Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) has been performed in patients with end-stage renal disease [1,2]. The advantages of CAPD are low cost, technical simplicity, improved patient mobility and independence, better control of hypertension, and fewer dietary restrictions [3,4]. A successful PD program is quite dependent on the proper placement and maintenance of the dialysis catheter [5]. The traditional and common method for placement of PD catheter is open surgical method through a mini-laparotomy incision using a malleable stylet [6]. Other insertion techniques include peritoneoscopic or laparoscopic guidance with different incisions and numbers of ports [7-9]. In recent years, laparoscopic surgery has found a wider use in peritoneal catheter placement with various techniques. Wright et al. [7] prospectively compared laparoscopic and open placement of dialysis catheter and found no difference in complication rates, catheter survival, pain scores, or length of stay. However, several authors have found a benefit to laparoscopic guidance, although consensus statements have not favored a specific technique [6,10]. Potential complications related to PD catheter include dysfunction frequently due to migration, leak, exit site or peritoneal infection, and intraabdominal injury or bleeding. Among them, catheter migration is one of the most frustrating complications resulting in dialysis failure and catheter removal. One of the most common procedures for migrated catheter salvage is laparoscopic procedure [11]. We hypothesized that the laparoscopic internal fixation of PD catheter to anterior abdominal wall may decrease catheter complications caused by catheter migration.

From January 2008 to August 2009, PD catheters were inserted in 54 patients with end-stage renal disease. It was our principle to adopt open surgery as a primary method. Open surgical method was used in 32 patients under local anesthesia. Laparoscopic internal fixation method was used in 22 patients under general anesthesia. Laparoscopic technique was preferentially used for patients requiring catheter salvage, previous abdominal surgery and willingness to undergo laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic surgery was done under general anesthesia. All procedures were undertaken by one surgeon. Informed consents were obtained before any surgical procedures. Kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) was checked daily after operation during the index admission, then monthly for a subsequent 6 months. Thereafter, KUB was checked every two or three months depending on the patient's visit. KUB was checked whenever catheter dysfunction was identified. Catheter migration was determined by abdominal radiography as deviation of the catheter tip outside the pelvic cavity. Peritonitis was defined as dialysate count of >100 cells/mm³ with >50% being polymorphonuclear leukocytes. The frequency of migration, peritonitis, and other catheter related complications were compared between the two groups. Migration-free and overall catheter survivals were compared. Patient survival rate at 2 years was also compared. Clinical data were collected retrospectively including patients' demographics, complications, and catheter outcomes.

The mean age was 45.2 ± 15.8 years (range, 19 to 69 years) in laparoscopic fixation (LF) group and 49.6 ± 14.7 years (range, 23 to 73 years) in OS group, respectively (P = 0.30). The sex ratio was similar between groups (P = 1.0). The mean follow-up duration was 29.1 ± 6.1 months in LF group and was 26.1 ± 10.2 months in OS group (P = 0.18). One patient in OS group was lost to follow up. Baseline characteristics other than laparotomy history were comparable between groups. Laparotomy history was higher in LF group (27.3%) than in OS group (3.1%) (P = 0.01) (Table 1). Laparoscopic procedure was used in conditions as follows; voluntary request (n = 8), presence of laparotomy history (n = 6), catheter salvage intention (n = 4), catheter reinsertion after catheter related complications (n = 3), failed open procedure (n = 1) (Table 2). The mean operation time was significantly longer in LF group (101.6 ± 30.4 minutes) than in OS group (72.4 ± 26.03 minutes) (P < 0.01). The cumulative incidence of catheter migration was 13.6% in LF group and 65.6% in OS group (P < 0.01) (Table 3). All migrated catheters repositioned spontaneously in LF group, but surgical correction was required in six patients (28.6%) in OS group (P = 0.55). The mean migration interval was 22.9 ± 2.1 months (range, 1.2 to 37.3 months) in LF group and 9.1 ± 2.1 months (range, 0.01 to 35.3 months) in OS group (P < 0.01). Odds ratio for migration between groups was 12.1 (P = 0.01). Migration-free catheter survival rate was significantly better in LF group than OS group (P = 0.01) (Fig. 4). However, overall catheter survival was not different between groups (P = 0.93) (Fig. 5). Peritonitis occurred in 3 patients (13.6%) in the OS group, and 8 patients (25.0%) in the LF group (P = 0.49). Exit site complication was 18.2% in LF group and 15.6% in OS group (P = 1.00). There were two cases of hernia in OS group (1 inguinal and 1 incisional), but there was no hernia in LF group (P = 0.51). Catheter dysfunction occurred in 2 patients in LF group and ten patients in OS group (P = 0.04). There was no 30-day or in-hospital mortality in both groups. One patient in LF group and six patients in OS group died during follow up (Table 3). Patient survival rate at 2 years was not different between groups (Fig. 6).

PD is an alternate, affordable, feasible, and readily available form of dialysis. Nevertheless, complications such as outflow obstruction, catheter-related infection, and dialysate leak remain problematic [12]. Ash [13] indicated that successful PD depends more on placement technique than on catheter design. Therefore, appropriate selection of surgical technique and adjunctive procedures to minimize related complications are mandatory. Current available techniques for catheter placement are categorized as follows: 1) percutaneous method, 2) open surgical method, 3) peritoneoscopic method, 4) laparoscopic method [12]. Although percutaneous method seems quick and simple, it carries a risk of visceral injury, particularly in patients with laparotomy history [14,15]. Among various techniques, only laparoscopic method enables not only internal fixation but also other adjunctive procedures enhancing catheter longevity or catheter salvage [16,17]. With the aid of laparoscopy, one can rescue a malfunctioning catheter, place a new catheter, or simultaneously perform other laparoscopic procedures [18-20]. Currently, the ideal method for inserting PD catheter remains debatable. Some reports favor laparoscopic technique [18,21,22], others do not [23,24]. A recent prospective randomized study reported that laparoscopic group had lower migration rates [12]. But, they indicated that laparoscopic technique had longer operative time than open surgery [12]. In our study, we found that more operative time is required for laparoscopic technique because of adjunctive procedures. Despite a longer operation time, we couldn't find additional morbidities attributable to elongated procedure time. The PD catheter may undergo spontaneous migration within the abdominal cavity, reducing dialysate flux. These problems may occur immediately or several months after the insertion [25,26]. Several studies have demonstrated that securing of the catheter tip in the pelvis reduces the incidence of catheter obstruction. Catheter fixation is easily accomplished by a laparoscopic approach using techniques which vary from suturing to stapling the suture loop to the pelvic peritoneum [5]. Comert et al. [27] reported a laparoscopic technique for the placement of PD catheter through a preperitoneal tunnel and found advantages of this method including accurate placement, preperitoneal fixation, and immediate use of the catheter for routine PD. Since internal fixation reduces free motion range of the catheter, the migration rate might be lower and the possibility of spontaneous return might be higher. As expected, migration rate was lower and all the migrated catheters returned spontaneously to the desired position in LF group in our study.

What limits this study is that it is neither a randomized nor a prospective one. In addition, factors affecting catheter migration were not included in this study. It requires further investigation to compare clinical outcomes between laparoscopic groups with or without internal fixation in well-designed prospective study.

In conclusion, laparoscopic internal fixation of PD catheter significantly reduces migration rates and migration interval without any addition of catheter related complications. Also, laparoscopic internal fixation improved migration-free catheter survival rates. Furthermore, laparoscopic technique incurs no patient morbidity and mortality despite the requirement of general endotracheal anesthesia and longer operation time. Therefore, internal fixation can be afforded safely in patients with previous abdominal surgery as a primary option or as a salvage or preventive measure in patients with repeated catheter migration events.