Journal List > Korean J Gastroenterol > v.64(2) > 1007329

Ahn, Kim, Kim, and Kim: Clinical Impact of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Peptic Ulcer Disease

Abstract

Background/Aims

Increased incidence of coronary artery disease has led to the increased use of dual antiplatelet therapy composed of aspirin and clopidogrel. We investigated the incidence of gastrointestinal complications in patients who received single or dual antiplatelet therapy and analyzed their clinical characteristics in order to predict the prognostic factors.

Methods

Between January 2009 and December 2011, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent coronary angiography at Chung-Ang University Hospital (Seoul, Korea). One hundred and ninety-four patients were classified into two groups: aspirin alone group and dual antiplatelet group. Clinical characteristics, past medical history, and presence of peptic ulcer were analyzed.

Results

During the follow-up period, 11 patients had duodenal ulcer; the event rate was 2.02% in the aspirin alone group and 9.47% in the dual antiplatelet group (hazard ratio [HR] 5.24, 95% CI 1.03–26.55, p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the rate of significant upper gastrointestinal bleeding: 0% vs. 4.2% (p=0.78). In patients who received proton pump inhibitor (PPI), 24 patients had gastric ulcer; the event rate was significantly different between the two groups: 4.87% vs. 22.98% (HR 3.40, 95% CI 1.02–11.27, p<0.05).

Conclusions

Dual antiplatelet groups had a higher incidence of duodenal ulcers without significant bleeding compared with the aspirin alone group. In patients who received PPI, the dual antiplatelet therapy group had a higher incidence of gastric ulcers without significant bleeding compared with the aspirin alone group. Therefore, physicians must pay attention to high risk groups who receive dual antiplatelet therapy and aggressive diagnostic endoscopy should also be considered.

References

1. Cutlip DE, Baim DS, Ho KK, et al. Stent thrombosis in the modern era: a pooled analysis of multicenter coronary stent clinical trials. Circulation. 2001; 103:1967–1971.
2. Wang F, Stouffer GA, Waxman S, Uretsky BF. Late coronary stent thrombosis: early vs. late stent thrombosis in the stent era. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002; 55:142–147.
crossref
3. Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration. Collaborative metaanalysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ. 2002; 324:71–86.
4. Peters RJ, Mehta SR, Fox KA, et al. Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) Trial Investigators. Effects of aspirin dose when used alone or in combination with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: observations from the Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) study. Circulation. 2003; 108:1682–1687.
crossref
5. Berger PB, Bhatt DL, Fuster V, et al. CHARISMA Investigators. Bleeding complications with dual antiplatelet therapy among patients with stable vascular disease or risk factors for vascular disease: results from the Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance (CHARISMA) trial. Circulation. 2010; 121:2575–2583.
crossref
6. Bhatt DL, Scheiman J, Abraham NS, et al. American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. ACCF/ACG/AHA 2008 expert consensus document on reducing the gastrointestinal risks of antiplatelet therapy and NSAID use: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52:1502–1517.
7. Results of statistics for cause of death, 2008. [Internet]. Seoul: Statistics Korea;2009 Aug 30. [cited 2014 Feb 20]. Available from:. http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/2/6/2/index.board?bmode=read&bSeq=&aSeq=66244&pageNo=1&rowNum=10&navCount=10&currPg=&sTarget=title&sTxt=.
8. Jeong MH. Current status of the development of new-drug elut- ing stents. Korean J Med. 2009; 76:544–548.
9. Moukarbel GV, Signorovitch JE, Pfeffer MA, et al. Gastrointestinal bleeding in high risk survivors of myocardial infarction: the VALIANT Trial. Eur Heart J. 2009; 30:2226–2232.
crossref
10. Ng FH, Wong SY, Chang CM, et al. High incidence of clopidogrel-associated gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with previous peptic ulcer disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003; 18:443–449.
crossref
11. Patrono C, Bachmann F, Baigent C, et al. European Society of Cardiology. Expert consensus document on the use of anti-platelet agents. The task force on the use of antiplatelet agents in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease of the European society of cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2004; 25:166–181.
crossref
12. Abraham NS, Hlatky MA, Antman EM, et al. ACCF/ACG/AHA. ACCF/ACG/AHA 2010 Expert Consensus Document on the concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and thienopyridines: a focused update of the ACCF/ACG/AHA 2008 expert consensus document on reducing the gastrointestinal risks of antiplatelet therapy and NSAID use: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. Circulation. 2010; 122:2619–2633.
13. Lin KJ, Hernández-Díaz S, García Rodríguez LA. Acid sup-pressants reduce risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on antithrombotic or anti-inflammatory therapy. Gastroenterology. 2011; 141:71–79.
crossref
14. Scheiman JM, Devereaux PJ, Herlitz J, et al. Prevention of peptic ulcers with esomeprazole in patients at risk of ulcer development treated with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid: a randomised, controlled trial (OBERON). Heart. 2011; 97:797–802.
crossref
15. Ng FH, Lam KF, Wong SY, et al. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with aspirin and clopidogrel co-therapy. Digestion. 2008; 77:173–177.
crossref

