Journal List > J Korean Med Sci > v.22(2) > 1020394

Park, Lee, Hong, Choi, Yoo, Lee, and Kim: The Increase in Hepatic Uncoupling by Fenofibrate Contributes to a Decrease in Adipose Tissue in Obese Rats

Abstract

Fenofibrate is a drug that has been suggested to inhibit weight gain by increasing the catabolism of fatty acid in the hepatic mitochondria. We hypothesized that fenofibrate induces an increase in energy expenditure in the hepatic mitochondria, which results in the reduction of adipose tissue. In this study we measured hepatic uncoupling protein (UCP)-2, -3, core temperatures and abdominal fat composition with MRI in Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty rats. The fenofibrate group (n=7) was fed fenofibrate (320 mg/kg) mixed chow. The control group (n=7) was fed chow only. The body weight (531.6±7.6 g) of the fenofibrate group was significantly lower than that (744.3±14.9 g) of the control group (p<0.005). The areas of visceral and subcutaneous fat in the fenofibrate group (11.0±0.9 cm2, 4.2±0.3 cm2) were significantly less than those in the control group (21.0±0.7 cm2, 7.4±0.4 cm2) (p=0.046, respectively). The esophageal and rectal temperatures of the fenofibrate group (37.7±0.1℃, 33.1±0.2℃) were significantly higher than those of the control group (37.3±0.1℃, 32.2±0.1℃) (p=0.025, p=0.005). There was de novo expression of UCP-3 in the liver of the fenofibrate group. These data suggest that increased energy dissipation, via hepatic UCP-3 by fenofibrate, contribute to decreased weight gain in obese rats.

INTRODUCTION

It has been reported that fenofibrate prevents weight gain (1) or body adiposity (2) in a variety of animal models (3-5). The mechanism that explains the effects of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) α activator has been attributed to increased fat catabolism in the liver primarily resulting from the induction of target enzymes involved in hepatic lipid metabolism (6, 7). According to a recent report (8), the effect of fenofibrate on adipose tissue metabolism may also contribute to decreasing adipose tissue. We have also previously shown that fenofibrate therapy reduced abdominal and skeletal adiposity and enhanced hepatic expression of fatty acid translocase (FAT)/CD36 and carnitine palmitoyltransferase (CPT)-I mRNA (9).
The effect on food intake of the PPAR α activator has been inconsistent. Some have reported that reduced adiposity with fenofibrate was associated with the reduction of food intake in obese diabetic rats (9), high-fat-fed rats (10) and diabetic mice (11); however, there have been several reports showing that PPAR α did not change with food intake.
PPAR α has also been suggested to regulate energy homeostasis. Three distinct uncoupling protein (UCP) isoforms, UCP-1, UCP-2, and UCP-3, have been implicated as mediators of thermogenesis. Brown adipose tissue (BAT) has been known to be an important site of thermogenesis in rodents. UCP-1, which is expressed exclusively in BAT, expression levels are reduced in several rodent models of obesity (12). UCP-1 functions to uncouple oxidative metabolism from ATP synthesis, resulting in the generation of heat (13). There is strong evidence that increased fat metabolism is associated with increased expression of UCP-2 and UCP-3 (14, 15). In addition, PPAR α as well as γ activators have been suggested to induce the expression of UCP-2 in hepatocytes (16) and UCP-3 in adipose tissues (17, 18) and skeletal muscles (19). Treatment of db/db mice with WY-14643, one PPAR α activator, did not affect expression of UCP-1, -2, or UCP-3 in BAT (20).
In a previous study, we suggested that the relationship between increased β-oxidation and anti-adiposity resulted in "the burning fuel effect" (9). We thought that fenofibrate increased fatty acid oxidation in hepatic mitochondria and consumed fat fuels, which resulted in increasing hepatic influx of fatty acid from fat depots especially from visceral fat. However, it was unclear how increased β-oxidation by chronic treatment with the PPAR α activator could increase energy expenditure rather than energy generation in the liver.
In this study, we hypothesized that chronic fenofibrate treatment might increase energy expenditure by induction of an uncoupling mechanism in the hepatic and/or skeletal muscular mitochondria, which may contribute to a decrease in body adiposity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals and diet

Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF) rats four weeks of age, a type 2 diabetes animal model (n=14) were kindly donated from Otsuka Pharmaceuticals (Tokushima, Japan); diabetes mellitus did not develop in any of these rats until 61 weeks of age for unknown reasons. They were fed with the standard rat diet and tap water ad libitum until 10 weeks of age. At this age, all of the OLETF rats were randomly divided into two groups. The average body weight of rats in the two groups was not significantly different. The one, the fenofibrate group (n=7), was fed with powdered diet, mixed with micronized fenofibrate (0.5% w/w, 320 mg/kg/day) and the other, the control group (n=7), was fed with powdered diet only. The fenofibrate group was fed freely. For paired-feeding, the total food intake of the fenofibrate group was monitored every two days and the same amount of food intake was provided to the control group. Body weights of each rat were monitored weekly. All the rats were cared and handled during the entire period of the experiment by the Guidelines for Animal Experiments developed by The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.

Measurement of blood glucose and ketone levels

At 60 weeks of age, after 12 hr of fasting, all rats inhaled ether after which we sampled blood from the tail vein for measurement of glucose and β-ketone. Whole blood glucose and β-ketone levels were measured with a MediSense Optium using blood glucose strips and β-ketone test strips (Abbott Laboratories, MediSense Products, Bedford, MA, U.S.A.).

Measurement of plasma lipid and insulin levels

At 61 weeks of age, after 12 hr fasting, all rats inhaled ether and were injected with ketamine (200 mg/kg) into the peritoneum. After the anesthesia was administered, we sacrificed all of the rats; blood samples were drawn for measurements of the plasma levels of free fatty acid, total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and insulin from the inferior vena cava. The blood samples were collected in 4.5% EDTA-treated bottles and stored in ice bottles at -20℃. The plasma levels of total cholesterol (Infinity Cholesterol Reagent, Sigma Diagnostics, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.), triglyceride (Infinity Triglycerides Reagent, Sigma Diagnostics, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.) and HDL-C (EZ HDL Cholesterol, Sigma Diagnostics, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.) were measured by the enzyme method. The plasma level of free fatty acid (FFA) was measured by the ACS-ACOD enzyme method (NEFA ZYME-S, Aiken, Japan). Plasma insulin levels were analyzed with a rat insulin radioimmunoassay kit (Linco Research Inc, St. Charles, MO, U.S.A.).

Measurement of fat amount by MRI

At 61 weeks of age, a day after body temperature measurement, six rats were selected randomly for MRI study. All rats were anesthetized as in the method described above. The rats (n=3 in each group) were placed in supine position with a V shaped hand-made fixing device to secure a constant position with flexion of the hip joint to prevent stretching of the thigh muscle. The imaging was performed on a 1.5 Tesla MRI machine (Magnetom Vision, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with a loop coil at the mid-abdominal level. Coronal and axial scans were obtained. First, the coronal scout view was obtained and then the axial scan was performed at the level just inferior to the lower pole of left kidney. The image parameters of T1 weighted images were 350/30 msec of TR/TE (time to repetition/time to echo), 8.8×10 cm of field of view, 190×256 for matrix number and three times for acquisition. In the scanned images, the areas of the region of interest presenting visceral and subcutaneous fat tissue were calculated automatically with an installed program (Vision VB33D) in the MRI.

Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) analysis

At 61 weeks of age, we obtained tissue samples for RT-PCR. Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol (Life Technologies, U.S.A.). Complementary DNA was synthesized from RNA samples by enhanced AMV reverse transcriptase. An aliquot of the reverse transcription reaction was then used for subsequent PCR amplification with specific primers. The sequences of the sense and antisense primers used for amplification were as follows: UCP-2, 5'-AACAGTTCTACACCAAGGGC-3'and 5'-AGCATGGTAAGGGCACAGTG-3'; UCP-3, 5'-GGAGCCATGGCAGTGACCTGT-3'and 5'-TGTGATGTTGGGCCAAGTCCC-3'; β-actin, 5'-GTGGTGGTGAAGCTGTAGCC-3'and 5'-GAGACCTTCAACACCCC-3'. PCR was performed in the Gene Amp PCR system 2,400 (Perkin-Elmer, U.S.A.). After initial denaturation for 5 min at 94℃, PCR was performed for 30 cycles for all samples. Each cycle consisted of denaturation at 94℃ for 1 min, primer annealing at 56℃ for 1 min, and primer extension at 72℃ for 1 min. A final 5 min extension step at 72℃ was included. Amplification of each gene yielded a single band of the expected size (UCP-2, 471 bp; UCP-3, 179 bp; beta-actin 763 bp). Preliminary experiments were carried out with various amounts of cDNA to determine nonsaturating conditions of PCR amplification for all of the genes studied. Therefore, under these conditions, the RT-PCR method used in this study permitted relative quantification of mRNA. The illuminated bands were quantified by Image Gauge (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). The results of the expression of specific mRNAs were presented relative to the expression of the control gene.

Western blot analysis

Frozen hepatic tissue were homogenized in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 25 mM sodium fluoride, 0.2% Triton X-100, 0.3% NP 40 and protease inhibitors (aprotinin 1 µg/mL, leupeptin 1 µg/mL PMSF 10 mM/L). The homogenates were centrifuged and the supernatant was decanted and saved on ice. Protein concentrations were measured using the BCA kit (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.). The proteins were separated on a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred electrophoretically onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL, U.S.A.) using a mini electroblotter (BioRad Laboratories, Hecules, CA, U.S.A.). The nitrocellulose membrane was blocked in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween and 5% non-fat milk and then incubated over night at 4℃ in anti-rat UCP3 polyclonal antibody (Fitzgerald Industries International, Inc, MA, U.S.A.). After washing in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween, blots was incubated with an anti-rabbit IgG antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL, U.S.A.). Immunoreactive bands were visualized with ECL Plus™ Western Blotting Detection Reagents (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL, U.S.A.). β-actin (42 kDa; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.) was used as the internal control.

Measurement of core temperature

At 61 weeks of age, all rats were anesthetized with ketamine (200 mg/kg, intraperitoneal injection), and the thermometer probe (Temperature controller, DX4-PSSNR, KSC 1614, HANYOUNG, Seoul, Korea) was placed into the esophageal and rectal canals. We evaluated both temperatures twice on separate days under the same conditions.

Statistical analysis

All results are presented as means±SEM. Significant differences in the data between the groups were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test. We used the statistical programs in SPSS 9.0 version for Windows. In all cases, a p value estimated less than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Change of body weight

As mentioned previously, the fenofibrate group was fed freely and the control group was fed the same amount as the fenofibrate group. The mean amount of daily food consumption in both groups was 26.1±2.8 g. The body weights in both groups increased continuously until the end of experiment.
The mean body weight of the control group was 744.3±14.9 g and that in the fenofibrate group was 531.6±7.6 g at 61 weeks of age. The average weight of the fenofibrate group was significantly less than that of the control group from 14 through 61 weeks (p<.005, Fig. 1A).
The weight gain during the experimental period in the fenofibrate group (326.6±8.5 g, 160.2±7.8%) was significantly decreased compared to the control group (543.7±11.0 g, 271.2±12.3%) (p=0.002, Fig. 1B).

Blood glucose, insulin, lipid and ketone levels

The whole blood glucose level in the fenofibrate group (7.98±0.97 mM/L) was slightly decreased compared to that of the control group (11.06±2.48 mM/L), but the difference was not significant. The plasma insulin levels were not significantly different between the two groups (Table 1). As has been already noted, diabetes did not develop in this strain.
To verify the effects of fenofibrate treatment, we measured plasma lipid profiles. At the end of the experiment, the plasma levels of FFA, triglyceride and total cholesterol in the fenofibrate group were significantly decreased compared with those in the control group (p<.05). The HDL cholesterol levels showed no significant difference between the two groups. The whole blood β-ketone of the fenofibrate group (0.60±0.07 mM/L) was slightly increased compared to that of the control group (0.57±0.06 mM/L) but this finding was not significant (Table 1).

Abdominal fat size

We measured abdominal fat composition with MRI. The areas with visceral and subcutaneous fat were calculated automatically. As shown in Fig. 2, the visceral fat area, representing V, was 21.0±0.7 cm2 and the subcutaneous fat area, representing S, was 7.4±0.4 cm2 in the control group (Fig. 2A). The visceral fat area and the subcutaneous fat area were 11.0±0.9 cm2 and 4.2±0.3 cm2, respectively, in the fenofibrate group (Fig. 2B). Therefore, the fat areas were significantly decreased in the fenofibrate group compared to the control group (p=0.046) (Table 2).

The expression of UCP-2 and UPC-3 in liver and muscle

To examine whether UCP-2 and UCP-3 in liver and muscle were unregulated by fenofibrate, we measured the expression of UCP-2 and UCP-3 mRNA by RT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 3, the expression of UPC-2 mRNA in liver and muscle did not show a sighificant difference between the two groups. The expression of UCP-3 mRNA in muscle showed no difference between the groups. However, hepatic UCP-3 mRNA appeared to be newly synthesized with fenofibrate treatment (Fig. 3A).
De novo expression of UCP-3 mRNA levels in the liver were reflected by the parallel effects on UCP-3 protein content, as measured by Western blot analysis (Fig. 4). In the fenofibrate treatment group, UCP-3 protein was detected, but not in the control group.

Body core temperature

If hepatic UCP-3 works as an uncoupling protein, the body core temperature may be increased. We measured body core temperatures to confirm this hypothesis. The esophageal temperatures were significantly higher in the fenofibrate group compared to those in the control group (37.7±0.1 vs. 37.3±0.1, p=0.025). The rectal temperatures were also significantly higher in the fenofibrate group compared to the control group (33.1±0.2℃ vs. 32.2±0.1℃, p=0.005) (Fig. 5).

DISCUSSION

We found that chronic fenofibrate treatment resulted in decreased body weight and abdominal adiposity. These effects of fenofibrate treatment were not associated with a dietary factor because the amount of oral intake was the same in both groups studied.
We also found that the core temperatures of the fenofibrate treated rats were significantly increased. This demonstrates that a large amount of energy was dissipated as heat especially from the liver. This heat may have resulted from uncoupling by UCP-2 as well as UCP-1 and UCP-3, if they are expressed in the liver.
In this study we observed that fenofibrate did not significantly increase the expression of UCP-2 mRNA and UCP-3 mRNA in skeletal muscle, but induced newly expressed UCP-3 mRNA in hepatic tissues. These data suggest that the major target organ for fenofibrate treatment is the liver, not skeletal muscles.
The exact physiologic role of UCP-3 in the liver is uncertain. There are two theories suggested on the function of UCPs. One is the uncoupler theory and the other is the exporter theory. The uncoupler theory can explain the anti-adiposity effect of fenofibrate. Fenofibrate increases β-oxidation of fatty acid, which leads to the production of acetyl CoA. Acetyl CoA may enter the TCA cycle, where it is converted into citrate by citrate synthase. During β-oxidation of fatty acids and the TCA cycle, high-energy electrons in the form of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (reduced from) (NADH) or flavin adenine dinucleotide (reduced from) (FADH) are generated. These electrons released in the re-oxidation of NADH and FADH2 flow through the electron-transport chain to generate a proton gradient across the inner mitochondrial membrane. When these protons flow through uncoupling proteins (such as UCP-3), their energy is converted into heat and then dissipated (21).
The function of UCP-3 as an exporter has also been postulated; this protein could be an exporter of fatty acid anions from the mitochondrial matrix under conditions of increased fatty acid oxidation (21). This hypothesis proposes that excess acyl CoA, within the mitochondria, is hydrolyzed by a mitochondrial acyl CoA thioesterase, yielding a fatty acid anion and coenzyme A (CoASH). The fatty acid anion is exported to the cytosol by being carried across the inner mitochondrial membrane by UCP-3. The exported fatty acid anion returns to the pool of fatty acid anions in the cytosol and is recycled by ATP consumption (22). Thus the energy consumption, via UCP proteins in the liver, can be explained by the uncoupler or exporter theory, though the efficiency of energy consumption would be different for each of them.
A recent report by Linn et al. (23) showed that fenofibrate induced de novo expression of UCP-3 in the liver of Winstar rats. They suggested that such de novo expression was associated with enhanced fatty acid metabolism by fenofibrate. Because UCP genes contain functional PPAR-responsive elements (24), they may be target genes for the PPAR activator (25).
The increased core (esophageal and rectal) temperatures suggest that fenofibrate treated rats may increase heat production or metabolic rate. If the major role of hepatic UCP-3 is an uncoupler, this de novo expression of UCP-3 by fenofibrate treatment may be indirect evidence that fenofibrate can increase heat production or energy expenditure.
The increased body core temperature and hepatic UCP-3 expression induced by fenofibrate supports the hypothesis that hepatic UCP-3 works as an uncoupler protein rather than an exporter protein. However, we did not provide direct evidence that UCP-3 works as an uncoupler. This unsolved topic may be resolved by measuring state-4 respiration and membrane potentials of isolated hepatic mitochondria, which would be diagnostic of mitochondrial uncoupling activity.
There may be no reason to accumulate adipose tissue in subcutaneous regions under conditions of increased core temperature; this is because the major function of subcutaneous fat is to insulate the body by maintaining heat at a constant body temperature. Thus the loss of subcutaneous fat mass might be enhanced by adaptive responses to increased core temperature.
In conclusion, fenofibrate decreases visceral and then subcutaneous fat mass. A possible hepatic mechanism for decreasing visceral adiposity is that fenofibrate increases hepatic energy dissipation via de novo expression of UCP-3 in mitochondria. The decreased subcutaneous fat mass results from adaptive mechanisms in response to increased core temperature induced by increased energy combustion.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
(A) Chronological changes of body weight in the two groups. The body weight of the rat in both groups increased continuously during the entire period of the experiment. The average body weight in the fenofibrate group (closed circle) was significantly less than that in the control group (open circle) during 14-61 weeks (p<0.005). (B) Percent change of body (delta) weight in the two groups. The fenofibrate group showed significantly less weight gain than the control group during the experimental period (p=0.002).
jkms-22-235-g001
Fig. 2
Comparison of the fat tissue areas between control and fenofibrate treated groups. Fat tissue areas in T1 weighted images just beneath the level of the lower pole of the left kidney, were measured automatically. (A) Coronal scan image. This presents the level (-----) for the axial scanning. (B, C) Axial image of the fenofibrate group and of the control group, respectively. The visceral (V) and subcutaneous (S) fat areas were significantly decreased in the fenofibrate group compared with the control group, respectively (p<0.05, Table 2).
jkms-22-235-g002
Fig. 3
(A) Expression of UCP-2 and UCP-3 mRNA in the liver. (B) Expression of UCP-2 and UCP-3 in muscle. UCP-2 mRNA was well expressed in the liver from both groups. However, there was distinctive de novo expression of UCP-3 in the liver of the fenofibrate group. UCP-2 and UCP-3 were well expressed in skeletal muscle in both groups. There were no significant changes in the levels of muscular UCP-2 and UCP-3 mRNA in both groups.
jkms-22-235-g003
Fig. 4
Representative Western blot of hepatic protein lysates probed with anti-UCP-3 antibody in the liver. In the fenofibrate treatment group, the UCP-3 protein was detected, but it was not detected in the control group.
jkms-22-235-g004
Fig. 5
Comparison of body core temperatures between control and fenofibrate groups. (A) Esophageal temperature, (B) rectal temperature. Flexible thermometer probes were placed into the esophageal and rectal canals. Digital body temperatures were monitored and measured. Both esophageal and rectal temperatures were significantly increased in the fenofibrate group compared to the control group, respectively (p<0.05).
jkms-22-235-g005
Table 1
Blood glucose, insulin, lipids and ketone levels in both groups
jkms-22-235-i001

The data represent the mean±SEM of 7 animals per group. Mann-Whitney U test. NS, not significant.

Table 2
The comparison of fat tissue areas between control and fenofibrate groups
jkms-22-235-i002

The data represent the mean±SEM of 3 animals per group. Mann-Whitney U test.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Dr. DJ Seo, DG Jung, JT Hur for various useful advices and CO Kim for technical assistance.

Notes

This work was supported by the Dong-A University Medical Center Research Fund and Dong-A University Research Fund in 2003 and by Korea Research Foundation Grant (KRF 2004-005-E0030).

References

1. Chaput E, Saladin R, Silvestre M, Edgar AD. Fenofibrate and rosiglitazone lower serum triglycerides with opposing effects on body weight. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000. 271:445–450.
crossref
2. Mancini FP, Lanni A, Sabatino L, Moreno M, Giannino A, Contaldo F, Colantuoni V, Goglia F. Fenofibrate prevents and reduces body weight gain and adiposity in diet-induced obese rats. FEBS Lett. 2001. 491:1541–1558.
crossref
3. Koh EH, Kim MS, Park JY, Kim HS, Youn JY, Park HS, Youn JH, Lee KU. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α activation prevents diabetes in OLETF rats. Diabetes. 2003. 52:2331–2337.
4. Mancini FP, Lanni A, Sabatino L, Moreno M, Giannino A, Contaldo F, Colantuoni V, Goglia F. Fenofibrate prevents and reduces body weight gain and adiposity in diet-induced obese rats. FEBS Lett. 2001. 491:154–158.
crossref
5. Guerre-Millo M, Gervois P, Raspe E, Madsen L, Poulain P, Derudas B, Herbert JM, Winegar DA, Willson TM, Fruchart JC, Berge RK, Staels B. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α activators improve insulin sensitivity and reduce adiposity. J Biol Chem. 2000. 275:16638–16642.
crossref
6. Auboeuf D, Rieusset J, Fajas L, Vallier P, Frering V, Riou JP, Staels B, Auwerx J, Laville M, Vidal H. Tissue distribution and quantification of the expression of the peroxisome proliferator activated receptors and of LXR mRNAs in human: effect of obesity and NIDDM in adipose tissue. Diabetes. 1997. 46:1319–1327.
7. Staels B, Dallongeville J, Auwerx J, Schoonjans K, Leitersdorf E, Fruchart JC. Mechanism of action of fibrates on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. Circulation. 1998. 98:2088–2093.
crossref
8. Ferreira AV, Parreira GG, Green A, Botion LM. Effects of fenofibrate on lipid metabolism in adipose tissue of rats. Metabolism. 2006. 55:731–735.
crossref
9. Lee HJ, Choi SS, Park MK, An YJ, Seo SY, Kim MC, Hong SH, Hwang TH, Kang DY, Garber AJ, Kim DK. Fenofibrate lowers abdominal and skeletal adiposity and improves insulin sensitivity in OLETF rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002. 296:293–299.
crossref
10. Larsen PJ, Jensen PB, Sorensen RV, Larsen LK, Vrang N, Wulff EM, Wassermann K. Differential influences of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors gamma and -alpha on food intake and energy homeostasis. Diabetes. 2003. 52:2249–2259.
11. Park CW, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Wu J, Chen L, Cha DR, Su D, Hwang MT, Fan X, Davis L, Striker G, Zheng F, Breyer M, Guan Y. PPARalpha agonist fenofibrate improves diabetic nephropathy in db/db mice. Kidney Int. 2006. 69:1511–1517.
12. Rothwell NJ, Stock MJ. Brown adipose tissue: does it play a role in the development of obesity? Diabetes Metab Rev. 1988. 4:595–601.
crossref
13. Ricquier D, Bouillaud F, Toumelin P, Mory G, Bazin R, Arch J, Pénicaud L. 1986 Expression of uncoupling protein mRNA in thermogenic or weakly thermogenic brown adipose tissue. Evidence for a rapid B-adrenoreceptor-mediated and transcriptionally regulated step during activation of thermogenesis. J Biol Chem. 1986. 261:13905–13910.
14. Dulloo AG, Samec S, Seydoux J. Uncoupling protein 3 and fatty acid metabolism. Biochem Soc Trans. 2001. 29:785–791.
crossref
15. Nisoli E, Carruba MO, Tonello C, Macor C, Federspil G, Vettor R. Induction of fatty acid translocase/CD36, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma2, leptin, uncoupling proteins 2 and 3, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha gene expression in human subcutaneous fat by lipid infusion. Diabete. 2000. 49:319–324.
crossref
16. Armstrong MB, Towle HC. Polyunsaturated fatty acids stimulate hepatic UCP-2 expression via a PPAR alpha-mediated pathway. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001. 281:1197–1204.
17. Cabrero A, Alegret M, Sanchez R, Adzet T, Laguna JC, Vazquez M. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR alpha) activators, bezafibrate and Wy-14,643, increase uncoupling protein-3 mRNA levels without modifying the mitochondrial membrane potential in primary culture of rat preadipocytes. Arch Biochem Biophys. 200. 380:353–359.
18. Teruel T, Smith SA, Peterson J, Clapham JC. Synergistic activation of UCP-3 expression in cultured fetal rat brown adipocytes by PPAR alpha and PPAR gamma ligands. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000. 273:560–564.
19. Pedraza N, Solanes G, Carmona MC, Iglesias R, Vinas O, Mampel T, Vazquez M, Giralt M, Villarroya F. Impaired expression of the uncoupling protein-3 gene in skeletal muscle during lactation: fibrates and troglitazone reverse lactation-induced downregulation of the uncoupling protein-3 gene. Diabetes. 2000. 49:1224–1230.
crossref
20. Kelly LJ, Vicario PP, Thompson GM, Candelore MR, Doebber TW, Ventre J, Wu MS, Meurer R, Forrest MJ, Conner MW, Cascieri MA, Moller DE. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors gamma and alpha mediate in vivo regulation of uncoupling protein (UCP-1, UCP-2, UCP-3) gene expression. Endocrinology. 1998. 139:4920–4927.
21. Berg JM, Tymoczko JL, Stryer L. The Citric Acid Cycle. Biochemistry. 2002. 5th ed. New York: WH Freeman & Company;465–490.
22. Himms-Hagen J, Harper ME. Physiological Role of UCP3 May Be Export of Fatty Acids from Mitochondria When Fatty Acid Oxidation Predominates: An Hypothesis. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2001. 226:78–84.
crossref
23. Lanni A, Mancini F, Sabatino L, Silvestri E, Franco R, De Rosa G, Goglia F, Colantuoni V. De novo expression of uncoupling protein 3 is associated to enhanced mitochondrial thioesterase-1 expression and fatty acid metabolism in liver of fenofibrate-treated rats. FEBS Letters. 2002. 525:7–12.
crossref
24. Acin A, Rodriguez M, Rique H, Canet E, Boutin JA, Galizzi JP. Cloning and characterization of the 5' flanking region of the human uncoupling protein 3 (UCP3) gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999. 258:278–283.
25. Brun S, Carmona MC, Mampel T, Vinas O, Giralt M, Iglesias R, Villarroya F. Activators of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha induce the expression of the uncoupling protein-3 gene in skeletal muscle: a potential mechanism for the lipid intake-dependent activation of uncoupling protein-3 gene expression at birth. Diabetes. 1999. 48:1217–1222.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles