To the Editor:
Although T-cell engager therapies, including bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, have revolutionized treatment of hematological malignancies, immune effector cell-associated Hematotoxicity (ICAHT) remains a significant clinical challenge [1, 2]. Effective ICAHT management requires a proactive strategy beyond reactive monitoring that integrates initial bone marrow capacity with post-infusion hematological trends to categorize patient risk [3, 4–5].
A critical first step is to use the CAR-HEMATOTOX score before lymphodepletion. While this model excels in identifying patients at high risk for prolonged neutropenia (Score ≥ 2), its clinical utility is primarily its high negative predictive value. Rather than serving as an absolute mandate for prophylactic intervention, a high CAR-HEMATOTOX score should be viewed as an indicator for intensified surveillance to ensure timely therapeutic intervention [3] (Table 1).
Management of neutropenia (N-ICAHT) underscores the principle that “faster recovery is not always better.” While short-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) allows for tighter control of myeloid recovery, prophylactic use of long-acting G-CSF before CAR-T infusion has been shown to significantly increase the risk of Grade ≥ 2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (HR 2.15, P = 0.02) [6]. We thus advocate a personalized, neutropenia-driven approach. While short-acting G-CSF can be initiated in response to the patient's immediate hematologic status, long-acting G-CSF should be strictly deferred until inflammatory safety is ensured following resolution of active CRS/ICANS [4] (Table 1).
Our focus must expand to include thrombocytopenia (T-ICAHT) as a primary prognostic driver. In a core cohort of 744 patients with B-NHL, severe early T-ICAHT (Grade 3—4) was a powerful independent predictor of poor survival. Specifically, grade 3—4 T-ICAHT was associated with a 2-year overall survival (OS) of only 35%, compared with 67% in grade 0 (p < 0.001). This survival deficit is driven by a 60% relapse rate rather than by non-relapse mortality. We hypothesize that severe thrombocytopenia serves as a surrogate for bone marrow reservoir exhaustion, reflecting a compromised immune microenvironment that fails to maintain long-term immunosurveillance [5] (Table 1).
In conclusion, optimizing CAR-T cell therapy outcomes necessitates a three-fold strategy: forecasting risk via CAR-HEMATOTOX, avoiding premature G-CSF intervention in N-ICAHT, and prioritizing T-ICAHT monitoring as a sentinel for relapses and long-term prognosis. Successful implementation of this framework will require establishing a robust nationwide registry to systematically collect and analyze real-world ICAHT data. Such a national-scale platform will serve as an essential foundation to validate these risk-adapted approaches and represent a cornerstone of balanced and effective patient care in this era of CAR-T cell therapies.
Notes
Author’s contributions
S.E.Y. wrote the main manuscript text, prepared Table 1 and reviewed the manuscrupt.
Notes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
1. Park SY, Min GJ. Current immunotherapeutic approaches for relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: bispecific antibodies and CAR T-Cell therapies. Blood Res. 2025; 60(1):DOI: 10.1007/s44313-025-00105-2. PMID: 41247626. PMCID: 12623552. 60.
2. Yoon SE, Cho J, Cho D, Kang E-S, Kim SJ, Kim WS. Clinical outcomes of tisagenlecleucel in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: insights from a single-center study. Int J Hematol. 2025; 122(4):533–545. DOI: 10.1007/s12185-025-04006-z. PMID: 40847083. PMCID: 12476396.
3. Rejeski K, Perez A, Sesque P, Hoster E, Berger C, Jentzsch L, et al. CAR-HEMATOTOX: a model for CAR T-cell–related hematologic toxicity in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2021; 138(24):2499–2513. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2020010543. PMID: 34166502. PMCID: 8893508.
4. Rejeski K, Subklewe M, Aljurf M, Bachy E, Balduzzi A, Barba P, et al. Immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity: EHA/EBMT consensus grading and best practice recommendations. Blood. 2023; 142(10):865–877. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2023020578. PMID: 37300386.
5. Rejeski K, Sanz J, Fei T, Nair MS, Hashmi H, Avigdor A, et al. T-ICAHT: grading and prognostic impact of thrombocytopenia after CAR T-cell therapy. Blood. 2025; 146(7):834–846. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2025028833. PMID: 40258181. PMCID: 12783514.
6. Miller KC, Johnson PC, Abramson JS, Soumerai JD, Yee AJ, Branagan AR, et al. Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on toxicities after CAR T cell therapy for lymphoma and myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2022; 12(10):DOI: 10.1038/s41408-022-00741-2. PMID: 36316312. PMCID: 9622902. 146. PMID: 3228817cf75c47368f94792a61f6aa4d.
Table 1
Clinical framework for prediction and management of Immune Effector Cell Associated Hematotoxicity (ICAHT)
Abbreviation:
ANC Absolute Neutrophil Count,
CAR-T Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell,
CRP C-reactive Protein,
CRS Cytokine Release Syndrome,
Hb Hemoglobin,
ICAHT Immune Effector Cell-Associated Hematotoxicity,
ICANS Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome,
N-ICAHT Neutropenic ICAHT,
OS Overall Survival,
PFS Progression-Free Survival,
PLT Platelet,
T-ICAHT Thrombocytopenic ICAHT,
OS overall survival



PDF
Citation
Print


XML Download