Journal List > Ann Lab Med > v.46(3) > 1516095230

Shin, Choi, Lim, and Kang: Reference Values for Extended Lymphocyte Subsets in Korean Children: A Multicenter Study Using the EuroFlow PIDOT Panel

Abstract

Background

Current reference intervals for lymphocyte subpopulations are primarily based on Western populations, with limited data available for Korean children, particularly for extended subsets. We determined absolute cell counts and percentages of lymphocyte subpopulations in Korean children, according to age and sex.

Methods

Samples from 92 children—stratified into two age groups, groups 1 (5–9 yrs) and 2 (10–17 yrs)—were obtained. Immunophenotyping was performed via flow cytometry using the Primary Immunodeficiency Orientation Tube (PIDOT) panel, primarily classifying the cells into T, B, and natural killer cell populations. T lymphocytes were divided into CD4+, CD8+, and CD4CD8 subsets; T and B cells were further subdivided according to their maturation stage.

Results

Children in group 1 exhibited higher absolute counts of total B cells, unswitched memory B cells/plasma cells, total T cells, CD4+ naïve cells, and TCRγδ+ T cells than those in group 2. In contrast, Group 2 children showed higher absolute counts of CD4+ effector memory (EM) T cells. Males had higher absolute counts of total B cells, particularly pre-germinal center B cells, CD4+ EM cells, and CD8+ terminally differentiated T cells, whereas females showed higher proportions of CD4+, CD4+ naïve, and CD8+ central memory/transitional memory T cells.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to establish reference values for extended lymphocyte subsets in Korean children using the PIDOT panel. Age, sex, and laboratory-related factors influenced lymphocyte subset distributions. These findings may serve as reference data for immune disorders and immunotherapy in pediatric populations.

INTRODUCTION

Inborn errors of immunity (IEIs), which include and expand beyond primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs), represent a heterogeneous group of primary immune system defects that encompass a comprehensive range of approximately 485 distinct clinical disorders [1]. For certain immunodeficiency disorders classified as IEIs, particularly severe combined PIDs, ascertaining decreased lymphocyte subpopulations as a part of the diagnostic procedure is essential. Immunophenotypic abnormalities range from the total absence of a specific cell population to subtle variations in the differentiated states of specific subpopulations [2]. Establishing reference intervals for each well-defined subset of peripheral blood lymphocytes in healthy children and adolescents across age groups is essential, as individuals can be diagnosed as having IEIs at various ages. This necessity is especially crucial for subsets that serve as reliable indicators of the maturation and activation status [3].
Reference intervals have been established for major lymphocyte subsets, including helper T cells, cytotoxic T cells, B cells, and natural killer (NK) cells [413]. More recent data provided reference intervals for extended subgroups of lymphocytes [3, 14, 15]. However, because most of these studies were conducted abroad and most manufacturers are based in Europe or the United States, manufacturer-provided immunological reference intervals are commonly adopted based on those populations. Given the potential inadequacy of these intervals in accounting for racial and ethnic differences, establishing a reference interval specific to a Korean population is imperative. However, relatively few studies have been conducted to investigate the reference values of lymphocyte subsets in Korean children [16, 17], and notably, no study has provided references for extended lymphocyte subgroups.
We used the Primary Immunodeficiency Orientation Tube (PIDOT) panel (Cytognos SL, Salamanca, Spain), which was developed as part of the EuroFlow Consortium. The PIDOT panel was designed for comprehensive immunophenotypic screening and classifying PIDs of the lymphoid system. The PIDOT panel consists of 12 antibodies distinguished by eight fluorophores and enables differentiation of the following T cell and B cell subtypes: pre-germinal center B cells (preGC cells; including immature/transitional and naïve B cells); post-germinal center B cells (postGC cells; including unswitched B cells [IgM+IgD+, IgM+IgD, and IgMIgD+ cells]); Ig-switched memory B cells (MBCs); plasma cells (PCs); and T cells based on their maturation level, including naïve, central memory/transitional memory (CM/TM), effector memory (EM), and terminally differentiated (TD) T cells [18].
To mitigate potential bias, samples were procured from three geographically diverse hospitals in Korea to ascertain the lymphocyte subpopulations. We determined the relative and absolute counts of lymphocyte subpopulations according to age and sex in Korean children aged 5–17 yrs without immunological or hematological disorders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Samples

Samples from participants were collected at three university hospitals (Pusan National University Hospital [Busan, Korea], Chonnam National University Hospital [Gwangju, Korea], Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital [Seoul, Korea]) from August 2020 to June 2021 to reflect the geographical diversity of Korea. Remnant samples originally collected from children aged 5–17 yrs for complete blood count analysis were included based on the absence of suspected immunological, hematological, or infectious conditions. We excluded individuals with a history of autoimmune or blood disorders, those receiving treatment or immunotherapy, those with symptoms consistent with infection, or those who had recently received a blood transfusion. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Board of each hospital (approval numbers 1912-005-085, CNUH-2020-215, and XC20SIDI0165). A consent waiver was obtained from each Institutional Ethics Review Board, as this was a non-interventional study. Participants were categorized into two age-based groups: Group 1 included children aged 5–9 yrs, and Group 2 included those aged 10–17 yrs.
All tests were conducted under a harmonized protocol agreed upon by the three participating hospitals. All samples were processed on the day of blood collection, with strict adherence to the manufacturer’s standard protocols in terms of sample volume, reagent quantities, and all procedural steps. Variability in the testing procedures across all three laboratories was evaluated using evaluation data from the external quality control program for lymphocyte subset analysis, administered by the Korean Association of External Quality Assessment Service.

Staining protocols

The PIDOT panel comprised a vial of 10 pre-mixed antibodies and two single-antibody vials, each labeled with one of eight different fluorophores. This multicolor flow cytometry panel enabled the analysis of 20 lymphocyte subtypes. Two similarly labeled monoclonal antibodies, defining two distinct populations, were mixed and labeled with the same fluorophore.
Antibodies against CD19 and T cell receptor (TCR) γδ (both conjugated to PE-Cyanine7), CD4 and IgM (PerCP-Cyanine 5.5), and CD8 and IgD (FITC) were used to detect two markers in the same channel. PE-conjugated antibodies against CD16 and CD56 were used to identify NK cells. In addition, two monoclonal antibodies against CD27 (BV421) and CD45RA (BV510) were added to a pre-mixed combination of anti-CD3 (APC) and anti-CD45 (APC-C750) antibodies. Sample preparation, staining, and acquisition were performed according to a standardized protocol developed based on the manufacturer’s instructions.

Acquisition and analysis of flow cytometry data

Tests were performed in three laboratories affiliated with different hospitals using Navios (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), Navios EX (Beckman Coulter), and FACS CantoII (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) instruments. A minimum of 20×103 nucleated cells was obtained. The gating markers, definitions of the T, B, and NK cell subpopulations, and flow cytometric gating strategy are provided in the supplemental data (See Supplemental Data Table S1 and Fig. S1). After initially gating leukocytes based on CD45 expression and lymphocytes based on forward scatter and side scatter characteristics, we subsequently identified CD3+, CD19+TCRγδ+, and CD16+CD56+ cells to initially classify T, B, and NK cells, respectively. T and B cells were defined based on the expression of CD3 and CD19, respectively, and T cells were further categorized into TCRγδ+ or TCRγδ subsets. T cell subsets were further classified into distinct subcategories: naïve, CM/TM, EM, and TD CD4+/CD8+ T cells based on CD45RA and CD27 expression. Furthermore, the population of CD4CD8 (double negative) T cells was characterized. B cell subsets were subsequently classified into preGC cells, postGC cells, unswitched MBCs/PCs, switched MBCs/PCs, and IgD+IgM postGC cells based on IgD, IgM, and CD27 expression [19].
Flow cytometry data (in Flow Cytometry Standard format) from three hospitals were collected and analyzed at a single site in Busan, using a standardized analysis template and report format created using Kaluza analysis software (Beckman Coulter). The list-mode data from all samples were further analyzed with the template.

Statistical analysis

Numerical variables did not follow a normal distribution using the Shapiro–Wilk test; thus, the data are presented as medians and ranges. Differences between the groups were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, the Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test, or ANOVA. P was calculated primarily using a linear mixed-effect model, with adjustments for sex and instrumentation. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. All analyses were performed using R software, version 4.4.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

RESULTS

Extended lymphocyte subsets were analyzed for 92 participants; Table 1 summarizes their distributions based on age and sex. Scatter plots illustrating age-related changes in lymphocyte subsets, showing the absolute cell counts (/μL) and percentages (%) for each participant, are presented in Fig. 1.
As expected, Group 1 (5–9 yrs) exhibited higher percentages of lymphocytes than did Group 2 (10–17 yrs). Among the distinct subpopulations of T cells studied, the absolute counts of naïve and memory CD4+ T cells (CM/TM and EM) and TCRγδ+ T cells demonstrated differences between the age groups (Tables 2 and 3). Group 1 had higher absolute counts of total T cells and TCRγδ+ T cells but lower counts of CD4+ T cells (CM/TM and EM) than did Group 2 (Table 2). These differences were also reflected in terms of percentages (Table 3). Among the B cell subpopulations, the absolute counts of total B cells and unswitched MBCs/PCs were significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2; however, no significant differences were found in their overall proportions (Tables 2 and 3). Conversely, the absolute count and proportion of NK cells increased in Group 2; however, these differences were not statistically significant.
Within Group 1, no significant sex-based differences in absolute lymphocyte counts were observed, except for the absolute counts of total lymphocytes and TD CD8+CD27 cells. In Group 2, the CD4+ EM and CD8+ TD T cell counts were higher in males than in females. No significant differences were observed in the absolute count of other T cell subpopulations based on sex (Table 2, Fig. 2). However, the percentages of CD4+ and CD4+ naïve T cells were higher in females, and the percentages of total B cells were higher in males (Table 3, Fig. 2). The total B cells, particularly, preGC B cells, exhibited higher absolute counts and percentages in males in Group 2 (Fig. 2).

DISCUSSION

This study represents the first multicenter investigation in Korea to establish reference data for extended lymphocyte subpopulations in pediatric populations. Although several investigators have proposed reference values for lymphocyte subsets (including extended subpopulations) over the last few decades, control studies focusing on children remain limited [3, 20, 21], particularly among Asian populations [22]. Research on the reference values for lymphocyte subsets is limited [23], with only two studies focusing on pediatric populations [16, 17].
Lymphocyte counts demonstrate a gradual exponential decline as individuals transition from childhood to adulthood after the first year of life. In our study, the lymphocyte counts in Group 2 were lower than those in Group 1. The results of a previous study conducted in Korea showed a similar age-related decline in lymphocyte counts [24]. This phenomenon can be attributed to a combination of various interconnected factors. These factors include gradual involution of the thymus, antigen exposure, transition from a naïve to a memory immune response associated with immunological learning, alterations in body size and blood volume because of growth, and gradual replacement of primary thymic output by peripheral cell division with aging [25].
T cell subsets that differ in functions and phenotypes are distinguished by a combination of different cell surface proteins. Naïve T cells that reach maturity express three specific markers: CD45RA, CCR7, and CD28. When exposed to cognate antigens, cells transform from thymic precursors into effector cells; a fraction of these cells subsequently differentiate into subsets of memory T cells [26]. The central memory pool, which can exhibit sustained long-lived T cell memory in a stem cell–like manner, constituted most memory cell subsets in all age groups [14]. In this study, CM cells constituted the majority of the memory cells. In the older group, we observed a notable decline in the naïve T cell population and a corresponding increase in the memory T cell population. The CD4+ naïve cell:memory cell ratio was higher in Group 1 than in Group 2; nevertheless, the CD8+ naïve cell:memory cell ratio did not demonstrate statistical significance, perhaps because of a limited sample size. The current findings are consistent with those of an earlier study [14], indicating that the overall lymphocyte count declines with advancing age, suggesting that the naïve cell population declines steadily despite a tendency toward expansion of the memory cell population, particularly EM cells.
Although γδT cells constitute a minor population of T cells, they play crucial roles in innate and adaptive immunity. The article by Ding et al. [14] included 1,075 Chinese children, and their results indicated that the relative size of the γδT population gradually increased with age and peaked at 8–12 yrs of age. However, in this study, the absolute cell counts and relative proportion of the TCRγδ+ population tended to be lower in the older group than in the younger group. These findings underscore the importance of establishing population-specific reference ranges.
The absolute total and naïve B cell counts were high during the first year of life and gradually decreased thereafter, reaching a plateau with increasing age in children [3, 14]. The significantly higher absolute counts of preGC B cells and unswitched MBCs/PCs observed in Group 1 than in Group 2 reflect the physiological expansion and high output of B cells during early childhood. These findings correspond to ongoing bone marrow maturation and robust primary immune responses during early antigen encounters. Conversely, the relative decline of these populations in older children aligns with a shift from primary to memory-driven adaptive immunity.
We observed no significant changes in the absolute cell counts and proportions of NK cells across both groups. Previous studies yielded inconsistent findings regarding a steady decrease in NK cell counts beyond the age of 5 yrs [3, 14, 27]. These variations may reflect differences in the characteristics of the pediatric populations recruited for the different studies.
We observed higher B cell and CD4+ EM and CD8+ TD T cell counts in males than in females. Some subsets showed statistical differences between males and females, indicating that sex-related factors might influence lymphocyte development and differentiation [14].
We also observed inter-laboratory variations in the estimations of most T and B cell subpopulations despite standardized protocols and personnel-training procedures, including harmonized testing workflows agreed upon by all three hospitals and same-day sample processing following the manufacturer’s instructions (Supplemental Data Table S2 and S3). Considering the relatively wide variability among the flow cytometry results obtained within and between laboratories, such differences may be inherent and influenced by unavoidable technical and operational factors [28]. In addition to technical variables, such as different types of flow cytometers and different personnel, differences in postnatal exposure to antigens and geographical disparities in pathogen prevalence rates might also have led to variable results [29].
The reference values defined in the EuroFlow PIDOT panel in healthy controls from each age group in previous research [19] and in this study are shown in Fig. 3. Although a direct statistical comparison was not performed, the reference ranges in our cohort were descriptively compared with those reported previously to enable contextual interpretation. The distributions of values for each subset and subpopulation were generally similar to those reported in the previous study or tended to be narrower, except for preGC B cells in Group 2.
This study has some limitations. Although reference intervals are ideally established using samples from healthy community-based individuals, we utilized remnant samples from hospital-based pediatric patients undergoing routine blood testing and had no suspected immunological, hematological, or infectious conditions. To minimize confounding, individuals with suspected immunological, hematological, or infectious conditions, as well as those with autoimmune diseases, recent transfusion, or ongoing immunotherapy, were rigorously excluded based on clinical information. Nonetheless, the possibility of undiagnosed subclinical conditions cannot be entirely excluded. Similar hospital-based strategies were used in previous studies on pediatric lymphocyte reference values, such as those conducted by Tosato et al. [20] in Italy and Jodhawat et al. in India [30], which also involved strict exclusion criteria to approximate a healthy cohort. This approach facilitates practical data collection; however, future studies involving community-derived cohorts may be needed to further validate and generalize these reference ranges.
The second limitation is the relatively small sample size involved, particularly the lack of participants under 5 yrs of age. This age group can exhibit the most dynamic changes in lymphocyte subsets. However, we were unable to recruit suitable participants because of clinical and ethical constraints. In infants and toddlers, the limited volume of blood permissible for clinical testing introduced difficulties in obtaining sufficient residual samples for research use. Nevertheless, the overall sample size in this study was larger than that employed in a previous study using the PIDOT panel [19]. Further studies with larger sample sizes, specifically those including children under 5 yrs of age, are warranted to establish more comprehensive and age-specific reference values for lymphocyte subpopulations.
The third limitation is that we used a manual gating strategy instead of the manufacturer-recommended Automated Gating & Identification (AG&I) module. Lymphocyte subset analysis was conducted using manual gating with Kaluza software. Although this method enables expert-guided flexibility and is widely used in clinical practice, it may introduce inter-operator variability because of its subjective nature. The manufacturer of the EuroFlow PIDOT panel recommends using Infinicyt software (Cytognos SL) with the AG&I module for more standardized and reproducible analyses using a reference-based algorithm. However, the Infinicyt software was unavailable at all participating centers in this multicenter study, primarily due to software licensing and training constraints. Although the AG&I module offers distinct advantages in harmonization and automation, the results of previous studies, including one by Linskens et al. [31], have demonstrated a high level of concordance between manual gating and AG&I in identifying lymphocyte subpopulations, supporting the validity of manual gating under controlled conditions.
In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, this multicenter study is the first to establish reference values for extended lymphocyte subpopulations in Korean children using the EuroFlow PIDOT panel. Significant age- and sex-related differences were identified across several lymphocyte subsets. Despite the use of standardized protocols and training, inter-laboratory variability was observed, emphasizing the need for harmonized methodological approaches. These findings highlight the importance of establishing population-specific reference ranges that account for both technical and biological variability in clinical immunophenotyping. The reference values established in this study may serve as a valuable resource for diagnosing immune disorders and monitoring immunotherapy in pediatric patients.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We gratefully acknowledge Yuwon Kim for his assistance with the statistical analyses and figure preparation.

