Journal List > Anat Cell Biol > v.59(2) > 1516095818

Hallajpour, Asadi-Fard, Vahidinia, Tameh, and Rahmatipour: Calcitriol provides neuroprotection against cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury through activation of the SIRT1 pathway

Abstract

Ischemic stroke, caused by arterial blockages, is a major global cause of mortality and long-term disability. Current treatments primarily aim to restore cerebral blood flow through the use of anticoagulant therapy and thrombectomy. Recent research has explored vitamin D3, particularly its active form, calcitriol, as an adjunctive treatment due to its neuroprotective effects. However, the exact mechanisms by which calcitriol mitigates ischemia-induced brain injury remain unclear. This study investigated the therapeutic potential of calcitriol in ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury using a rat model. Male Wistar rats were subjected to 1 hour of ischemia followed by 72 hours of reperfusion to establish an I/R injury model. The rats then received calcitriol treatment for three days. Neurobehavioral deficits and cerebral infarct volume were evaluated 72 hours post-ischemia. Oxidative stress markers—including malondialdehyde (MDA), nitric oxide (NO), and total antioxidant capacity (TAC)—were quantified. Additionally, RT-PCR was performed to assess mRNA expression levels of SIRT1 and PGC1-α. The study demonstrated that calcitriol administration significantly reduced cerebral infarct volume and improved neurological outcomes following I/R injury. Treatment with calcitriol effectively decreased oxidative stress markers, as evidenced by reduced MDA and NO levels, while simultaneously enhancing TAC. Notably, calcitriol treatment substantially upregulated mRNA expression of SIRT1 in ischemic brain tissue. Our results demonstrate that calcitriol exhibits neuroprotective effects against I/R injury. These benefits appear to be mediated through two key mechanisms: (1) attenuation of oxidative stress and (2) activation of the SIRT1/PGC1-α signaling pathway.

Introduction

Ischemic stroke remains a leading global cause of disability and mortality. While incidence and mortality rates have declined, treatment strategies remain largely empirical due to the incomplete understanding of its complex pathophysiology. Although restoring blood flow (reperfusion) after ischemia is critical, it paradoxically exacerbates brain tissue damage [1]. The mechanisms underlying neuronal injury in stroke involve multiple pathways, including calcium overload, excitotoxicity, free radical production, oxidative stress, and impaired protein synthesis [2, 3]. During cerebral ischemia/reperfusion (I/R), excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation induces oxidative stress, causing damage to cellular components, including lipids, carbohydrates, proteins, and DNA.
Oxidative stress plays a pivotal role in neuronal injury following ischemic stroke. This pathological mechanism highlights the critical need for antioxidant-based therapeutic strategies to attenuate ischemic brain damage and improve functional recovery. While significant efforts have been devoted to identifying effective neuromodulators, few candidate therapies have successfully transitioned to clinical applications for stroke treatment.
Sirtuins, a class of histone deacetylases, represent a particularly promising cellular defense system against oxidative stress, functioning through multiple molecular pathways. Among these, Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) is an NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase capable of regulating numerous non-histone proteins [4]. SIRT1 is widely expressed throughout the rat brain and plays a significant role in the pathophysiological mechanisms of I/R injury [5].
Extensive research has established that SIRT1 participates in multiple essential biological processes, including chromatin remodeling, transcriptional silencing, chromosome stability maintenance, cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, autophagy, metabolic regulation, growth inhibition, and oxidative stress response [6]. Of particular significance, SIRT1 plays a crucial role in maintaining mitochondrial function and integrity. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1α (PGC-1α) is a central regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative metabolism [7]. PGC-1α functions as a transcriptional coactivator for SIRT1, while SIRT1 reciprocally enhances PGC-1α activity, creating a positive feedback loop that critically regulates mitochondrial function [8]. Moreover, PGC-1α upregulates nuclear respiratory factor 1 (NRF-1) expression, which subsequently stimulates mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, modulates nuclear-encoded respiratory enzyme genes, and coordinates mitochondrial DNA replication, transcription, and protein expression [9]. Notably, activation of the SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway enhances oxidative stress resistance in chronic cerebral ischemia models and mitigates associated cognitive impairments [10].
Vitamin D, recognized as a neurosteroid, modulates multiple brain functions and has been associated with reduced stroke risk [11]. Its activation occurs through sequential hydroxylation, first in the liver to form calcifediol (25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D]), then in the kidneys where it is converted to its biologically active form, calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D) [12]. Calcitriol, an FDA-approved compound, has emerged as a promising neuroprotective agent. Its primary mechanism of action involves binding to the vitamin D receptor (VDR). Given the ubiquitous expression of VDR, vitamin D signaling appears to regulate diverse physiological processes, including immune system modulation, cell cycle regulation, and neurodevelopmental processes [13, 14]. These findings highlight the importance of developing novel therapeutic strategies targeting vitamin D pathways to improve post-stroke outcomes.
In multiple neurotoxicity models, vitamin D administration has been shown to enhance neuronal survival through dual mechanisms: (1) regulation of intracellular calcium homeostasis and (2) attenuation of free radical production. Both in vivo and in vitro studies demonstrate vitamin D’s ability to reduce oxidative stress markers and downregulate pro-inflammatory cytokine expression [15]. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms underlying vitamin D’s therapeutic effects in ischemic stroke remain insufficiently explored. Based on current evidence, we propose that vitamin D exerts neuroprotective effects in focal cerebral ischemia by mitigating oxidative stress damage, mediated in part through activation of the SIRT1-PGC1-α signaling pathway.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Forty-five adult male Wistar rats (weight range: 230–300 g) were procured from the Animal Research Facility of Arak University of Medical Sciences. The animals were housed under controlled environmental conditions with: A 12:12 hour light-dark cycle, ambient temperature maintained at 23°C±2°C, and relative humidity of 55%–60%. All animals received ad libitum access to standard laboratory chow and filtered water, except during specified experimental procedures. All experimental protocols were performed in full compliance with the institutional ethical guidelines of the Animal Ethics Committee of Arak University of Medical Sciences for animal research (Ethical Approval Code: IR.ARAKMU.AEC.1403.009).

Middle cerebral artery occlusion model

Focal cerebral ischemia was induced in rats using an established intraluminal filament model. Animals were anesthetized with 3% isoflurane (in 70% N2O/30% O2) and surgically prepared for left common carotid artery (CCA) exposure. A silicon-coated 4-0 monofilament (diameter: 0.28–0.30 mm) was inserted into the CCA and advanced 18–20 mm distally into the internal carotid artery to occlude the middle cerebral artery origin. After 60 minutes of occlusion, the filament was carefully withdrawn to initiate reperfusion.

Study design

Animals were randomly allocated into three experimental groups:
(1) Sham-operated group (n=15): animals underwent the same surgical procedure as the middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) groups, but no monofilament was inserted into the CCA.
(2) Stroke-treated MCAO group (n=15): animals in this group received saline supplemented with ethanol, mirroring the treatment conditions of the calcitriol group but without the active drug.
(3) Calcitriol-treated MCAO group (n=15): rats were administered intraperitoneal injections of calcitriol (Cayman Company) at a dosage of 1 µg/kg body weight for three consecutive days after stroke induction.
The calcitriol was dissolved in ethanol and diluted with saline. Following ischemia induction, all animals were deeply anesthetized and decapitated 72 hours later for further experiments. Rats that achieved a full score in the behavioral test were included in the study, and those that died during model induction were replaced.

Neurobehavioral performance

Neurological deficits in a MCAO model were evaluated using the Garcia score (an 18-point scoring system) before and 72 hours after occlusion for all groups (n=15) [16], with minor modifications. This test assesses six behavioral components: spontaneous activity [17], movement symmetry [18], climbing ability [19], forelimb extension [20], body awareness [21], response to vibrissae stimulation. Each component contributes to the total score, with lower scores indicating more severe neurological dysfunction. In this study, sham-operated animals consistently scored the maximum (18 points), confirming the absence of functional impairments.

Assessment of brain infarct volume

Following a 72-hour reperfusion period after ischemia, animals were euthanized (each group; n=4), and their brains were rapidly harvested and flash-frozen at −20°C for 10 minutes. Coronal sections (2 mm thick) were then prepared using a brain matrix (Zivic Instruments). These sections were immersed for 20 minutes in 1% 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC; Merck) dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (37°C). This staining process distinguishes normal brain tissue, which appears dark red, from infarcted areas that remain unstained. To account for edema-related volume changes, the corrected infarct volume for each brain section was calculated using the following formula: Infarct measurements were conducted by an investigator blinded to treatment group assignments to ensure unbiased assessment.
Infarction volume=contralateral hemisphere volume-ipsilateral hemisphere non-injured volumecontralateral hemisphere volume×100

Tissue preparation

After the completion of behavioral assessments, the rats were sacrificed for histological analysis (each group; n=4). Anesthesia was first induced using 10% chloral hydrate, followed by transcardial perfusion—initially with 0.9% normal saline, and then with 10% neutral buffered formalin (NBF). The brains were then removed and fixed in 10% NBF at 4°C for 48 hours. Subsequently, the brain tissues were embedded in paraffin, sectioned coronally at a thickness of 5 micrometers, and stained using Nissl staining for examination under a light microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti-U; Nikon).

Nissl staining

Brain tissue sections were deparaffinized in xylene and stained with 0.1% cresyl violet solution. Stained sections were visualized and imaged using a light microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti-U). For quantitative assessment, neurons were counted based on specific criteria: healthy neurons exhibit well-defined cell bodies with prominent Nissl substance and visible nuclei. In contrast, dead or degenerating neurons appear shrunken, with darkly stained (pyknotic) nuclei and a loss of Nissl substance, reflecting cytoplasmic degradation.

