Journal List > Korean J Urol > v.49(12) > 1005037

Kim, Bae, and Lee: Preoperative Factors Predicting the Outcome of a Midurethal Sling Operation for Treating Women with Mixed Incontinence

Abstract

Purpose

We wanted to investigate outcomes after midurethral sling (MUS) operations for treating women with mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) and we wanted to identify the factors for achieving a favorable outcome.

Materials and Methods

The retrospective data was collected for 279 women with MUI and who underwent a MUS operation with at least 2 years follow up. The following measures were recorded before MUS: a disease-specific validated questionnaire, 1-hour pad tests, standardized stress tests and urodynamic study. The patients were divided as followed; a predominance of bothering symptoms (stress-predominance, urgency-predominance) and the presence of detrusor overactivity (DO). The patients with DO were further classified into the high detrusor pressure (HPDO) group and the low pressure (LPDO) group with a reference level of 15cmH2O of maximum detusor pressure at which involuntary contraction occurred during filling cystometry. The patient's postoperative global impression of improvement, the Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptom (BFLUTS) score, improvement of stress incontinence (SUI) and urgency were analyzed.

Results

The overall success rate of SUI was 96.4%. The predominance of bothering symptoms or the presence of DO did not influence the over all SUI success rate. In a subgroup of women with DO, those women with LPDO showed a significantly higher SUI cure rate than those with HPDO. Urge incontinence resolved in 176 (63.1%) and it improved in 60 (21.5%), while it was aggravated or it persisted in 43 (15.4%). Women with stress-predominant MUI, DO and LPDO experienced better resolution of urgency incontinence, an improved quality of life (QoL) and a higher global impression of improvement.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that women with stress-predominant MUI and without DO or with LPDO are more likely to be cured of their urge urinary incontinence after a MUS operation for treating mixed urinary incontinence. (Korean J Urol 2008;49:1112–1118)

References

1. Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varos G. An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996; 7:81–6.
crossref
2. Delorme E, Droupy S, de Tayrac R, Delmas V. Transobturator tape (Uratape): a new minimally-invasive procedure to treat female urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2004; 45:203–7.
crossref
3. de Leval J. Novel surgical technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: transobturator vaginal tape inside-out. Eur Urol. 2003; 44:724–30.
crossref
4. Tsivian A, Mogutin B, Kessler O, Korczak D, Levin S, Sidi AA. Tension-free vaginal tape procedure for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: longterm results. J Urol. 2004; 172:998–1000.
5. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardization Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002; 21:167–78.
6. Karram MM, Bhatia NN. Management if coexistent stress and urge urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 73:4–7.
7. Stanton SL. Female stress incontinence. Treatment options and indications. Urologe A. 1991; 30:239–43.
8. Cucchi A. A possible link between stress urinary incontinence and detrusor instability in the female-urodynamic (pressure/flow) data and speculative considerations. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1998; 9:3–8.
9. Rezapour M, Ulmsten U. Tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) in women with mixed urinary incontinence-a longterm followup. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001; 12(Suppl 2):S15–8.
10. Artibani W. Difficult to manage patient populations-mixed symptomatology. BJU Int. 2000; 85(Suppl 3):53–4.
11. Scotti JJ, Angell G, Flora R, Greston WM. Antecedent history as a predictor of surgical cure of urgency symptoms in mixed incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 91:51–4.
crossref
12. Oh SJ, Park HG, Paick SH, Park WH, Choo MS. Translation and linguistic validation of Korean version of the bristol female lower urinary tract symptom instrument. J Korean Continence Soc. 2004; 8:89–113.
crossref
13. Oh BS, Park SH, Park SS. The effect of anticholinergic drug treatment before a midurethral sling operation in mixed urinary incontinence. Korean J Urol. 2007; 48:1075–81.
crossref
14. Koonings P, Bergman A, Ballard CA. Combined detrusor instability and stress urinary incontinence: Where is the primary pathology? Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1988; 26:250–6.
crossref
15. Jeffry L, Deval B, Birsan A, Soriano D, Darai E. Objective and subjective cure rates after tension-free vaginal tape for treatment of urinary incontinence. Urology. 2001; 58:702–6.
crossref
16. Sinha D, Blackwell A, Moran PA. Outcome measures after TVT for mixed urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008; 19:927–31.
crossref
17. Schrepferman CG, Griebling TL, Nygaard IE, Kreder KJ. Resolution of urge symptoms following sling cystourethro-pexy. J Urol. 2000; 164:1628–31.
crossref
18. Segal JL, Vassallo B, Kleeman S, Silva WA, Karram MM. Prevalence of persistent and de novo overactive bladder symptoms after the tension-free vaginal tape. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 104:1263–9.
crossref
19. Ku JH, Shin JW, Son H, Oh SJ, Kim SW, Paick JS. Predictive factors for persistent urgency or urge incontinence after tension-free vaginal tape procedure in mixed urinary incontinence. Korean J Urol. 2004; 45:330–6.
20. Radley SC, Rosario DJ, Chapple CR, Farkas AG. Conventional and ambulatory urodynamic findings in women with symptoms suggestive of bladder overactivity. J Urol. 2001; 166:2253–8.
crossref

Table 1.
Characteristics and outcomes according to the predominant symptoms and the existence of detrusor overactivity on urodynamic study
Overall patients (n=279) Symptom predominance Detrusor overactivity
SMUI (n=129) UMUI (n=150) p-value Yes (n=88) No (n=191) p-value
Age (years) 55.2±8.6 54.8±8.4 55.6±8.7 0.422 54.6±9.1 55.5±8.3 0.461
Parity (no.) 3.0±1.1 2.9±1.1 3.0±1.0 0.723 3.0±1.0 3.0±1.1 0.964
Symptom period (years) 8.2±5.9 8.3±5.6 8.2±6.1 0.942 8.1±5.8 8.3±6.0 0.854
Symptom grade     0.573     0.595
Grade I (%) 29 (10.4) 16 (12.4) 13 (8.7)   11 (12.5) 18 (9.4)  
Grade II (%) 201 (72.0) 90 (69.8) 111 (74.0)   60 (68.2) 141 (73.8)  
Grade III (%) 49 (17.6) 23 (17.8) 26 (17.3)   17 (19.3) 32 (16.8)  
1-hour pad test (g) 31.8±14.3 31.6±13.3 32.0±15.2 0.990 32.0±15.9 31.3±13.5 0.736
Q-tip test (o) 41.5±16.4 42.1±16.8 40.9±16.0 0.711 40.0±14.8 42.6±17.0 0.215
MUCP (cmH2O) 39.1±10.7 40.1±11.1 38.2±10.4 0.155 37.7±10.9 39.7±10.7 0.133
Results of stress incontinence (%)
Cured 230 (82.4) 111 (86.0) 119 (79.3) 0.303 67 (76.1) 163 (85.3) 0.148
Improved 39 (14.0) 15 (11.6) 24 (16.0)   16 (18.2) 23 (12.0)  
Failed 10 (3.6) 3 (2.3) 7 (4.7)   5 (5.7) 5 (2.6)  
Results of urge symptoms (%)
Resolved 176 (63.1) 100 (77.5) 76 (50.7) <0.01∗ 46 (52.3) 130 (68.1) 0.013∗
Improved 60 (21.5) 19 (14.7) 41 (27.3)   28 (32.8) 32 (16.8)  
Unchanged 43 (15.4) 10 (7.8) 33 (22.0)   14 (15.9) 29 (15.2)  
Patient's global impression of improvement (%)
Very satisfied 201 (72.0) 104 (80.6) 97 (64.7) 0.012∗ 53 (60.2) 148 (77.5) 0.010∗
Satisfied 47 (16.8) 15 (11.6) 32 (21.3)   20 (22.7) 27 (14.1)  
Dissatisfied 31 (11.1) 10 (7.8) 21 (14.0)   15 (17.0) 16 (8.4)  

SMUI: stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence, UMUI: urgency predominant mixed urinary incontinence, MUCP: maximal urethral closing pressure, ∗: statistically significant (p<0.05)

Table 2.
The outcomes according to the maximum detrusor pressure in patients with detrusor overactivity
  Low pressure (n=58) High pressure (n=30) p-value
Results of stress incontinence (%)
Cured 49 (84.5) 18 (60.0) 0.038∗
Improved 7 (12.1) 9 (30.0)  
Failed 2 (3.4) 3 (10.0)  
Results of urge symptoms (%)
Resolved 34 (58.6) 12 (40.0) 0.030∗
Improved 19 (32.8) 9 (30.0)  
Unchanged 5 (8.6) 9 (30.0)  
Patient's global impression of improvement (%)
Very satisfied 40 (69.0) 13 (43.3) <0.01∗
Satisfied 15 (25.9) 5 (16.7)  
Dissatisfied 3 (5.2) 12 (40.0)  

Low pressure: maximal detrusor pressure <15cmH2O, High pressure: maximal detrusor pressure ≥15cmH2O, MUCP: maximal urethral closing pressure, ∗: statistically significant (p<0.05)

Table 3.
The patients' satisfaction according to postoperative urgency
  Postoperative urgency p-value
Cure or improvement Unchanged
Very satisfied (%) 195 (82.6) 6 (14.0) <0.001∗
Satisfied (%) 35 (14.8) 12 (27.9)  
Dissatisfied (%) 6 (2.5) 25 (58.1)  
Total (%) 236 (100) 43 (100)  

: statistically significant (p<0.05)

Table 4.
Comparison of the postoperative BFLUTS score according to the predominant symptom, the presence of detrusor overactivity on urodynamic study and the degree of maximum detrusor pressure in the patients with detrusor overactivity
  Symptom predominance   Detrusor overactivity   Maximal detrusor pressure p-value
SMUI UMUI p-value Yes No p-value Low pressure High pressure
(n=129) (n=150)   (n=88) (n=191)   (n=58) (n=30)
BFLUTS-FS 2.14±2.40 3.11±2.91 0.002∗ 3.19±3.08 2.42±2.52 0.041∗ 2.50±2.46 4.53±3.72 0.010∗
BFLUTS-VS 0.31±0.62 0.29±0.56 0.741 0.33±0.60 0.28±0.58 0.538 0.29±0.50 0.40±0.77 0.494
BFLUTS-IS 0.68±1.88 1.20±2.63 0.057 1.40±2.82 0.76±2.03 0.059 0.91±2.36 2.33±3.40 0.047∗
BFLUTS-Sex 0.04±0.26 0.07±0.38 0.482 0.09±0.45 0.04±0.26 0.290 0.09±0.47 0.10±0.40 0.891
BFLUTS-QoL 0.90±1.91 1.74±2.58 0.002∗ 1.86±2.76 1.12±2.07 0.025∗ 1.19±2.03 3.17±3.46 0.006∗

BFLUTS: Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptom, SMUI: stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence, UMUI: urgency predominant mixed urinary incontinence, BFLUTS-FS: filling factor, BFLUTS-VS: voiding factor, BFLUTS-IS: incontinent factor BFLUTS-sex: sexual factor, BFLUTS-QoL: quality of life factor, ∗: statistically significant (p<0.05)

TOOLS
Similar articles