17 results

e71 Could fertility-sparing surgery be considered for women with early stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma?
Dimitrios Nasioudis, Eloise Chapman-Davis, Melissa K. Frey, Steven S. Witkin, Kevin Holcomb
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(6):e71.  Published online 2017 July 3    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e71
         
e72 Fear of cancer recurrence and its predictors among cervical cancer survivors
Jitti Hanprasertpong, Alan Geater, Ingporn Jiamset, Laaong Padungkul, Phongchawee Hirunkajonpan, Nartya Songhong
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(6):e72.  Published online 2017 July 17    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e72
         
e73 External validation of chemotherapy response score system for histopathological assessment of tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma
Jung-Yun Lee, Young Shin Chung, Kiyong Na, Hye Min Kim, Cheol Keun Park, Eun Ji Nam, Sunghoon Kim, Sang Wun Kim, Young Tae Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(6):e73.  Published online 2017 July 24    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e73
         
e75 Down-regulated serum microRNA-101 is associated with aggressive progression and poor prognosis of cervical cancer
Wei Jiang, Jia-Jia Pan, Ying-Hui Deng, Mei-Rong Liang, Li-Hua Yao
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(6):e75.  Published online 2017 August 1    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e75
         
e76 Assessing the effect of guideline introduction on clinical practice and outcome in patients with endometrial cancer in Japan: a project of the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) guideline evaluation committee
Shogo Shigeta, Satoru Nagase, Mikio Mikami, Masae Ikeda, Masako Shida, Isao Sakaguchi, Norichika Ushioda, Fumiaki Takahashi, Wataru Yamagami, Nobuo Yaegashi, Yasuhiro Udagawa, Hidetaka Katabuchi
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(6):e76.  Published online 2017 August 18    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e76
         
e77 Prognostic value of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in ovarian clear cell carcinoma
Jun Zhu, Hao Wen, Rui Bi, Yong Wu, Xiaohua Wu
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(6):e77.  Published online 2017 August 18    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e77
         
e78 Comparison of three different risk-stratification models for predicting lymph node involvement in endometrioid endometrial cancer clinically confined to the uterus
Vakkas Korkmaz, Mehmet Mutlu Meydanli, Ibrahim Yalçın, Mustafa Erkan Sarı, Hanifi Sahin, Eda Kocaman, Ali Haberal, Polat Dursun, Tayfun Güngör, Ali Ayhan
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(6):e78.  Published online 2017 September 2    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e78
         
e79 Comparing treatment outcomes of stage IIIB cervical cancer patients between those with and without lower third of vaginal invasion
Kanyarat Katanyoo
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(6):e79.  Published online 2017 August 29    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e79
         
e80 Nutritional status, cachexia, and anorexia in women with peritoneal metastasis and intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a longitudinal analysis
Ziad Hilal, Günther A. Rezniczek, Robert Klenke, Askin Dogan, Clemens B. Tempfer
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(6):e80.  Published online 2017 September 2    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e80
         
e81 Early-stage node negative cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma show similar survival outcomes after hysterectomy: a population-based study
San-Gang Wu, Jia-Yuan Sun, Zhen-Yu He, Qiong-Hua Chen, Juan Zhou
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(6):e81.  Published online 2017 September 8    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e81
         
e82 Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer
Chirag A. Shah, Tiffany Beck, John B. Liao, Nadia V. Giannakopoulos, Dan Veljovich, Pam Paley
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(6):e82.  Published online 2017 September 12    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e82
         
e83 Identification of DNA methylation associated gene signatures in endometrial cancer via integrated analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression systematically
Chuandi Men, Hongjuan Chai, Xumin Song, Yue Li, Huawen Du, Qing Ren
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(6):e83.  Published online 2017 September 8    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e83
         
e84 Impact of vaginal cylinder diameter on outcomes following brachytherapy for early stage endometrial cancer
Jack M. Qian, John M. Stahl, Melissa R. Young, Elena Ratner, Shari Damast
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(6):e84.  Published online 2017 September 11    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e84
         
e85 Survival of gynecological cancers in Turkey: where are we at?
Murat Gultekin, Selin Dundar, Irem Kucukyildiz, Mujdegul Zayifoglu Karaca, Guledal Boztas, Semra Hatice Turan, Ezgi Hacikamiloglu, Bekir Keskinkilic
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(6):e85.  Published online 2017 September 9    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e85
         
e86 Transvaginal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative assessment of myometrial infiltration in patients with endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Juan Luis Alcázar, Begoña Gastón, Beatriz Navarro, Rocío Salas, Juana Aranda, Stefano Guerriero
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(6):e86.  Published online 2017 September 8    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e86
         
e91 Safety of fertility-sparing surgery for stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma
Jeong-Yeol Park
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(6):e91.  Published online 2017 October 11    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e91
         
e92 Comparing prediction models for lymph node metastasis risk in endometrial cancer: the winner may not take it all
Sokbom Kang
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017;28(6):e92.  Published online 2017 October 11    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e92
         
Articles from Journal of Gynecologic Oncology are provided here courtesy of Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology