Journal List > Korean J Radiol > v.4(4) > 1027579

Yilmaz, Birlik, Arican, and Guney: Carcinosarcoma of the Renal Pelvis and Urinary Bladder: A Case Report

Abstract

Carcinosarcomas are rare biphasic malignant neoplasms with an epithelial and a spindle cell component. We present a 62-year-old man with a history of noticeably abdominal distension, proved by surgery to be caused by carcinosarcoma of the renal pelvis and urinary bladder, occupying the entire left abdominal flank. We also illustrate the appearance of this rare entity on sonography and computed tomography.

Carcinosarcomas of the urothelial system, consisting of both malignant epithelial and malignant stromal components, are extremely rare tumors (1). Tumors of this type usually arise from urinary bladder and tend to be large, bulky by growing rapidly and infiltrating widely (2, 3). Seventy-eight cases with carcinosarcoma in the urinary bladder have been previously reported (1). To our knowledge, the imaging findings of this uncommon tumor originating from the renal pelvis are not previously described in the radiology literature. Herein, we present a histologically proven case of carcinosarcoma extending from the left renal pelvis and urinary bladder, shown at sonography and CT.

CASE REPORT

A 62-year-old man was admitted for evaluation of a progressive abdominal distension noticed initially 4 months earlier in the left upper quadrant. Physical examination revealed a grossly distended and tender abdomen. The top margin of the swelling was at the level of the left upper quadrant and the lower margin was in the suprapubic region. Urinalysis showed seven to ten red blood cells per high-power field.
Abdominal ultrasonography demonstrated a huge, relatively well-demarcated tumor that consisted of an intermediate echogenic background stroma with variable, slightly hyperechoic, periphery nodules measuring up to 12 cm in diameter. The largest component of the tumor located at the upper margin had multiple, small hypoechoic areas thought to be corresponding to necrosis (Figs. 1A, B). No vascular thrombosis was observed in main abdominal veins. The contralateral kidney was also normal.
A subsequent contrast-enhanced CT examination of the whole abdomen confirmed the sonographic findings. The tumor was heterogeneous and solid with a large, central low-density area. It has an extension into the pelvic inlet and a focal compression of the main vascular structures (Figs. 1C-E). Approximate tumor dimensions were 35.0 cm (superior-inferior) by 24.0 cm (transverse) by 22.0 cm (anterior-posterior). No evidence of hepatic metastasis or regional lymphadenopathy was found. Neither imaging techniques could identify separate normal renal parenchyma or collecting system of the left kidney. Additionally, both sonography and CT scans of the lesser pelvis showed a second separate mass in 1.0 cm-diameter arising from the left postero-lateral bladder wall.
Based on the clinical and radiological findings, our diagnosis was initially a malignant tumor of the kidney such as a transitional carcinoma or renal cell carcinoma. A left radical nephrectomy with partial cystectomy was performed to remove the tumors. Pathological specimen showed that the entire left kidney was completely replaced by the tumor. The tumor had occupied the renal collecting system and extended into the renal capsule without leaving any cortical tissue (Fig. 1F). Left ureter was not identified, a finding suggesting invasion of the tumor. Microscopic examination of the surgical specimens obtained from kidney and bladder showed malignant both epithelial and stromal components. The predominant component mainly consisted of an undifferentiated spindle cell sarcoma with small areas of chondrosarcoma. The sarcomatous component comprised nests of invasive transitional cell carcinoma (Fig. 1G). The pathological findings were consistent with a true carcinosarcoma of the kidney and bladder concomitantly. Immunohistologic features supported this diagnosis. The areas of transitional cell carcinoma stained positive for both keratin and epithelial membrane antigen. By contrast, the sarcomatous component stained positive for vimentin. A small number of cells were S-100 protein and α-smooth muscle actin positive. Following the surgery, the patient was treated by radiation therapy. Still, no recurrence was observed after 6 months.

