Journal List > Korean J Endocr Surg > v.10(3) > 1060001

M.D., M.D., M.D., M.D., M.D., M.D., and M.D.: Analysis of Clinicopathologic Features of Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma According to Cut-off of Tumor Size

Abstract

Purpose:

Although the detected incidence of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) has increased with development of ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration biopsy, the best treatment has not yet been established. Treatment decisions require information on many factors including lymph node metastasis, extrathyroidal extension, and bilaterality. With this aim, the present study analyzed clinicopathologic features of PTMC according to cut-off of tumor size.

Methods:

The clinicopathologic features of patients with PTMC between January 2007 and December 2009 were reviewed retrospectively from medical records. Patients were divided according to tumors lesser than or equal to cut-off (Group I) and tumors exceeding cut-off (Group II).

Results:

Both capsule invasion and lymphovascular invasion were significantly different at all cut-off diameters (5 ∼9 mm). Central node metastasis revealed a difference in all cut-off values except 8 mm. Extrathyroidal extension differed at all cut-off values except 5 mm. Bilaterality displayed a statistically significantdifference only at the 8 mm cut-off.

Conclusion:

A cut-off of 5 mm represents a safe value to discriminate less aggressive from aggressive treatment for PTMC. (Korean J Endocrine Surg 2010;10:152-156)

REFERENCES

1.Ito Y., Miyauchi A., Inoue H., Fukushima M., Kihara M., Higashiyama T, et al. An observational trial for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma in Japanese patients. World J Surg. 2010. 34:28–35.
crossref
2.Arora N., Turbendian HK., Kato MA., Moo TA., Zarnegar R., Fahey TJ 3rd. Papillary thyroid carcinoma and microcar-cinoma: is there a need to distinguish the two? Thyroid. 2009. 19:473–7.
crossref
3.Mazzaferri EL., Sipos J. Should all patients with subcentimeter thyroid nodules undergo fine-needle aspiration biopsy and preoperative neck ultrasonography to define the extent of tumor invasion. Thyroid. 2008. 18:597–602.
crossref
4.Ito Y., Uruno T., Nakano K., Takamura Y., Miya A., Kobayashi K, et al. An observation trial without surgical treatment in patients with papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid. Thyroid. 2003. 13:381–7.
crossref
5.Roti E., degli Uberti EC., Bondanelli M., Braverman LE. Thyroid papillary microcarcinoma: a descriptive and meta-analysis study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008. 159:659–73.
crossref
6.Ito Y., Higashiyama T., Takamura Y., Miya A., Kobayashi K., Matsuzuka F, et al. Prognosis of patients with benign thyroid diseases accompanied by incidental papillary carcinoma undetectable on preoperative imaging tests. World J Surg. 2007. 31:1672–6.
crossref
8.Pelizzo MR., Boschin IM., Toniato A., Piotto A., Bernante P., Pagetta C, et al. Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC): prognostic factors, management and outcome in 403 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006. 32:1144–8.
crossref
9.Hay ID., Hutchinson ME., Gonzalez-Losada T., McIver B., Reinalda ME., Grant CS, et al. Papillary thyroid microcar-cinoma: a study of 900 cases observed in a 60-year period. Surgery. 2008. 144:980–7. discussion 87-8.
crossref
10.Lee KJ., Kim HR., Kim SJ., Lee SC., Kim JG., Sung GY, et al. Analysis of the relationship between central cervical lymph node metastasis from papillary thyroid carcinoma and the associated factors according to the tumor size. J Korean Surg Soc. 2008. 75:156–61.
11.Lee NS., Bae JS., Jeong SR., Jung CK., Lim DJ., Park WC, et al. Risk factors of lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. J Korean Surg Soc. 2010. 78:82–6.
crossref
12.Harwood J., Clark OH., Dunphy JE. Significance of lymph node metastasis in differentiated thyroid cancer. Am J Surg. 1978. 136:107–12.
crossref
13.Ito Y., Tomoda C., Uruno T., Takamura Y., Miya A., Kobayashi K, et al. Clinical significance of metastasis to the central com-partment from papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid. World J Surg. 2006. 30:91–9.
crossref
14.Ito Y., Tomoda C., Uruno T., Takamura Y., Miya A., Kobayashi K, et al. Papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid: how should it be treated? World J Surg. 2004. 28:1115–21.
crossref
15.Shin IY., Lee KJ., Kim HR., Kim SJ., KIM JG., Lee DH, et al. Analysis of the relationship between bilaterality and other clinicopathological factors in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Korean J Endocrine Surg. 2008. 8:123–7.
crossref
16.Mazzaferri EL., Jhiang SM. Long-term impact of initial surgical and medical therapy on papillary and follicular thyroid cancer. Am J Med. 1994. 97:418–28.
crossref
17.Baudin E., Travagli JP., Ropers J., Mancusi F., Bruno-Bossio G., Caillou B, et al. Microcarcinoma of the thyroid gland: the Gustave-Roussy Institute experience. Cancer. 1998. 83:553–9.
18.Giordano D., Gradoni P., Oretti G., Molina E., Ferri T. Treatment and prognostic factors of papillary thyroid microcar-cinoma. Clin Otolaryngol. 2010. 35:118–24.
crossref

Table 1.
Clinicopathologic features of papillary thyroid micro
carcinoma  
  Patients (%)
Gender  
Male 18 (5.7)
Female 300 (94.3)
Capsule invasion 120 (37.7)
Extrathyroidal extension 79 (24.8)
Central node metastasis 113 (35.5)
Lymphovascular invasion 112 (35.2)
Type of surgery  
Lobectomy 66 (20.8)
Total thyroidectomy 252 (79.2)
Bilaterality 62 (19.5)
Multifocality 102 (32.1)
Table 2.
Analysis of clinicopathologic features of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma according to 5 mm, 6 mm, and 7 mm cut-off
Patients (%)
5 mm cut-off P value 6 mm cut-off P value 7 mm cut-off P value
Group I Group II Group I Group II Group I Group II
Gender     0.79     0.65     0.44
Male 8 (6.1) 10 (5.4)   11 (6.2) 7 (5.0)   14 (6.3) 4 (4.2)  
Female 124 (93.9) 176 (94.6)   167 (93.8) 133 (95.0)   208 (93.7) 92 (95.8)  
Age (years)     0.02     0.09     0.26
<45 57 (43.2) 57 (30.6)   71 (39.9) 43 (30.7)   84 (37.8) 30 (31.3)  
≥45s 75 (56.8) 129 (69.4)   107 (60.1) 97 (69.3)   138 (62.2) 66 (68.8)  
Capsule invasion 35 (26.5) 85 (45.7) 0.001 50 (28.1) 70 (50.0) <0.001 70 (31.5) 50 (52.1) 0.001
ETE∗ 27 (20.5) 52 (28.0) 0.12 33 (18.5) 46 (32.9) 0.003 46 (20.7) 33 (34.4) 0.01
CN metastasis 37 (28.0) 76 (40.9) 0.019 52 (29.2) 61 (43.6) 0.008 70 (31.5) 43 (44.8) 0.023
LV invasion 37 (29.8) 75 (41.7) 0.036 50 (29.8) 62 (45.6) 0.004 69 (33.0) 43 (45.3) 0.04
Type of surgery     <0.001     0.002     0.003
Lobectomy 41 (31.1) 25 (13.4)   48 (27.0) 18 (12.9)   56 (25.2) 10 (10.4)  
Total thyroidectom my 91 (68.9) 161 (86.6)   130 (73.0) 122 (87.1)   166 (74.8) 86 (89.6)  
Bilaterality§ 18 (19.8) 44 (27.3) 0.181 29 (22.3) 33 (27.0) 0.38 37 (22.3) 25 (29.1) 0.236
Multifocality 33 (25.0) 69 (37.1) 0.023 52 (29.2) 50 (35.7) 0.21 65 (29.3) 37 (38.5) 0.104

Extrathyroidal extension;

Central node;

Lymphvascular; The case that was not described about lymphovascular invasion was excluded;

§ The patients who underwent lobecotmy were excluded.

Table 3.
Analysis of clinicopathologic features of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma according to 8 mm and 9 mm cut-off
    Patients (%)  
  8 mm cut-off P value 9 mm cut-off P value
  Group I Group II Group I Group II
Gender   0.42   0.28
Male 16 (6.2) 2 (3.4)   17 (6.2) 1 (2.2)  
Female 244 (93.8) 56 (96.6)   256 (93.8) 44 (97.8)  
Age (years)   0.58   0.29
<45 95 (36.5) 19 (32.8)   101 (37.0) 13 (28.9)  
≥45s 165 (63.5) 39 (67.2)   172 (63.0) 32 (71.1)  
Capsule invasion 88 (33.8) 32 (55.2) 0.002 96 (35.2) 24 (53.3) 0.02
ETE∗ 57 (21.9) 22 (37.9) 0.011 62 (22.7) 17 (37.8) 0.03
CN metastasis 87 (33.5) 26 (44.8) 0.102 91 (33.3) 22 (48.9) 0.04
LV invasion 84 (34.0) 28 (49.1) 0.03 90 (34.6) 22 (50.0) 0.05
Type of surgery   <0.001   0.004
Lobectomy 64 (24.6) 2 (3.4)   64 (23.4) 2 (4.4)  
Total thyroidectomy y 196 (75.4) 56 (96.6)   209 (76.6) 43 (95.6)  
Bilaterality§ 42 (21.4) 20 (35.7) 0.029 48 (23.0) 14 (32.6) 0.18
Multifocality 74 (28.5) 28 (48.3) 0.003 81 (29.7) 21 (46.7) 0.024

Extrathyroidal extension;

Central node;

Lymphvascular; The case that was not described about lymphovascular invasion was excluded;

§ The patients who underwent lobecotmy were excluded.

TOOLS
Similar articles