). High chloride pipette solution containing (in mM): 140 KCl, 1 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 4 Adenosine 5΄-triphosphate magnesium salt (Mg-ATP), and 10 EGTA (pH 7.3 with KOH) for boosting the chloride currents at the holding potential of –60 mV. Low chloride pipette solution containing (in mM): 136 C6H11KO7, 4 KCl, 1 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 4 Mg-ATP, and 10 EGTA (pH 7.3 with KOH) was applied for current-clamp experiment.
When charged by internal solution, the tip resistance of the patch pipette was approximately 4 to 7 MΩ. Once a gigaseal was formed between the pipette and the neuronal membrane, a slight negative pressure was applied to form the whole-cell mode. Signals were sequentially amplified by an Axopatch 200B (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA), digitized by an Axon Digidata 1550B (Molecular Devices). Acquired data were analyzed by the pClamp 10.6 software (Molecular Devices) and Origin 8 software (OriginLab Corp., Northampton, MA, USA).

Chemicals and statistics

Chemicals including borneol, picrotoxin, strychnine hydrochloride (strychnine), GABA, glycine, and ACSF compositions were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), except for 6-cyano-7-nitro-quinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX), DL-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP5), and tetrodotoxin citrate (TTX) by Tocris Bioscience (Avonmouth, Bristol, UK). Stocked drugs were dissolved in ACSF and tested at known concentrations.
In whole-cell voltage-clamp experiment, no less than 15 pA was considered to be responded by borneol to reduce possible error that may occur when measuring the currents. All data were presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. A paired t-test was used to compare the mean values between the two groups. Statistical significance level was set as p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Seventy-three SG neurons from 34 mice (postnatal day 7 to 20) were experienced under the whole-cell patch-clamp technique including 67 neurons for voltage-clamp mode and 6 for current-clamp experiments.

Borneol induces repeatable inward currents on SG neurons

In whole-cell voltage-clamp experiment, 43 out of 54 SG neurons tested responded to 0.3 mM borneol and used for further analysis.
Under the high chloride pipette solution, borneol was successively introduced into the bath to examine how SG neurons of the Vc respond to borneol. No significant difference was found in the borneol-induced inward currents between the first and second applications (Fig. 2A). In 17 neurons tested, the mean amplitude of inward current (34.8 ± 4.71 pA) induced by the first application of borneol was similar to that of the second application (34.8 ± 3.85 pA, n = 17, p > 0.05; Fig. 2B) indicating that SG neurons of the Vc are not desensitized by the consecutive applications of borneol.

Borneol directly acts on SG neurons

TTX, a potent selective blocker of sodium channel mediated by the membrane potential, can interfere with the generation of action potentials and depress the propagation of impulses in excitable membranes [14]. TTX acts on neither the release of the transmitter from nerve terminals nor the sensitivity of the postsynaptic membrane to the transmitter. Therefore, TTX applications are extremely useful for studies of the mechanism of transmitter release and of the mechanism whereby the transmitter interacts with the postsynaptic membrane [15]. In this study, TTX was co-applied with borneol to examine whether borneol acts on SG neurons via action potentials generated. The borneol-induced inward currents were conserved in the presence of 0.5 µM TTX in 13 SG neurons (Fig. 3A). There was a similarity in the mean amplitude of borneol-induced inward current between the absence (31.4 ± 2.47 pA) and the presence (31.2 ± 3.54 pA, n = 13, p > 0.05; Fig. 3B) of TTX. This result indicates that borneol directly acts on the postsynaptic SG neurons.

Borneol activates GABAA receptor and/or glycine receptor

To consider the action of borneol is mediated via ionotropic glutamate receptors, borneol was examined in a cocktail of CNQX, a non-NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist and AP5, an NMDA receptor antagonist. The borneol-induced inward currents were not affected by the presence of CNQX and AP5 in 8 tested neurons (Fig. 4A). The mean inward current (37.7 ± 6.33 pA) by borneol was proximately similar to that in the presence of AP5 (20 µM) and 10 µM CNQX (36.9 ± 4.36 pA, n = 8, p > 0.05; Fig. 4B).
Picrotoxin, a non-competitive GABAA receptors antagonist, is often used as a tool to prove the behavior of GABA receptors [16]. In the presence of 50 µM picrotoxin, the borneol-induced currents tended to reduce, compared with those in the absence of picrotoxin in the same neurons (Fig. 5A). The mean inward currents induced by borneol were 37.6 ± 6.49 pA and 18.0 ± 3.27 pA in the absence and the presence of picrotoxin, respectively (n = 10, p < 0.001; Fig. 5B). Additionally, a competitive antagonist of glycine receptor, strychnine was applied for testing the relationship between the borneol response and the strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors [17]. The borneol-induced currents experienced significant decrease when 2 µM strychnine was applied prior to the borneol (Fig. 6A). The mean inward current (31.9 ± 4.40 pA) by borneol was reduced in the presence of strychnine (18.3 ± 2.24 pA, n = 7, p < 0.01; Fig. 6B). Also, the borneol-induced inward currents were almost blocked by co-application of picrotoxin and strychnine (Fig. 7A). The mean inward current (36.5 ± 5.10 pA) induced by borneol was almost depressed to 8.31 ± 1.28 pA in the presence of picrotoxin and strychnine (n = 8, p < 0.001; Fig. 7B). These results indicate that borneol-induced actions are mediated by activation of GABAA and/or glycine receptors but not by ionotropic glutamate receptors.

Borneol enhances GABA-mediated actions

Although controversy persisted well into the function of GABA and glycine, it is now widely admitted that GABA and glycine are the most crucial inhibitory neurotransmitters in the CNS [18]. Under the high chloride intracellular condition, GABA and glycine can induce inward currents as a result of the chloride ion out-flux. Lower concentration of borneol (0.2 mM) not producing detectable inward currents was co-applied to check the effect of borneol on the GABA or glycine responses. Fig. 8A exhibits a representative trace showing a potentiation effect between GABA (30 µM) and borneol (0.2 mM). The mean GABA-induced inward current (164 ± 40.8 pA) was increased in the presence of borneol (300 ± 64.9 pA, n = 5, p < 0.05; Fig. 8B). Fig. 8C exhibits a representative trace showing no borneol effect on glycine-induced response. The mean inward currents (132 ± 33.5 pA) induced by glycine (30 µM) was not changed in the presence of borneol (0.2 mM, 130 ± 30.5 pA, n = 8, p > 0.05; Fig. 8D).
To confirm whether borneol affects the GABA-induced hyperpolarization, borneol was applied in current-clamp mode under low chloride pipette solution. GABA (30 µM) induced hyperpolarization in all neurons tested and the GABA-induced hyperpolarization was enhanced by borneol (Fig. 9A). The mean hyperpolarization by GABA (6.58 ± 1.19 mV) was increased in the presence of borneol (0.3 mM, 9.87 ± 1.02 mV, n = 6, p < 0.05; Fig. 9B).

DISCUSSION

Giving a brief summary, borneol-induced non-desensitizing inward currents were preserved in the presence of TTX or CNQX and AP5, but suppressed by the presence of strychnine, a glycine antagonist and picrotoxin, a GABAA antagonist. Additionally, borneol enhanced the GABA-mediated inward currents under the high chloride pipette solution and the GABA-induced hyperpolarization in the low chloride internal solution on the SG neurons of the Vc in mice.
In this study, we used 0.3 mM borneol. It has been reported that the half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) of borneol to enhance GABA effect in Xenopus laevis oocytes and half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of borneol to inhibit human TRPA1 mediated cationic currents in heterologous expression systems like Xenopus oocytes or in neurons cultured from trigeminal ganglia were 248 µM and 200 µM, respectively [19,20].
Although borneol showed GABA or glycine mimetic actions, the responses were shown much slower than that of typical GABA or glycine. In some whole-cell patch-clamp studies, borneol-mediated responses were evaluated around 3 to 5 min after borneol application on the members of transient receptor potential family such as TRPA1 and TRPM8 [20,21]. So, further studies might be needed to confirm the precise mechanism how borneol activates GABA and glycine receptors.
Borneol, a bicyclic organic compound and a terpene derivative, is historically termed as borneocamphor. In traditional Chinese medicine, borneol is classified as “Herbs that Open Orifices” and is commonly used to treat conditions associated with nociception [22]. However, traditional herbal remedies have encountered significant skepticism because these treatments are mostly based on anecdotes and clinical observations instead of verifiable scientific trials. In recent decades, scientists have shown increasing interest in deciphering the nociceptive mechanism responsible for the borneol clinical effect. Borneol has demonstrated its analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects on the photodynamic therapy of acne [23]. A study measuring nociception by acetic acid, formalin, hot plate, and grip strength tests has proved that borneol produces a significant reduction of nociceptive behavior and proposes this terpene as a substantial central and peripheral antinociceptive agent [7]. Borneol can inhibit TRPA1, a member of TRP family, as a key player in neuropathic pain and inflammation [12]. Also, borneol has demonstrated a considerable antihyperalgesic activity in the mouse model of chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain [10]. This body of evidence somewhat demonstrates that borneol has been a traditional pain management treatment for thousands of years.
The operation of neuronal networks depends on the balance of the excitatory and inhibitory transmission, in which GABA and glycine function as the main inhibitory neurotransmitters in the spinal cord and dorsal horn. There is an array of natural terpene compounds of plant origin, including citral, eucalyptol, or linalool proven to influence the function of ionotropic GABAA receptors [13]. Glycine largely modulates the fast inhibitory neurotransmission in the spinal cord and brainstem through specific glycine receptors popular in the postsynaptic membrane [17]. GABAA or glycine receptors are a ligand gated chloride channel, the opening of which results in the membrane hyperpolarization, and depression of firing action potentials [17,24].
As the main inhibitory neurotransmitters in CNS, it is widely believed that GABA and glycine have a major role in controlling nociceptive processing. A study concerning fear recall and anxiety-like behaviors indicates that the currents evoked by GABA are enhanced by borneol in mice hippocampal slices and the enhancement is reversed in the presence of bicuculline, a GABAA receptors antagonist [25]. Borneol has also been proven to ameliorate mechanical hyperalgesia in models of chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain via increasing GABAergic transmission in the spinal cord [9]. A study on the content changes of excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters in corpus striatum of rats using single-applied of borneol or combining it with diazepam indicates that borneol significantly increased the content of glycine and GABA but not aspartate and glutamate [26]. From our results, borneol is demonstrated to activate GABAA receptor and/or glycine and possess a potentiation effect with GABA but not glycine. This might be explained that GABA receptors are more sensitive than glycine receptors to positive allosteric modulation by borneol. This mechanism is also indicated in an experiment on Xenopus oocyte revealing that borneol showed an inhibitory neurotransmission enhancement via a stronger potentiation effect with GABA than that with glycine [27].
The majority of SG neurons are inhibitory including GABA and glycine, in that approximately one third of SG neurons are GABAergic [28]. The Vc contributes substantially in the transmission of non-discriminative touch, thermal sensations and nociception from the face and oral cavity [3,4]. For these reasons, the SG neurons of the Vc is considered as a principal region for regulating the orofacial nociceptive information via unmyelinated C and myelinated Aδ fibers. Knowledge about the response of SG neurons of the Vc to traditional Chinese medicine-based on agents may set scientific documentation as well as develop a novel approach for understanding their effect on the orofacial nociception.
Together, we demonstrate that borneol can directly activate GABAA receptor or glycine receptor and enhance GABA-mediated actions on the SG neurons of the Vc in mice, and suggest that borneol may serve an agent concerning to inhibitory synaptic transmission of the CNS and be a therapeutic target for the orofacial pain treatment.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported by research funds of Jeonbuk National University in 2018 and Basic Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by Ministry of Education (2016R1D1A3B03932241).

Notes

Author contributions: P.T.T.N. and S.H.J. performed experiments, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. S.R. and S.J.P. contributed to writing and editing of the manuscript. S.K.H. conceptualized and designed the study, and completed the manuscript.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Romero-Reyes M, Uyanik JM. 2014; Orofacial pain management: current perspectives. J Pain Res. 7:99–115. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S37593. PMID: 24591846. PMCID: PMC3937250.
crossref
2. Melzack R, Wall PD. 1965; Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 150(3699):971–979. DOI: 10.1126/science.150.3699.971. PMID: 5320816.
crossref
3. Tsai CM, Chiang CY, Yu XM, Sessle BJ. 1999; Involvement of trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (medullary dorsal horn) in craniofacial nociceptive reflex activity. Pain. 81:115–128. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00009-3. PMID: 10353499.
crossref
4. Ren K, Dubner R. 2011; The role of trigeminal interpolaris-caudalis transition zone in persistent orofacial pain. Int Rev Neurobiol. 97:207–225. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385198-7.00008-4. PMID: 21708312. PMCID: PMC3257052.
crossref
5. Sessle BJ. 2000; Acute and chronic craniofacial pain: brainstem mechanisms of nociceptive transmission and neuroplasticity, and their clinical correlates. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 11:57–91. DOI: 10.1177/10454411000110010401. PMID: 10682901.
crossref
6. Hattori A. 2000; [Camphor in the Edo era - camphor and borneol for medicines]. Yakushigaku Zasshi. 35:49–54. Japanese.
7. Almeida JR, Souza GR, Silva JC, Saraiva SR, Júnior RG, Quintans Jde S, Barreto Rde S, Bonjardim LR, Cavalcanti SC, Quintans LJ Jr. 2013; Borneol, a bicyclic monoterpene alcohol, reduces nociceptive behavior and inflammatory response in mice. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013:808460. DOI: 10.1155/2013/808460. PMID: 23710149. PMCID: PMC3654274.
crossref
8. Bhatia SP, Letizia CS, Api AM. 2008; Fragrance material review on borneol. Food Chem Toxicol. 46(Suppl 11):S77–S80. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.06.031. PMID: 18640181.
crossref
9. Jiang J, Shen YY, Li J, Lin YH, Luo CX, Zhu DY. 2015; (+)-Borneol alleviates mechanical hyperalgesia in models of chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain in mice. Eur J Pharmacol. 757:53–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.03.056. PMID: 25835611.
crossref
10. Zhou HH, Zhang L, Zhou QG, Fang Y, Ge WH. 2016; (+)-Borneol attenuates oxaliplatin-induced neuropathic hyperalgesia in mice. Neuroreport. 27:160–165. DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000516. PMID: 26730517.
crossref
11. Nesterkina M, Kravchenko I. 2017; Synthesis and pharmacological properties of novel esters based on monoterpenoids and glycine. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 10:47. DOI: 10.3390/ph10020047. PMID: 28524111. PMCID: PMC5490404.
crossref
12. Takaishi M, Uchida K, Fujita F, Tominaga M. 2014; Inhibitory effects of monoterpenes on human TRPA1 and the structural basis of their activity. J Physiol Sci. 64:47–57. DOI: 10.1007/s12576-013-0289-0. PMID: 24122170. PMCID: PMC3889502.
crossref
13. Nguyen TTP, Jang SH, Park SJ, Cho DH, Han SK. 2019; Action of citral on the substantia gelatinosa neurons of the trigeminal subnucleus caudalis in juvenile mice. Chin J Physiol. 62:175–181. DOI: 10.4103/CJP.CJP_32_19. PMID: 31670280.
crossref
14. Katz B, Miledi R. 1969; Tetrodotoxin-resistant electric activity in presynaptic terminals. J Physiol. 203:459–487. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008875. PMID: 4307710. PMCID: PMC1351456.
crossref
15. Narahashi T. 1974; Chemicals as tools in the study of excitable membranes. Physiol Rev. 54:813–889. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.1974.54.4.813. PMID: 4153804.
crossref
16. Carpenter TS, Lau EY, Lightstone FC. 2013; Identification of a possible secondary picrotoxin-binding site on the GABAA receptor. Chem Res Toxicol. 26:1444–1454. DOI: 10.1021/tx400167b. PMID: 24028067.
17. Dutertre S, Becker CM, Betz H. 2012; Inhibitory glycine receptors: an update. J Biol Chem. 287:40216–40223. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.R112.408229. PMID: 23038260. PMCID: PMC3504737.
crossref
18. Todd AJ, Watt C, Spike RC, Sieghart W. 1996; Colocalization of GABA, glycine, and their receptors at synapses in the rat spinal cord. J Neurosci. 16:974–982. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-03-00974.1996. PMID: 8558266. PMCID: PMC6578783.
crossref
19. Granger RE, Campbell EL, Johnston GA. 2005; (+)- and (-)-borneol: efficacious positive modulators of GABA action at human recombinant alpha1beta2gamma2L GABAA receptors. Biochem Pharmacol. 69:1101–1111. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2005.01.002. PMID: 15763546.
20. Sherkheli MA, Schreiner B, Haq R, Werner M, Hatt H. 2015; Borneol inhibits TRPA1, a proinflammatory and noxious pain-sensing cation channel. Pak J Pharm Sci. 28:1357–1363. PMID: 26142526.
21. Chen GL, Lei M, Zhou LP, Zeng B, Zou F. 2016; Borneol is a TRPM8 agonist that increases ocular surface wetness. PLoS One. 11:e0158868. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158868. PMID: 27448228. PMCID: PMC4957794.
crossref
22. Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. 2010. Pharmacopoeia of the People's Republic of China. China Medical Science Press;Beijing: p. 161–162.
23. Ji J, Zhang R, Li H, Zhu J, Pan Y, Guo Q. 2020; Analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects and mechanism of action of borneol on photodynamic therapy of acne. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 75:103329. DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2020.103329. PMID: 31978868.
crossref
24. Bowery NG, Smart TG. 2006; GABA and glycine as neurotransmitters: a brief history. Br J Pharmacol. 147(Suppl 1):S109–S119. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706443. PMID: 16402094. PMCID: PMC1760744.
crossref
25. Cao B, Ni HY, Li J, Zhou Y, Bian XL, Tao Y, Cai CY, Qin C, Wu HY, Chang L, Luo CX, Zhu DY. 2018; (+)-Borneol suppresses conditioned fear recall and anxiety-like behaviors in mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 495:1588–1593. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.12.025. PMID: 29223397.
crossref
26. Zhang N, Liu P, He X. 2011; [Effect of single-used borneol and combining it with diazepam on content of neurotransmitter in corpus striatum of rats]. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 36:3180–3183. Chinese. PMID: 22375403.
27. Hall AC, Turcotte CM, Betts BA, Yeung WY, Agyeman AS, Burk LA. 2004; Modulation of human GABAA and glycine receptor currents by menthol and related monoterpenoids. Eur J Pharmacol. 506:9–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.10.026. PMID: 15588619.
28. Todd AJ, Sullivan AC. 1990; Light microscope study of the coexistence of GABA-like and glycine-like immunoreactivities in the spinal cord of the rat. J Comp Neurol. 296:496–505. DOI: 10.1002/cne.902960312. PMID: 2358549.
crossref

Fig. 1

Chemical structure of borneol.

KJPP-24-433-f1.tif
Fig. 2

Borneol-induced inward currents are repeatable on the SG neurons of the Vc.

(A) A representative trace showing the repeatable inward currents by borneol (0.3 mM) under high chloride pipette solution. (B) The before and after plot shows no significant difference in the mean inward currents between the 1st and the 2nd applications of 0.3 mM borneol (n = 17, paired t-test, p > 0.05). NS implicates not significant.
KJPP-24-433-f2.tif
Fig. 3

Direct action of borneol on the SG neurons of the Vc.

(A) A representative current trace showing no effect on the borneol-induced response by tetrodotoxin (TTX, 0.5 µM), a voltage-sensitive Na+ channel blocker under high chloride pipette solution. (B) The before and after plot shows no significant difference in the mean borneol-induced inward currents between the absence and the presence of tetrodotoxin (n = 13, paired t-test, p > 0.05). NS implicates not significant.
KJPP-24-433-f3.tif
Fig. 4

Borneol-induced action is not mediated by ionotropic glutamate receptor activation.

(A) A representative current trace showing no effect on the borneol-induced response by 6-cyano-7-nitro-quinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX) (10 µM) and DL-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP5) (20 µM), ionotropic glutamate receptor antagonists. (B) The before and after plot shows no significant difference in the borneol-induced inward currents between the absence and the presence of CNQX and AP5 (n = 8, paired t-test, p > 0.05). NS implicates not significant.
KJPP-24-433-f4.tif
Fig. 5

Borneol activates GABAA receptor on the SG neurons of the Vc.

(A) A representative current trace showing the inhibition of borneol-induced inward current by picrotoxin (50 µM), a GABAA receptor antagonist. (B) The before and after plot shows significant inhibition of mean inward currents by borneol in the presence of picrotoxin (n = 10, paired t-test, ***p < 0.001).
KJPP-24-433-f5.tif
Fig. 6

Borneol activates glycine receptor on the SG neurons of the Vc.

A representative current trace showing the inhibition of the borneol-induced inward currents by strychnine (2 µM), a glycine receptor antagonist. (B) The before and after plot shows significant inhibition of mean inward currents by borneol in the presence of strychnine (n = 7, paired t-test, **p < 0.01).
KJPP-24-433-f6.tif
Fig. 7

GABA- and/or glycine-mimetic actions of borneol.

(A) A representative current trace showing inhibition of the borneol-induced inward currents by both picrotoxin (50 µM) and strychnine (2 µM). (B) The before and after plot shows significant inhibition of mean inward currents by borneol in the presence of picrotoxin and strychnine (n = 8, paired t-test, ***p < 0.001).
KJPP-24-433-f7.tif
Fig. 8

Borneol enhances on GABA-induced responses but not glycine-induced responses.

(A) A representative current trace showing the increase of the GABA-induced response by borneol. (B) The before and after plot shows significant increase of mean inward current by GABA (30 µM) in the presence of 0.2 mM borneol (n = 5, paired t-test, *p < 0.05). (C) A representative current trace showing no change of the glycine-induced response by borneol. (D) The before and after plot shows no significant change in the mean inward currents by glycine (30 µM) in the presence of 0.2 mM borneol (n = 8, paired t-test, p > 0.05). NS implicates not significant.
KJPP-24-433-f8.tif
Fig. 9

Borneol enhances GABA-induced hyperpolarization.

(A) A representative trace showing the membrane hyperpolarization induced by GABA (30 µM) alone and GABA in the presence of borneol (0.3 mM) in the current-clamp mode. (B) The before and after plot shows significant enhancement of mean membrane potential change by GABA in the absence and the presence of borneol (n = 6, paired t-test, *p < 0.05).
KJPP-24-433-f9.tif
TOOLS
Similar articles