Journal List > J Korean Foot Ankle Soc > v.21(4) > 1043428

Kang, Song, Kim, Oh, and Yoo: The Effect of Second Toe Valgus on Correction Loss of Hallux Valgus Angle in Surgical Treatment

Abstract

Purpose:

The purpose of this study is to determine the correlation between the correction loss of hallux valgus angle and the severity of valgus angle of the second toe.

Materials and Methods:

We selected 312 cases from 268 surgical patients with hallux valgus deformity receiving distal chevron osteotomy. For a radiological evaluation, we analyzed the changes in the hallux valgus angles, first to second intermetatarsal angles, and valgus angle of the second toe post index operations. All patients were women; the mean age was 46 years. The mean follow-up period was 17 months.

Results:

The mean hallux valgus angle was 33.6° preoperatively (range, 25.7°∼44.8°), 13.1° (range, 8.4°∼16.4°) after 4 weeks of postoperative period, and 17.1° (range, 9.4°∼28.5°) at their final follow-up. The mean valgus angle of the second toe was 8.4° preoperatively (range, 2.0°∼25.8°) and 8.3° (range, 1.7°∼24.9°) at the final follow-up. Preoperatively, there was a positive correlation between the valgus angle of the second toe and hallux valgus angle (r=0.747, p=0.001). The correction loss of hallux valgus angle had a significant correlation with the severity of valgus angle of the second toe (r=0.802, p=0.001).

Conclusion:

The existence of the second toe valgus deformity may present itself as a cause of correction loss of hallux valgus angle. The preoperative measurement of the second toe valgus angle may be a good predictor of correction loss; therefore, thorough preoperative warning on the possibility of correction loss should be conducted to maximize patient satisfaction after the procedure.

REFERENCES

1.Mann RA., Coughlin MJ. Adult hallux valgus1 In: Mann RA, Coughlin MJ, editors1 Surgery of the foot and ankle1 6th ed1 St1 Louis: Mosby-Year Book. 19931. p1167-2961.
2.Schneider W., Aigner N., Pinggera O., Knahr K. Chevron osteotomy in hallux valgus1 Ten-year results of 112 cases1 J Bone Joint Surg Br1. 2004. 86:1016–201.
3.Schneider W., Knahr K. Keller procedure and chevron osteotomy in hallux valgus: five-year results of different surgical philosophies in comparable collectives1 Foot Ankle Int1. 2002. 23:321–91.
4.Mann RA., Rudicel S., Graves SC. Repair of hallux valgus with a distal soft-tissue procedure and proximal metatarsal osteotomy1 A long-term follow-up1 J Bone Joint Surg Am1. 1992. 74:124–91.
6.Pochatko DJ., Schlehr FJ., Murphey MD., Hamilton JJ. Distal chevron osteotomy with lateral release for treatment of hallux valgus deformity1 Foot Ankle Int1. 1994. 15:457–611.
7.Klosok JK., Pring DJ., Jessop JH., Maffulli N. Chevron or Wilson metatarsal osteotomy for hallux valgus1 A prospective randomised trial1 J Bone Joint Surg Br1. 1993. 75:825–91.
8.Okuda R., Kinoshita M., Morikawa J., Jotoku T., Abe M. Distal soft tissue procedure and proximal metatarsal osteotomy in hallux valgus1 Clin Orthop Relat Res1. 2000. 379:209–171.
9.Hardy RH., Clapham JC. Observations on hallux valgus; based on a controlled series1 J Bone Joint Surg Br1. 1951. 33:376–911.
10.Lee KT., Song JS. Measurement of the angle related hallux valgus in normal Korean adults1 J Korean Soc Foot Surg1. 1997. 1:11–41.
11.Coughlin MJ., Mann RA. Surgery of the foot and ankle1 6th ed1 St1 Louis: Mosby. 19931. p1297-3391.
12.Peterson HA., Newman SR. Adolescent bunion deformity treated with double osteotomy and longitudinal pin fixation of the first ray1 J Pediatr Orthop1. 1993. 13:80–41.
13.Ferrari J., Malone-Lee J. A radiographic study of the relationship between metatarsus adductus and hallux valgus1 J Foot Ankle Surg1. 2003. 42:9–141.
14.Larholt J., Kilmartin TE. Rotational scarf and akin osteotomy for correction of hallux valgus associated with metatarsus adductus1 Foot Ankle Int1. 2010. 31:220–81.
15.Kilmartin TE., O’Kane C. Correction of valgus second toe by closing wedge osteotomy of the proximal phalanx1 Foot Ankle Int1. 2007. 28:1260–41.

Figure 1.
The second metatarsal and proximal phalanx were bisected to give the valgus angle of 2nd toe.
jkfas-21-135f1.tif
Table 1.
Changes in Radiologic Indices
Preoperative 4 wk after operation Final follow-up
Hallux valgus angle (°) 33.6 (25.7∼44.8) 13.1 (8.4∼16.4) 17.1 (9.4∼28.5)
1∼2 intermetatarsal angle (°) 17.1 (15.6∼22.1) 6.6 (4.6∼9.1) 7.1 (5.1∼9.3)
Valgus angle of 2nd toe (°) 8.4 (2.0∼25.8) - 8.3 (1.7∼24.9)

Values are presented as mean (range).

Table 2.
Comparison of Correction Loss of Hallux Valgus Angle according to Valgus Angle of 2nd Toe
Valgus angle of 2nd toe (°) p-value*
<5 5∼15 >15
No. of cases 104 63 47
Mean CLA (°) 1.62 2.87 11.71 0.001

CLA: Correction loss of hallux valgus angle. *By independent t-test.

TOOLS
Similar articles