Journal List > Endocrinol Metab > v.41(1) > 1516095182

Hsu, Chen, Liu, Lo, Liu, Gao, Huang, and Hsu: Reduced Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Levels Exacerbate Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Associated Complications in a High-Fat Diet Mouse Model

Abstract

Background

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasingly prevalent and frequently associated with obesity, insulin resistance, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and chronic kidney disease. Emerging evidence suggests sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), a bioactive sphingolipid, plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of T2DM. This study aimed to investigate how reduced S1P levels impact T2DM development.

Methods

S1P lyase knock-in (S1PLC317A KI) mice, characterized by reduced S1P levels due to impaired S1P degradation, were compared with wild-type (WT) mice. Both groups were fed a high-fat diet (HFD) to induce T2DM. Parameters including body weight, insulin resistance, blood glucose levels, hepatic fat accumulation, and kidney pathology were evaluated. Next-generation sequencing was employed to identify differentially expressed genes.

Results

S1PLC317A KI mice exhibited greater body weight, more pronounced insulin resistance, and higher blood glucose levels compared to WT mice on an HFD. Increased hepatic fat deposition and worsened diabetic kidney disease were also observed in KI mice. Sequencing analysis identified 4,656 differentially expressed genes, notably enriched in mitochondrial and bioenergetic pathways, including 133 diabetes-related genes.

Conclusion

Reduced S1P levels exacerbate T2DM symptoms, indicating that therapeutic targeting of S1P pathways may offer promising strategies for treating T2DM and its related complications.

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 9% of the global adult population has diabetes, with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) comprising the majority of cases [1]. Obesity is recognized as a major risk factor for T2DM, with epidemiological evidence consistently linking the two conditions [2]. The prevalence of obesity-associated T2DM is rising yearly and is characterized primarily by insulin resistance [3]. Furthermore, obesity and T2DM are linked to additional metabolic disorders such as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) [4,5]. T2DM is a progressive metabolic disorder characterized by impaired glucose homeostasis, mainly due to inadequate peripheral tissue insulin response and insufficient insulin secretion. Additionally, T2DM has been proposed to have inflammatory and metabolic etiologies [6]. Several studies have demonstrated that dysregulated sphingolipid metabolism significantly contributes to insulin resistance and mitochondrial dysfunction associated with T2DM [7,8]. Clinical studies indicate plasma sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) levels are reduced in T2DM [9], suggesting a potential role for S1P in the disease’s pathogenesis.
S1P is a bioactive sphingolipid with multiple physiological roles [10,11]. Its concentration is regulated by sphingosine kinases (SphK1 and SphK2) and S1P lyase (S1PL) [10]. S1P functions as a ligand for five distinct G protein-coupled receptors, termed S1P receptors 1 through 5 [10,11]. S1P participates in various physiological processes, including immune responses, endothelial barrier integrity, angiogenesis, brain development, and cardiac development [12,13]. In T2DM, inflammation is a crucial pathogenic mediator, with chronic low-grade inflammation observed in patients [14,15]. Although multiple immune factors contribute to T2DM pathogenesis, macrophages play an essential role [15,16]. S1P production is induced during inflammation and tissue injury, facilitating tissue surveillance by recruiting immune cells and regulating their lifespan [17]. Moreover, S1P contributes to maintaining tissue homeostasis by influencing macrophage differentiation, migration, and survival [18,19].
Insulin resistance is characterized by impaired insulin signaling in insulin-responsive tissues. T2DM represents a severe disruption in metabolic communication, where insulin production becomes inadequate to maintain glucose homeostasis. Each tissue contains specialized macrophages that fulfill specific physiological functions essential for tissue integrity. The tissue macrophage population dynamically adapts during the progression of T2DM [20,21]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines significantly disrupt insulin signaling pathways, contributing to insulin resistance [22]. Macrophages also play a role in the pathogenesis of both MASLD and CKD [23,24].
Based on these observations, we hypothesize that S1P plays a critical role in T2DM and obesity pathophysiology. While S1P involvement in various mechanisms underlying T2DM and obesity has been reported, the precise mechanisms by which S1P contributes to T2DM development remain incompletely understood. Therefore, this study aims to elucidate the association between S1P and T2DM.

METHODS

Mouse high-fat diet-induced T2DM model

The S1PLC317A knock-in (KI) mice used in this study carry a point mutation in exon 11 of the sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase 1 (Sgpl1) gene, substituting cysteine (codon TGT) at amino acid position 317 with alanine (codon GCT). This site-directed mutation disrupts S1PL catalytic activity and was introduced using the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 genome-editing system in Professor Shau-Ku Huang’s laboratory at the National Institutes of Health, Taiwan (Supplemental Fig. S1A). Oxidation normally inhibits S1PL activity; however, the C317A mutation renders S1PL resistant to oxidation. Consequently, the C317A mutant exhibits increased enzymatic activity relative to wild-type (WT) S1PL, resulting in reduced S1P levels.
Single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) targeting exon 11 of Sgpl1 were designed to generate the KI model. The sgRNAs and Cas9 mRNA were synthesized in vitro and co-injected into fertilized C57BL/6 mouse zygotes. The resulting embryos were transferred to pseudo-pregnant female mice to generate founder animals.
For genotyping, genomic DNA was extracted from neonatal mouse toe biopsies. A 579 bp DNA fragment containing the mutation site was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using these primers: Forward: 5ʹ-GTTTCTCCTGTGGTGGTTGG-3ʹ and reverse: 5ʹ-AATGCTGGTCACACCTTTCA-3ʹ. PCR products underwent restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis using the Sal I enzyme (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA; #R0138). A silent mutation (GTC→GCT), introduced alongside the C317A substitution, created a Sal I recognition site within the KI allele. Digestion of PCR products yielded two fragments (480 and 99 bp) in KI alleles, whereas WT alleles remained intact at 579 bp (Supplemental Fig. S1B).
To further validate the mutation, direct Sanger sequencing was performed. The chromatograms confirmed the intended nucleotide substitution (TGT→GCT) at codon 317, clearly distinguishing WT from KI genotypes (Supplemental Fig. S1C).
Together, these two complementary methods—PCR-RFLP and Sanger sequencing—provided robust molecular evidence confirming the successful generation of the Sgpl1C317A KI mouse line. Plasma S1P concentrations from WT and SGPL KI mice were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (MyBioSource, San Diego, CA, USA; #MBS1602779). Additionally, 6-week-old male C57BL/6JNarl mice were purchased from Taiwan’s National Laboratory Animal Center. All animal protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Taipei Medical University Wan Fang Hospital, Taiwan (protocol #: wan-111-024), complying with animal management regulations. The mice were housed under controlled conditions (22°C, 50% relative humidity) with a 12-hour light/dark cycle and free access to food and water.
The mice were acclimated to the environment for 1 week prior to the experiment. The sample size was determined by an a priori power analysis using G*Power software version 3.1.9.2 (Franz, Universität Kiel, Kiel, Germany), specifying an effect size of 2, alpha level of 0.05, and a power of 0.90, requiring seven mice per group (14 mice total). Mice were then allocated into four groups (n>7 per group) by an investigator blinded to experimental protocols. The control group received a normal diet (ND; standard chow diet), and the diabetes model group received a high-fat diet (HFD; Research Diets, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; D12331, 58% fat energy/sucrose). T2DM was induced by HFD feeding for 3 months [25]. Mice with high body weight and fasting blood glucose levels ≥11.1 mmol/L were classified as diabetic. Groups included WT mice (ND, n=7; HFD, n=10; total, 17 mice) and SGPL1 KI mice (ND, n=7; HFD, n=10; total, 17 mice). Mouse body weights were recorded weekly throughout the experiment. At the study’s conclusion, the mice were euthanized.

Metabolic research

After a 13-week diet period, oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) and insulin measurements were conducted following an 8-hour fast. Mice received an oral glucose load of 1 g/kg, and blood glucose was measured via tail bleeding at 0, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes using a Contour Plus blood glucose meter (Ascensia Diabetes Care, Basel, Switzerland). The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated from these measurements. Upon sacrifice, plasma samples, liver, and kidney tissues were collected. Plasma insulin concentrations were measured with an ELISA kit (Mercodia Mouse Insulin ELISA, Uppsala, Sweden), and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were determined using the Apex Bio Eclipse Hemoglobin A1c reagent kit (Houston, TX, USA). Serum and hepatic triglyceride (TG) concentrations were quantified using the Triglyceride Colorimetric Assay Kit (#10010303, Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Serum samples were diluted 1:2 before analysis. For hepatic TG quantification, approximately 160–200 mg of liver tissue was homogenized in 1× NP-40 substitute buffer and centrifuged at 10,000 ×g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The resulting supernatant was analyzed spectrophotometrically at 540 nm. TG concentrations were calculated using a standard curve and expressed as milligrams per gram of liver tissue (mg/g tissue).
Plasma non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) concentrations were measured using the Randox NEFA assay kit (Randox Laboratories, Antrim, UK; #FA 115) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Serum samples were incubated with assay reagents at 37°C for 10 minutes, and absorbance was recorded at 550 nm. NEFA levels were determined using a standard curve and expressed as millimoles per liter (mmol/L).

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from mouse liver tissues using TRIzolTM Reagent (#15596026; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, 1 μg of total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the ProtoScript® First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (#E6560L; New England Biolabs). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using Fast SYBRTM Green Master Mix (#4385612; Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The expression levels of target genes were normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Primer sequences are listed in Supplemental Table S1. Relative gene expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method.

Histologic and morphometric methods of liver sections

Liver tissues were harvested, fixed in 10% formalin, and embedded in paraffin. Embedded tissues were dehydrated through graded alcohol solutions. Sections (5 μm thickness) were prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), then examined using light microscopy. The histological examination of liver tissues included assessment of the MASLD activity score (NAS), ranging from 0 to 8. This score integrates three critical histological parameters: lobular inflammation (score 0–3), steatosis (score 0–3), and ballooning degeneration (score 0–2) [26].

Histologic and morphometric methods of kidney sections

Mouse kidney specimens were fixed in paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. Coronal sections of kidney tissues were prepared and stained using periodic acid–Schiff staining (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Histological images were scanned and analyzed using the Motic Digital Slide Assistant (Motic China Group Co., Ltd., Xiamen, China; 2017) to quantify the areas of glomeruli, mesangium, and renal tubular lumens. For each mouse, five glomeruli were randomly selected to measure average glomerular and mesangial areas, and five high-power fields were randomly chosen to calculate the mean tubular lumen fraction.

RNA extraction and quality control

Total RNA was extracted from lung tissue samples of ND WT mice and SGPL1 KI mice using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA concentration and purity were assessed using a SimpliNanoTM Biochrom Spectrophotometer (Biochrom, Holliston, MA, USA). RNA integrity and degradation were evaluated using the Qsep 100 DNA/RNA Analyzer (BiOptic Inc., New Taipei City, Taiwan).

Library preparation and RNA sequencing

High-quality RNA samples were sent to BGI Americas (San Jose, CA, USA) for RNA-Seq transcriptome sequencing. Libraries were prepared using the KAPA mRNA HyperPrep Kit (KAPA Biosystems, Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Briefly, mRNA was isolated from total RNA using oligo-dT magnetic beads and fragmented using KAPA Fragment, Prime, and Elute Buffer. First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed using random hexamer primers, followed by second-strand synthesis incorporating deoxyuridine triphosphate to ensure strand specificity during sequencing. The resulting double-stranded cDNA was end-repaired, A-tailed, and ligated to adapters. cDNA fragments (300 to 400 bp) were purified using KAPA Pure Beads. Libraries were amplified using KAPA HiFi HotStart ReadyMix, and quality and size distribution were validated on the Qsep 100 DNA/RNA Analyzer.

Sequencing and data analysis

Prepared libraries were sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), generating 150 bp paired-end reads. Raw sequencing data were processed and analyzed by BGI Americas (Cambridge, MA, USA) using their bioinformatics pipeline. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using the DESeq2 algorithm, with significance determined by a false discovery rate-adjusted P<0.05 and log2-fold change (log2FC) ≥1 or ≤−1. Functional enrichment analysis of DEGs was performed using the Gene Ontology (GO) and Disease Ontology (DO) databases to elucidate biological processes, cellular components, molecular functions involved in gene expression changes, and associations with diseases.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism software version 9.0.2 (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA). Results are expressed as mean±standard error of the mean or median with interquartile range (IQR). The Mann-Whitney U test was used for continuous variables not following a parametric distribution. Statistical significance was defined as a P value less than 0.05. One-way analysis of variance was conducted for comparisons involving three or more groups, with the Bonferroni correction applied for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

HFD-fed S1PLC317A KI mice had overall higher total body weights

To evaluate the impact of reduced S1P on T2DM, we conducted an experiment using WT and S1PLC317A mutant (KI) mice. Plasma S1P concentrations were measured initially, and as expected, KI mice showed significantly lower S1P levels than WT mice (Fig. 1A). To induce diabetes mellitus, mice were fed an HFD, a widely used model for studying impaired glucose tolerance and T2DM. Four groups were established: WT mice on an ND, WT mice on an HFD, KI mice on an ND, and KI mice on an HFD. After 8 weeks, diabetes mellitus was successfully induced in the HFD-fed groups. Mice were sacrificed after 13 weeks of feeding. Throughout the experiment, mouse body weights were closely monitored. After introducing the HFD, KI mice had significantly higher body weights than WT mice as early as the first week. Over time, KI mouse body weights progressively increased with continued HFD feeding. Both groups demonstrated similar growth patterns, continuously gaining weight for the initial 12 weeks and plateauing thereafter (Fig. 1B). In contrast, the ND groups showed comparable weights throughout (Fig. 1B). Visually, HFD-fed S1PLC317A KI mice appeared physically larger than HFD-fed WT mice (Fig. 1C). Final body weights for the HFD-fed KI mice (median 43.56 g [IQR, 42.41 to 48.05]) were significantly greater (P<0.05) compared to the HFD-fed WT mice (median 40.50 g [IQR, 37.6 to 45.82]).

HFD-fed S1PLC317A KI mice exhibited increased glucose intolerance

An OGTT was conducted to compare the metabolic phenotypes among the four mouse groups. Blood glucose (Fig. 2A) and insulin (Fig. 2B) levels over time during the OGTT are shown in Fig. 2. Typically, glucose-tolerant mice exhibit a sharp increase in glucose levels, peaking at 15 to 30 minutes post-glucose challenge, followed by rapid clearance. WT mice fed an ND served as the glucose-tolerant control and displayed expected glucose kinetics, peaking around 371 mg/dL at 30 minutes and rapidly decreasing by 90 minutes, indicating efficient glucose clearance. Conversely, WT mice fed an HFD peaked at approximately 404 mg/dL with delayed glucose clearance, indicative of glucose intolerance. KI mice on an HFD reached a higher peak glucose level (approximately 454 mg/dL) and demonstrated a clearance pattern similar to HFD-fed WT mice, indicating exacerbated glucose intolerance. The AUC of the time-blood glucose curve of the OGTT of the HFD-fed S1P lyase knock-in (S1PLC317A KI) mice was notably higher than that of the respective control group (Fig. 2C). Although glucose responses at 15 and 30 minutes post-glucose administration appeared similar between ND and HFD-fed WT groups, the calculated glucose AUC was higher in HFD-fed WT mice, though not statistically significant. However, KI mice showed a significantly greater effect of the HFD on glucose tolerance, suggesting increased susceptibility to glucose intolerance and warranting further investigation.
Insulin levels were also measured to explore underlying metabolic disruptions across groups. Mice on ND showed unchanged insulin responses, whereas HFD-fed mice exhibited significantly elevated insulin responses (Fig. 2B). The AUC of the time blood insulin curve of the OGTT was significantly greater in HFD-fed KI and WT mice compared to their ND-fed counterparts. Furthermore, the AUC of the time-blood Insulin curve of OGTT in HFD-fed KI mice significantly exceeded that of HFD-fed WT mice (Fig. 2D). Notably, ND-fed mice across both genotypes displayed comparable glucose and insulin levels, confirming appropriate baseline controls (Fig. 2A, B). HbA1c levels measured in all groups showed no significant differences (Fig. 2E). Plasma TG and NEFA were significantly higher in mice fed an HFD compared to ND-fed mice (TG: WT P<0.05, KI P<0.005; NEFA: WT P<0.05, KI P<0.005) (Fig. 2F, G). Although HFD-fed KI mice had higher plasma TG and NEFA levels than HFD-fed WT mice, these differences were not statistically significant (P=0.4814) (Fig. 2F, G).

HFD-fed S1PLC317A KI mice exhibited a higher NAS with higher hepatic TG levels

The liver is an insulin-responsive organ crucial for glucose homeostasis, lipid metabolism, and the pathogenesis of T2DM. Hepatic steatosis, linked to T2DM and obesity, exacerbates insulin resistance in the liver [27,28]. Thus, we investigated S1P’s impact on hepatic steatosis. Liver sections from HFD-fed S1PLC317A KI mice stained with H&E revealed greater lipid deposition than in HFD-fed WT mice (Fig. 3A). KI mice fed an ND exhibited baseline lipid accumulation comparable to WT mice. Further histological analysis employed the NAS, revealing significantly higher NAS scores in HFD-fed KI mice compared to HFD-fed WT mice (median 7.5 vs. 5.0, P<0.0001) (Fig. 3B). Hepatic TG concentrations were significantly increased in HFD-fed KI mice compared to HFD-fed WT mice (P<0.05) (Fig. 3C). Liver mRNA expression of lipogenesis-related genes (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ [PPARG], apolipoprotein A2 [APOA2], apolipoprotein C4 [APOC4]) and a lipolysis-related gene (patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 2 [PNPLA2]) were analyzed. KI mice on HFD demonstrated upregulated lipogenesis genes and downregulated lipolysis genes, though only APOC4 reached statistical significance (P<0.0005) (Fig. 3D-G). These findings indicate that reduced S1P levels significantly enhance hepatic steatosis.

HFD-fed S1PLC317A KI mice exhibited more severe diabetic nephropathy

Histological examination showed that the two groups fed an ND exhibited normal glomerular morphology, characterized by intact capillary lumina and minimal mesangial expansion. Interestingly, KI mice on the ND showed significantly increased glomerular cross-sectional areas compared to WT mice on the same diet (Fig. 4A). WT mice fed an HFD readily developed diabetic nephropathy (DN), demonstrated by marked mesangial expansion within the glomerulus (Fig. 4A). KI mice fed an HFD exhibited significantly greater glomerular area and mesangial fraction compared to WT mice on the HFD (Fig. 4A). These findings suggest that reduced circulating S1P levels exacerbate mesangial hypertrophy in DN. Additionally, decreased S1P levels alone induce glomerular hypertrophy even in the absence of diabetes mellitus (Fig. 4B, C). Furthermore, mice fed an HFD displayed significant renal tubular dilation (Fig. 4D). KI mice on an ND did not exhibit increased renal tubular dilation compared to WT mice on the ND diet (Fig. 4D). However, KI mice on an HFD demonstrated significantly greater renal tubular dilation compared to HFD-fed WT mice (Fig. 4D, E). The differences observed between WT and KI mice on the same diet can be attributed to alterations in S1P levels, whereas the differences within the same mouse strain fed ND versus HFD reflect diabetes-induced effects. Collectively, these results suggest that decreased circulating S1P significantly exacerbates DN severity. Nonetheless, lower S1P alone appears sufficient to induce glomerular hypertrophy even without diabetes mellitus.

Enrichment analyses of S1P-related differentially expressed genes

To compare gene expression between S1PLC317A KI and WT mice, next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed. A total of 4656 DEGs between KI and WT samples were identified, using a statistical significance threshold of P<0.05 and a log2FC >1 for upregulated genes or log2FC <−1 for downregulated genes. Specifically, 2,985 genes were upregulated, and 1,671 genes were downregulated. GO and DO enrichment analyses were conducted to characterize the functions of DEGs and identify associations with diseases. The enrichment of DEGs across various GO categories was analyzed, and the top 30 GO categories with the highest overall enrichment, determined by adjusted P values, were identified. The numbers of positively and negatively regulated genes within these categories were then reported.
Fig. 5 illustrates the top 30 GO terms, comprising 21 biological processes and nine cellular components. Among biological processes, the five most significantly enriched GO terms were: ‘ATP metabolic process,’ ‘purine ribonucleoside monophosphate metabolic process,’ ‘purine ribonucleoside triphosphate metabolic process,’ ‘ribonucleoside monophosphate metabolic process,’ and ‘ribonucleoside triphosphate metabolic process.’ For cellular components, the five most enriched GO terms included: ‘inner mitochondrial membrane protein complex,’ ‘respiratory chain complex,’ ‘respiratory chain,’ ‘mitochondrial respiratory chain,’ and ‘mitochondrial inner membrane.’ Overall, the GO enrichment analysis demonstrated that the top enriched categories primarily related to mitochondrial function and bioenergetics, with most of these genes downregulated in the S1PLC317A KI group (Fig. 5). Notably, genes involved in cell division and DNA repair were generally upregulated in KI mice. DO, a standardized human disease ontology, was used to interpret interactions between DEGs and diseases. Based on the DO database, the 10 most enriched terms related to human diseases were identified, with ‘diabetes mellitus’ ranking highest. Within this category, 131 diabetes mellitus-related genes were found to be differentially expressed (Fig. 6, Supplemental Table S2).

DISCUSSION

In this study, we established an HFD-induced T2DM mouse model using S1PLC317A KI and WT mice. Throughout the experiment, we closely monitored body weight and diabetes parameters. Our results revealed that S1PLC317A KI mice exhibited significantly greater weight gain when fed an HFD compared to WT mice. OGTT results demonstrated that S1PLC317A KI mice (with reduced S1P levels) showed enhanced glucose intolerance compared to WT mice. Additionally, KI mice exhibited more severe hepatic steatosis and exacerbated DN under HFD conditions. NGS and subsequent GO enrichment analysis identified mitochondrial function and bioenergy utilization as major enriched categories. Utilizing the DO database, we found 133 significant DEGs related to diabetes mellitus. Our findings suggest that reduced S1P levels in mice are associated with increased glucose intolerance and exacerbation of diabetes-related complications. This study provides crucial insights into the role of S1P in diabetes pathophysiology, potentially aiding the understanding and treatment of this complex disease.
In the study, mice with higher S1PL enzymatic activity had higher body weight and worse impairment in glucose control when fed an HFD. This phenomenon aligns with findings from Andrea and colleagues, who developed an adipose-specific sphingosine kinase 1 knockout (SK1fatKO) mouse strain that similarly exhibited increased HFD-induced weight gain and impaired glucose clearance [29]. S1P concentrations are governed by the activities of sphingosine kinases and S1PL; thus, deletion of SPHK1 and increased S1PL activity are expected to yield analogous effects. Several studies suggest that S1P metabolism positively influences insulin signaling, indicating a potential adaptive role of S1P against insulin resistance [25,30,31]. However, other reports associate elevated S1P levels with obesity and insulin resistance in both humans and rodents [32,33]. Yet, certain studies propose that S1P metabolism could causatively contribute to insulin resistance in hepatic and adipose tissues [34,35]. These discrepancies may be explained by the diverse functions of specific S1P receptor subtypes, as supported by previous publications [36]. Our NGS dataset further identified 133 significant DEGs associated with diabetes, reinforcing the role of S1P in the pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus.
Hepatic insulin resistance often coincides with hepatic steatosis, characterized by excessive fatty acid uptake and enhanced de novo lipogenesis in the liver [37,38]. We observed that HFD-fed mice with reduced S1P levels exhibited increased hepatic lipid deposition compared to WT mice. Additionally, HFD-fed KI mice had significantly higher NASs and hepatic TG levels relative to WT mice, suggesting that reduced S1P exacerbates hepatic steatosis. Recent research indicates that S1P might protect against hepatic insulin resistance by activating the Akt pathway via S1PR1 or S1PR3 receptors, improving mitochondrial function [39]. Studies examining the role of S1P in adipogenesis have yielded mixed outcomes, with some suggesting a promotive effect and others an inhibitory one [40-42]. Current evidence suggests S1P’s effects on adipogenesis depend on the specific receptor subtype (S1PR) involved and its cellular context [36]. Our NGS GO enrichment analysis, identifying predominantly mitochondrial function-related genes among the top enriched categories, aligns with previous research. Interestingly, an S1PR1-selective agonist (SEW-2871) was found to reduce weight gain and improve glucose intolerance but not prevent hepatic steatosis [43], underscoring the complexity of the S1PS1PR signaling pathway.
DN is a chronic complication of diabetes characterized by structural and functional renal changes, including microangiopathy. It is a primary cause of CKD and end-stage renal disease [44]. Thus, we assessed DN severity in our T2DM mouse model. Our findings demonstrated that decreased circulating S1P exacerbates DN severity. A previous DN mouse model showed that an S1PR1 agonist improved renal tubular epithelial barrier function, thereby enhancing renal microcirculation [45]. Moreover, earlier studies suggest S1P can attenuate kidney inflammation and prevent renal injury under hyperglycemic conditions [46,47]. Intriguingly, our study also revealed that reduced S1P alone induces glomerular hypertrophy independently of diabetes. Previous studies have proposed that glomerular hypertrophy results from glomerular hypertension and hyperfiltration, which precede glomerulosclerosis and renal injury [48,49]. Glomerular hypertrophy is considered an early marker of renal damage severity in kidney disease models [50,51]. Our findings align with previous research, suggesting that normal circulating S1P levels may contribute to renal health.
Nevertheless, this study has several limitations. First, it was conducted exclusively in male mice, as male models are conventionally employed in MASLD studies [51,52]. Additionally, estrogen confers protective effects against renal injury, making female mice less susceptible to obesity-related kidney injury [53]. Our study demonstrated S1P’s influence on weight gain using an HFD mouse model. However, it remains unclear whether increased body weight reflects enhanced adiposity or generalized growth. Further research should elucidate these underlying mechanisms. This study assessed the role of S1PL in a specific mouse model of T2DM and examined liver and kidney tissues but did not explore detailed molecular mechanisms or signaling pathways such as phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT). Obesity and T2DM involve multifaceted mechanisms, and our analysis was limited primarily to hepatic and renal impacts. Further research should address broader metabolic regulation across various tissues. Finally, our NGS data were derived from lung tissue due to availability and tissue preservation constraints. Although not ideal, pulmonary S1P signaling can reflect systemic immune-metabolic states. Future studies should prioritize transcriptomic analyses in metabolically relevant tissues such as adipose and liver tissues. Comprehensive exploration of S1P’s molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways in T2DM will be essential to generate more definitive conclusions.
In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that S1P plays an important role in the development of T2DM. We observed that mice with low S1P levels had the highest weight gain and showed increased glucose intolerance when fed an HFD. Furthermore, mice with low S1P levels under an HFD displayed more severe hepatic steatosis and exacerbated DN. The NGS analysis further indicated that the effects of altered S1P levels may occur through significant changes in mitochondrial function.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Table S1.

Primer Sequences Used for Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis of Mouse Liver Genes
enm-2025-2360-Supplemental-Table-S1.pdf

Supplemental Table S2.

One Hundred and Thirty-One Differentially Expressed Genes in the S1PLC317A KI Group Associated with Diabetes Mellitus
enm-2025-2360-Supplemental-Table-S2.pdf

Supplemental Fig. S1.

Genotyping and sequencing confirmation of C317A knock-in (KI) mice. (A) Schematic representation of the sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase 1 (Sgpl1) gene locus and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9-targeted region within exon 11. A silent mutation (GTC→GCT) introducing a Sal I (New England Biolabs) site was co-inserted with the C317A knock-in (TGT→GCT). (B) Polymerase chain reaction products (579 bp) were digested with Sal I. Wild-type (WT) alleles remained uncut (579 bp), whereas KI alleles generated two fragments (480 and 99 bp). (C) Representative Sanger sequencing chromatograms confirming the TGT→GCT substitution in the KI allele. VF1, forward sequencing primer; VR1, reverse sequencing primer; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
enm-2025-2360-Supplemental-Fig-S1.pdf

Notes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan (grant numbers: MOST 111-2314-B-038-022-MY3); the Taipei Medical University (grant number: TMU110-AEI-B17 [110-5425-002-112]); and Wan Fang Hospital (grant number: 112-wf-swf-06).

During the preparation of this work, the author(s) used ChatGPT and Grammarly to improve language and readability. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take(s) full responsibility for the content of the publication.

We thank Professor Shau-Ku Huang of the National Health Research Institutes (NHRI) for providing and caring for the S1PLC317A KI mice.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conception or design: S.C.H., Y.K.L., P.S.G., S.K.H., C.W.H. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: S.C.H., C.L.C., C.T.L., C.W.H. Drafting the work or revising: S.C.H., C.L.C., C.W.H. Final approval of the manuscript: S.C.H., C.L.C., C.T.L., H.C.L., Y.K.L., P.S.G., S.K.H., C.W.H.

REFERENCES

1. Zheng Y, Ley SH, Hu FB. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018; 14:88–98.
crossref
2. Yan K. Recent advances in the effect of adipose tissue inflammation on insulin resistance. Cell Signal. 2024; 120:111229.
crossref
3. Ruze R, Liu T, Zou X, Song J, Chen Y, Xu R, et al. Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus: connections in epidemiology, pathogenesis, and treatments. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1161521.
crossref
4. Francis A, Harhay MN, Ong AC, Tummalapalli SL, Ortiz A, Fogo AB, et al. Chronic kidney disease and the global public health agenda: an international consensus. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2024; 20:473–85.
crossref
5. Shih CI, Wu KT, Hsieh MH, Yang JF, Chen YY, Tsai WL, et al. Severity of fatty liver is highly correlated with the risk of hypertension and diabetes: a cross-sectional and longitudinal cohort study. Hepatol Int. 2024; 18:138–54.
crossref
6. Orliaguet L, Dalmas E, Drareni K, Venteclef N, Alzaid F. Mechanisms of macrophage polarization in insulin signaling and sensitivity. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020; 11:62.
crossref
7. Roszczyc-Owsiejczuk K, Zabielski P. Sphingolipids as a culprit of mitochondrial dysfunction in insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021; 12:635175.
8. Zhao J, Zhang S, Chen L, Liu X, Su H, Chen L, et al. Sphingosine 1-phosphate protects against radiation-induced ovarian injury in female rats-impact on mitochondrial-related genes. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020; 18:99.
crossref
9. Vaisar T, Couzens E, Hwang A, Russell M, Barlow CE, De-Fina LF, et al. Type 2 diabetes is associated with loss of HDL endothelium protective functions. PLoS One. 2018; 13:e0192616.
crossref
10. Rosen H, Goetzl EJ. Sphingosine 1-phosphate and its receptors: an autocrine and paracrine network. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005; 5:560–70.
crossref
11. Anliker B, Chun J. Cell surface receptors in lysophospholipid signaling. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2004; 15:457–65.
crossref
12. Pappu R, Schwab SR, Cornelissen I, Pereira JP, Regard JB, Xu Y, et al. Promotion of lymphocyte egress into blood and lymph by distinct sources of sphingosine-1-phosphate. Science. 2007; 316:295–8.
crossref
13. Xiong Y, Hla T. S1P control of endothelial integrity. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2014; 378:85–105.
crossref
14. Kalupahana NS, Moustaid-Moussa N, Claycombe KJ. Immunity as a link between obesity and insulin resistance. Mol Aspects Med. 2012; 33:26–34.
crossref
15. Schilling JD, Mann DL. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: bench to bedside. Heart Fail Clin. 2012; 8:619–31.
16. Cancello R, Clement K. Is obesity an inflammatory illness? Role of low-grade inflammation and macrophage infiltration in human white adipose tissue. BJOG. 2006; 113:1141–7.
crossref
17. Kunkel GT, Maceyka M, Milstien S, Spiegel S. Targeting the sphingosine-1-phosphate axis in cancer, inflammation and beyond. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013; 12:688–702.
crossref
18. Gomez-Munoz A, Kong J, Salh B, Steinbrecher UP. Sphingosine-1-phosphate inhibits acid sphingomyelinase and blocks apoptosis in macrophages. FEBS Lett. 2003; 539:56–60.
crossref
19. Weigert A, Weis N, Brune B. Regulation of macrophage function by sphingosine-1-phosphate. Immunobiology. 2009; 214:748–60.
20. Jager J, Aparicio-Vergara M, Aouadi M. Liver innate immune cells and insulin resistance: the multiple facets of Kupffer cells. J Intern Med. 2016; 280:209–20.
crossref
21. Bhatt M, Rudrapatna S, Banfield L, Bierbrier R, Wang PW, Wang KW, et al. Evaluating the evidence for macrophage presence in skeletal muscle and its relation to insulin resistance in obese mice and humans: a systematic review protocol. BMC Res Notes. 2017; 10:374.
crossref
22. Hotamisligil GS, Peraldi P, Budavari A, Ellis R, White MF, Spiegelman BM. IRS-1-mediated inhibition of insulin receptor tyrosine kinase activity in TNF-alpha- and obesity-induced insulin resistance. Science. 1996; 271:665–8.
crossref
23. Zeng J, Zhang Y, Huang C. Macrophages polarization in renal inflammation and fibrosis animal models (review). Mol Med Rep. 2024; 29:29.
crossref
24. Kholodenko IV, Yarygin KN. Hepatic macrophages as targets for the MSC-based cell therapy in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Biomedicines. 2023; 11:3056.
crossref
25. Bruce CR, Risis S, Babb JR, Yang C, Kowalski GM, Selathurai A, et al. Overexpression of sphingosine kinase 1 prevents ceramide accumulation and ameliorates muscle insulin resistance in high-fat diet-fed mice. Diabetes. 2012; 61:3148–55.
crossref
26. Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, Behling C, Contos MJ, Cummings OW, et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005; 41:1313–21.
crossref
27. Fujii H, Kawada N; Japan Study Group of NAFLD. The role of insulin resistance and diabetes in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21:3863.
crossref
28. Tanase DM, Gosav EM, Costea CF, Ciocoiu M, Lacatusu CM, Maranduca MA, et al. The intricate relationship between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), insulin resistance (IR), and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). J Diabetes Res. 2020; 2020:3920196.
crossref
29. Anderson AK, Lambert JM, Montefusco DJ, Tran BN, Roddy P, Holland WL, et al. Depletion of adipocyte sphingosine kinase 1 leads to cell hypertrophy, impaired lipolysis, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Lipid Res. 2020; 61:1328–40.
crossref
30. Osawa Y, Seki E, Kodama Y, Suetsugu A, Miura K, Adachi M, et al. Acid sphingomyelinase regulates glucose and lipid metabolism in hepatocytes through AKT activation and AMP-activated protein kinase suppression. FASEB J. 2011; 25:1133–44.
crossref
31. He Q, Bo J, Shen R, Li Y, Zhang Y, Zhang J, et al. S1P signaling pathways in pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Res. 2021; 2021:1341750.
crossref
32. Kowalski GM, Carey AL, Selathurai A, Kingwell BA, Bruce CR. Plasma sphingosine-1-phosphate is elevated in obesity. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e72449.
crossref
33. Blachnio-Zabielska AU, Koutsari C, Tchkonia T, Jensen MD. Sphingolipid content of human adipose tissue: relationship to adiponectin and insulin resistance. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012; 20:2341–7.
crossref
34. Fox TE, Bewley MC, Unrath KA, Pedersen MM, Anderson RE, Jung DY, et al. Circulating sphingolipid biomarkers in models of type 1 diabetes. J Lipid Res. 2011; 52:509–17.
crossref
35. Wang J, Badeanlou L, Bielawski J, Ciaraldi TP, Samad F. Sphingosine kinase 1 regulates adipose proinflammatory responses and insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 306:E756–68.
36. Kajita K, Ishii I, Mori I, Asano M, Fuwa M, Morita H. Sphingosine 1-phosphate regulates obesity and glucose homeostasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25:932.
crossref
37. Brouwers B, Schrauwen-Hinderling VB, Jelenik T, Gemmink A, Havekes B, Bruls Y, et al. Metabolic disturbances of non-alcoholic fatty liver resemble the alterations typical for type 2 diabetes. Clin Sci (Lond). 2017; 131:1905–17.
crossref
38. Sancar G, Birkenfeld AL. The role of adipose tissue dysfunction in hepatic insulin resistance and T2D. J Endocrinol. 2024; 262:e240115.
crossref
39. Fang H, Feng Q, Shi Y, Zhou J, Wang Q, Zhong L. Hepatic insulin resistance induced by mitochondrial oxidative stress can be ameliorated by sphingosine 1-phosphate. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2020; 501:110660.
crossref
40. Jeong JK, Moon MH, Park SY. Modulation of the expression of sphingosine 1-phosphate 2 receptors regulates the differentiation of pre-adipocytes. Mol Med Rep. 2015; 12:7496–502.
crossref
41. Chakrabarty S, Bui Q, Badeanlou L, Hester K, Chun J, Ruf W, et al. S1P/S1PR3 signalling axis protects against obesity-induced metabolic dysfunction. Adipocyte. 2022; 11:69–83.
crossref
42. Fang Z, Pyne S, Pyne NJ. Ceramide and sphingosine 1-phosphate in adipose dysfunction. Prog Lipid Res. 2019; 74:145–59.
crossref
43. Asano M, Kajita K, Fuwa M, Kajita T, Mori I, Akahoshi N, et al. Opposing roles of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors 1 and 2 in fat deposition and glucose tolerance in obese male mice. Endocrinology. 2023; 164:bqad019.
44. Lin YC, Chang YH, Yang SY, Wu KD, Chu TS. Update of pathophysiology and management of diabetic kidney disease. J Formos Med Assoc. 2018; 117:662–75.
crossref
45. Bekpinar S, Yenidunya G, Gurdol F, Unlucerci Y, Aycan-Ustyol E, Dinccag N. The effect of nephropathy on plasma sphingosine 1-phosphate concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin Biochem. 2015; 48:1264–7.
crossref
46. Lai LW, Yong KC, Igarashi S, Lien YH. A sphingosine-1-phosphate type 1 receptor agonist inhibits the early T-cell transient following renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Kidney Int. 2007; 71:1223–31.
crossref
47. Lien YH, Yong KC, Cho C, Igarashi S, Lai LW. S1P(1)-selective agonist, SEW2871, ameliorates ischemic acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 2006; 69:1601–8.
crossref
48. D’Agati VD, Chagnac A, de Vries AP, Levi M, Porrini E, Herman-Edelstein M, et al. Obesity-related glomerulopathy: clinical and pathologic characteristics and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2016; 12:453–71.
crossref
49. Reidy K, Kang HM, Hostetter T, Susztak K. Molecular mechanisms of diabetic kidney disease. J Clin Invest. 2014; 124:2333–40.
crossref
50. Guo M, Ricardo SD, Deane JA, Shi M, Cullen-McEwen L, Bertram JF. A stereological study of the renal glomerular vasculature in the db/db mouse model of diabetic nephropathy. J Anat. 2005; 207:813–21.
51. Kren S, Hostetter TH. The course of the remnant kidney model in mice. Kidney Int. 1999; 56:333–7.
52. Dong X, Lu S, Tian Y, Ma H, Wang Y, Zhang X, et al. Bavachinin protects the liver in NAFLD by promoting regeneration via targeting PCNA. J Adv Res. 2024; 55:131–44.
crossref
53. Mattsson C, Olsson T. Estrogens and glucocorticoid hormones in adipose tissue metabolism. Curr Med Chem. 2007; 14:2918–24.
crossref

Fig. 1.
(A) The distribution of plasma sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) concentrations in naïve wild-type (WT) and S1PLC317A knock-in (KI) mice. (B) Change in body weight over the experiment duration. (C) Mice body shape after 13 weeks of normal diet (ND) or high-fat diet (HFD) feeding. aP<0.005; b,d,fHFD-WT vs. HFD-KI and c,e,gND-WT vs. HFD-WT: b,cP<0.05, d,eP<0.01, and f,gP<0.005; hP<0.001.
enm-2025-2360f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Effects of 12 weeks of high-fat diet (HFD) or normal diet (ND) on oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and insulin responses. (A) OGTT results. (B) The plasma insulin levels were determined during the OGTT. (C) Area under the curve (AUC) of the time-blood glucose curve of OGTT. (D) AUC of the time-blood insulin curve of OGTT. (E) Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c; %). (F) Serum triglyceride levels. (G) Serum non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) levels in different groups of mice. KI, knock-in; WT, wild-type; NS, not significant. aP<0.05; bP<0.01; cP<0.001; dP<0.05; eP<0.001; fP<0.0001.
enm-2025-2360f2.tif
Fig. 3.
Histological analysis of liver sections. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of liver sections from each group (original magnification ×200). (B) Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) activity score. (C) Hepatic triglyceride concentrations. Hepatic mRNA expression levels of lipid metabolism-related genes: (D) peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (Ppar-γ), (E) apolipoprotein A2 (Apoa2), (F) apolipoprotein C4 (Apoc4), (G) patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 2 (Pnpla2). ND, normal diet; HFD, high-fat diet; WT, wild-type; KI, knock-in. aP<0.001; bP<0.05; cP<0.001.
enm-2025-2360f3.tif
Fig. 4.
Histological analysis of kidney sections. (A) Histology of the glomerulus (original magnification ×400) (wild-type [WT] mice on a normal diet [ND] [n=4, upper left], WT mice on a high-fat diet [HFD] [n=4, upper right], S1PLC317A mutant mice on a ND [n=4, lower left], S1PLC317A mutant mice on a HFD [n=4, lower right]). (B) Analysis of glomerular cross-section area. (C) Analysis of mesangial fraction. (D) Histology of the renal cortex (original magnification ×200) (WT mice on a ND [n=4, upper left], WT mice on a HFD [n=4, upper right], S1PLC317A mutant mice on a ND [n=4, lower left], S1PLC317A mutant mice on a HFD [n=4, lower right]). (E) Analysis of tubular area fraction. White arrow, mesangial expansion; white arrowhead, proximal tubule; red arrowhead, afferent or efferent arteriole. KI, knock-in; NS, not significant. aP<0.01.
enm-2025-2360f4.tif
Fig. 5.
Top 30 genes in Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis (naïve S1PLC317A knock-in mice vs. naïve C57BL/6 wild-type mice). ATP, adenosine triphosphate.
enm-2025-2360f5.tif
Fig. 6.
Top differentially expressed genes (DEGs) based on the Disease Ontology (DO) database (naïve S1PLC317A knock-in mice vs. naïve C57BL/6 wild-type mice).
enm-2025-2360f6.tif
enm-2025-2360f7.tif
TOOLS
Similar articles