Notes

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Shin KH and Choi HW conducted the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the draft. Lim J and Kang ES conceived the study, analyzed the data, and finalized the draft. All authors discussed the data, reviewed the manuscript, and approved the final version.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None declared.

RESEARCH FUNDING

None declared.

Appendix

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary materials can be found via https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2025.0241.

REFERENCES

1. Bousfiha A, Moundir A, Tangye SG, Picard C, Jeddane L, Al-Herz W, et al. 2022; The 2022 update of IUIS phenotypical classification for human inborn errors of immunity. J Clin Immunol. 42:1508–20. DOI: 10.1007/s10875-022-01352-z. PMID: 36198931.
2. Kanegane H, Hoshino A, Okano T, Yasumi T, Wada T, Takada H, et al. 2018; Flow cytometry-based diagnosis of primary immunodeficiency diseases. Allergol Int. 67:43–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.alit.2017.06.003. PMID: 28684198. PMID: 8ebd6cfe06e64dfcbe7cf81567adaa1c.
3. Garcia-Prat M, Álvarez-Sierra D, Aguiló-Cucurull A, Salgado-Perandrés S, Briongos-Sebastian S, Franco-Jarava C, et al. 2019; Extended immunophenotyping reference values in a healthy pediatric population. Cytom B Clin Cytom. 96:223–33. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21728. PMID: 30334372.
4. Kotylo PK, Fineberg NS, Freeman KS, Redmond NL, Charland C. 1993; Reference ranges for lymphocyte subsets in pediatric patients. Am J Clin Pathol. 100:111–5. DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/100.2.111. PMID: 8356941.
5. Panaro A, Amati A, Di Loreto M, Felle R, Ferrante M, Papadia A, et al. 1991; Lymphocyte subpopulations in pediatric age. Definition of reference values by flow cytometry. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 19:109–12. PMID: 1799167.
6. Erkeller-Yuksel FM, Deneys V, Yuksel B, Hannet I, Hulstaert F, Hamilton C, et al. 1992; Age-related changes in human blood lymphocyte subpopulations. J Pediatr. 120:216–22. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)80430-5. PMID: 1735817.
7. Comans-Bitter WM, de Groot R, van den Beemd R, Neijens HJ, Hop WCJ, Groeneveld K, et al. 1997; Immunophenotyping of blood lymphocytes in childhood. Reference values for lymphocyte subpopulations. J Pediatr. 130:388–93. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3476(97)70200-2. PMID: 9063413.
8. Thakar M, Saxena V, Janakiram N, Ravi V, Desai A, Singh S, et al. 2021; Reference ranges of different lymphocyte subsets in Indian children: a multi-centric study. Indian Pediatr. 58:424–9. DOI: 10.1007/s13312-021-2211-9. PMID: 33980728.
9. Shahabuddin S, al Ayed IH, el-Rab MO, Qureshi MI. 1998; Lymphocyte subset reference ranges in healthy Saudi Arabian children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 9:44–8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.1998.tb00300.x. PMID: 9560843.
10. Lisse IM, Aaby P, Whittle H, Jensen H, Engelmann M, Christensen LB. 1997; T-lymphocyte subsets in West African children: impact of age, sex, and season. J Pediatr. 130:77–85. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3476(97)70313-5. PMID: 9003854.
11. İkincioğulları A, Kendirli T, Doğu F, Eğin Y, Reisli İ, Cin S, et al. 2004; Peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets in healthy Turkish children. Turk J Pediatr. 46:125–30. PMID: 15214740. PMID: 7c56a4a556ed4a99bbea58b9653cc96e.
12. Bunders M, Cortina-Borja M, Newell ML. European Collaborative Study. 2005; Age-related standards for total lymphocyte, CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts in children born in Europe. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 24:595–600. DOI: 10.1097/01.inf.0000168835.01233.64. PMID: 15998999.
13. Lin SC, Chou CC, Tsai MJ, Wu KH, Huang MT, Wang LH, et al. 1998; Age-related changes in blood lymphocyte subsets of Chinese children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 9:215–20. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.1998.tb00376.x. PMID: 9920221.
14. Ding Y, Zhou L, Xia Y, Wang W, Wang Y, Li L, et al. 2018; Reference values for peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets of healthy children in China. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 142:970–3.e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.04.022. PMID: 29746882.
15. Payne H, Lawrie D, Nieuwoudt M, Cotton MF, Gibb DM, Babiker A, et al. 2020; Comparison of lymphocyte subset populations in children from South Africa, US and Europe. Front Pediatr. 8:406. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2020.00406. PMID: 32793531. PMCID: PMC7390891. PMID: feb32d442c5e4c70bc0b85fb795ad5eb.
16. Han SH, Kim CH, Cho BC, Park CJ. 2002; Reference values for peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets by flow cytometry. Korean J Clin Lab Sci. 34:30–5. PMID: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Reference+values+for+peripheral+blood+lymphocyte+subsets+by+flow+cytometry&publication=Korean+J+Clin+Lab+Sci&publication_year=2002.
17. Kim DU, Lee JS. 1996; Age related reference ranges for lymphocyte subsets in healthy Korean children. Clin Exp Pediatr. 39:264–72. PMID: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Age+related+reference+ranges+for+lymphocyte+subsets+in+healthy+Korean+children&publication=Clin+Exp+Pediatr.&publication_year=1996.
18. van Dongen JJM, van der Burg M, Kalina T, Perez-Andres M, Mejstrikova E, Vlkova M, et al. 2019; EuroFlow-based flowcytometric diagnostic screening and classification of primary immunodeficiencies of the lymphoid system. Front Immunol. 10:1271. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01271. PMID: 31263462. PMCID: PMC6585843. PMID: b18bb9cdc8a64f338a1f8f279e9c7898.
19. van der Burg M, Kalina T, Perez-Andres M, Vlkova M, Lopez-Granados E, Blanco E, et al. 2019; The EuroFlow PID orientation tube for flow cytometric diagnostic screening of primary immunodeficiencies of the lymphoid system. Front Immunol. 10:246. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00246. PMID: 30886612. PMCID: PMC6410673. PMID: 8b977927ec874c27be67072996c5a875.
20. Tosato F, Bucciol G, Pantano G, Putti MC, Sanzari MC, Basso G, et al. 2015; Lymphocytes subsets reference values in childhood. Cytometry A. 87:81–5. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.22520. PMID: 25132325.
21. Shearer WT, Rosenblatt HM, Gelman RS, Oyomopito R, Plaeger S, Stiehm ER, et al. 2003; Lymphocyte subsets in healthy children from birth through 18 years of age: the Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group P1009 study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 112:973–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.07.003. PMID: 14610491.
22. Lee BW, Yap HK, Chew FT, Quah TC, Prabhakaran K, Chan GSH, et al. 1996; Age- and sex-related changes in lymphocyte subpopulations of healthy Asian subjects: from birth to adulthood. Cytometry. 26:8–15. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19960315)26:1<8::AID-CYTO2>3.0.CO;2-E. PMID: 8809475.
23. Choi J, Lee SJ, Lee YA, Maeng HG, Lee JK, Kang YW. 2014; Reference values for peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets in a healthy Korean population. Immune Netw. 14:289–95. DOI: 10.4110/in.2014.14.6.289. PMID: 25550695. PMCID: PMC4275386.
24. Nah EH, Kim S, Cho S, Cho HI. 2018; Complete blood count reference intervals and patterns of changes across pediatric, adult, and geriatric ages in Korea. Ann Lab Med. 38:503–11. DOI: 10.3343/alm.2018.38.6.503. PMID: 30027692. PMCID: PMC6056383.
25. De Boer RJ, Perelson AS. 2013; Quantifying T lymphocyte turnover. J Theor Biol. 327:45–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.12.025. PMID: 23313150. PMCID: PMC3640348.
26. Hamann D, Baars PA, Rep MHG, Hooibrink B, Kerkhof-Garde SR, Klein MR, et al. 1997; Phenotypic and functional separation of memory and effector human CD8+ T cells. J Exp Med. 186:1407–18. DOI: 10.1084/jem.186.9.1407. PMID: 9348298. PMCID: PMC2199103.
27. Sack U, Gerling F, Tárnok A. 2007; Age-related lymphocyte subset changes in the peripheral blood of healthy children - a meta-study. Transfus Med Hemother. 34:176–81. DOI: 10.1159/000101357.
28. Park M, Choi HW, Lim J, Shin KH, Oh EJ, Song J, Kim KH, Jeong IH, Park JH, Hwang SH, Kang ES. 2025; Jun. 4. Considerations of Flow Cytometric Lymphocyte Subset Analysis in Korea Based on a Survey of Current Clinical Laboratory Practice. Ann Lab Med. Online ahead of print. DOI: 10.3343/alm.2025.0064. PMID: 40462209. PMCID: PMC12915368.
29. Burel JG, Qian Y, Lindestam Arlehamn C, Weiskopf D, Zapardiel-Gonzalo J, Taplitz R, et al. 2017; An integrated workflow to assess technical and biological variability of cell population frequencies in human peripheral blood by flow cytometry. J Immunol. 198:1748–58. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601750. PMID: 28069807. PMCID: PMC5296239.
30. Jodhawat N, Bargir UA, Setia P, Taur P, Bala N, Madkaikar A, et al. 2023; Normative data for paediatric lymphocyte subsets: a pilot study from western India. Indian J Med Res. 158:161–74. DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_3282_21. PMID: 37787259. PMCID: PMC10645029.
31. Linskens E, Diks AM, Neirinck J, Perez-Andres M, De Maertelaere E, Berkowska MA, et al. 2020; Improved standardization of flow cytometry diagnostic screening of primary immunodeficiency by software-based automated gating. Front Immunol. 11:584646. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.584646. PMID: 33224147. PMCID: PMC7667243. PMID: ffa5fd68136e4a5c92cb0cb572faeace.

Fig. 1
Scatter plots of absolute cell counts (/μL) and percentages (%) for different lymphocyte subpopulations, according to age. (A) Absolute cell counts of total lymphocytes, total T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, total B cells, and NK cells. (B) Absolute cell counts of T cell subpopulations. (C) Absolute cell counts of B cell subpopulations. (D) Percentages of total lymphocytes, total T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, total B cells, and NK cells. (E) Percentages of T cell subpopulations. (F) Percentages of B cell subpopulations.
Abbreviations: CM/TM, central memory/transitional memory; DNT, double-negative T cell; EM, effector memory; GC, germinal center; MBC/PC, memory B cell/plasma cell; NK, natural killer; TCR, T cell receptor; TD, terminally differentiated.
alm-46-3-297-f1.tif
Fig. 2
Box plots showing absolute cell counts (/μL) and percentages (%) of lymphocyte subpopulations, according to sex. (A) Absolute cell counts of total lymphocytes, total T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, total B cells, and NK cells. (B) Absolute cell counts of T cell subpopulations. (C) Absolute cell counts of B cell subpopulations. (D) Percentages of total lymphocytes, total T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, total B cells, and NK cells. (E) Percentages of T cell subpopulations. (F) Percentages of B cell subpopulations.
Abbreviations: CM/TM, central memory/transitional memory; DNT, double-negative T cell; EM, effector memory; GC, germinal center; MBC/PC, memory B cell/plasma cell; NK, natural killer; TCR, T cell receptor; TD, terminally differentiated.
alm-46-3-297-f2.tif
Fig. 3
Reference values (5th–95th percentile of absolute cell counts/µL) identified using the EuroFlow PIDOT panel in healthy controls in this and a previous study, stratified on the basis of the age group. Yellow, 5–9 yrs [19]; green, Group 1 (5–9 yrs), this study; orange, 10–17 yrs [19]; blue, Group 2 (10–17 yrs), this study. (A) Total lymphocyte counts, total T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, total B cells, NK cells. (B) Subpopulations of CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells. (C) Subpopulations of B cells.
Abbreviations: CM/TM, central memory/transitional memory; EM, effector memory; GC, germinal center; MBC/PC, memory B cell/plasma cell; PIDOT, Primary Immunodeficiency Orientation Tube; TD, terminally differentiated.
alm-46-3-297-f3.tif
Table 1
Characteristics of participating hospitals, their analytical platforms, and the samples analyzed in this study
Characteristics Pusan National University Hospital Chonnam National University Hospital Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital
Location Busan Gwangju Seoul
Flow cytometer NAVIOS EX NAVIOS FACS Canto II
Manufacturer BC BC BD
Sample* (N=92) 35 29 28
Group 1 (5–9 yrs, N=47)
Males (N=22) 13 5 4
Females (N=25) 9 9 7
Group 2 (10–17 yrs, N=45)
Males (N=20) 9 7 4
Females (N=25) 4 8 13

*Samples were selected based on predefined exclusion criteria to approximate a healthy pediatric population. Individuals with a history of autoimmune or blood disorders, those receiving immunotherapy, those with symptoms consistent with infection, or those recently receiving a blood transfusion were excluded.

Abbreviations: BC, Beckman Coulter; BD, Becton Dickinson; N, number.

Table 2
Differences in absolute cell counts (/μL) of total lymphocytes and T and B cell subpopulations, according to age group and sex
Lymphocyte population Age Sex
Group 1
(5–9 yrs, N=47)
Group 2
(10–17 yrs, N=45)
P* Group 1 (5–9 yrs) P* Group 2 (10–17 yrs) P*
Males (N=22) Females (N=25) Males (N=20) Females (N=25)
Median 5th–95th percentile Median 5th–95th percentile Median 5th–95th percentile Median 5th–95th percentile Median 5th–95th percentile Median 5th–95th percentile
Total lymphocytes 2,763 1,897–3,715 2,433 1,706–3,741 0.109 2,858 2,148–3,922 2,586 1,890–3,246 0.006 2,532 1,850–3,554 2,390 1,705–3,971 0.580
Total T cells 1,832 1,219–2,836 1,649 1,142–2,629 0.036 1888 968–2,920 1,785 1,311–2,586 0.479 1,753 1,163–2,711 1530 1,142–2,570 0.347
CD4+CD8 887 526–1,377 895 496–1,209 0.194 879 469–1,290 922 616–1,410 0.371 936 441–1,201 844 615–1,207 0.318
CD4+ naïve 615 292–868 555 221–790 0.011 629 224–831 597 428–872 0.643 543 226–890 572 222–758 0.275
CD4+ CM/TM 203 139–339 252 118–389 0.083 196 143–355 222 143–334 0.546 251 144–393 268 112–273 0.930
CD4+ EM 30 15–61 52 14–94 <0.001 36 16–83 28 13–58 0.180 64 33–102 42 14–85 0.034
CD4+ TD 11 4–36 8 2–32 0.078 10 4–33 12 5–36 0.191 8 3–34 9 2–30 0.719
CD4CD8+ 696 353–986 622 334–1,159 0.459 785 409–968 674 350–987 0.064 576 333–1,172 635 354–1,142 0.374
CD8+ naïve 370 126–593 270 134–614 0.069 375 121–652 349 149–532 0.067 262 153–759 276 117–581 0.221
CD8+ CM/TM 163 68–301 144 72–227 0.084 162 66–233 165 82–318 0.322 123 73–203 165 73–253 0.291
CD8+ EM 35 8–127 42 14–111 0.866 36 9–104 33 8–131 0.501 40 15–131 47 15–84 0.386
CD8+ TD CD27dim 18 8–37 12 7–38 0.072 18 7–37 18 10–31 0.858 16 9–40 12 5–31 0.032
CD8+ TD CD27 44 6–129 41 4–140 0.534 74 7–131 27 6–111 0.009 48 12–130 35 4–142 0.262
CD4CD8 TCRγδ+ 138 48–267 68 33–248 <0.001 142 58–239 136 48–267 0.858 86 41–257 66 32–165 0.049
CD4CD8 TCRγδ 22 13–37 22 8–39 0.877 20 13–36 22 14–37 0.969 24 10–39 22 7–43 0.421
Total B cells 381 233–783 343 197–655 0.040 493 235–793 343 235–739 0.158 376 254–703 276 197–532 0.047
PreGC 236 89–544 193 87–466 0.238 296 109–555 212 63–460 0.096 240 114–480 139 84–423 0.026
PostGC 74 30–128 67 22–117 0.374 85 34–115 68 30–131 0.839 69 30–96 66 19–116 0.839
Unswitched MBC/PC 41 14–75 32 9–57 0.030 42 16–67 38 15–75 0.835 31 15–49 32 9–58 0.878
Switched MBC/PC 28 12–60 32 8–63 0.580 38 14–54 27 11–70 0.835 35 14–61 28 6–62 0.772
IgD+IgM postGC 3 1–9 2 1–9 0.136 4 1–8 3 1–9 0.166 2 1–6 3 1–9 0.306
NK cells 259 119–531 300 87–586 0.289 272 132–629 236 117–489 0.321 335 200–552 262 87–615 0.152

*Adjusted P was calculated primarily using a linear mixed-effect model adjusted for sex and instrumentation. Statistically significant values (P<0.05) are shown in bold.

Abbreviations: CM/TM, central memory/transitional memory; EM, effector memory; GC, germinal center; MBC/PC, memory B cell/plasma B cell; N, number; NK, natural killer; TCR, T cell receptor; TD, terminally differentiated.

Table 3
Differences in percentages (%) of total lymphocytes and T and B cell subpopulations, according to age group and sex
Lymphocyte population Age Sex
Group 1
(5–9 yrs, N=47)
Group 2
(10–17 yrs, N=45)
P* Group 1 (5–9 yrs) P* Group 2 (10–17 yrs) P*
Males (N=22) Females (N=25) Males (N=20) Females (N=25)
Median 5th–95th percentile Median 5th–95th percentile Median 5th–95th percentile Median 5th–95th percentile Median 5th–95th percentile Median 5th–95th percentile
Total lymphocytes 42.4 28.9–56.8 37.4 23.3–49.9 0.003 43.9 32.0–57.3 41.8 28.0–52.3 0.131 39.8 22.7–48.6 37.1 25.7–49.5 0.731
Total T cells 68.9 54.2–82.4 70.2 51.9–81.2 0.380 64.5 53.6–82.9 69.0 61.2–80.7 0.167 66.7 56.9–81.2 72.7 52.2–80.7 0.630
CD4+CD8 33.7 22.5–48.7 37.0 25.4–48.0 0.771 31.6 21.9–48.2 39.0 29.8–48.7 0.004 34.0 21.0–42.0 37.5 29.9–48.6 0.027
CD4+ naïve 23.0 12.1–33.9 22.0 11.1–34.9 0.236 21.8 10.6–30.6 24.1 16.3–35.7 0.003 19.4 10.9–27.9 23.5 12.2–38.3 0.068
CD4+ CM/TM 8.2 4.7–15.0 9.7 5.7–14.7 0.011 7.3 5.1–15.8 8.9 4.7–11.6 0.335 9.8 5.8–14.2 9.7 5.5–14.7 0.951
CD4+ EM 1.2 0.5–2.5 2.1 0.8–3.6 <0.001 1.1 0.5–2.7 1.2 0.6–1.8 0.605 2.3 1.2–3.5 1.6 0.8–3.8 0.113
CD4+ TD 0.4 0.2–1.5 0.4 0.1–1.2 0.249 0.4 0.2–1.3 0.5 0.2–1.5 0.220 0.3 0.1–1.1 0.4 0.1–1.2 0.495
CD4+ naïve: memory cell ratio 2.4 0.9–7.7 1.6 0.6–4.3 0.003 2.4 0.9–3.8 2.4 1.3–7.9 0.415 1.4 0.6–3.2 1.8 0.4–5.0 0.098
CD4CD8+ 24.7 14.4–36.9 26.6 16.3–39.1 0.540 25.6 18.5–37.5 24.7 14.3–35.1 0.277 27.5 12.8–41.1 26.5 17.2–36.6 0.594
CD8+ naïve 11.5 6.8–23.9 13.0 5.6–26.1 0.540 12.0 6.9–23.0 11.5 6.8–24.8 0.331 11.8 5.5–21.1 13.9 6.0–27.9 0.831
CD8+ CM/TM 6.3 2.0–10.8 5.4 3.1–11.1 0.880 5.8 2.0–9.3 6.8 2.2–10.8 0.197 4.9 3.7–8.1 5.8 3.2–11.5 0.102
CD8+ EM 1.3 0.3–5.0 1.8 0.5–4.1 0.399 1.4 0.3–3.2 1.3 0.3–5.5 0.858 1.4 0.6–4.4 2.0 0.5–3.9 0.573
CD8+ TD CD27dim 0.7 0.2–1.3 0.5 0.3–1.3 0.160 0.6 0.2–1.3 0.7 0.3–1.2 0.452 0.6 0.4–1.2 0.4 0.2–1.3 0.071
CD8+ TD CD27 1.7 0.2–4.6 1.7 0.1–4.4 0.569 2.4 0.3–4.7 1.2 0.2–4.2 0.307 2.0 0.4–4.5 1.7 0.1–3.7 0.114
CD8+ naïve: memory cell ratio 0.9 0.4–4.7 1.2 0.2–3.3 0.500 1.0 0.7–5.1 1.0 0.4–3.0 0.391 0.9 0.2–2.6 1.5 0.2–5.3 0.203
CD4CD8 TCRγδ+ 4.6 1.8–10.7 2.9 1.4–8.0 0.003 4.6 1.8–10.4 5.3 2.3–10.7 0.697 3.4 1.6–8.3 2.4 1.4–7.8 0.097
CD4CD8 TCRγδ 0.8 0.4–1.4 0.9 0.3–1.5 0.502 0.7 0.4–1.4 0.8 0.5–1.4 0.325 0.9 0.5–1.5 0.8 0.3–1.4 0.723
CD4+: CD8+ ratio 1.4 0.8–3.2 1.3 0.7–2.8 0.781 1.2 0.8–2.3 1.5 0.8–3.6 0.019 1.3 0.4–2.5 1.5 0.9–2.5 0.395
Total B cells 15.0 7.7–29.9 14.2 8.2–21.7 0.193 19.3 7.0–30.7 13.9 9.0–23.9 0.496 16.2 9.6–22.0 12.6 8.2–19.3 0.025
PreGC 9.6 2.8–17.2 7.8 3.3–16.2 0.458 12.0 3.0–17.3 9.3 3.1–16.7 0.420 10.3 4.1–15.9 6.3 2.9–15.9 0.126
PostGC 2.8 0.9–4.4 2.9 0.9–4.9 0.578 2.7 0.9–3.9 3.0 1.5–4.7 0.382 2.6 1.2–4.9 3.1 0.8–4.6 0.609
Unswitched MBC/PC 1.5 0.5–2.6 1.3 0.4–2.3 0.359 1.5 0.5–2.3 1.5 0.8–2.6 0.261 1.4 0.6–2.2 1.2 0.4–2.3 0.868
Switched MBC/PC 1.2 0.4–2.1 1.4 0.4-–2.6 0.170 1.3 0.4–1.9 1.2 0.5–2.1 0.843 1.4 0.6–2.4 1.3 0.3–2.6 0.621
IgD+IgM postGC 0.1 0–0.3 0.1 0–0.3 0.404 0.1 0.1–0.2 0.1 0–0.3 0.843 0.1 0–0.3 0.2 0–0.3 0.269
NK cells 9.2 4.4–23.9 12.8 4.9–22.4 0.054 9.3 5.3–25.4 9.2 4.0–22.0 0.427 14.6 5.5–22.7 11.4 4.9–19.5 0.324

*Adjusted P values were calculated primarily using a linear mixed-effect model, adjusted for sex and instrumentation. Statistically significant differences (P<0.05) are shown in bold.

Abbreviations: CM/TM, central memory/transitional memory; EM, effector memory; GC, germinal center; MBC/PC, memory B cell/plasma cell; N, number; NK, natural killer; TCR, T cell receptor; TD, terminally differentiated.

TOOLS
Similar articles