Table 1.
Demographic Characteristics of Patients Who Underwent Endoscopy
  Aspirin (n=99) Aspirin+clopidogrel (n=95) p-value
Age (yr) 59.89±11.71 63.88±11.55 0.01
Male 46 (46.46) 61 (64.21) 0.01
Time to endoscopy (mo) 12.34±9.516 11.79±9.909 0.69
Dyspepsia 20 (20.20) 21 (22.10) 0.74
Smoking 19 (19.19) 30 (31.57) 0.04
Comorbid disease      
  Hypertension 56 (56.56) 60 (63.15) 0.34
  DIabetes mellitus 21 (21.21) 34 (35.78) 0.02
  Chronic kidney disease 3 (3.03) 14 (14.73) 0.01
Drugs      
  NSAIDs 8 (8.08) 4 (4.21) 0.26
  Proton pump inhibitor 82 (82.82) 87 (91.57) 0.06
  H2 blocker 68 (68.68) 63 (66.31) 0.72
Endoscopic finding      
  Gastric erosion 23 (23.23) 12 (12.63) 0.06
  Gastric ulcer 6 (6.06) 20 (21.05) 0.01
  Duodenal ulcer 2 (2.02) 9 (9.47) 0.02
  Significant bleeding 0 (0) 4 (4.21) 0.03

Values are presented as mean±SD or n (%).

Table 2.
Demographic Characteristics of Patients Who Received Proton Pump Inhibitor
  Aspirin (n=82) Aspirin+clopidogrel (n=87) p-value
Age (yr) 59.16±11.91 63.98±11.74 0.01
Male 39 (47.56) 56 (64.36) 0.02
Time to endoscopy (mo) 12.05±9.803 11.86±10.251 0.90
Dyspepsia 16 (19.51) 20 (22.98) 0.58
Smoking 17 (20.73) 28 (32.18) 0.09
Comorbid disease      
  Hypertension 47 (57.31) 57 (65.51) 0.27
  Diabetes mellitus 15 (18.29) 32 (36.78) 0.01
  Chronic kidney disease 3 (3.65) 13 (14.9) 0.01
Drugs      
  NSAIDs 6 (7.31) 4 (4.59) 0.45
  H2 blocker 68 (82.92) 63 (72.41) 0.68
Endoscopic finding      
  Gastric erosion 20 (24.39) 11 (12.64) 0.07
  Gastric ulcer 4 (4.87) 20 (22.98) 0.01
  Duodenal ulcer 2 (2.43) 9 (10.34) 0.03
  Significant bleeding 0 (0) 4 (4.51) 0.04

Values are presented as mean±SD or n (%).

Table 3.
Comparison of Clinical and Endoscopic Factors between Aspirin Group and Dual Antiplatelet Group
  Aspirin (n=99) Aspirin+clopidogrel (n=95) Hazard ratio p-value 95% CI
Age (yr) 59.89±11.71 63.88±11.55 1.03 0.03 1.00–1.05
Male 46 (46.46) 61 (64.21) 2.24 0.02 1.10–4.55
Chronic kidney disease 3 (3.03) 14 (14.73) 4.75 0.02 1.11–19.03
Duodenal ulcer 2 (2.02) 9 (9.47) 5.24 0.04 1.03–26.55

Values are presented as mean±SD or n (%).

Table 4.
Comparison of Clinical and Endoscopic Factors between Aspirin Group and Dual Antiplatelet Group Receiving Proton Pump Inhibitor
  Aspirin (n=82) Aspirin+clopidogrel (n=87) Hazard ratio p-value 95% CI
Age (yr) 59.16±11.91 63.98±11.74 1.03 0.04 1.01–1.06
Male 39 (47.56) 56 (64.36) 2.45 0.01 1.21–4.97
Gastric ulcer 4 (4.87) 20 (22.98) 3.40 0.04 1.02–11.27

Values are presented as mean±SD or n (%).

TOOLS
Similar articles