Journal List > Pediatr Emerg Med J > v.13(2) > 1516095335

Abuhadi and Alawi: A pediatric case of cecal volvulus with literature review

Abstract

Cecal volvulus is a rare condition, particularly in the pediatric population, and is associated with serious complications such as ischemia, gangrene, or perforation. Its clinical presentation is often vague and variable, which may delay diagnosis. We present a case of a 10-year-old female who presented to the emergency department with an acute abdomen. Imaging findings showed bowel obstruction, and she subsequently underwent an emergency laparotomy, which confirmed the presence of cecal volvulus. She recovered well and was discharged in stable condition. This case highlights the importance of early recognition and timely management of cecal volvulus to achieve successful outcomes and is supported by a review of the relevant literature.

Introduction

Cecal volvulus is an uncommon presentation in adults, constituting 1.9% of intestinal obstructions in the United States (1). It is presumed to be even rarer in pediatric patients (2,3). Nonspecific presentation of this condition might delay diagnosis or timely intervention, thereby raising the risk of serious complications such as strangulation, perforation, or peritonitis (4). Due to limited data, we aimed to stratify the surgical management of cecal volvulus and to conclude an integrated management approach.

Case

A 10-year-old girl with poor dietary habits presented to the emergency department with a history of chronic constipation since the age of 2 years, associated with diffuse abdominal pain and bilious vomiting. Upon physical examination, she looked sick and febrile. The initial vital signs were as follows: blood pressure, 105/67 mmHg; heart rate, 105 beats/minute; respiratory rate, 20 breaths/minute; temperature, 38 °C; and oxygen saturation, 99% on room air. The abdomen was diffusely distended and tender with no signs of rigidity. The rectum was full of hard stool during the digital rectal examination.
Laboratory investigations showed a C-reactive protein concentration of 10.9 mg/L, with unremarkable findings of complete blood count, serum electrolytes, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine. Plain abdominal radiography showed no signs of perforation, but a dilated colon (Figure 1). A high suspicion of intestinal obstruction was raised. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis suggested the presence of a high-grade obstruction due to colonic volvulus (Figure 2).
Given the hemodynamic stability, as well as the absence of signs of peritoneal irritation, ischemia, or perforation, an initial trial of colonoscopic detorsion was considered reasonable. This approach served diagnostic and potentially therapeutic purposes since computed tomography findings did not clearly define which segment of the colon was twisted. The patient was resuscitated with intravenous hydration along with empirical antibiotics. Then she was taken to the operating room for an initial attempt at colonoscopic detorsion under general anesthesia; if unsuccessful, she would proceed to laparotomy. We found the rectum and sigmoid full of stool, failing to decompress the abdomen. At the same setting, since she remained stable intraoperatively, a trial of laparoscopic exploration through an umbilical port was made. However, it was converted to laparotomy as the dilated bowel obscured the underlying pathology. Upon the laparotomy, cecal volvulus was encountered with no signs of ischemia (Figure 3). We proceeded with detorsion of the cecal volvulus, appendectomy, colonic deflation via appendectomy opening, and cecopexy.
The patient was shifted to the intensive care unit for 48 hours of observation, then was discharged in good condition on day 5. She was followed up in the clinic for several weeks, where lifestyle modifications and referral to a gastroenterologist were recommended to avoid constipation. There was no reported incidence of recurrence after 3 years.

Discussion

This literature review encompassed case reports, case series, and systematic reviews published from 2017 through 2024 on cecal volvulus in patients younger than 18 years (514), focusing particularly on risk factors, such as comorbidities, surgical history, and chronic constipation, operative management, and recurrence (Table). Studies were excluded if they involved late operative interventions, such as cases of ischemic or perforated viscus necessitating resection.
Cecal volvulus is more commonly seen in adults than in the pediatric population (15,16). Literature shows different results regarding the most common locations of colonic volvulus. Cecal volvulus was observed in 2 cases in a case series consisting of 7 cases (17), whereas it was seen in only 1 case in a 28-case series (18). In a series of 19 cases, 14 were cecal volvulus (4). This difference likely reflects small sample sizes and heterogeneous study populations of the 3 studies (4,17,18).
Cecal volvulus is thought to be caused by a long redundant cecum due to failure of its fixation to the retroperitoneum (19). Reported risk factors include previous abdominal surgeries, prolonged fecal loading, and dysmotility with associated colonic distention, particularly in patients with neurodevelopmental delay and chronic constipation. In some series, a history of Nissen fundoplication has been noted. Patients can develop postoperative gas bloating, which impairs belching and normal decompression of the small intestine and cecum (24,17,20). This may contribute to increased gaseous colonic distention and, eventually, cecal volvulus.
It is crucial to raise the index of clinical suspicion in diagnosing colonic volvulus. Clinical manifestations suggestive of high-grade intestinal obstruction may also overlap with those of other causes of obstruction. Despite early conservative management, the clinical overlap was described in several reports where rapid deterioration occurred, ultimately requiring surgical interventions that revealed an intraoperative finding of ischemic changes mandating resection (5,21). The use of plain radiography is important for visualizing features of obstruction and guiding management although it is more likely to be diagnosed intraoperatively (22).
Surgical resection of the twisted colonic segments remains the therapeutic modality of choice in adults. Still, its role is debatable in pediatric patients where management decisions are largely guided by case reports and personal experience (6,23). In children with uncomplicated conditions, various procedures have been proposed, including release of obstructing bands, detorsion, appendectomy, or cecopexy. Of these, cecopexy is often preferred, as reported by Miura da Costa and Saxena (2) in their systematic review, due to its association with a lower risk of recurrence (P = 0.002). Nevertheless, regardless of age, segmental resection with or without need for stoma is still considered the mainstay in case of complicated volvulus with any evidence of ischemic changes, gangrene, or perforation (19,24).
Colonoscopic detorsion is known to be a bridge to surgery despite its known risk of high recurrence within 6 weeks (7,25,26). Hence, some authors have suggested its use as a temporary measure to optimize low-risk or stable patients in whom no signs of peritonitis are present, before definitive surgical treatment (2,17,27). In this review, 3 cases were approached with nonoperative treatment, including gastric decompression as a conservative treatment for suspected adhesive bowel obstruction on day 4 post-appendectomy, and colonoscopic detorsion with or without rectal tube insertion. Two of the 3 cases required operation with resection and anastomosis, either due to the development of complications such as gangrene, necrosis, or recurrence after conservative therapy (5,7,8).
In conclusion, pediatric cecal volvulus is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition. Early diagnosis and prompt intervention are critical to prevent bowel ischemia and serious complications. The selection of an appropriate surgical management should be individualized, depending on the patient’s stability and the extent of bowel compromise. We recommend resection with or without anastomosis in case of compromised bowel viability or hemodynamic instability. In uncomplicated cases, we prefer detorsion with cecopexy as the addition of cecopexy has more advantages over other techniques in terms of morbidity and recurrence.

Notes

Author contributions

All the work was done by the authors.

Conflicts of interest

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Funding sources

No funding source relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Halabi WJ, Jafari MD, Kang CY, Nguyen VQ, Carmichael JC, Mills S, et al. Colonic volvulus in the United States: trends, outcomes, and predictors of mortality. Ann Surg. 2014; 259:293–301.
2. Miura da Costa K, Saxena AK. A systematic review of the management and outcomes of cecal and appendiceal volvulus in children. Acta Paediatr. 2018; 107:2054–8.
crossref
3. Vo NJ, O'Hara SM, Alonso MH. Cecal volvulus: a rare cause of bowel obstruction in a pediatric patient diagnosed pre-operatively by conventional imaging studies. Pediatr Radiol. 2005; 35:1128–31.
crossref
4. Marine MB, Cooper ML, Delaney LR, Jennings SG, Rescorla FJ, Karmazyn B. Diagnosis of pediatric colonic volvulus with abdominal radiography: how good are we? Pediatr Radiol. 2017; 47:404–10.
crossref
5. Saiad MO, Aballa N. Cecal volvulus in children. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2021; 18:174–6.
crossref
6. Tannouri S, Hendi A, Gilje E, Grissom L, Katz D. Pediatric colonic volvulus: A single-institution experience and review. J Pediatr Surg. 2017; 52:1062–6.
crossref
7. van de Lagemaat M, Blink M, Bakx R, de Meij TG. Cecal volvulus in children: is there place for colonoscopic decompression? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018; 66:e59–60.
8. Shahramian I, Bazil A, Ebadati D, Rostami K, Delaramnasab M. Colonoscopic decompression of childhood sigmoid and cecal volvulus. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2018; 29:221–5.
9. Zouari M, Ben Ameur H, Ben Saad N, Kraiem N, Rhaiem W, Mhiri R, et al. Cecal volvulus: an uncommon diagnosis in a child with Down's syndrome. Arch Iran Med. 2023; 26:117–8.
crossref
10. Alzahrani L, Joueidi F, Abodahab FM, Joueidi K, Khan A. Explorative laparotomy of cecal volvulus in a pediatric patient. A case report and review of literature. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2024; 117:109495.
11. Khanal N, Subedi R, Shrestha N, Pradhan SB, Shah P, Shrestha S, et al. Cecal volvulus following appendectomy in a teenage patient: A case report. Clin Case Rep. 2024; 12:e8480.
crossref
12. Benmassaoud Z, Baldé FB, Alaoui O, Mahmoudi A, Khattala K, Bouabdallah Y. Caecal volvulus: a report of three paediatric cases. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2023; 20:318–20.
13. Shehata AE, Helal MA, Ibrahim EA, Magdy B, El Seoudy M, Shaban M, et al. Cecal volvulus in a child with congenital dilated cardiomyopathy: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020; 66:30–2.
14. Loureiro SO, Lynch T, Medeiros BJ, Merritt N, Lim R. A rare case of cecal bascule in a child with normal neurodevelopment. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020; 36:e168–71.
crossref
15. Ballantyne GH, Brandner MD, Beart RW, Ilstrup DM. Volvulus of the colon. Incidence and mortality. Ann Surg. 1985; 202:83–92.
16. Habre J, Sautot-Vial N, Marcotte C, Benchimol D. Caecal volvulus. Am J Surg. 2008; 196:e48–9.
crossref
17. Samuel M, Boddy SA, Nicholls E, Capps S. Large bowel volvulus in childhood. Aust N Z J Surg. 2000; 70:258–62.
crossref
18. Ameh EA, Nmadu PT. Intestinal volvulus: aetiology, morbidity, and mortality in Nigerian children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2000; 16:50–2.
crossref
19. Madiba TE, Thomson SR. The management of cecal volvulus. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002; 45:264–7.
crossref
20. Takada K, Hamada Y, Sato M, Fujii Y, Teraguchi M, Kaneko K, et al. Cecal volvulus in children with mental disability. Pediatr Surg Int. 2007; 23:1011–4.
crossref
21. Lee EK, Kim JE, Lee YY, Kim S, Choi KH. A case of cecal volvulus presenting with chronic constipation in lissencephaly. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2013; 16:131–4.
crossref
22. Hasbahceci M, Basak F, Alimoglu O. Cecal volvulus. Indian J Surg. 2012; 74:476–9.
crossref
23. Alavi K, Poylin V, Davids JS, Patel SV, Felder S, Valente MA, et al. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the management of colonic volvulus and acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum. 2021; 64:1046–57.
24. Lee SY, Bhaduri M. Cecal volvulus. CMAJ. 2013; 185:684.
crossref
25. Ismail A. Recurrent colonic volvulus in children. J Pediatr Surg. 1997; 32:1739–42.
26. Renzulli P, Maurer CA, Netzer P, Büchler MW. Preoperative colonoscopic derotation is beneficial in acute colonic volvulus. Dig Surg. 2002; 19:223–9.
crossref
27. Shah SS, Louie JP, Fein JA. Cecal volvulus in childhood. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2002; 18:300–2.

Fig. 1.
A plain radiograph showing gaseous dilatation (8 cm) at the left upper abdomen (asterisk) and fecal impaction in the rectum and distal colon (arrow).
pemj-2026-01571f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Computed tomography scans showing the dilated colon with multiple air-fluid levels (A, arrows) and swirl sign at the right paramedian aspect of the mid-abdomen at the superior mesenteric vessels (B, curved arrow).
pemj-2026-01571f2.tif
Fig. 3.
Operative findings, demonstrating the dilated cecum and ascending colon with volvulus formation. A point of twisting on the appendix (A, arrow) is seen with no sign of ischemia on the terminal ileum (B, curved arrow) and on the cecum (B, asterisk).
pemj-2026-01571f3.tif
Table.
Reported pediatric cases of cecal volvulus: patient characteristics, management, and outcomes
Study Year Age (y)/sex Morbidities/surgical history Constipation Initial management and outcomes
Alzahrani et al. (10) 2024 12/Male Epilepsy, ectodermal dysplasia Yes Detorsion, appendectomy, and cecopexy
Benmassaoud et al. (12) 2023 11/Female Growth, mental retardation Yes Resection and anastomosis (the area of volvulus was atretic)
6/Female No No Cecopexy
Loureiro et al. (14) 2017 10/Male No No Release of several bands with detorsion and appendectomy
No recurrence (unknown follow-up period)
Khanal et al. (11) 2024 14/Female No/appendectomy during the hospital stay No Decompressive loop ileostomy and cecopexy*
No recurrences of 6-wk follow-up
Saiad et al. (5) 2024 8/Male No No Detorsion, appendectomy, and no cecopexy
No recurrences of 3-y follow-up
11/Male No/appendectomy 4 d back No Conservative with a nasogastric intubation; after 1 d, segmental resection of gangrenous cecum and right colon + ileo-transverse anastomosis
No recurrence during 3-y follow-up
Shahramian et al. (8) 2018 10/Female No NA Colonoscopic detorsion (as she was stable)
No recurrence during 6-mo follow-up
Shehata et al. (13) 2020 3/Female Dilated cardiomyopathy No Release of the band with detorsion, appendectomy, and cecopexy
No recurrence during 2-y follow-up
Tannouri et al. (6) 2017 NA Four cases NA Two cases of cecopexy (1 recurrence ended by resection)
van de Lagemaatet al. (7) 2018 14/Male Severe kyphosis, spastic tetraparesis secondary to pontocerebellar hypoplasia No Colonoscopic detorsion and rectal tube (he was at high risk for mechanical ventilation)
Recurrence after 6 wk
Zouari et al. (9) 2023 12/Female Down syndrome Yes Cecal detorsion, cecopexy, and appendectomy
No recurrence during 4-y follow-up

* Due to the difficulty of detorsion of volvulus.

Ileocecal resection with end-to-end anastomosis was performed to prevent recurrence.

TOOLS
Similar articles