Toll-like Receptor 1/2 Agonist Pam3CSK4 Suppresses Lipopolysaccharide-driven IgG1 Production while Enhancing IgG2a Production by B Cells

Sang-Hoon Lee; Seok-Rae Park

doi:10.4110/in.2018.18.e10

Journal List > Immune Netw > v.18(1) > 1108153

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Lee and Park: Toll-like Receptor 1/2 Agonist Pam3CSK4 Suppresses Lipopolysaccharide-driven IgG1 Production while Enhancing IgG2a Production by B Cells

Original Article

Immune Network 2018; 18(1): e10.

Published online: 20 February 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4110/in.2018.18.e10

Toll-like Receptor 1/2 Agonist Pam3CSK4 Suppresses Lipopolysaccharide-driven IgG1 Production while Enhancing IgG2a Production by B Cells

Sang-Hoon Lee¹, Seok-Rae Park^1,²

¹Department of Microbiology, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon 35365, Korea.

²Priority Research Center, Myunggok Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon 35365, Korea.

Correspondence to Seok-Rae Park. Department of Microbiology, College of Medicine, Konyang University, 158 Gwanjeodong-ro, Seo-gu, Daejeon 35365, Korea. srpark@konyang.ac.kr

Received 2 December 2017 Revised 6 February 2018 Accepted 6 February 2018

The Korean Association of Immunologists

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Interaction between pathogen-associated molecular patterns and pattern recognition receptors triggers innate and adaptive immune responses. Several studies have reported that toll-like receptors (TLRs) are involved in B cell proliferation, differentiation, and Ig class switch recombination (CSR). However, roles of TLRs in B cell activation and differentiation are not completely understood. In this study, we investigated the direct effect of stimulation of TLR1/2 agonist Pam3CSK4 on mouse B cell viability, proliferation, activation, Ig production, and Ig CSR in vitro. Treatment with 0.5 µg/ml of Pam3CSK4 only barely induced IgG1 production although it enhanced B cell viability. In addition, high-dosage Pam3CSK4 diminished IgG1 production in a dose-dependent manner, whereas the production of other Igs, cell viability, and proliferation increased. Pam3CSK4 additively increased TLR4 agonist lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced mouse B cell growth and activation. However, interestingly, Pam3CSK4 abrogated LPS-induced IgG1 production but enhanced LPS-induced IgG2a production. Further, Pam3CSK4 decreased LPS-induced germline γ1 transcripts (GLTγ1)/GLTε expression but increased GLTγ2a expression. On the other hand, Pam3CSK4 had no effect on LPS-induced plasma cell differentiation. Taken together, these results suggest that TLR1/2 agonist Pam3CSK4 acts as a potent mouse B cell mitogen in combination with TLR4 agonist LPS, but these 2 different TLR agonists play diverse roles in regulating the Ig CSR of each isotype, particularly IgG1/IgE and IgG2a.

Keywords: B cells, Toll-like receptor, IgG1, IgG2a, IgE, Class switching

Abbreviations

AID

activation-induced cytidine deaminase

BCR

B cell receptor

CSR

class switch recombination

GLT

germline transcripts

LPS

lipopolysaccharide

PI3K

phosphoinositide 3-kinase

PRR

pattern recognition receptor

TLR

toll-like receptor

INTRODUCTION

A class of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), toll-like receptors (TLRs), is expressed in immune cells (e.g., monocytes/macrophages, dendritic cells, T cells, and B cells) as well as non-immune cells, such as epithelial cells. In total, 10 TLRs have been identified in humans and 12 in mice (1). Each TLR recognizes a specific molecular pattern of pathogen called pathogen-associated molecular patterns, such as lipoprotein (TLR2 agonist), dsRNA (TLR3 agonist), lipopolysaccharide (LPS, TLR4 agonist), flagellin (TLR5 agonist), ssRNA (TLR7/8 agonist), and unmethylated CpG DNA (TLR9 agonist) (2). In innate immune cells, TLR signaling induces the production of various pro-inflammatory cytokines leading to innate immune responses (3 4). Most TLRs act as homodimers, but TLR2 functions as a heterodimer with either TLR1 or TLR6. TLR1/2 heterodimer senses triacyl lipoproteins, whereas TLR2/6 heterodimer senses diacyl lipoprotein (5). TLR2 is important in recognizing gram-positive bacteria, whereas TLR4 recognizes gram-negative bacteria in innate immune response (6).

B cell receptor (BCR) cross-linking with Ag, B cell–T cell (CD40–CD40L) interaction, and the optimal TLR stimulation of B cells is sufficient for B cell activation, proliferation, and plasma cells expressing high-affinity Abs. Cytokines produced by other immune cells, such as T cells and macrophages, directly help B cells to activate and undergo Ig class switching. Ig class switch recombination (CSR) is a mechanism that causes the production of Abs to change from IgM or IgD to other Ab isotypes, namely, IgG, IgE, or IgA, which have defined roles in the humoral immunity of the immune system. Ig CSR occurs between switch regions located 5′ to each constant region gene of IgH (C_H) except for δ. The transcription of the corresponding unrearranged C_H gene produces germline transcripts (GLT), which are prerequisites for subsequent Ig CSR (7 8). Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) is also essential for the process, Ig CSR (9). T cell-dependent B cell Ab responses produce high-affinity Abs for antigens but require approximately 1 week, which a rather long delay for defense against fast-replicating pathogens such as pathogenic Escherichia coli and influenza virus. To overcome this limitation, extrafollicular B cells rapidly undergo Ig CSR, seemingly through TLR-mediated T cell-independent pathway (10). As a result, class switched-IgG, IgE, and IgA as well as IgM are produced. Consistent with the concept, naïve B cells proliferate and secrete Abs to various TLR agonists in vitro, in the absence of BCR cross-linking or T cell help (11).

TLR stimulation has been reported to affect B cell functions directly without support by T cells (12). In mouse, TLR4 agonist LPS promotes B cell proliferation and differentiation into plasma cells (13 14). In addition, LPS induces IgG2b and IgG3 class switching (15 16). TLR9 agonist CpG also strongly induces B cell proliferation and differentiation (12 17). Furthermore, CpG inhibits LPS/IL-4 induced IgG1 and IgE production, while it promotes IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgG3 production (18 19). IgG2a production induced by CpG is reported to result directly from induction of the transcription factor T-bet, which is important to induce GLTγ2a expression (18 20). The suppression of IgG1 and IgE production by CpG may be mediated by the inhibition of NF-κB and IRF4 activity (21). TLR7/8 agonist R-848 directly inhibits anti-CD40/IL-4-mediated IgE production (22). Several reports have shown that TLR signaling interplays with other receptor signaling such as other TLRs, nod-like receptors (e.g., Nod1 and Nod2), and BCR (23 24). LPS promotes B cell maturation, but this is arrested upon TLR2 stimulation (25). In addition, BCR signaling synergizes with TLR signaling for AID expression and Ig CSR (26). Furthermore, in humans, Nod1 and Nod2 cooperate with BCR and TLR, but not anti-CD40, to induce B cell activation (27). Recently, we found that the C-type lectin receptor Dectin-1 selectively induces IgG1 class switching by LPS-activated mouse B cells (28).

Thus, many studies have focused on the direct effect of stimulation of B cell PRRs (i.e., TLRs, nod-like receptors, C-type lectin receptor) on B cell activation and Ig class switching. Nevertheless, the role of TLR1/2 on B cells in activation and differentiation of B cells is not clear. Hence, in this study, we used purified untouched mouse spleen resting B cells and investigated the direct effect of stimulation of the TLR1/2 agonist Pam3CSK4 on B cell viability, proliferation, activation, isotype switching, and Ig production in the absence or presence of TLR4 agonist LPS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

BALB/C mice were purchased from Damool Science (Daejeon, Korea) and maintained on an 8:16 h light/dark cycle in an animal environmental control chamber. Eight- to twelve-week-old mice were used, and animal care was conducted in accordance with the institutional guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Konyang University.

Cell culture and reagents

The mouse B lymphoma cell line CH12F3-2A (surface µ⁺) (29) was provided by Dr. T. Honjo (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan). The mouse B cell lines, L10A6.2 (surface µ⁺, mature B cell line) and A20.3 (surface γ2a⁺), were provided by Dr. J. Stavnezer (University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA). Untouched mouse spleen resting B cells were obtained by depletion of CD43⁺ cells using anti-CD43 microbeads and high-gradient magnetic cell separation according to manufacturer's instruction (MACS; Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Briefly, BALB/c spleen cell suspensions were washed with Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS; WelGENE, Daegu, Korea) and treated with 0.83% ammonium chloride to lyse red blood cells (RBCs). The spleen cells were treated with anti-mouse CD43 microbeads and depleted with LS column and MACS Separator (Miltenyi Biotec). The purity of resting B cells (CD43^-B220⁺) assessed by FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) following staining of the cells with anti-CD43 FITC (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) and anti-B220 PE (BD Biosciences). The cells were cultured at 37°C in a humidified CO₂ incubator (Forma Scientific, Marietta, OH, USA) in RPMI-1640 medium (WelGENE) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (PAA Laboratories, Etobicoke, ON, Canada). The cells were stimulated with Pam3CSK4 (Pam3CysSerLys4: synthetic bacterial tripalmitoylated lipopeptide - TLR1/2 ligand; Invivogen, San Diego, CA, USA) and LPS (ultra pure LPS, E. coli 0111:B4; Invivogen). The mouse macrophage cell line RAW264.7 was cultured in DMEM (WelGENE, 2 mM L-glutamine; 100 U/ml penicillin; 100 μg/ml streptomycin) plus 10% fetal bovine serum in a humidified CO₂ incubator.

Cell viability, proliferation, and activation assays

Cell viability was determined by either trypan blue exclusion test or EZ-Cytox cell viability assay (DaeilLab Service Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) according to manufacturer's instructions (28). For cell proliferation assay, purified mouse resting B cells were labeled with CFSE (eBioscience) and then added with Pam3CSK4 and LPS. CFSE dilution was measured by counting 10,000 cells with a FACSCalibur. For cell activation assay, cultured cells were stained with anti-CD69-FITC (BD Biosciences) and the expression levels were analyzed by flow cytometry (FACSCalibur).

Isotype-specific ELISA

Abs produced in B cell cultures were detected using isotype-specific ELISAs as previously described (28).

RT-PCR

RNA preparation and RT-PCR were performed as previously described (28). The PCR primers [for TLRs (30); for GLTs (31); for AID (32); for T-bet (designed by Primer3 software); for Blimp-1, XBP-1, IRF-4, Pax5, BCL6, and c-myc (33); for ELL2 (34)] were synthesized by Bioneer (Daejeon, Korea): TLR1, forward 5′-GGACTTCCACATGTCTCCACTATCC-3′, reverse 5′-TCCATGC TTGTTCTTCTCTGTGG-3′, (product size, 569 bp); TLR2, forward 5′-GTGGTACC TGAGAATGATGTGGG-3′, reverse 5′-TTAAGGAAGTCAGGAACTGGGTG-3′, (product size, 541 bp); TLR4, forward 5′-CTGGGTGAGAAATGAGCTGG-3′, reverse 5′-GATACAATTCCACCTGCTGCC-3′, (product size, 249 bp); GLTγ1, forward 5′-CAGCCTGGTGTCAACTAG-3′, reverse 5′-CTGTACATATGCAAGGCT-3′ (product size, 532 bp); GLTε, forward 5′-ACTAGAGATTCACAACG-3′, reverse 5′-AGCGATGAATGGAGTAGC-3′ (product size, 423 bp); GLTγ2a, forward 5′-GCTGATGTACCTACCTGAGAGA-3′, reverse 5′-GCTGGGCCAGGTGCTCGAGGTT-3′, (product size, 394 bp); GLTγ2b, forward 5′-GGGAGAGCACTGGGCCTT-3′, reverse 5′-AGTCACTGACTCAGGGAA-3′ (product size, 318 bp); GLTγ3, forward 5′-CAAGTGGATCTGAACACA-3′, reverse 5′-GGCTCCATAGTTCCATT-3′ (product size, 349 bp); GLTα, forward 5′-CTACCATAGGGAAGATAGCCT-3′, reverse 5′-TAATCGTGAATCAGGCAG-3′ (product size, 206 bp); AID, forward 5′-AGATAGTGCCACCTCCTGCTCACTGG-3′, reverse 5′-GGCTGAGGTTAGGGTTCCATCTCAG-3′ (product size, 209 bp); T-bet, forward 5′-GTCGCTTCCTTGGATCCTTC-3′, reverse 5′-TCCACCAAGACCACATCCAC-3′ (product size, 373 bp); Blimp-1, forward 5′-CCCGCGGCCGTAGAAAA-3′, reverse 5′-GGATGCCTCGGCTTGAACAG-3′ (product size, 350 bp); XBP-1, forward 5′-GCTGGAGCAGCAAGTGGTGGATTTGG-3′, reverse 5′-GGCTTCCAGCTTGGCTGATGAGGTCC-3′ (product size, 418 bp); IRF-4, forward 5′-GGACTACAATCGTGAGGAGGAC-3′, reverse 5′-ACGTCACAGGACATTGATATGG -3′ (product size, 413 bp); Pax5, forward 5′-ACCGCGTGTTTGAGAGACAG-3′, reverse 5′-TTGGGGAACCTCCAAGAATC-3′ (product size, 373 bp); BCL-6, forward 5′-CAGCACCTTCCTCTTCTCTGATGAGGAGCTCC-3′, reverse 5′-CTGGCGGAGAGCCAGAGGCCTGAAGGATGC-3′ (product size, 485 bp); c-myc, forward 5′-CTCCGGGCTCTGCTCTCCATCCT-3′, reverse 5′-GGGGGTGCGGCGTAGTTGTGC-3′ (product size, 741 bp); ELL2, forward 5′-GAGAGGAAAAGGTCAACGCC-3′, reverse 5′-GGCTGGTGCAGCATTTGA-3′ (product size, 367 bp); and β-actin, forward 5′-CATGTTTGAGACCTTCAACACCCC-3′, reverse 5′-GCCATCTCCTGCTCGAAGTCTAG-3′ (product size, 318 bp). cDNA synthesis kit and PCR reagents were purchased from NanoHelix (Daejeon, Korea) and iNtRON Biotechnology (Seongnam, Korea), respectively. PCR for β-actin were performed in parallel to normalize cDNA concentrations within each set of samples. PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels.