DISCUSSION

Carcinosarcomas are rare tumors containing both malignant mesenchymal and epithelial elements (1). While the mesenchymal elements are usually chondrosarcoma or osteosarcoma, the epithelial component may be most frequently of transitional cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma or an admixture of these. Meyer (4) classified the carcinosarcomas into three histogenetic groups. One of them is a collision tumor in which a carcinoma and sarcoma coincidentally arise in proximity and then invade each other. The two other groups include combination tumors in which both the carcinomatous and sarcomatous components arise from a pluripotential cell, and composition tumors in which both components derive from the same tissue concomitantly. Two main mechanisms of tumor involvement of both renal pelvis and urinary bladder are suggested for carcinosarcoma (2). Neoplastic transformation may occur in two distinct tissues or secondary sarcomatous change may develop in the stroma of a carcinoma. Willis (5) has limited the term carcinosarcoma more rigid by excluding the group of collision tumors. Sarcomatoid carcinomas exhibit a prominent spindle cell component and are also aggressive tumors, but should not be confused with carcinosarcomas (6).
Carcinosarcomas usually occur in the urinary bladder and only few of them originate from the renal pelvis (1, 2). To our knowledge, there are two articles regarding imaging findings of carcinosarcoma of the bladder (3, 7). But carcinosarcoma of the renal pelvis has not previously been reported in the radiology literature. The sonographic characteristics of a renal mass are not sufficiently specific to allow confident differentiation among the various malignant tumors. Moreover, if a renal mass is markedly large, it is sometimes difficult to note the adjacent structures at sonography, particularly when they are compressed or displaced. For this reason, assessment of such a mass can be difficult in terms of renal origin. In our case presented here, the mass sonographically was well-circumscribed with a clearly defined margin. The mass showed heterogeneous echo-pattern with central areas of low attenuation consistent with necrosis. It appeared to occupy nearly the entire left intraabdominal space and the origin of the mass was not clear. Conversely, the expansive type of growth arising from the left kidney, which reaches a very large size without sparing normal renal tissue, was well-delineated by CT images. Both CT and sonography excellently depicted the involvement of the urinary bladder. Enhanced CT images also documented the nature of the tumor by showing contrast enhanced components at the peripheral location, as large, central areas of necrosis have not exhibited any changing in density. Moreover, CT yielded more information related to adjacent organs and main blood vessels.
Only one case of carcinosarcoma involving the urinary bladder, ureter and renal pelvis in an old man was presented by Orsatti et al (2) with clinical and histopathologic findings. In that case, when considering the temporal evolution, a secondary transformation in a preexisting carcinoma had been suggested. In fact, this change denoted an evolution into a highly aggressive tumor type spreading to other urothelial segments and replacing the whole kidney. We believed that our case had the same change because of the similar clinical appearance and pathological findings. In another case, Kakoi et al. recently reported an old man with carcinosarcoma arising from the renal pelvis and ureter (8).
Obviously, when considering the bladder involvement, we initially thought that the tumor might be transitional cell carcinoma with an extension through urothelial system. However the typical transitional cell tumor is centrally located with centrifugal expansion that presumes the uniform contour of the kidney and extrarenal spread at and through the renal hilum. The hydronephrotic form of transitional cell tumor is due to ureteropelvic junction obstruction and may present a diagnostic dilemma (9). Main differential radiologic diagnosis also includes other renal tumors arising within the renal parenchyma, such as sarcoma, sarcomatoid carcinoma or renal cell carcinoma. Histologically, carcinosarcomas and sarcomatoid carcinomas of the renal pelvis mimic each other. Carcinosarcomas contain both malignant mesenchymal and epithelial elements. Whereas, sarcomatoid renal or transtitional carcinomas have a histologic pattern consisting of a mixture of malignant elements, giving a sarcomatoid appearance. Therefore, they are by consensus excluded from the designation of carcinosarcom. Radiologically, Shirkhoda et al. reported that renal cell carcinomas and sarcomatoid carcinomas, which are indistinguishable from each other, generally involve the renal vein or the inferior vena cava, and associated with retroperitoneal adenopathy especially whenever the tumor reach such a large size (10). However, imaging findings of carcinosarcoma arising from renal pelvis are not well-known in the literature. Carcinosarcomas are usually highly aggressive, and the 5-year survival rate is approximately 20%. Although these tumors are resistant to radiation therapy, most investigators agree that the best outlook for cure includes a combination of surgery and irradiation (6).
If a rapidly growing tumor is detected that seems to originate from the kidney with extension to ureter and bladder, though it is a rare tumor, carcinosarcoma should be included in the differential diagnosis. However, histopathologic confirmation is needed for the definitive diagnosis in that this tumor not only has imaging findings of renal sarcoma but also resembles radiologic features of variable types of epithelial malignancy arising from urothelial organs.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
A. Sonogram of 12 cm-mass component located on top of the tumor shows variable echogenity with heterogeneous hyperechoic areas mixed with less echoic areas or small cysts presenting cystic necrosis (arrowheads).
B. Transverse sonogram of urinary bladder reveals a small tumor (arrow) arising from the left postero-lateral bladder wall.
C-E. Sequential enhanced CT scans through pancreas (C), at the level of the lower abdominal region (D) and the bladder (E).
C. Relatively well-defined, heterogeneous tumor seems to originate from the left kidney without any normal tissue apparently preserved from invasion. Obliteration of the fat plane (arrowhead) is seen between the upper-medial portion of the tumor (arrow) and the pancreatic tail corresponding to invasion that was pathologically proven.
D. Giant tumor extends caudally as a smoothly marginated mass with considerable displacement of the aorta and the inferior vena cava (arrowhead) at the midline. The tumor displays peripheral and nodular enhancement (arrows), which delineates large, hypodense zone of necrosis. The center has an attenuation value of between 20-25 HU.
E. A soft tissue sessile mass (arrow) extends into the bladder lumen. The perivesical fat planes are intact.
F. Photograph of resected kidney demonstrates that the tumor involves the entire renal parenchyma and pelvocaliceal system.
G. Photomicrograph of histological specimen obtained from renal neoplasm shows nest of transitional cell carcinoma (arrow) in a sarcomatous stroma (H and E, ×100).
kjr-4-255-g001

References

1. Baschinsky DY, Chen JH, Vadmal MS, et al. Carcinosarcoma of the urinary bladder- an aggressive tumor with diverse histogenesis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000. 124:1172–1178.
2. Orsatti G, Corgan FJ, Goldberg SA. Carcinosarcoma of urothelial organs: sequential involvement of urinary bladder, ureter, and renal pelvis. Urology. 1993. 41:289–291.
3. Sumi Y, Shindoh N, Kimizuka T, Katayama H. Carcinosarcoma of the urinary bladder. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999. 172:767–769.
4. Meyer R. Beitrag zur Vestandigung uber die Namengebung in der Geschwulstlehre. Zentralbl Allg Path. 1920. 30:291.
5. Willis RA. Carcinoma. Pathology of tumors. 1967. 4th ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts;138.
6. Catalona WJ. Walsh PC, Retik AB, Stamey TA, Vaughan ED, editors. Urothelial tumors of the urinary tract. Campbell's urology. 1992. 6th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders;1134–1135.
7. Tekes A, Kamel IR, Szarf G, et al. Carcinosarcoma of the urinary bladder: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with clinical and pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003. 181:139–142.
8. Kakoi N, Miyajima A, Motizuku T. Carcinosarcoma of the renal pelvis and ureter: a case report. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2002. 48:29–32.
9. Leder RA, Dunnick NR. Transitional cell carcinoma of the pelvicalices and ureter. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990. 155:713–722.
10. Shirkhoda A, Lewis E. Renal sarcoma and sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma: CT and angiographic features. Radiology. 1987. 162:353–357.
TOOLS
Similar articles