Journal List > Infect Chemother > v.42(3) > 1035009

Lee, Park, Lee, Rhee, and Lee: Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium Meningitis Treated with Linezolid: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Abstract

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) infection is a serious problem because optimal therapy has not been established. Different agents in various combinations, including teicoplanin, chloramphenicol, and quinupristin/dalfopristin, have been used to treat patients with VRE meningitis, but the efficacy of these agents is not satisfactory because of their limited ability to penetrate into the cerebrospinal fluid. We report a case of nosocomial vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium meningitis in a patient with ventriculoperitoneal shunt that was successfully treated with linezolid. We will also review previously reported cases of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium meningitis treated by linezolid.

Introduction

Enterococci continue to be an unusual pathogen of bacterial meningitis. Enterococcal meningitis is associated with a high mortality rate, reaching up to 33%(1). Vancomycin-resistance rate of Enterococcus faecium has risen significantly, but this rate in Korea differ significantly from that of western countries because of the different types of selective pressure or patterns of nosocomial spread (2). Linezolid, the first available oxazolidinone for clinical use, has been shown to be effective in treating serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) infections (3). Herein, we report a case of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium (VREF) meningitis secondary to infected ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt, which was successfully treated with linezolid, along with a review of previous reported cases of VREF meningitis treated by linezolid.

Case Report

A 57-year-old man visited our emergency department due to intermittent fever and decline of consciousness that had been present for two weeks. The patients received a craniotomy with VP shunt to remove hematoma for acute epidural, subdural, and intracerebral hemorrhage caused by traffic accident three months ago. On admission, the patient's body temperature was 37.5℃, blood pressure 115/80 mmHg, pulse rate 93/min, and respiration rate 30/min. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis revealed WBC 185 cells/mm3 (80% neutrophils and 20% lymphocytes), protein 20.5 mg/dL, and glucose 60 mg/dL (serum glucose, 108 mg/dL). The shunt catheter was removed, and vancomycin was introduced. No microorganism was cultured from the tip of the shunt catheter. After treatment with vancomycin for two weeks, fever subsided and CSF pleocytosis with neutrophil dominance almost normalized. Therefore, VP shunt was placed again 8 weeks later.
On the 136th day from his first visit for treatment of meningitis, the body temperature rose to over 38.5℃ and the patient became nervous and grew restless again. Erythematous swelling of the skin at abdominal insertion site of VP shunt was detected, and subcutaneous abscess formation was confirmed on ultrasonography. Surgical incision and drainage of the abscess was performed. The drained fluid was a mixture of pus and peritoneal fluid. Because fever was persistent for 6 days despite complete drainage of the abscess, lumbar puncture was performed. Analysis of CSF revealed WBC 1,346 cells/mm3 (90% neutrophils and 10% lymphocytes), protein 123 mg/dL, and glucose 24 mg/dL (serum glucose, 121 mg/dL). The culture of the CSF and another peritoneal fluid specimen yielded VREF with a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of >32 µg/mL vancomycin by VITEK (BioMerieux, Hazelwood, MO, USA). The isolate was found to be resistant to vancomycin and teicoplanin by the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Ceftriaxone and levofloxacin were changed to meropenem (1 g every 8 hours) and quinupristin/dalfopristin (7.5 mg/kg every 8 hours). After 5 days of quinupristin/dalfopristin treatment, his clinical condition did not improve and subsequent CSF cultures were still positive for VREF. Intravenous linezolid, 600 mg every 12 hours, was challenged (Table 1). The patient's clinical status progressively improved, and subsequent CSF cultures became negative after linezolid treatment for 5 days. Intravenous linezolid was continued for 12 days and then changed to oral linezolid (600 mg every 12 hours) for additional 10 days. Linezolid was well tolerated, and adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, skin rash, and bone marrow suppression were not observed. After successful treatment of meningitis using linezolid, the patient was operated to remove VP shunt after 3 months and remained stable with no recurrence of VREF infection for 2 years.

Discussion

Enterococci have become a common pathogen for nosocomial infections of the urinary tract, wound, bloodstream, heart, and rarely, meninges (1). Enterococci are naturally resistant to several antibiotics and possess the ability to acquire resistance through the exchange of genetic material (4).
A total of 7 cases of VRE meningitis treated by linezolid have been reported in the literature, in addition to the present case(5-12) (Table 2). The median age was 59.5 years and the six of them were male. Of them, 7 cases were cured and only one died. Underlying diseases included 3 ventriculostomy, 2 VP shunt, and 3 steroid users. The median duration of treatment was 21.5 days. The median WBC, glucose, and protein levels were 875 cells/mm3, 24 mg/dL, and 243 mg/dL, respectively. There is also one report that the VREF meningitis was successfully treated with linezolid in Korea (12).
VREF meningitis has rarely been documented (5-8) and represents a therapeutic challenge because of limited treatment options (13). Chloramphenicol, which was chosen as the initial agent, has good CSF penetration but it is bacteriostatic against enterococci and associated with serious hematologic adverse effects. There are case reports describing patients with VREF meningitis who were treated with chloramphenicol, which failed to sterilize the CSF resulting in poor clinical outcomes (14, 15). Quinupristin/dalfopristin has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treatment of severe VREF infection. There are several reports that VRE meningitis was successfully treated with quinupristin/dalfopristin (14-17). However, in most cases, quinupristin/dalfopristin was administrated intravenously and intraventricularly because of its poor CSF penetration (14-18).
Linezolid, like other available agents that have activity against VRE, is bacteriostatic. Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that linezolid distributes well into the tissues (6). In healthy volunteers without meningitis, linezolid concentrations in the CSF were 70% of plasma concentrations (6). In patients with meningitis, linezolid concentrations in the CSF was over 70% of plasma concentrations (6). In our case, intravenous linezolid was changed to oral form because the patient was very stable clinically, VREF was not cultured from the CSF, and bioavailability of linezolid was known to be excellent (6).
Although only very few clinical cases have been reported, linezolid appears to be an excellent antimicrobial agent for the treatment of central nervous system infections caused by VRE.