Cell surface analysis to detect plasma cells

The purified resting B cells were stimulated for 3 or 4 days and then collected. The cells were stained with rat anti-mouse CD138 PE (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA) and rat anti-mouse CD45R/B220 FITC (BD Pharmingen). The proportion of plasma cells (CD138⁺B220^lo) was assessed by flow cytometric analysis with a FACSCalibur.

Statistical analysis

Statistical differences between experimental groups were determined by analysis of variances. All p-values were calculated using unpaired 2-tailed Student's t-tests to consider statistical significance.

RESULTS

Effect of Pam3CSK4 on mouse B cell growth and Ig production

We used untouched resting B cells (CD43⁻B220⁺) purified from mouse spleen to investigate the direct effect of TLR1/2 agonist Pam3CSK4 on B cell activation and differentiation. The purity of resting B cells assessed by flow cytometric analysis was higher than 98% (Fig. 1A). Many studies have reported that mouse and human B cells express various TLRs (12 24 35 36 37 38). First, we verified whether the purified resting B cells express TLR1, TLR2, and TLR4. As shown in Fig. 1B, resting B cells as well as 3 mouse B cell lines (CH12F3-2A, L10A6.2, and A20.3) expressed TLR1, TLR2, and TLR4 mRNAs (Fig. 1B). RAW264.7 mouse macrophage cell line was used as a positive control for the TLRs expression (24). We stimulated resting B cells with 0.5 µg/ml of Pam3CSK4 or 1 µg/ml of LPS, a well-known potent mouse B cell mitogen (Fig. 1C), to examine the effect of Pam3CSK4 on B cell proliferation, viability, and Ig production. Pam3CSK4 highly increased cell proliferation and sustained cell viability up to 3 days of culture. LPS increased cell proliferation much more slowly than Pam3CSK4, but steadily sustained cell viability up to 4 days. At least in part, Pam3CSK4 increased cell proliferation and sustained cell viability during overall culture time, and this ability is much better than LPS. Thus, Pam3CSK4 can act as a potent mitogen for mouse B cells. Then, we determined Ig production by Pam3CSK4- or LPS-stimulated B cells in the same culture. The levels of IgM, IgG2b, and IgG3 produced by Pam3CSK4-stimulated B cells were not quite different from LPS stimulation, whereas Pam3CSK4 much more enhanced IgG2a and IgA production compared with LPS (Fig. 1D). Interestingly enough, we observed that Pam3CSK4 only barely induced IgG1 secretion by B cells even though its enhancing effect on cell growth was better. We could not detect any IgE production in this culture (data not shown). These results indicate that Pam3CSK4 is not an appropriate TLR agonist to steadily induce IgG1 production by B cells, although it is a good candidate for B cell mitogen.

Figure 1

Effects of Pam3CSK4 and LPS on mouse B cell viability and Ig production. (A) Purity of isolated mouse spleen resting B cells (CD43⁻B220⁺) was measured by flow cytometric analysis. Data shown are representative of all the experiments carried out in this study. (B) Expression of TLR1, TLR2, and TLR4 in the isolated mouse spleen resting B cells (CD43⁻B220⁺). RNAs were isolated from the resting B cells and the indicated cell lines, and the levels of TLR1, TLR2, and TLR4 mRNA were measured by RT-PCR. (C) Effects of Pam3CSK4 and LPS on mouse B cell viability. The resting B cells (1.5×10⁶ cells/ml) were cultured with Pam3CSK4 (0.5 µg/ml) or LPS (1 µg/ml). Cell viability was assessed using trypan blue exclusion test at the indicated days. Data shown are representative of 2 independent experiments. (D) Effects of Pam3CSK4 and LPS on Ig production. Culture conditions were the same as in (C). After 7 days of culture, supernatants were harvested and the levels of Ig production were determined by isotype-specific ELISA. Data shown are averages of quadruplicate cultures with SEM error bars.

SEM, standard error of the mean.

^*p<0.05, ^**p<0.01.

Pam3CSK4 increases B cell growth but decreases IgG1 production in a dose-dependent manner

To further elucidate the role of Pam3CSK4 in B cell growth and Ig production, we stimulated resting B cells with various doses of Pam3CSK4 and measured cell proliferation, cell viability, and Ig production. Pam3CSK4 dose-dependently increased both cell proliferation (Fig. 2A) and cell viability (Fig. 2B), which were maximal at about 1 µg/ml of Pam3CSK4 (Fig. 2C). These data indicate that B cell TLR1/2 saturation with Pam3CSK4 was achieved at the agonist concentrations higher than 1 µg/ml. On the other hand, Pam3CSK4 increased the productions of IgM, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, and IgA, while IgG1 production was selectively decreased in a dose-dependent manner (at >0.25 µg/ml) (Fig. 2D). These results suggest that excess Pam3CSK4 specifically has less effect on IgG1 production by mouse B cells, although it is a potent B cell mitogen and a stimulant to enhance other Ig isotype production.

Figure 2

Dosage effect of Pam3CSK4 on B cell proliferation, viability, and Ig production. Mouse spleen resting B cells were stimulated with the indicated concentrations of Pam3CSK4. After 2 and 3 days of culture, cell proliferation was measured by CFSE assay (A) and cell viability was measured by EZ-Cytox assay (B). (C) Overlap graph of cell proliferation (A) and viability (B) at 3 days of culture. Low CFSE intensity cells (%) means the proportion of proliferating cells. (D) After 7 days of culture, supernatants were harvested and the levels of Ig production were determined by isotype-specific ELISA. Data shown are representative of 2 independent experiments.

Combination effect of Pam3CSK4 and LPS on B cell proliferation, viability, activation, and Ig production

Different TLR agonists can result in a synergistic effect on biological activities including cytokine production by immune cells. TLR4 signaling promotes B cell maturation, while TLR2 inhibits that process (25). Therefore, in this study, we further investigated the roles of TLR1/2 agonist Pam3CSK4 and TLR4 agonist LPS in B cell proliferation, viability, and Ig production. TLR4 agonist LPS is a mouse B cell mitogen and polyclonal activator and induces switching to IgG3 and IgG2b (15 16). As shown in Supplementary Fig. 1, LPS dose-dependently increased B cell growth (proliferation and viability) and all Ig production. To determine whether 2 different TLR agonists, Pam3CSK4 and LPS, have synergistic/antagonistic effect on B cell function, we stimulated resting B cells with 0.5 µg/ml of Pam3CSK4 and/or 5 µg/ml of LPS. As shown in Fig. 3A and B, Pam3CSK4 further enhanced not only LPS-induced cell proliferation but also cell viability. We examined the expression of surface CD69, a lymphocyte activation marker, on LPS and/or Pam3CSK4-stimulated B cells to evaluate the effect of Pam3CSK4 and LPS on B cell activation. LPS and Pam3CSK4 induced B cell activation (approximately 28% increase and 32% increase, respectively), and this increase was further enhanced by their combination (approximately 54% increase) (Fig. 3C). Pam3CSK4 did not affect LPS-induced IgM and IgG2b secretion by B cells, whereas it dramatically decreased LPS-induced IgG1 and IgG3 production (Fig. 3D). In addition, Pam3CSK4-induced IgA production was decreased by LPS. By contrast, LPS-induced IgG2a production was further reinforced by Pam3CSK4. In addition, we observed that Pam3CSK4 enhances LPS-induced cell growth and regulates each Ig production in a dose-dependent manner (Supplementary Fig. 2). These results indicate that TLR1/2 agonist Pam3CSK4 and TLR4 agonist LPS play diverse roles in each Ig production, even if both are potent B cell activator and they synergistically induce B cell growth and activation.

Figure 3

Combination effect of LPS and Pam3CSK4 on B cell proliferation, viability, activation, and Ig production. The resting B cells were stimulated with LPS (5 µg/ml) and Pam3CSK4 (0.5 µg/ml). After 2 and 3 days of culture, cell proliferation was measured by CFSE assay (A), and cell viability was measured by EZ-Cytox assay (B). (C) After 2 days of culture, cells were stained with anti-CD69-FITC and surface CD69 expression was analyzed by flow cytometry. (D) After 7 days of culture, supernatants were harvested and the levels of Igs production were determined by isotype-specific ELISA. Data shown are averages of quadruplicate cultures with SEM error bars.

SEM, standard error of the mean; NS, not significant.

^*p<0.05, ^**p<0.01, ^***p<0.001.

Effects of Pam3CSK4 and LPS on the expression of GLT

To elucidate the mechanism of differential regulation of Ig production by Pam3CSK4 and LPS, we analyzed the expression of each GLT, which is a prerequisite for each Ig CSR, by Pam3CSK4 and/or LPS-stimulated mouse resting B cells (Fig. 4). Pam3CSK4 alone and LPS alone induced all GLT expression. Interestingly, Pam3CSK4 diminished LPS-induced GLTγ1 and GLTε expressions, whereas it enhanced LPS-induced GLTγ2a. However, Pam3CSK4 did not affect LPS-induced GLTγ2b, GLTγ3, and AID expression. We could not detect any GLTα expression in this culture (data not shown). Then, we tested the kinetic effect of Pam3CSK on LPS-induced GLTγ1 and GLTγ2a expression. As shown in Fig. 5, Pam3CSK4 consistently decreased LPS-induced GLTγ1 expression from day 3 to day 5, whereas it enhanced LPS-induced GLTγ2a from day 1 to day 3. Expression pattern of GLTε was similar to those of GLTγ1. Here Pam3CSK4 additively stimulated LPS-induced cell growth and differentially regulated each Ig production as described in Fig. 3D (Supplementary Fig. 3). Transcription factor T-bet is required for the induction of GLTγ2a transcription, resulting in IgG2a CSR (39). T-bet mRNA expression was increased when Pam3CSK4 and LPS were treated in combination at days 2 and 3 (Fig. 5). Collectively, these results indicate that Pam3CSK4, at least in part, regulates LPS-induced IgG1 and IgG2a production through the modulation of their GLTs, i.e., GLTγ1 and GLTγ2a, respectively.

Figure 4

Effect of Pam3CSK4 on LPS-driven GLT expression. The resting B cells were stimulated with LPS (5 µg/ml) and Pam3CSK4 (0.5 µg/ml). After 3 days of culture, RNAs were isolated, and the levels of GLTs and AID mRNA were measured by RT-PCR (upper panel). cDNA from each sample were prepared at 1/5 and 1/25 dilutions, and the expression levels of GLTs were measured by PCR (lower panel). Data were obtained from 2 independent experiments (Exp1 and Exp2).

Figure 5

Kinetic effect of LPS and Pam3CSK4 on GLT expression. The resting B cells were stimulated with LPS (5 µg/ml) and Pam3CSK4 (0.5 µg/ml). After the indicated days of culture, RNAs were isolated and the levels of GLTs and T-bet mRNA were measured by RT-PCR. Graphs show relative GLTγ1 and GLTγ2a cDNA levels normalized to the expression of β-actin cDNA by ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) analysis. Densitometric data are averages of 2 independent experiments with ranges (bars).

Effects of Pam3CSK4 and LPS on plasma cell differentiation

To test whether the pattern of differential Ig production by Pam3CSK4 is due to the regulation of plasma cell differentiation in the stimulated B cells, we analyzed mRNA expression pattern of various transcription factors (33 40), which are related to plasma cell differentiation. Blimp-1 is a key molecule in plasma cell development and directly represses Pax5 expression. Pax5 is required for the maintenance of B cell identity and represses the expression of XBP-1, itself an essential player in plasma cell development. IRF4 is an essential transcriptional regulator of Ab-secreting cell function. Repression of c-myc by Blimp-1 is necessary for terminal differentiation of B cells. BCL6 is also a B cell maintenance factor and acts as a repressor of Blimp-1. ELL2 is essential for the shifting of Igs from a membrane form to a secrete form in plasma cells (34). Both LPS and Pam3CSK4, respectively, increased Blimp-1, XBP-1, IRF-4, and ELL2 expression, whereas there was no any combination effect of Pam3CSK4 and LPS on those expressions (Fig. 6A). In addition, Pax5, BCL6, and c-myc expressions were not changed in the condition of Pam3CSK4 in combination with LPS. Furthermore, Pam3CSK4- or LPS-induced CD138^hiB220^lo plasma cell population was not altered when they were stimulated in the combination (Fig. 6B, C). Overall, these results suggest that TLR1/2 and TLR4 stimulation induces plasma differentiation, but there is neither a synergistic nor an antagonistic effect between those TLRs on it.

Figure 6

Effects of LPS and Pam3CSK4 on plasma cell differentiation. Resting B cells were stimulated with LPS (5 µg/ml) and Pam3CSK4 (0.5 µg/ml). (A) After 2.5 days of culture, RNAs were isolated and the levels of indicated mRNAs measured by RT-PCR. (B, C) Proportions of CD138⁺ (Syndecan-1⁺) B220^lo plasma cells. After 3 and 4 days of culture, harvested cells were stained with anti-CD138 PE and anti-B220 FITC Abs and analyzed by FACSCalibur. (B) Data shown are representative (3 days culture) of 2 independent experiments. (C) Data are averages of 3 and 4 days cultures from 2 independent experiments with SEM error bars.

SEM, standard error of the mean.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we demonstrated that TLR1/2 agonist Pam3CSK4 acts as a potent mouse B cell mitogen (an activator) commonly with TLR4 agonist LPS, and Pam3CSK4 differentially regulates LPS-induced Ig (especially IgG1 and IgG2a) production through the modulation of the GLT expression (GLTγ1 and GLTγ2a, respectively).

Pam3CSK4 selectively diminished the expression of LPS-induced GLTγ1/ε, whereas it enhanced GLTγ2a (Fig. 4). IL-4 and IFN-γ induce IgG1 and IgG2a production, respectively, by mouse B cells stimulated with LPS (41 42). To determine the autocrine effect of IL-4 and IFN-γ on GLT expression in the same culture, we examined the levels of IL-4 and IFN-γ production from the Pam3CSK4- and/or LPS-stimulated mouse B cells. We did not detect any IL-4 and IFN-γ production in the culture (data not shown). IL-12 was also known to negatively regulate IgG1 and IgE syntheses (43 44), and IL-12 and CpG synergistically induces T-bet expression and IgG2a production by mouse B cells (18). Pam3CSK4 was reported to enhance IL-12 production by dendritic cells in vitro (45). IL-12 is a heterodimeric protein produced by B cells, phagocytic cells, and other antigen-presenting cells (46). Both human and mouse B cells produce large amounts of IL-12 in response to combined stimulation with BCR, CD40 and CpG (18 47). LPS has been shown to stimulate IL-12 production in host cells and consequently down-regulate Th2 responses in animal models of allergic airway inflammation. Thus, it is possible that Pam3CSK4 and LPS stimulate mouse B cells to produce IL-12, which is involved in regulation of IgG1/IgE and IgG2a production. Further studies will examine this possibility.

Other possibilities will explain the inhibiting or enhancing effect of Pam3CSK4 on LPS-induced GLTγ1/ε or GLTγ2a transcription. First, Pam3CSK4 may block LPS-mediated GLTγ1 expression through NF-κB pathway. Previous studies reported that LPS induces NF-κB complexes p50-cRel and p50-p50 dimers, while CD40L induces p50-p65 and p50-RelB dimers in spleen B cells (48 49). LPS-induced p50-cRel/p50-p50 complex inhibits CD40L-induced p50-p65/p50-RelB complex by competitively binding to GLTγ1 promoter, resulting in diminishing GLTγ1 promoter activity (48). In addition, CTLA-4 was reported to decrease GLTγ1 and GLTε expression by inhibiting NF-κB activation, resulting in inhibition of IgG1 and IgE production (50). This indicates that different induction of NF-κB/Rel proteins has different effect on GLTγ1 transcription. NF-κB subunit p65 is activated by Pam3CSK4, which is important for Pam3CSK4-medicated B cell activation (51 52). Therefore, it is possible that LPS-induced NF-κB activation for GLTγ1 transcription was blocked by either binding of other Pam3CSK4-induced NF-κB complexes on GLTγ1 promoter region or competition between LPS- and Pam3CSK4-induced NF-κB subunits for functional NF-κB complex formation. On the other hand, previous report demonstrated that phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-mediated signaling negatively regulates LPS responses in macrophages (53). Furthermore, the cytosolic domain of TLR2 was reported to contain PI3K binding motif, and TLR2 activates PI3K-mediated signaling (51). Therefore, Pam3CSK4 may directly inhibit LPS-induced GLTγ1 expression via the PI3K pathway (54 55). In addition, previous reports demonstrated that transcription factors BCL6 and ID2 repress IgE CSR (55 56 57). Indeed, we are currently exploring these possibilities whether Pam3CSK4-induced/activated transcription factors, such as NF-κB, BCL6, and ID2, repress LPS-induced GLTγ1/ε promoter activity and which signal pathways were involved.

We showed that transcription factor T-bet expression was further enhanced by Pam3CSK4 in combination with LPS (Fig. 5). T-bet acts as a transcription factor on GLTγ2a promoter to induce class switching to IgG2a in B cells (20 39). Indeed, TLR9 agonist CpG directly induces T-bet expression in B cells, resulting in increasing IgG2a (“Th1-like” Ig) production, and inhibits IgG1 and IgE (“Th2-like” Igs) class switching in B cells (18 19 58 59 60). In addition, CpG suppresses IgE CSR by reducing NF-κB binding to the GLTε promoter, but not through transcription factor ID2 or BCL6 (21). STAT1 is also a key transcription factor to activate IFNγ-induced GLTγ2a transcription. Pam3CSK4 did not further enhance LPS-induced STAT1 mRNA expression (data not shown). However, whether Pam3CSK4 affects STAT1 activation (phosphorylation) in combination with LPS stimulation in mouse B cells remains to be tested. Thus, we speculate that Pam3CSK4 negatively and positively regulates LPS-induced GLTγ1/ε and GLTγ2a expression, respectively, by enhancing T-bet expression, resulting in the regulation of LPS-induced IgG1/IgE and IgG2a production.

We observed that, although Pam3CSK4 inhibits LPS-induced IgG3 production (Fig. 3D), LPS-induced GLTγ3 expression was not altered by Pam3CSK4 treatment (Fig. 4). IFN-γ inhibits LPS-mediated switching to IgG3 (41). Interestingly, IFN-γ suppression of LPS-induced switching to IgG3 is not associated with a corresponding reduction in the levels of GLTγ3 (61 62). Therefore, Pam3CSK4 may suppress LPS-induced IgG3 production through other pathways independent of the GLTγ3.

In this study, we used Pam3CSK4, which is a ligand for the TLR1/2 complex. TLR2 forms with either TLR1 or TLR6 and is recognized differently according to the type of complexes. Therefore, to further verify the role of TLR2, it is necessary to test other TLR2 agonists, such as MALP-2, Pam3Cys (TLR2/6 agonist), and PGN (TLR2 agonist). Indeed, we have tested the effect of TLR2/6 agonist Pam2CSK4 on B cell proliferation, GLT expression, and Ig production. We observed that, like Pam3CSK4, Pam2CSK4 enhances LPS-induced cell proliferation, GLTγ2a expression, and IgG2a production while decreasing GLTγ1/ε expression (data not shown). Thus, TLR2 engagement on B cells is involved in their proliferation, activation, and differential Ig class switching, especially IgG1/IgE and IgG2a.

In conclusion, our findings show that the TLR1/2 engagement with Pam3CSK4 activates B cell proliferation and differentially regulates LPS-driven Ig production through the modulation of GLT expression by B cells, down-regulation of IgG1/IgE (through suppressing GLTγ1/GLTε), and up-regulation of IgG2a (through enhancing GLTγ2a). IgG2a efficiently activates complement through binding to C1q, but IgG1 does not (63), and IgG2a is appropriate for clearing viral infections (64 65). High-affinity IgE and IgG1 cause anaphylaxis (66 67), and abnormal overproduction of IgE causes various allergic disorders. Recently, Weir et al. (68) demonstrated that combinations of TLR adjuvants (which consisted of 2 TLR agonists, poly I:C and Pam3CSK4) promote more effective B cell activation in vitro and can be used to augment antibody responses to vaccines in vivo. Consequently, Pam3CSK4 not only can be a candidate for effectively treating IgE-mediated allergic diseases but also may be used for B cell adjuvants to enhance IgG2a response to protect infection with fast-replicating pathogens, especially gram-negative bacteria with LPS.

Abbreviations

AID

activation-induced cytidine deaminase

BCR

B cell receptor

CSR

class switch recombination

GLT

germline transcripts

LPS

lipopolysaccharide

PI3K

phosphoinositide 3-kinase

PRR

pattern recognition receptor

TLR

toll-like receptor

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) (NRF-2013R1A1A2013036). This work was also supported in part by the Priority Research Centers Program through the NRF funded by the MEST (NRF-2017R1A6A1A03015713).

Notes

^{Conflict of Interest} The author declares no potential conflicts of interest.

^{Author Contributions}

Conceptualization: Park SR.
Data curation: Lee SH, Park SR.
Formal analysis: Lee SH, Park SR.
Funding acquisition: Park SR.
Investigation: Lee SH, Park SR.
Resources: Park SR.
Supervision: Park SR.
Writing - original draft: Lee SH, Park SR.

References

1. Kawai T, Akira S. Toll-like receptors and their crosstalk with other innate receptors in infection and immunity. Immunity. 2011; 34:637–650.

2. Jin MS, Lee JO. Structures of TLR-ligand complexes. Curr Opin Immunol. 2008; 20:414–419.

3. Medzhitov R. Toll-like receptors and innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2001; 1:135–145.

4. Takeuchi O, Akira S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell. 2010; 140:805–820.

5. Schenk M, Belisle JT, Modlin RL. TLR2 looks at lipoproteins. Immunity. 2009; 31:847–849.

6. Takeuchi O, Hoshino K, Kawai T, Sanjo H, Takada H, Ogawa T, Takeda K, Akira S. Differential roles of TLR2 and TLR4 in recognition of gram-negative and gram-positive bacterial cell wall components. Immunity. 1999; 11:443–451.

7. Jung S, Rajewsky K, Radbruch A. Shutdown of class switch recombination by deletion of a switch region control element. Science. 1993; 259:984–987.

8. Stavnezer J. Molecular processes that regulate class switching. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2000; 245:127–168.

9. Muramatsu M, Kinoshita K, Fagarasan S, Yamada S, Shinkai Y, Honjo T. Class switch recombination and hypermutation require activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a potential RNA editing enzyme. Cell. 2000; 102:553–563.

10. Fagarasan S, Honjo T. T-Independent immune response: new aspects of B cell biology. Science. 2000; 290:89–92.

11. Gururajan M, Jacob J, Pulendran B. Toll-like receptor expression and responsiveness of distinct murine splenic and mucosal B-cell subsets. PLoS One. 2007; 2:e863.

12. Bekeredjian-Ding I, Jego G. Toll-like receptors--sentries in the B-cell response. Immunology. 2009; 128:311–323.

13. Gronowicz E, Coutinho A, Möller G. Differentiation of B cells: sequential appearance of responsiveness to polyclonal activators. Scand J Immunol. 1974; 3:413–421.

14. Sultzer BM, Goodman GW. Endotoxin protein: a B-cell mitogen and polyclonal activator of C3H/HeJ lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1976; 144:821–827.

15. Snapper CM, Mond JJ. Towards a comprehensive view of immunoglobulin class switching. Immunol Today. 1993; 14:15–17.

16. Quintana FJ, Solomon A, Cohen IR, Nussbaum G. Induction of IgG3 to LPS via Toll-like receptor 4 co-stimulation. PLoS One. 2008; 3:e3509.

17. Kim YH, Lee SH, Yoo YC, Lee J, Park JH, Park SR. Kinetic analysis of CpG-induced mouse B cell growth and Ig production. Immune Netw. 2012; 12:89–95.

18. Liu N, Ohnishi N, Ni L, Akira S, Bacon KB. CpG directly induces T-bet expression and inhibits IgG1 and IgE switching in B cells. Nat Immunol. 2003; 4:687–693.

19. Lin L, Gerth AJ, Peng SL. CpG DNA redirects class-switching towards “Th1-like” Ig isotype production via TLR9 and MyD88. Eur J Immunol. 2004; 34:1483–1487.

20. Peng SL, Szabo SJ, Glimcher LH. T-bet regulates IgG class switching and pathogenic autoantibody production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002; 99:5545–5550.

21. Kusunoki T, Sugai M, Gonda H, Nambu Y, Nagata-Nakajima N, Katakai T, Kusunoki M, Sakamoto A, Tokuhisa T, Nakahata T, et al. CpG inhibits IgE class switch recombination through suppression of NF kappa B activity, but not through Id2 or Bcl6. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005; 328:499–506.

22. Shen E, Lu L, Wu C. TLR7/8 ligand, R-848, inhibits IgE synthesis by acting directly on B lymphocytes. Scand J Immunol. 2008; 67:560–568.

23. Pone EJ, Zan H, Zhang J, Al-Qahtani A, Xu Z, Casali P. Toll-like receptors and B-cell receptors synergize to induce immunoglobulin class-switch DNA recombination: relevance to microbial antibody responses. Crit Rev Immunol. 2010; 30:1–29.

24. Pone EJ, Xu Z, White CA, Zan H, Casali P. B cell TLRs and induction of immunoglobulin class-switch DNA recombination. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2012; 17:2594–2615.

25. Hayashi EA, Akira S, Nobrega A. Role of TLR in B cell development: signaling through TLR4 promotes B cell maturation and is inhibited by TLR2. J Immunol. 2005; 174:6639–6647.

26. Pone EJ, Zhang J, Mai T, White CA, Li G, Sakakura JK, Patel PJ, Al-Qahtani A, Zan H, Xu Z, et al. BCR-signalling synergizes with TLR-signalling for induction of AID and immunoglobulin class-switching through the non-canonical NF-κB pathway. Nat Commun. 2012; 3:767.

27. Petterson T, Jendholm J, Månsson A, Bjartell A, Riesbeck K, Cardell LO. Effects of NOD-like receptors in human B lymphocytes and crosstalk between NOD1/NOD2 and Toll-like receptors. J Leukoc Biol. 2011; 89:177–187.

28. Seo BS, Park HY, Yoon HK, Yoo YC, Lee J, Park SR. Dectin-1 agonist selectively induces IgG1 class switching by LPS-activated mouse B cells. Immunol Lett. 2016; 178:114–121.

29. Nakamura M, Kondo S, Sugai M, Nazarea M, Imamura S, Honjo T. High frequency class switching of an IgM+ B lymphoma clone CH12F3 to IgA+ cells. Int Immunol. 1996; 8:193–201.

30. Rodríguez-Martínez S, Cancino-Díaz ME, Jiménez-Zamudio L, García-Latorre E, Cancino-Díaz JC. TLRs and NODs mRNA expression pattern in healthy mouse eye. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005; 89:904–910.

31. Park SR, Zan H, Pal Z, Zhang J, Al-Qahtani A, Pone EJ, Xu Z, Mai T, Casali P. HoxC4 binds to the promoter of the cytidine deaminase AID gene to induce AID expression, class-switch DNA recombination and somatic hypermutation. Nat Immunol. 2009; 10:540–550.

32. Park SR, Kim HA, Chun SK, Park JB, Kim PH. Mechanisms underlying the effects of LPS and activation-induced cytidine deaminase on IgA isotype expression. Mol Cells. 2005; 19:445–451.

33. Kallies A, Hasbold J, Tarlinton DM, Dietrich W, Corcoran LM, Hodgkin PD, Nutt SL. Plasma cell ontogeny defined by quantitative changes in blimp-1 expression. J Exp Med. 2004; 200:967–977.

34. Martincic K, Alkan SA, Cheatle A, Borghesi L, Milcarek C. Transcription elongation factor ELL2 directs immunoglobulin secretion in plasma cells by stimulating altered RNA processing. Nat Immunol. 2009; 10:1102–1109.

35. Peng SL. Signaling in B cells via Toll-like receptors. Curr Opin Immunol. 2005; 17:230–236.

36. Genestier L, Taillardet M, Mondiere P, Gheit H, Bella C, Defrance T. TLR agonists selectively promote terminal plasma cell differentiation of B cell subsets specialized in thymus-independent responses. J Immunol. 2007; 178:7779–7786.

37. Barr TA, Brown S, Ryan G, Zhao J, Gray D. TLR-mediated stimulation of APC: distinct cytokine responses of B cells and dendritic cells. Eur J Immunol. 2007; 37:3040–3053.

38. Booth J, Wilson H, Jimbo S, Mutwiri G. Modulation of B cell responses by Toll-like receptors. Cell Tissue Res. 2011; 343:131–140.

39. Gerth AJ, Lin L, Peng SL. T-bet regulates T-independent IgG2a class switching. Int Immunol. 2003; 15:937–944.

40. Shapiro-Shelef M, Calame K. Regulation of plasma-cell development. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005; 5:230–242.

41. Snapper CM, Paul WE. Interferon-gamma and B cell stimulatory factor-1 reciprocally regulate Ig isotype production. Science. 1987; 236:944–947.

42. Snapper CM, Finkelman FD, Paul WE. Regulation of IgG1 and IgE production by interleukin 4. Immunol Rev. 1988; 102:51–75.

43. Kiniwa M, Gately M, Gubler U, Chizzonite R, Fargeas C, Delespesse G. Recombinant interleukin-12 suppresses the synthesis of immunoglobulin E by interleukin-4 stimulated human lymphocytes. J Clin Invest. 1992; 90:262–266.

44. Faquim-Mauro EL, Coffman RL, Abrahamsohn IA, Macedo MS. Cutting edge: mouse IgG1 antibodies comprise two functionally distinct types that are differentially regulated by IL-4 and IL-12. J Immunol. 1999; 163:3572–3576.

45. Patel M, Xu D, Kewin P, Choo-Kang B, McSharry C, Thomson NC, Liew FY. TLR2 agonist ameliorates established allergic airway inflammation by promoting Th1 response and not via regulatory T cells. J Immunol. 2005; 174:7558–7563.

46. Sartori A, Ma X, Gri G, Showe L, Benjamin D, Trinchieri G. Interleukin-12: an immunoregulatory cytokine produced by B cells and antigen-presenting cells. Methods. 1997; 11:116–127.

47. Wagner M, Poeck H, Jahrsdoerfer B, Rothenfusser S, Prell D, Bohle B, Tuma E, Giese T, Ellwart JW, Endres S, et al. IL-12p70-dependent Th1 induction by human B cells requires combined activation with CD40 ligand and CpG DNA. J Immunol. 2004; 172:954–963.

48. Lin SC, Wortis HH, Stavnezer J. The ability of CD40L, but not lipopolysaccharide, to initiate immunoglobulin switching to immunoglobulin G1 is explained by differential induction of NF-kappaB/Rel proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1998; 18:5523–5532.

49. Kaku H, Horikawa K, Obata Y, Kato I, Okamoto H, Sakaguchi N, Gerondakis S, Takatsu K. NF-kappaB is required for CD38-mediated induction of C(gamma)1 germline transcripts in murine B lymphocytes. Int Immunol. 2002; 14:1055–1064.

50. Pioli C, Gatta L, Ubaldi V, Doria G. Inhibition of IgG1 and IgE production by stimulation of the B cell CTLA-4 receptor. J Immunol. 2000; 165:5530–5536.

51. Arbibe L, Mira JP, Teusch N, Kline L, Guha M, Mackman N, Godowski PJ, Ulevitch RJ, Knaus UG. Toll-like receptor 2-mediated NF-kappa B activation requires a Rac1-dependent pathway. Nat Immunol. 2000; 1:533–540.

52. Huang ZM, Kang JK, Chen CY, Tseng TH, Chang CW, Chang YC, Tai SK, Hsieh SL, Leu CM. Decoy receptor 3 suppresses TLR2-mediated B cell activation by targeting NF-κB. J Immunol. 2012; 188:5867–5876.

53. Laird MH, Rhee SH, Perkins DJ, Medvedev AE, Piao W, Fenton MJ, Vogel SN. TLR4/MyD88/PI3K interactions regulate TLR4 signaling. J Leukoc Biol. 2009; 85:966–977.

54. Omori SA, Cato MH, Anzelon-Mills A, Puri KD, Shapiro-Shelef M, Calame K, Rickert RC. Regulation of class-switch recombination and plasma cell differentiation by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling. Immunity. 2006; 25:545–557.

55. Zhang TT, Makondo KJ, Marshall AJ. p110δ phosphoinositide 3-kinase represses IgE switch by potentiating BCL6 expression. J Immunol. 2012; 188:3700–3708.

56. Harris MB, Chang CC, Berton MT, Danial NN, Zhang J, Kuehner D, Ye BH, Kvatyuk M, Pandolfi PP, Cattoretti G, et al. Transcriptional repression of Stat6-dependent interleukin-4-induced genes by BCL-6: specific regulation of iepsilon transcription and immunoglobulin E switching. Mol Cell Biol. 1999; 19:7264–7275.

57. Sugai M, Gonda H, Kusunoki T, Katakai T, Yokota Y, Shimizu A. Essential role of Id2 in negative regulation of IgE class switching. Nat Immunol. 2003; 4:25–30.

58. Vasilakos JP, Smith RM, Gibson SJ, Lindh JM, Pederson LK, Reiter MJ, Smith MH, Tomai MA. Adjuvant activities of immune response modifier R-848: comparison with CpG ODN. Cell Immunol. 2000; 204:64–74.

59. Peng SL, Li J, Lin L, Gerth A. The role of T-bet in B cells. Nat Immunol. 2003; 4:1041.

60. Rifkin IR, Marshak-Rothstein A. T-bet: the Toll-bridge to class-switch recombination? Nat Immunol. 2003; 4:650–652.

61. Severinson E, Fernandez C, Stavnezer J. Induction of germ-line immunoglobulin heavy chain transcripts by mitogens and interleukins prior to switch recombination. Eur J Immunol. 1990; 20:1079–1084.

62. Zelazowski P, Collins JT, Dunnick W, Snapper CM. Antigen receptor cross-linking differentially regulates germ-line CH ribonucleic acid expression in murine B cells. J Immunol. 1995; 154:1223–1231.

63. McKendall RR, Woo W. Murine IgG subclass responses to herpes simplex virus type 1 and polypeptides. J Gen Virol. 1988; 69:847–857.

64. Coutelier JP, van der Logt JT, Heessen FW, Warnier G, Van Snick J. IgG2a restriction of murine antibodies elicited by viral infections. J Exp Med. 1987; 165:64–69.

65. Ferrante A, Beard LJ, Feldman RG. IgG subclass distribution of antibodies to bacterial and viral antigens. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1990; 9:S16–S24.

66. Miyajima I, Dombrowicz D, Martin TR, Ravetch JV, Kinet JP, Galli SJ. Systemic anaphylaxis in the mouse can be mediated largely through IgG1 and Fc gammaRIII. Assessment of the cardiopulmonary changes, mast cell degranulation, and death associated with active or IgE- or IgG1-dependent passive anaphylaxis. J Clin Invest. 1997; 99:901–914.

67. Xiong H, Dolpady J, Wabl M, Curotto de Lafaille MA, Lafaille JJ. Sequential class switching is required for the generation of high affinity IgE antibodies. J Exp Med. 2012; 209:353–364.

68. Weir GM, Karkada M, Hoskin D, Stanford MM, MacDonald L, Mansour M, Liwski RS. Combination of poly I:C and Pam3CSK4 enhances activation of B cells in vitro and boosts antibody responses to protein vaccines in vivo . PLoS One. 2017; 12:e0180073.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary Figure 1

Dosage effect of LPS on B cell proliferation, viability, and Ig production.

Supplementary Figure 2

Dosage effect of Pam3CSK4 on LPS-induced B cell growth and Ig production.

Supplementary Figure 3

Kinetic effect of Pam3CSK4 and LPS on B cell growth and Ig production.

TOOLS

Similar articles