Journal List > J Korean Soc Spine Surg > v.24(3) > 1076142

Hwang, Kim, Park, Jung, and Cha: Differential Diagnosis and Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Mimicking Myelitis in an Adolescent Patient - A Case Report -

Abstract

Study Design

Case report

Objectives

This study introduces an interesting case of adolescent cervical myelopathy with atypical cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. A differential diagnosis was made, followed by successful surgical treatment.

Summary of Literature Review

A careful differential diagnosis of high signal intensity on T2-weighted cervical MRI is necessary if there is no evidence of cervical stenosis. Recent reports have suggested that the differential diagnosis should be based on a comprehensive analysis of data, including brain MRI, a cerebrospinal fluid examination, and empirical steroid treatment.

Materials and Methods

A 17-year-old male patient complained of upper extremity weakness, gait disturbance, and decreased sensation in the upper extremity. Cervical spine MRI findings suggested C3/4 disc herniation, moderate cervical stenosis, and high signal intensity in the spinal cord. A differential diagnosis was made between cervical myelopathy and myelitis.

Results

Decompression and posterolateral fusion of C3/4 were performed in a 17-year-old patient with cervical myelopathy without significant cervical stenosis. Postoperatively, upper extremity sensation and weakness and gait disturbance showed improvement, and the Japanese Orthopedic Association score improved to 17 points at 6 months after surgery.

Conclusions

In patients with cervical myelopathy showing high signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging without evident spinal stenosis, a differential diagnosis should be made between cervical myelopathy and myelitis; surgical decompression can be an effective treatment choice upon the diagnosis of cervical myelopathy.

REFERENCES

1. Garfin SR. Cervical degenerative disorders: etiology, presentation, and imaging studies. Instr Course Lect. 2000; 49:335–8.
2. Bernhardt M, Hynes RA, Blume HW, et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75:119–28.
crossref
3. Conway BL, Clarke MJ, Kaufmann TJ, et al. Utility of extension views in spondylotic myelopathy mimicking trans-verseMyelitis. Mult scler Relat Disord. 2017; 11:62–4.
4. Flanagan EP, Krecke KN, Marsh RW, et al. Specific Pattern of Gadolinium Enhancement in Spondylotic Myelopathy. Ann Neurol. 2014; 76:54–65.
crossref
5. Paternostro-Sluga T, Grim-Stieger M, Posch M, et al. Reliability and validity of the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and a modified scale for testing muscle strength in patients with radial palsy. J Rehabil Med. 2008; 40:665–71.
crossref
6. Anderst W, Donaldson W, Lee J, et al. Cervical Spine Disc Deformation During In Vivo Three-Dimensional Head Movements. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016; 44:1598–612.
crossref
7. Rua A, Blanco Y, Sepulveda M, et al. Spondylotic myelopathy mimicking myelitis: diagnostic clues by magnetic resonance imaging. Rev Neurol. 2015; 61:499–502.
8. Weinshenker BG, Wingerchuk DM, Vukusic S, et al. Neuromyelitis optica IgG predicts relapse after longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis. Ann Neurol. 2006; 59:566–9.
crossref
9. Jeffrey DeSanto, Jeffrey S. Ross, Spine infection/inflammation. Radiol Clin North Am. 2011; 49:105–27.
10. Jacob A, Weinshenker BG. An Approach to the Diagnosis of Acute Transverse Myelitis. Semin Neurol. 2008; 28:105–20.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Radiographs of the cervical spine in anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) views. No definite degenerative changes are seen, although there is a decrease in cervical lordosis. cervical spine extension stress (C) and flexion stress (D) in the radiographs. There is hypermobility at C5/6 and C6/7.
jkss-24-198f1.tif
Fig. 2.
(A) Cervical spine T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, sagittal view. There is moderate intervertebral disc protrusion and fusiform type high signal intensity at C3/4 (white arrow). (B) Cervical spine T1-weighted gadolinium enhancement, sagittal view. There is focal enhancement just proximal to the C3/4 level (white arrow).
jkss-24-198f2.tif
Fig. 3.
Postoperative radiographs in anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) views after posterior decompression with posterior fusion at C3/4.
jkss-24-198f3.tif
Table 1.
Medical research council scale5)
0 No movement is observed.
1 Only a trace or flicker of movement is seen or felt in the muscle or fasciculations are observed in the muscle.
2 Muscle can move only if the resistance of gravity is removed. As an example, the elbow can be fully flexed only if the arm is maintained in a horizontal plane.
3 Muscle strength is further reduced such that the joint can be moved only against gravity with the examiner's resistance completely removed. As an example, the elbow can be moved from full extension to full flexion starting with the arm hanging down at the side.
4 Muscle strength is reduced but muscle contraction can still move joint against resistance.
5 Muscle contracts normally against full resistance.
TOOLS
Similar articles