Abstract
The role of radiation therapy (RT) in cancer management has grown remarkably during the past few decades. For successful RT, the most important factor is highly conformal radiation delivery focused to the tumor-bearing region while minimizing the surrounding normal tissue damage. RT has evolved from 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional techniques to intensity modulated RT (IMRT) along with the development of computer science and mechanical engineering. IMRT is a special form of 3-dimensional conformal RT techniques, by which the intensities of radiation coming though the beamlets are modulated so that conformal radiation dose distribution around the tumor-bearing region is achieved. IMRT has been covered by the Korean health insurance system since July 2001. The basic principles and process of IMRT are introduced.
Figures and Tables
References
1. Mackie TR. Radiation therapy treatment optimization. Introduction. Semin Radiat Oncol. 1999. 9:1–3.
2. Purdy JA. Advances in three-dimensional treatment planning and conformal dose delivery. Semin Oncol. 1997. 24:655–671.
3. Shepard DM, Olivera GH, Reckwerdt PJ, Mackie TR. Iterative approaches to dose optimization in tomotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2000. 45:69–90.
4. Bedford JL, Warrington AP. Commissioning of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009. 73:537–545.
5. Mackie TR, Holmes T, Swerdloff S, Reckwerdt P, Deasy JO, Yang J, Paliwal B, Kinsella T. Tomotherapy: a new concept for the delivery of dynamic conformal radiotherapy. Med Phys. 1993. 20:1709–1719.
6. Palma DA, Verbakel WF, Otto K, Senan S. New developments in arc radiation therapy: a review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2010. 36:393–399.
7. Lu W, Olivera GH, Chen Q, Chen ML, Ruchala KJ. Automatic re-contouring in 4D radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2006. 51:1077–1099.
8. Nutting CM, Convery DJ, Cosgrove VP, Rowbottom C, Padhani AR, Webb S, Dearnaley DP. Reduction of small and large bowel irradiation using an optimized intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy technique in patients with prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000. 48:649–656.
9. Sanguineti G, Cavey ML, Endres EJ, Brandon GG, Bayouth JE. Is IMRT needed to spare the rectum when pelvic lymph nodes are part of the initial treatment volume for prostate cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006. 64:151–160.
10. Mangar SA, Huddart RA, Parker CC, Dearnaley DP, Khoo VS, Horwich A. Technological advances in radiotherapy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2005. 41:908–921.
11. Luxton G, Hancock SL, Boyer AL. Dosimetry and radiobiologic model comparison of IMRT and 3D conformal radiotherapy in treatment of carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004. 59:267–284.
12. Guerrero Urbano MT, Nutting CM. Clinical use of intensitymodulated radiotherapy: part II. Br J Radiol. 2004. 77:177–182.
13. Wang L, Hoban P, Paskalev K, Yang J, Li J, Chen L, Xiong W, Ma CC. Dosimetric advantage and clinical implication of a micro-multileaf collimator in the treatment of prostate with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Med Dosim. 2005. 30:97–103.
14. Wang-Chesebro A, Xia P, Coleman J, Akazawa C, Roach M 3rd. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy improves lymph node coverage and dose to critical structures compared with threedimensional conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006. 66:654–662.
15. Alongi F, Fiorino C, Cozzarini C, Broggi S, Perna L, Cattaneo GM, Calandrino R, Di Muzio N. IMRT significantly reduces acute toxicity of whole-pelvis irradiation in patients treated with post-operative adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. Radiother Oncol. 2009. 93:207–212.