I. Introduction
Antibiotics are commonly prescribed in dental clinics along with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
1. In dental clinics, antibiotics are often prescribed to assist with surgical procedures, treat inflammatory conditions such as acute ulcerative gingivitis, and prevent systemic infections such as bacterial endocarditis
23. However, misuse of antibiotics has highlighted the issue of antibiotic resistance, to the extent that a warning was announced by the World Health Organization
4. A recent study reported that infection with antibiotic-resistant bacteria may kill 10 million people every year until 2050
5. In addition, another study that assessed
Staphylococcus aureus in saliva samples collected from 122 participants showed that 88.6% of the strain exhibited resistance to two or more antibiotics
6.
Among all antibiotic prescriptions, the proportion of prescriptions from dental clinics was reported to be approximately 10%
3789. Several previous studies have reported inappropriate prescription of antibiotics in dental clinics
1011, and the high rate of broad-spectrum antibiotic prescription in dental clinics has been identified as a cause of antibiotic resistance
12. In order to prevent antibiotic-resistance development caused by the misuse of antibiotics, broad-spectrum antibiotic use should be limited to cases of severe infection
13.
In dental clinics, antibiotics are frequently prescribed to prevent local and systemic infections that may occur after invasive surgical treatment. Among various invasive procedures, the rate of antibiotic prescription is particularly high after tooth extractions
1415. However, indiscriminate prescription of antibiotics to all patients after tooth extraction has been highlighted as antibiotic misuse, particularly in patients who have a very low risk of infection (e.g., simple tooth extraction in a healthy patient without systemic disease)
16.
Antibiotic prescription patterns in dental clinics have been described for various countries. A previous study that analyzed antibiotic prescription in Korean dental clinics reported that antibiotics prescribed after tooth extractions account for the greatest proportion of antibiotic use following dental procedures
17. A nationwide study that analyzed antibiotic prescriptions from dentists in Germany over a 4-year period reported that, although the most frequently prescribed antibiotic was amoxicillin, the rate of prescribing clindamycin (a broad-spectrum antibiotic) increased over the study period, and the rate of prescribing clindamycin in the most recent year was markedly higher than the rate prescribed in medical clinics
12. A retrospective cross-sectional study in the United States analyzed the medical records of antibiotic prescription in 2015. Similar to the German study, amoxicillin was the most frequently prescribed antibiotic, but broad-spectrum antibiotics such as amoxicillin clavulanate or clindamycin were frequently used and the prescription duration was longer than that in medical clinics
9.
Studies assessing the status of antibiotic prescription in dental clinics are essential to resolve the issue of antibiotic misuse. In Korea, enrollment in the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) is enforced by law, and ≥98% of the citizens are enrolled in this service. The National Health Insurance Service–National Sample Cohort (NHIS–NSC) is a dataset comprised of data representing 2% of the entire Korean population and involves stratified sampling based on sex, age, health insurance cost, and region. In addition, this vast database includes information on not only the use of medical services, but also on sociodemographic factors and family relationships of the population. Furthermore, detailed information regarding medications prescribed at medical and dental clinics is included, making this database an optimal source for the analysis of antibiotic prescriptions in dental clinics. To the best of our knowledge, no previous study has assessed antibiotic prescription after tooth extraction using the Korean NHIS–NSC database. Thus, this study aimed to utilize the NHIS–NSC database to understand the nationwide patterns of antibiotic prescription after tooth extraction and to identify factors affecting the prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics in Korea.
IV. Discussion
This study utilized a large-scale dataset of 503,725 cases of tooth extraction to evaluate patterns of antibiotic prescription after tooth extraction and factors affecting broad-spectrum antibiotic prescription in Korea. No previous study has performed a nationwide, large-scale cohort analysis of antibiotics prescribed after tooth extraction in Korean dental clinics and hospitals.
The most frequently prescribed antibiotic after tooth extraction was penicillin (45.25%), which was in agreement with similar studies in South Africa, Germany, and the United States
91214. Among these studies, the South African study
14 reported that the rate of penicillin prescription was 80.9%, which was markedly higher than in Korea. The values in the German study (51.4%) and the American study (68%) were similar to that noted in Korea in the present study
912, but those studies assessed the rate of antibiotic prescription for all dental procedures, not limited to tooth extractions. The second-most frequently prescribed antibiotic varied largely among the different countries. While penicillin with beta-lactamase inhibitors was the second-most frequently used antibiotic in this study (18.76%), clindamycin was the second-most frequently prescribed antibiotic in both the German (34.9%) and American (15.64%) studies
912. Moreover, dental clinics in the Czech Republic also frequently prescribed clindamycin (25.1%)
7. The use of lincomycin-derivatives (including clindamycin) in our study was merely 0.21%, and was <5% in the UK and Norway, showing varying frequencies among different countries
323. In South Africa, while macrolides were the second-most frequently prescribed antibiotic following tooth extraction, they merely accounted for 3.3% of all prescribed antibiotics
14. In the UK, the second-most frequently prescribed antibiotic was metronidazole, accounting for 28.3% of all antibiotic prescriptions
23. While metronidazole was the third-most frequently prescribed antibiotic in our study (12.29%), the frequencies of metronidazole prescription in Germany, the US, and South Africa were all <1%
91214. Thus, while the use of penicillin as the primary antibiotic in dental settings seems to be the general rule, the use of other antibiotics was markedly variable across countries. These differences are likely due to differences in educational programs, health policies, demographics, and clinical experiences. Furthermore, in this study, the more invasive tooth extraction techniques resulted in a greater frequency of broad-spectrum antibiotic prescription (i.e., penicillins with beta-lactamase inhibitors or second- to fourth-generation cephalosporins), and these outcomes were in agreement with a previous study
17.
In the present study, the rate of antibiotic prescription after tooth extraction was 81.85%, which was markedly higher than the 11.0% reported in the South African study
14. In Korea, the rate of antibiotic prescription even exceeded 80% after exposed molar extraction, while the highest rate in the South African study was 54.5% (after impacted tooth extraction in patients with chronic disease). In an Australian study, the rate of antibiotic prescription after third molar extraction ranged between 19% and 75% depending on associated symptoms
24, while approximately 25% of patients in a Belgian study were given antibiotics after surgical extraction of a third molar
20. Thus, the rate of antibiotic prescription in Korea was markedly higher than in other countries, which is consistent with another Korean study that previously described habitual antibiotic prescription after tooth extraction without consideration for potential misuse
16. Moreover, 45.88% of antibiotics prescribed after tooth extraction were broad-spectrum antibiotics, raising concerns about the potential misuse of antibiotics.
In this study, the rate of antibiotic prescription was higher in males than in females, as previously reported
17. However, there was no significant difference in the proportion of broad-spectrum antibiotic prescription between males and females. Furthermore, a younger age was associated with higher rates of both antibiotic prescription and broad-spectrum antibiotic prescription. This is likely because older patients tend to have simple tooth extractions due to periodontal disease while tooth extractions in younger patients often involve invasive techniques to extract impacted teeth, such as third molars.
The rates of overall antibiotic and broad-spectrum antibiotic prescription in patients with systemic disease (diabetes and hypertension) were lower than in healthy individuals, although this phenomenon may be partly attributed to a large proportion of patients with systemic disease being elderly who have lower rates of antibiotic prescription as described earlier. Thus, diabetes and hypertension were not significant factors affecting the rate of broad-spectrum antibiotic prescription in a regression model that incorporated all identified confounders, including age. Furthermore, patients with systemic disease sometimes use medications prescribed from their medical clinics rather than dental clinics, which may have contributed to the low rate of antibiotic prescription.
Comparison of antibiotic usage between dental clinics and dental hospitals showed that while there was no difference in the rate of antibiotic prescription, dental hospitals exhibited a greater frequency of broad-spectrum antibiotic prescription. This is likely because cases involving invasive procedures with a high risk of dental infection are often transferred from dental clinics to dental hospitals. Compared to 2011, rates of both antibiotic prescription and broad-spectrum antibiotic prescription were higher in 2015. While this may be due to an increase in antibiotic prescription over time, it may also be explained by the increasing age of participants. Therefore, temporal changes in antibiotic prescription habits cannot be characterized solely based on the findings of our study and additional time series analyses are required.
The use of antibiotics should be limited to severe cases (i.e., those with suspected dental infections), and more specifically, the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics should be minimized1
321. Recently, misuse of antibiotics has been highlighted as the main reason for increased antibiotic-resistance
1025. In an effort to investigate factors relating to the prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics after tooth extraction, the following criteria were concluded to be statistically significant: sex (male), older age, household income (low), type of dental institution (dental hospital), region of dental institution (rural), year of prescription (2015), and type of tooth extraction (completely impacted tooth extraction).
Despite these findings, there were some limitations to this study. First, only antibiotics prescribed on the day of the tooth extraction procedure were included in the analysis. Thus, any antibiotic prescribed prior to or after the date of surgery was not taken into consideration. In addition, tooth extraction for orthodontic treatment is not covered by the NHIS, and those procedures were therefore were not included in this study. Moreover, since the NHIS dataset primarily serves administrative purposes, information that may be crucial to a research study might not always be available. For example, the specific name of tooth extracted or the reason for tooth extraction were not included. Lastly, the large number of participants in this study allows for more accurate representation of the status of antibiotic prescription in Korean dental institutions, but also makes the P-values exceedingly small, which may lead to biased conclusions. Despite these limitations, this study utilized the NHIS–NSC dataset—which is representative of the entire Korean population—to analyze antibiotic prescription patterns after tooth extraction while controlling for confounders such as sociodemographic variables and systemic disease. Using this resource minimizes recall bias and allows for accurate representation of the course of prescription and treatment provided to patients, making the outcomes of this study highly reliable.