Measurement of oxidant and antioxidant levels

Following brain extraction, the ischemic cortical tissue was dissected and homogenized in RIPA lysis buffer. The homogenate was centrifuged (10,000×g, 15 minutes, 4°C), and the supernatant was collected for analysis. MDA levels were quantified as an indicator of lipid peroxidation using the thiobarbituric acid (TBA) assay, following established methodology [22]. The supernatant was mixed with a stock solution containing: 15% trichloroacetic acid, 0.375% TBA, and 0.25 N hydrochloric acid (HCl). The reaction mixture was heated to 95°C (90°C–100°C range) for 15 minutes, then centrifuged at 5,000×g (10 minutes). Absorbance was measured at 532 nm using an ELISA reader (Garni Medical Engineering Co.). In biological systems, NO undergoes rapid oxidation to stable metabolites (nitrite and nitrate). Therefore, nitrite concentration serves as a reliable surrogate marker for assessing NO production. Nitrite concentration was determined using a modified Griess reaction. The assay protocol consisted of: mixing 100 µl supernatant with 100 µl freshly prepared Griess reagent containing: 0.1% N-(1-naphthyl) ethylenediamine dihydrochloride and 2% sulfanilamide in 5% phosphoric acid, incubating the mixture at room temperature (25°C) for 30 minutes protected from light and measuring absorbance at 540 nm using a microplate reader.
Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) was measured using the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay according to established methodology. The procedure was as follows: FRAP reagent preparation (combined the following preheated [37°C] components: 25 ml sodium acetate buffer [0.3 M, pH 3.6], 2.5 ml TPTZ solution [0.01 M in 0.04 M HCl], 2.5 ml FeCl3·6H2O solution [0.02 M] and final working volume: 1.5 ml FRAP reagent), assay protocol (mixed 50 μl supernatant with 1.5 ml FRAP reagent, incubated at 37°C for 15 minutes in the dark, measured absorbance at 593 nm against a blank).

Real time PCR

Fresh tissue samples (n=4) from the penumbra region of the injured cortex were collected in sterile microtubes and immediately flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen for storage at –80°C until processing. Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (MaxZol), with concentration and purity verified by spectrophotometric measurement of A260/A280 ratios. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized from extracted RNA using the cDNA Synthesis Kit (Parstous) under standard reaction conditions. For quantitative analysis, real-time PCR reactions were performed in 10 μl reaction volumes containing 1X Ampliqon RealQ Plus 2X Master Mix Green (Ampliqon), gene-specific primers (sequences listed below), and diluted cDNA template, with amplification conducted by an Applied Biosystems real-time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using optimized cycling conditions. The primer sequences utilized in this experiment were as Table 1.

Statistical analysis

The data were reported as mean±SD, and statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism version 8.0 (Dotmatics). The t-test was used for comparing two samples, while comparisons among groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. A statistical significance level of P-value <0.05 was considered.

Results

Therapeutic effects of calcitriol against I/R injury

To calculate the volume of brain infarction, vital staining with TTC was used 72 hours after MCAO. As illustrated in Fig. 1, the sham group displayed no signs of cerebral injury, whereas the stroke group exhibited a significant infarct volume. Treatment with calcitriol led to a notable decrease in infarct volume compared to stroke group (P<0.01). Neurological scores and infarct size serve as critical biomarkers for evaluating ischemic brain injury severity. In our recent study, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test demonstrated statistically significant intergroup differences (P<0.05). Neurological assessment using the 18-point Garcia scale revealed: sham-operated animals maintained normal scores, indicating intact neurological function, vehicle-treated controls showed significant deficit, and calcitriol-treated animals exhibited substantial functional improvement (Fig. 2). This suggests that calcitriol may have a therapeutic effect against neurological injuries induced by infarction.

Cell death in I/R injury

Nissl staining revealed significant ischemic damage in the cortical region, with I/R injury causing a 66% increase in neuronal cell death compared to sham controls (P<0.001). As demonstrated in Fig. 3, calcitriol treatment significantly attenuated this neuronal loss, reducing cell death by 61% versus the vehicle-treated I/R group (P<0.01). Quantitative analysis of Nissl-positive cells confirmed these findings (Fig. 3).

Therapeutic mechanism of calcitriol against I/R

To elucidate the neuroprotective mechanisms of calcitriol following cerebral ischemia, we examined mRNA expression levels of SIRT1 and PGC1-α in the ischemic penumbra using quantitative RT-PCR. Statistical analysis by one-way ANOVA demonstrated significant intergroup differences in SIRT1 expression. Post-hoc analysis revealed that vehicle-treated ischemic animals showed decreased SIRT1 (P<0.05) and PGC1-α expression compared to sham controls. Importantly, calcitriol treatment further significantly enhanced mRNA expression of SIRT1 (P<0.01) relative to vehicle-treated animals, as illustrated in Fig. 4. Although PGC1-α expression increased following calcitriol, the difference was not statistically significant.

Therapeutic impact of calcitriol on markers of oxidative stress

This study examines the pivotal role of oxidative stress in cellular survival pathways following cerebral ischemia, with particular emphasis on the neuroprotective potential of calcitriol. Through a comprehensive analysis of key oxidative stress biomarkers—MDA, NO, and TAC—we demonstrate that oxidative damage constitutes a fundamental mechanism in ischemic brain injury. One-way ANOVA analysis showed significant variations in MDA, NO, and TAC levels across the groups. Post-hoc Tukey’s test indicated that vehicle-treated rats exhibited increased MDA and NO levels alongside decreased TAC levels compared to the sham-operated group 72 hours after MCAO (P<0.05, P<0.01, respectively). In contrast, calcitriol treatment resulted in a notable reduction in MDA and NO levels while significantly enhancing TAC levels compared to the vehicle group (P<0.05, P<0.01, respectively) (Fig. 5). These findings demonstrate that the therapeutic potential of calcitriol may stem from its ability to simultaneously target multiple components of the oxidative stress cascade.

Discussion

The key discovery of this research indicates the therapeutic effects of calcitriol against brain injuries, which were confirmed through the improvement of neurological deficit scores and the reduction of lesion volume and oxidative stress. Mechanistically, these neuroprotective effects appear mediated through activation of the SIRT1 antioxidant pathway, suggesting a novel molecular target for stroke intervention. Ischemic stroke remains a leading global cause of mortality and long-term disability [23], with comparable burdens across developed and developing nations. Although thrombolytic therapy has proven effective, its use is limited due to a narrow therapeutic window and strict criteria [24]. These limitations underscore the critical need for complementary therapeutic approaches. Nutritional interventions like vitamin D supplementation offer distinct advantages, including a favorable safety profile, cost-effectiveness, and widespread accessibility. Emerging evidence supports their potential in both neuroprotection and functional recovery [25, 26].
Vitamin D, a fat-soluble secosteroid, is primarily synthesized in the skin through ultraviolet B radiation-mediated conversion of 7-dehydrocholesterol, with dietary intake serving as a secondary source. This essential nutrient plays critical roles in maintaining neural homeostasis through immunomodulation of neuroinflammatory pathways, enhancement of endogenous detoxification mechanisms, and regulation of neurotrophic factor expression [27]. Epidemiological data reveal a strong inverse correlation between serum vitamin D levels and cerebrovascular disease risk and neurological disorders, such as stroke [28, 29]. Studies in rats have demonstrated that a lack of vitamin D results in increased brain infarct sizes and more pronounced behavioral impairments following stroke induction [30].
The bioactivation of vitamin D occurs through two sequential hydroxylation reactions: (1) hepatic conversion: 25-hydroxylation in the liver produces 25(OH)D, the major circulating form and (2) renal activation: 1α-hydroxylation in proximal renal tubules generates calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3), the biologically active metabolite. This tightly regulated metabolic pathway highlights the critical relationship between vitamin D homeostasis and neurological function. Given these mechanisms, ensuring adequate vitamin D status—whether through sensible sun exposure (15–30 minutes daily) or supplementation (1,000–4,000 IU/day)—represents a potentially crucial modifiable factor for cerebrovascular and neurological disease prevention [31].
Accumulating evidence demonstrates that vitamin D exerts significant neuroprotective effects following ischemic brain injury. Experimental studies have shown that calcitriol administration can reduce total infarct volume in rat MCAO models, preserve blood-brain barrier integrity, and attenuate neuronal apoptosis. These protective effects have been consistently observed across multiple studies [32, 33], suggesting vitamin D’s potential as a therapeutic agent for stroke. However, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying these benefits remain incompletely characterized. Current gaps in understanding include: the relative contribution of genomic vs. non-genomic signaling pathways, potential interactions with other neuroprotective systems, and optimal dosing and administration timelines. Further investigation is needed to elucidate these mechanisms and translate preclinical findings into clinical applications [34]. This investigation employed a comprehensive approach to evaluate ischemic stroke outcomes through quantitative measurement of cerebral infarction volume and systematic assessment of functional neurological deficits.
Our findings demonstrate that calcitriol treatment provides substantial neuroprotective effects, significantly reducing neurological deficit scores and decreasing cerebral infarction volume. These protective effects occur against the complex pathophysiology of cerebral I/R injury, which is characterized by excessive ROS generation [35] leading to widespread oxidative damage of cellular macromolecules (lipids, proteins, and DNA) and subsequent activation of apoptotic pathways. Importantly, we established calcitriol’s potent antioxidant properties through three key measurements: enhancement of TAC, reduction in lipid peroxidation, and decrease in nitric oxide metabolites, collectively demonstrating its ability to mitigate oxidative stress following ischemic insult. Vehicle-treated animals demonstrated significant oxidative stress, characterized by reduction in TAC versus sham controls, increase in NO metabolites, and elevation in MDA levels. Calcitriol administration markedly attenuated these oxidative disturbances, producing: recovery of TAC activity, reduction in NO levels, and decrease in MDA concentration. These findings demonstrate calcitriol’s potent antioxidant effects in mitigating IR-induced oxidative damage.
SIRT1 modulates PGC-1α activity through post-translational modifications (deacetylation and phosphorylation), critically regulating mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative metabolism in neural tissue [36, 37]. Under hypoxic conditions, PGC-1α upregulation serves as an adaptive response, with studies demonstrating its neuroprotective effects against oxidative stress-induced apoptosis [38, 39]. Our findings reveal that calcitriol treatment significantly elevated SIRT1 expression in the ipsilateral cortex 72 hours post-MCAO, suggesting its involvement in calcitriol-mediated neuroprotection. In contrast, PGC-1α expression exhibited an increasing trend; however, this change did not reach statistical significance. The ischemic cascade initiates when cerebral blood flow interruption (≤30% of baseline) creates an energy crisis, with reperfusion paradoxically generating cytotoxic ROS levels [40]. Mitochondria, while essential for ATP production, become mediators of cell death when compromised. PGC-1α regulates energy metabolism by promoting mitochondrial gene expression and biogenesis. Notably, we observed a strong positive correlation between PGC-1α and SIRT1 expression levels, indicating that their coordinated upregulation may represent a key mechanism in calcitriol’s therapeutic effects against ischemic injury.
To our knowledge, this study provides the first evidence of calcitriol’s interaction with the SIRT1/PGC-1α pathway in cerebral ischemia. Our RT-PCR analysis revealed two key findings: vehicle-treated animals showed decreased SIRT1 expression in the peri-infarct cortex, suggesting an endogenous neuroprotective response to ischemic stress, and calcitriol treatment significantly amplified this effect by further increasing SIRT1 expression. These results indicate that calcitriol potentiates the brain’s intrinsic antioxidant defenses through SIRT1 activation. While previous research has identified K610 deacetylation as a mechanism for SIRT1 activation by other compounds, our study uniquely demonstrates the temporal pattern of SIRT1/PGC-1α regulation post-ischemia, calcitriol’s specific enhancement of this pathway, and a correlated reduction in oxidative stress markers. These novel findings position the SIRT1/PGC-1α axis as a key mediator of calcitriol’s neuroprotective effects, opening new avenues for targeted stroke therapies.
Although SIRT1 is known to activate PGC-1α through deacetylation, the lack of significant changes in PGC-1α mRNA expression following calcitriol treatment in our study may be explained by post-translational regulation mechanisms. SIRT1 can enhance PGC-1α activity via deacetylation without necessarily affecting its transcriptional levels. Moreover, SIRT1 exerts its effects through multiple downstream targets beyond PGC-1α, including FOXO transcription factors, p53, NF-κB, PPARγ, LXR, and AMPK, influencing diverse cellular processes such as apoptosis, inflammation, oxidative stress, lipid metabolism, and mitochondrial biogenesis. Therefore, the observed neuroprotective effects of calcitriol-induced SIRT1 upregulation may involve alternative SIRT1-mediated pathways independent of PGC-1α transcriptional activation.
In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that calcitriol exerts significant neuroprotection against cerebral I/R injury by activating the SIRT1 pathway, resulting in a reduction in lipid peroxidation (MDA) and an increase in TAC. This pathway activation reduces infarct volume and improves neurological recovery on standardized deficit scales. Calcitriol’s therapeutic potential is further supported by its established safety profile, blood-brain barrier permeability, and multimodal mechanisms of action. The robust neuroprotection mediated through SIRT1 activation highlights this pathway as a novel therapeutic target that merits clinical translation for ischemic stroke treatment.

Limitation

Although our findings indicate an upregulation of SIRT1 following calcitriol treatment, further studies employing pharmacological inhibition or genetic silencing (e.g., SIRT1 knockdown) are required to confirm the causal role of SIRT1 in mediating the neuroprotective effects of calcitriol.

Acknowledgements

The results described in this paper were part of the Master’s thesis of Sepideh Hallajpour, a MSc student in Anatomical Sciences. We acknowledge the use of ChatGPT (OpenAI) AI tool to improve the language of manuscript.

Notes

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: YAF, ZV. Data acquisition: SH, SR. Data analysis or interpretation: SH, SR. Funding acquisition: YAF. Drafting of the manuscript: YAF, ZV. Critical revision of the manuscript: YAF, ZV, AA. Approval of the final version of the manuscript: all authors.

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding

We thank Molecular and Medicine Research Center of Arak University of Medical Sciences for supporting this study under grant agreement number 7412.

References

1. Yan C, Zhang J, Wang S, Xue G, Hou Y. 2013; Neuroprotective effects of rutaecarpine on cerebral ischemia reperfusion injury. Neural Regen Res. 8:2030–8.
2. Kim JH, Lee NS, Jeong YG, Lee JH, Kim EJ, Han SY. 2012; Protective efficacy of an Ecklonia cava extract used to treat transient focal ischemia of the rat brain. Anat Cell Biol. 45:103–13. DOI: 10.5115/acb.2012.45.2.103. PMID: 22822465. PMCID: PMC3398172.
3. Wong CH, Crack PJ. 2008; Modulation of neuro-inflammation and vascular response by oxidative stress following cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury. Curr Med Chem. 15:1–14. DOI: 10.2174/092986708783330665. PMID: 18220759.
4. Yamamoto T, Byun J, Zhai P, Ikeda Y, Oka S, Sadoshima J. 2014; Nicotinamide mononucleotide, an intermediate of NAD+ synthesis, protects the heart from ischemia and reperfusion. PLoS One. 9:e98972. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098972. PMID: 24905194. PMCID: PMC4048236.
5. Pantazi E, Zaouali MA, Bejaoui M, Folch-Puy E, Ben Abdennebi H, Roselló-Catafau J. 2013; Role of sirtuins in ischemia-reperfusion injury. World J Gastroenterol. 19:7594–602. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i43.7594. PMID: 24616566. PMCID: PMC3837258.
6. Baur JA, Ungvari Z, Minor RK, Le Couteur DG, de Cabo R. 2012; Are sirtuins viable targets for improving healthspan and lifespan? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 11:443–61. DOI: 10.1038/nrd3738. PMID: 22653216. PMCID: PMC4684642.
7. Funk JA, Schnellmann RG. 2013; Accelerated recovery of renal mitochondrial and tubule homeostasis with SIRT1/PGC-1α activation following ischemia-reperfusion injury. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 273:345–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2013.09.026. PMID: 24096033. PMCID: PMC3987743.
8. Chong ZZ, Shang YC, Hou J, Maiese K. 2010; Wnt1 neuroprotection translates into improved neurological function during oxidant stress and cerebral ischemia through AKT1 and mitochondrial apoptotic pathways. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 3:153–65. DOI: 10.4161/oxim.3.2.11758. PMID: 20716939. PMCID: PMC2952099.
9. Scarpulla RC. 2008; Transcriptional paradigms in mammalian mitochondrial biogenesis and function. Physiol Rev. 88:611–38. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00025.2007. PMID: 18391175.
10. Raval AP, Lin HW, Dave KR, Defazio RA, Della Morte D, Kim EJ, Perez-Pinzon MA. 2008; Resveratrol and ischemic preconditioning in the brain. Curr Med Chem. 15:1545–51. DOI: 10.2174/092986708784638861. PMID: 18537630.
11. Zhou R, Wang M, Huang H, Li W, Hu Y, Wu T. 2018; Lower vitamin D status is associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. 10:277. DOI: 10.3390/nu10030277. PMID: 29495586. PMCID: PMC5872695.
12. Evans MA, Kim HA, Ling YH, Uong S, Vinh A, De Silva TM, Arumugam TV, Clarkson AN, Zosky GR, Drummond GR, Broughton BRS, Sobey CG. 2018; Vitamin D3 supplementation reduces subsequent brain injury and inflammation associated with ischemic stroke. Neuromolecular Med. 20:147–59. DOI: 10.1007/s12017-018-8484-z. PMID: 29476479. PMCID: PMC5834596.
13. Jorde R, Mathiesen EB, Rogne S, Wilsgaard T, Kjærgaard M, Grimnes G, Schirmer H. 2015; Vitamin D and cognitive function: the Tromsø study. J Neurol Sci. 355:155–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.06.009. PMID: 26092373.
14. Eyles DW, Burne TH, McGrath JJ. 2013; Vitamin D, effects on brain development, adult brain function and the links between low levels of vitamin D and neuropsychiatric disease. Front Neuroendocrinol. 34:47–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2012.07.001. PMID: 22796576.
15. Cui C, Xu P, Li G, Qiao Y, Han W, Geng C, Liao D, Yang M, Chen D, Jiang P. 2019; Vitamin D receptor activation regulates microglia polarization and oxidative stress in spontaneously hypertensive rats and angiotensin II-exposed microglial cells: role of renin-angiotensin system. Redox Biol. 26:101295. DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2019.101295. PMID: 31421410. PMCID: PMC6831892.
16. Nematipour S, Vahidinia Z, Nejati M, Naderian H, Beyer C, Azami Tameh A. 2020; Estrogen and progesterone attenuate glutamate neurotoxicity via regulation of EAAT3 and GLT-1 in a rat model of ischemic stroke. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 23:1346–52.
17. Zhou Z, Lu J, Liu WW, Manaenko A, Hou X, Mei Q, Huang JL, Tang J, Zhang JH, Yao H, Hu Q. 2018; Advances in stroke pharmacology. Pharmacol Ther. 191:23–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.05.012. PMID: 29807056.
18. Chamorro Á, Dirnagl U, Urra X, Planas AM. 2016; Neuroprotection in acute stroke: targeting excitotoxicity, oxidative and nitrosative stress, and inflammation. Lancet Neurol. 15:869–81. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00114-9. PMID: 27180033.
19. Robbins NM, Swanson RA. 2014; Opposing effects of glucose on stroke and reperfusion injury: acidosis, oxidative stress, and energy metabolism. Stroke. 45:1881–6. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004889. PMID: 24743441. PMCID: PMC4102697.
20. Domínguez C, Delgado P, Vilches A, Martín-Gallán P, Ribó M, Santamarina E, Molina C, Corbeto N, Rodríguez-Sureda V, Rosell A, Alvarez-Sabín J, Montaner J. 2010; Oxidative stress after thrombolysis-induced reperfusion in human stroke. Stroke. 41:653–60. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.571935. PMID: 20185784.
21. Olmez I, Ozyurt H. 2012; Reactive oxygen species and ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Neurochem Int. 60:208–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2011.11.009. PMID: 22122807.
22. Admasu FT, Demissie B, Yitbarek GY, Geto Z, Tesfaw A, Zewde EA, Tilahun A, Walle G, Bekele TT, Habte ML, Feyisa TO, Amare TJ, Alebachew W, Asnakew S, Sisay E, Tiruneh M, Yemata GA, Aytenew TM, Dejenie TA. Evaluation of total oxidative stress and antioxidant capacity of brain tumour patients attending referral hospitals in Addis Ababa, 2020: a comparative cross-sectional study. Ecancermedicalscience 2022;16:1391. 10.3332/ecancer.2022.1391 35919224 PMC9300404
23. Feigin VL, Mensah GA, Norrving B, Murray CJ, Roth GA. 2015; Atlas of the global burden of stroke (1990-2013): the GBD 2013 study. Neuroepidemiology. 45:230–6. DOI: 10.1159/000441106. PMID: 26505985. PMCID: PMC4630023.
24. Guo C, Wang S, Duan J, Jia N, Zhu Y, Ding Y, Guan Y, Wei G, Yin Y, Xi M, Wen A. 2017; Protocatechualdehyde protects against cerebral ischemia-reperfusion-induced oxidative injury via protein kinase Cε/Nrf2/HO-1 pathway. Mol Neurobiol. 54:833–45. DOI: 10.1007/s12035-016-9690-z. PMID: 26780453.
25. Scrimgeour AG, Condlin ML. 2014; Nutritional treatment for traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 31:989–99. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2013.3234. PMID: 24605947.
26. Vahidinia Z, Joghataei MT, Beyer C, Karimian M, Tameh AA. 2021; G-protein-coupled receptors and ischemic stroke: a focus on molecular function and therapeutic potential. Mol Neurobiol. 58:4588–614. DOI: 10.1007/s12035-021-02435-5. PMID: 34120294.
27. Kubis AM, Piwowar A. 2015; The new insight on the regulatory role of the vitamin D3 in metabolic pathways characteristic for cancerogenesis and neurodegenerative diseases. Ageing Res Rev. 24:126–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2015.07.008. PMID: 26238411.
28. Daubail B, Jacquin A, Guilland JC, Khoumri C, Aboa-Eboulé C, Giroud M, Béjot Y. 2014; Association between serum concentration of vitamin D and 1-year mortality in stroke patients. Cerebrovasc Dis. 37:364–7. DOI: 10.1159/000362534. PMID: 24970287.
29. Tuñón J, Cristóbal C, Tarín N, Aceña Á, González-Casaus ML, Huelmos A, Alonso J, Lorenzo Ó, González-Parra E, Mahíllo-Fernández I, Pello AM, Carda R, Farré J, Rodríguez-Artalejo F, López-Bescós L, Egido J. 2014; Coexistence of low vitamin D and high fibroblast growth factor-23 plasma levels predicts an adverse outcome in patients with coronary artery disease. PLoS One. 9:e95402. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095402. PMID: 24748388. PMCID: PMC3991663.
30. Pál É, Hricisák L, Lékai Á, Nagy D, Fülöp Á, Erben RG, Várbíró S, Sándor P, Benyó Z. 2020; Ablation of vitamin D signaling compromises cerebrovascular adaptation to carotid artery occlusion in mice. Cells. 9:1457. DOI: 10.3390/cells9061457. PMID: 32545499. PMCID: PMC7349396.
31. Holick MF. 2007; Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 357:266–81. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra070553. PMID: 17634462.
32. Fu J, Xue R, Gu J, Xiao Y, Zhong H, Pan X, Ran R. 2013; Neuroprotective effect of calcitriol on ischemic/reperfusion injury through the NR3A/CREB pathways in the rat hippocampus. Mol Med Rep. 8:1708–14. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2013.1734. PMID: 24141895.
33. Sadeghian N, Shadman J, Moradi A, Ghasem Golmohammadi M, Panahpour H. 2019; Calcitriol protects the blood-brain barrier integrity against ischemic stroke and reduces vasogenic brain edema via antioxidant and antiapoptotic actions in rats. Brain Res Bull. 150:281–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2019.06.010. PMID: 31220552.
34. Vahidinia Z, Karimian M, Joghataei MT. 2020; Neurosteroids and their receptors in ischemic stroke: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities. Pharmacol Res. 160:105163. DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105163. PMID: 32846212.
35. Han J, Wang M, Jing X, Shi H, Ren M, Lou H. 2014; (-)-Epigallocatechin gallate protects against cerebral ischemia-induced oxidative stress via Nrf2/ARE signaling. Neurochem Res. 39:1292–9. DOI: 10.1007/s11064-014-1311-5. PMID: 24792731.
36. Cantó C, Auwerx J. 2009; Pgc-1alpha, SIRT1 and AMPK, an energy sensing network that controls energy expenditure. Curr Opin Lipidol. 20:98–105. DOI: 10.1097/MOL.0b013e328328d0a4. PMID: 19276888. PMCID: PMC3627054.
37. Wareski P, Vaarmann A, Choubey V, Safiulina D, Liiv J, Kuum M, Kaasik A. 2009; Pgc-1{alpha} and Pgc-1{beta} regulate mitochondrial density in neurons. J Biol Chem. 284:21379–85. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M109.018911. PMID: 19542216. PMCID: PMC2755862.
38. Gutsaeva DR, Carraway MS, Suliman HB, Demchenko IT, Shitara H, Yonekawa H, Piantadosi CA. 2008; Transient hypoxia stimulates mitochondrial biogenesis in brain subcortex by a neuronal nitric oxide synthase-dependent mechanism. J Neurosci. 28:2015–24. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5654-07.2008. PMID: 18305236. PMCID: PMC6671843.
39. St-Pierre J, Drori S, Uldry M, Silvaggi JM, Rhee J, Jäger S, Handschin C, Zheng K, Lin J, Yang W, Simon DK, Bachoo R, Spiegelman BM. 2006; Suppression of reactive oxygen species and neurodegeneration by the PGC-1 transcriptional coactivators. Cell. 127:397–408. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.024. PMID: 17055439.
40. Chan PH. 2001; Reactive oxygen radicals in signaling and damage in the ischemic brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 21:2–14. DOI: 10.1097/00004647-200101000-00002. PMID: 11149664.

Fig. 1
Typical photographs of brain sections stained by 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) (A) and quantitative analysis of the cerebral infarction volumes (B), respectively. No ischemic lesion was detected in the sham rats. In the vehicle group, brain slices stained with TTC showed a massive infarct region, and treatment with calcitriol decreased the infarction volume. All data are reported as mean±SD (n=4 per group). **P<0.01.
acb-59-2-298-f1.tif
Fig. 2
Comprehensive evaluation of neurological deficits and treatment effects across multiple parameters. (A) Behavioral scoring in sham, stroke (vehicle), and calcitriol groups. (B) Activity. (C) Forepaw outstretching. (D) Walking. (E) Climbing. (F) Proprioception. (G) Vibrissae. Neurological deficit was enhanced in vehicle-exposed rats when compared with the sham group, and dramatically reduced in the calcitriol group compared with the vehicle group. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001.
acb-59-2-298-f2.tif
Fig. 3
Nissl staining for evaluation of neuronal cell injury in different groups. (A) Representative image of the Sham group showing normal neuronal morphology. (B) Representative image of the Stroke (vehicle-exposed) group showing increased dead neurons. (C) Representative image of the calcitriol-treated group showing reduced neuronal death. (D) Quantitative analysis of dead neurons per mm2 in the three groups. Neuronal cell death was enhanced in vehicle-exposed rats compared with the sham group and was dramatically reduced in the calcitriol group compared with the vehicle group (n=4 per group). Stain method: Nissl staining. Magnification: ×400. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
acb-59-2-298-f3.tif
Fig. 4
The impacts of calcitriol on SIRT1 and PGC-1α mRNA expression. (A) Relative SIRT1 mRNA expression (fold change) in the sham, vehicle (stroke), and calcitriol groups. (B) Relative PGC-1α mRNA expression (fold change) in different groups. SIRT1 expression was downregulated in the vehicle group compared with the sham group and significantly increased after calcitriol treatment compared with the vehicle group. PGC-1α expression was lower in the vehicle group compared with the sham group, with a further slight decrease in the calcitriol group. Data are presented as mean±SEM (n=4 per group). *P<0.05, **P<0.01.
acb-59-2-298-f4.tif
Fig. 5
Calcitriol effects on ischemia/reperfusion-induced oxidative stress. (A) Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) levels (μmol/L) in the sham, stroke (vehicle), and calcitriol groups. TAC levels decreased in the stroke group compared with the sham group and were significantly increased after calcitriol treatment. (B) Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels (μmol/L) in the sham, stroke, and calcitriol groups. MDA levels were elevated in the stroke group compared with the sham group and were significantly reduced in the calcitriol group. (C) Nitric oxide (NO) contents (μmol/L) in the sham, stroke, and calcitriol groups. NO levels were increased in the stroke group compared with the sham group and were significantly decreased after calcitriol treatment. All data are reported as mean±SD (n=3 per group). *P<0.05, **P<0.01.
acb-59-2-298-f5.tif
Table 1
Primer sequences used in this study
Primer name Sequence (5′ to 3′) Size (bp)
SIRT1 Forward: TTGCTGCAGACGTGGTAATG
Reverse: TAGGGTCAGAAAGGCTTTGC
231
PGC1-α Forward: GTGGATGAAGACGGATTGCC
Reverse: GGTGTGGTTTGCATGGTTCT
219
HPRT Forward: GCTCGAGATGTCATGAAGGAGA
Reverse: TCAGCGCTTTAATGTAATCCAGC
109
TOOLS
Similar articles