Figures and Tables

Table 1
Summary of Antibiotic Therapy and the Results of CSF Analysis during Admission
ic-42-194-i001

VAN, vancomycin; MRP, meropenem; SYN, synercid(quinupristin/dalfopristin); Lin, linezolid

Table 2
Summary of Reported Cases of Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) meningitis Treated with Linezolid
ic-42-194-i002

COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; WBC, white blood cell count; RBC, red blood cell count; IV, intravenous; Lin, linezolid; Gen, gentamicin; VP shunt, ventriculoperitoneal shunt; Lin, linezolid; Gen, gentamicin

References

1. Bayer AS, Seidel JS, Yoshikawa TT, Anthony BF, Guze LB. Group D Enterococcal meningitis. Clinical and therapeutic considerations with report of three cases and review of the literature. Arch Intern Med. 1976. 136:883–886.
crossref
2. Shin JW, Yong D, Kim MS, Chang KH, Lee K, Kim JM, Chong Y. Sudden increase of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections in a Korean tertiary care hospital: possible consequences of increased use of oral vancomycin. J Infect Chemother. 2003. 9:62–67.
crossref
3. Evans GA. The Oxazolidinones. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2002. 4:17–27.
crossref
4. Huycke MM, Sahm DF, Gilmore MS. Multiple-drug resistant enterococci: the nature of the problem and an agenda for the future. Emerg Infect Dis. 1998. 4:239–249.
crossref
5. Shaikh ZH, Peloquin CA, Ericsson CD. Successful treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium meningitis with linezolid: case report and literature review. Scand J Infect Dis. 2001. 33:375–379.
6. Zeana C, Kubin CJ, Della-Latta P, Hammer SM. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium meningitis successfully managed with linezolid: case report and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis. 2001. 33:477–482.
crossref
7. Hachem R, Afif C, Gokaslan Z, Raad I. Successful treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus meningitis with linezolid. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001. 20:432–434.
crossref
8. Steinmetz MP, Vogelbaum MA, De Georgia MA, Andrefsky JC, Isada C. Successful treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus meningitis with linezolid: case report and review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2001. 29:2383–2385.
crossref
9. Tsai TN, Wu CP, Peng MY, Giian CF, Lee SY, Lu JJ. Short course of linezolid treatment for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium meningitis. Int J Clin Pract. 2006. 60:740–741.
crossref
10. Kumar S, Kohlhoff S, Valencia G, Hammerschlag MR, Sharma R. Treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium ventriculitis in a neonate. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007. 29:740–741.
crossref
11. Mizell KN, Carter JE. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium meningitis successfully treated with linezolid. South Med J. 2008. 101:569–570.
crossref
12. Ryu WS, Bae EK, Kim JS, Erm GH, Jung KH, Park HK, Chu K. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus meningitis. J Korean Neurol Assoc. 2008. 26:273–276.
13. Losonsky GA, Wolf A, Schwalbe RS, Nataro J, Gibson CB, Lewis EW. Successful treatment of meningitis due to multiply resistant Enterococcus faecium with a combination of intrathecal teicoplanin and intravenous antimicrobial agents. Clin Infect Dis. 1994. 19:163–165.
crossref
14. Nachman SA, Verma R, Egnor M. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium shunt infection in an infant: an anti-biotic cure. Microb Drug Resist. 1995. 1:95–96.
crossref
15. Tush GM, Huneycutt S, Phillips A, Ward JD. Intraventricular quinupristin/dalfopristin for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium shunt infection. Clin Infect Dis. 1998. 26:1460–1461.
crossref
16. Williamson JC, Glazier SS, Peacock JE Jr. Successful treatment of ventriculostomy-related meningitis caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus with intravenous and intraventricular quinupristin/dalfopristin. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2002. 104:54–56.
crossref
17. Tan TY, Pitman I, Penrose-Stevens A, Simpson BA, Flanagan PG. Treatment of a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium ventricular drain infection with quinupristin/dalfopristin and review of the literature. J Infect. 2000. 41:95–97.
18. Tarasi A, Dever LL, Tomasz A. Activity of quinupristin/dalfopristin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in vitro and in vivo in the rabbit model of experimental meningitis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997. 39:Suppl A. 121–127.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles