Journal List > J Korean Neurotraumatol Soc > v.6(2) > 1097517

Yang, Cho, Yu, Heo, Sheen, Hwang, and Park: Usability of Magnetic Resonance Neurography for Diagnosis of Neuralgic Amyotrophy in Acute Stage

Abstract

Objective

Neuralgic amyotrophy (NA) is a distinct clinical syndrome of unknown etiology involving the brachial plexus, which is characterized by the acute onset of shoulder and arm pain followed by weakness, and sensory loss. Diagnosis with neurophysiologic studies and a conventional MRI of brachial plexus is very difficult in acute stage. The magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) is considered to be more sensitive than MRI for the peripheral neuropathies. The objective of this study is to describe the MRN findings and its usability for patients with neuralgic amyotrophy in acute stage.

Methods

The authors have treated 10 patients with NA between 2006 and 2009. All the patients had clinical and neurophysiologic evidence of acute brachial plexopathy without a definable cause. Recently, three patients were evaluated in acute stage using a MRN with a 1.5-T scanner and had positive findings for NA. Imaging sequences for brachial plexus included axial, sagittal, and coronal conventional spin echo sequences, and gadolinium was administered for axial and coronal images, employing short tau inversion recovery sequences.

Results

All patients were checked the brachial plexus MRN within 3 weeks after onset. In conventional MRI, the authors did not find any evidences of plexopathy, mass lesion, muscle atrophy or rotator cuff tear. However, brachial plexus MRN of all the patients showed thickened and hyperintense trunks of the brachial plexus in lesion site consistent with plexitis.

Conclusion

MRN is the most specific diagnostic modality especially in acute stage of NA. It can help early diagnosis and prevent unnecessary studies.

Figures and Tables

FIGURE 1
These pictures of No. 1 patient show weakness of deltoid and biceps in the right side and normal motor function of palmar interossei.
jknts-6-106-g001
FIGURE 2
Short tau inversion recovery image of the magnetic resonance neurography of patient No. 3 shows a diffuse thickening and increased signal intensity in the right lower trunk of the brachial plexus (white arrow).
jknts-6-106-g002
TABLE 1
Clinical manifestations
jknts-6-106-i001

No.: number, SP: shoulder pain, SW: shoulder weakness, Gr: grade, E: extensor

TABLE 2
Neurophysiologic findings
jknts-6-106-i002

no.: number, NCS: nerve conduction study, CMAP: compound muscle action potential, SNAP: sensory nerve action potential, UTP: upper trunk plexopathy, LTP: lower trunk plexopathy

References

1. Aagaard BD, Maravilla KR, Kliot M. MR neurography. MR imaging of peripheral nerves. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1998; 6:179–194.
2. Dill-Macky MJ, Song S, Silbert PL. Magnetic resonance imaging features of subacute idiopathic brachial neuritis. Australas Radiol. 2000; 44:98–100.
crossref
3. Du R, Auguste KI, Chin CT, Engstrom JW, Weinstein PR. Magnetic resonance neurography for the evaluation of peripheral nerve, brachial plexus, and nerve root disorders. J Neurosurg. 2010; 112:362–371.
crossref
4. Duman I, Guvenc I, Kalyon TA. Neuralgic amyotrophy, diagnosed with magnetic resonance neurography in acute stage: a case report and review of the literature. Neurologist. 2007; 13:219–221.
5. Favero KJ, Hawkins RH, Jones MW. Neuralgic amyotrophy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987; 69:195–198.
crossref
6. Flaggman PD, Kelly JJ Jr. Brachial plexus neuropathy. An electrophysiologic evaluation. Arch Neurol. 1980; 37:160–164.
7. Helms CA, Martinez S, Speer KP. Acute brachial neuritis (Parsonage-Turner syndrome): MR imaging appearance--report of three cases. Radiology. 1998; 207:255–259.
crossref
8. Mullins GM, O'Sullivan SS, Neligan A, Daly S, Galvin RJ, Sweeney BJ, et al. Non-traumatic brachial plexopathies, clinical, radiological and neurophysiological findings from a tertiary centre. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2007; 109:661–666.
crossref
9. Parsonage MJ, Turner JW. Neuralgic amyotrophy; the shoulder-girdle syndrome. Lancet. 1948; 1:973–978.
crossref
10. Patel M, Mahajan A, Desai S. Neuralgic amyotrophy: a long term follow-up of four cases. J Postgrad Med. 1990; 36:112–114.
11. Qayyum A, MacVicar AD, Padhani AR, Revell P, Husband JE. Symptomatic brachial plexopathy following treatment for breast cancer: utility of MR imaging with surface-coil techniques. Radiology. 2000; 214:837–842.
crossref
12. Rix GD, Rothman EH, Robinson AW. Idiopathic neuralgic amyotrophy: an illustrative case report. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006; 29:52–59.
crossref
13. Rubin DI. Neuralgic amyotrophy: clinical features and diagnostic evaluation. Neurologist. 2001; 7:350–356.
crossref
14. Sarikaya S, Sumer M, Ozdolap S, Erdem CZ. Magnetic resonance neurography diagnosed brachial plexitis: a case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86:1058–1059.
crossref
15. Scalf RE, Wenger DE, Frick MA, Mandrekar JN, Adkins MC. MRI findings of 26 patients with Parsonage-Turner syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 189:W39–W44.
crossref
16. Tsairis P, Dyck PJ, Mulder DW. Natural history of brachial plexus neuropathy. Report on 99 patients. Arch Neurol. 1972; 27:109–117.
17. van Alfen N. The neuralgic amyotrophy consultation. J Neurol. 2007; 254:695–704.
crossref
18. van Alfen N, van Engelen BG. The clinical spectrum of neuralgic amyotrophy in 246 cases. Brain. 2006; 129:438–450.
crossref
19. Vargas MI, Viallon M, Nguyen D, Beaulieu JY, Delavelle J, Becker M. New approaches in imaging of the brachial plexus. Eur J Radiol. 2010; 74:403–410.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles