Journal List > J Korean Acad Oral Health > v.40(4) > 1057701

Oh and Choi: Effect of bamboo salt on the caries activity of Streptococcus mutans

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anti-caries activity of bamboo salt on Streptococcus mutans.

Methods

The pH of bamboo salt, bay salt, and NaCl were measured at concentrations of 1%, 3%, 5%, and 10%. At 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 h, the growth and acid production of S. mutans was measured using a spectrophotometer and pH meter, respectively.

Results

The growth of S. mutans remarkably reduced with the addition of 1% NaCl. Bamboo salt showed effective growth inhibition at concentrations higher than 3%. Bay salt showed effective growth inhibition at concentrations higher than 5% (P<0.01). At salt concentrations of 1%, the pH value of bacterial culture broth reduced to below 5.5 after 12 h. Bamboo salt and NaCl reduced acid production at concentrations higher than 3%. Moreover, bay salt decreased acid production at concentrations higher than 5%.

Conclusions

These results showed that the bamboo salt inhibited growth and acid production of S. mutans. Thus, bamboo salt can be considered a useful material for the prevention of dental caries.

References

1. Van Houte J. Role of micro-organisms in caries etiology. J Dent Res. 1994; 73:672–681.
crossref
2. Trahan L, Söderling E, Dréan MF, Chevrier MC, Isokangas P. Effect of xylitol consumption on the plaque-saliva distribution of mutans streptococci and the occurrence and long-term survival of xylitol-resistant strains. J Dent Res. 1992; 71:1785–1791.
crossref
3. Bender GR, Sutton SV, Marquis RE. Acid tolerance, proton permeabilities, and membrane ATPases of oral streptococci. Infect Immun. 1986; 53:331–338.
crossref
4. Hamilton IR, Buckley ND. Adaptation by Streptococcus mutans to acid tolerance. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1991; 6:65–71.
crossref
5. Vaikuntam J. Fluoride varnishes: should we be using them? Pediatr Dent. 2000; 22:513–516.
6. Reynolds EC, Cai F, Shen P, Walker GD. Retention in plaque and remineralization of enamel lesions by various forms of calcium in a mouthrinse or sugar-free chewing gum. J Dent Res. 2003; 82:206–211.
crossref
7. Mäkinen KK, Isotupa KP, Kivilompolo T, Mäkinen PL, Toivanen J, Söderling E. Comparison of erythritol and xylitol saliva stimulants in the control of dental plaque and mutans streptococci. Caries Res. 2001; 35:129–135.
crossref
8. Sohn WS, Yoo YC, Kim CY. The effect of NaCl and bamboo salt on the growth of various oral bacteria. J Korean Acad Dent Health. 1991; 15:255–268.
9. Kim IH. Sinyak. Seoul: Insanga;2008. p. 35–42.
10. Ju IO, Jung GT, Ryu J, Choi JS, Choi YG. Chemical components and physiological activities of bamboo (Phyllostachys bambusoides Starf) extracts prepared with different methods. Korean J Food Sci. Technol. 2005; 37:542–548.
11. Choi CH, Ha MO, Youn HJ, Jeong SS, Iijima Y, Sohn W, et al. Effect of bamboo salt-NaF dentifrice on enamel remineralization. Am J Dent. 2012; 25:9–12.
12. Oh HN, Choi CH, Hong SJ. Remineralization effect of bamboo salt and sodium fluoride solutions on artificial enamel Lesion by Micro-computed tomography. J Korean Acad Dent Health. 2011; 35:273–280.
13. Ha MO, Choi CH, Youn HJ, Hong SJ. The effect of dentifrice containing bamboo salt on the acid resistance of enamel. J Korean Acad Dent Health. 2010; 34:482–490.
14. Listgarten MA, Korostoff J. Dental plaque. Harris NO, García-Godoy F.Primary preventive dentistry. 6th ed.New Jersey: Person Education Inc;2004. p. 14–28.
15. Takahashi N. Microbial ecosystem in the oral cavity: Metabolic diversity in an ecological niche and its relationship with oral diseases. International Congress Series. 2005; 1284:103–112.
crossref
16. Fejerskov O, Scheie AA, Manji F. The effect of sucrose on plaque pH in the primary and permanent dentition of caries-inactive and -active Kenyan children. J Dent Res. 1992; 71(1):25–31.
crossref
17. Filoche SK, Soma K, Sissons CH. Antimicrobial effects of essential oils in combination with chlorhexidine digluconate. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2005; 20(4):221–225.
crossref
18. Xu X, Burgess JO. Compressive strength, fluoride release and recharge of fluoride-releasing materials. Biomaterials. 2003; 24(14):2451–2461.
crossref
19. Cho HS, Hae TR, Yoon JW. Isolation of α-1,3 glucanase from microorganism and the prodution of high activity α-1,3 glucanase for hydrolysis of dental plaque. Kor J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1993; 21:263–268.
20. McDonnell G, Russell AD. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999; 12(1):147–179.
crossref
21. Trahan L, Bourgeau G, Breton R. Emergence of multiple xylitol-resistant (fructose PTS-) mutants from human isolates of mutans streptococci during growth on dietary sugars in the presence of xylitol. J Dent Res. 1996; 75:1892–1900.
crossref
22. Kim YH, Ryu HI. Elements in a bamboo salt and comparision of its elemental contents with those in other salts. Yakhak Hoeji. 2003; 47:135–141.
23. Kim JG, Seo KW, Lee BH, Park MK, Park CW, Shin DW, et al. 3 Months repeated dose toxicity studies of the bamboo salt(Jukyum) in rats. J Toxicol Pub Health. 2002; 18:149–157.
24. Jo EJ, Shin DH. Study on the chemical compositions of sun-dried, refined, and processed salt produced in chonbuk area. J Fd Hyg Safety. 1998; 13:360–364.
25. Zhao X, Jung OS, Park KY. Alkaline and antioxidant effects of bamboo salt. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr. 2012; 41:1301–1304.
crossref

Table 1.
The pH of experimental solutions Unit: Mean±SD
Concentration (%) pH
Bamboo salt NaCl Bay salt
1* 9.31±0.04a 6.05±0.09c 6.73±0.05b
3* 9.52±0.09a 6.11±0.06c 6.94±0.03b
5* 9.69±0.06a 6.13±0.07c 7.10±0.08b
10* 9.89±0.01a 6.15±0.04c 7.22±0.06b

a,b,c The letter indicates significant difference by Mann-Whitney test at each concentration. *P<0.05, by Kruskal-Wallis test.

Table 2.
Growth of Streptococcus mutans in 1% experimental solutions Unit: Mean±SD
Time (hr) Group
Controlc Bamboo saltb NaCla Bay saltc
0 0.005±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.005±0.00
3 0.005±0.00 0.006±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.006±0.00
6 0.007±0.00 0.006±0.00 0.002±0.00 0.007±0.00
9 0.016±0.00 0.006±0.00 0.002±0.00 0.010±0.00
12 0.034±0.00 0.008±0.00 0.002±0.00 0.025±0.00
15 0.035±0.00 0.015±0.00 0.002±0.00 0.035±0.00
18 0.034±0.00 0.021±0.00 0.002±0.00 0.033±0.00
21 0.032±0.00 0.027±0.00 0.002±0.00 0.033±0.00
24 0.032±0.00 0.026±0.00 0.001±0.00 0.033±0.00

a.b,c The letter indicates significant difference by Tukey, at α=0.05. *P<0.01, by repeated measures ANOVA.

Table 3.
Growth of Streptococcus mutans in 3% experimenta solutions Unit: Mean±S
Time (hr) Group
Controlc Bamboo salta NaCla Bay saltb
0 0.005±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.005±0.00
3 0.005±0.00 0.004±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.006±0.00
6 0.007±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.007±0.00
9 0.012±0.00 0.004±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.006±0.00
12 0.034±0.00 0.004±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.007±0.00
15 0.035±0.00 0.004±0.00 0.004±0.00 0.009±0.00
18 0.034±0.00 0.004±0.00 0.004±0.00 0.013±0.02
21 0.032±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.020±0.00
24 0.032±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.026±0.00

a.b,c The letter indicates significant difference by Tukey, at α=0.05. *P<0.01, by repeated measures ANOVA.

Table 4.
Growth of Streptococcus mutans in 5% experimental solutions Unit: Mean±SD
Time (hr) Group
Controld Bamboo saltb NaCla Bay saltc
0 0.005±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.005±0.00
3 0.005±0.00 0.007±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.010±0.00
6 0.007±0.00 0.007±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.012±0.00
9 0.012±0.00 0.007±0.00 0.004±0.00 0.012±0.00
12 0.034±0.00 0.007±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.012±0.00
15 0.035±0.00 0.007±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.013±0.00
18 0.034±0.00 0.007±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.013±0.00
21 0.032±0.00 0.007±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.015±0.00
24 0.032±0.00 0.007±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.016±0.00

a.b,c,d The letter indicates significant difference by Tukey, at α=0.05. *P<0.01, by repeated measures ANOVA.

Table 5.
Growth of Streptococcus mutans in 10% experimenta solutions Unit: Mean±SD
Time (hr) Group
Controlc Bamboo salta NaCla Bay saltb
0 0.005±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.005±0.00
3 0.005±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.004±0.00 0.006±0.00
6 0.007±0.00 0.007±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.007±0.00
9 0.012±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.004±0.00 0.006±0.00
12 0.034±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.004±0.00 0.007±0.00
15 0.035±0.00 0.004±0.00 0.004±0.00 0.007±0.00
18 0.034±0.00 0.003±0.00 0.004±0.00 0.006±0.00
21 0.032±0.00 0.004±0.00 0.004±0.00 0.014±0.00
24 0.032±0.00 0.004±0.00 0.005±0.00 0.010±0.00

a .b,cThe letter indicates significant difference by Tukey, at α=0.05. *P<0.01, by repeated measures ANOVA.

Table 6.
Acid production by Streptococcus mutans in 1% experimenta solutions Unit: Mean±S
Time (hr) pH
Controla NaClb Bay saltb Bamboo saltc
0 7.29±0.04 7.24±0.03 7.26±0.01 7.59±0.02
2 7.28±0.04 7.21±0.04 7.25±0.02 7.58±0.01
4 7.18±0.02 7.16±0.03 7.19±0.02 7.57±0.01
8 6.26±0.03 6.58±0.01 6.53±0.01 7.13±0.00
12 4.14±0.04 4.98±0.04 4.82±0.02 5.36±0.07
16 4.11±0.01 4.18±0.09 4.18±0.04 4.34±0.02
24 4.05±0.01 4.08±0.03 4.09±0.01 4.17±0.02

a.b,c The letter indicates significant difference by Tukey, at α=0.05. *P<0.01, by repeated measures ANOVA.

Table 7.
Acid production by Streptococcus mutans in 3% experimental solutions Unit: Mean±SD
Time (hr) pH
Controla NaClc Bay saltb Bamboo saltd
0 7.29±0.04 7.13±0.01 7.23±0.02 8.01±0.03
2 7.28±0.04 7.12±0.02 7.14±0.03 8.02±0.01
4 7.18±0.02 7.10±0.02 7.08±0.01 8.03±0.02
8 6.26±0.03 7.06±0.01 6.91±0.01 8.03±0.03
12 4.14±0.04 6.95±0.01 6.42±0.03 7.84±0.03
16 4.11±0.01 6.71±0.06 4.87±0.01 7.34±0.04
24 4.05±0.02 6.69±0.02 4.25±0.00 6.00±0.07

a.b,c,d The letter indicates significant difference by Tukey, at α=0.05. *P<0.01, by repeated measures ANOVA.

Table 8.
Acid production by Streptococcus mutans in 5% experimenta solutions Unit: Mean±SD
Time (hr) pH
Controla NaClc Bay saltb Bamboo saltd
0 7.29±0.04 7.06±0.03 7.26±0.01 8.24±0.04
2 7.28±0.04 7.07±0.01 7.06±0.03 8.25±0.04
4 7.18±0.02 7.05±0.01 7.02±0.01 8.27±0.02
8 6.26±0.03 7.04±0.00 7.00±0.01 8.26±0.04
12 4.14±0.04 7.00±0.03 6.89±0.01 8.27±0.03
16 4.11±0.01 6.99±0.01 6.54±0.01 8.03±0.01
24 4.05±0.02 6.98±0.01 6.21±0.01 8.37±0.01

a.b,c,d The letter indicates significant difference by Tukey, at α=0.05. *P<0.01, by repeated measures ANOVA.

Table 9.
Acid production by Streptococcus mutans in 10% experimenta solutions Unit: Mean±SD
Time (hr) pH
Controla NaClb Bay saltb Bamboo saltc
0 7.29±0.04 7.04±0.02 7.22±0.02 8.67±0.01
2 7.28±0.04 7.03±0.05 7.22±0.02 8.66±0.01
4 7.18±0.02 7.00±0.04 7.20±0.02 8.64±0.01
8 6.26±0.03 7.01±0.03 7.17±0.01 8.64±0.02
12 4.14±0.04 6.98±0.04 6.89±0.06 8.60±0.04
16 4.11±0.01 6.94±0.06 6.64±0.06 8.33±0.02
24 4.05±0.02 6.93±0.04 6.73±0.03 8.69±0.04

a.b,c The letter indicates significant difference by Tukey, at α=0.05. *P<0.01, by repeated measures ANOVA.

TOOLS
Similar articles