Journal List > Ann Surg Treat Res > v.110(3) > 1516094797

Hwang, Ko, Youn, Yang, and Kim: Single-center experience with pediatric short bowel syndrome: clinical outcomes based on etiology and anatomical type in a retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Purpose

Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is a critical condition in pediatric patients. It often results in dependence on parenteral nutrition (PN) and significant morbidity. This study aimed to review pediatric SBS patients from a single center and analyze clinical outcomes based on etiology and anatomical type.

Methods

A total of 55 patients diagnosed with SBS at our institution from January 2004 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical demographics and outcomes including growth and PN dependence were evaluated according to etiology and anatomical type.

Results

The predominant cause of SBS was necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). At the last follow-up, the mean weight-for-age (z-score) was -2.00 ± 2.07 and 52.7% of patients were weaned off PN. Catheter-related bloodstream infection and PN-associated liver disease occurred in 36.4% and 20.0% of cases, respectively. Patients with motility disorders exhibited lower weight-for-age and longer durations of PN than those with NEC or intestinal atresia. Additionally, outcomes varied significantly by anatomical type, with type I patients showing higher PN dependence and lower rates of successful weaning off PN than type III patients.

Conclusion

The study suggests that clinical outcomes in pediatric SBS patients can vary depending on underlying etiology and anatomical type, indicating that tailored interventions might enhance patient outcomes. Further research is needed to identify independent prognostic factors for SBS and improve the quality of life of SBS children.

INTRODUCTION

Short bowel syndrome (SBS), a subgroup of intestinal failure, is a condition that occurs after major resection of the small intestine due to congenital or acquired lesions that result in malabsorption [12]. Throughout the past decades, there have been a variety of definitions for SBS. When evaluating the short bowel, the focus used to be on the length of the small intestine. However, recently, definitions have been based more on the function of the remaining bowel than on the length of the small intestine [34]. Thus, SBS is generally defined as either requiring parenteral nutrition (PN) for >60 days after small bowel resection or having a remnant small bowel length (RSBL) <25% of that expected for gestational age [56].
According to a previous study, the overall incidence of pediatric SBS was 24.5 per 100,000 live births, with its incidence increased in premature birth [7]. Commonly, major resection of the small bowel is caused by necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), although it can also occur due to midgut volvulus, intestinal atresia, or motility disorders such as chronic intestinal pseudoobstruction (CIPO) [8]. In one study, the mortality rate of SBS was 27% over 5 years [9]. The mortality was primarily due to complications related to PN. Children with SBS are initially dependent on PN for survival. They may require long-term PN support for several years. As a result, some patients need PN administered at home rather than in a hospital.
Unfortunately, PN and central venous catheters used for PN can be risk factors contributing to the high morbidity and mortality of SBS. For example, sepsis due to catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) and cholestasis often develops into PN-associated liver disease (PNALD). Factors such as RSBL, preservation of the ileocecal valve (ICV), and anatomical type of SBS are also known to significantly impact the morbidity and mortality of SBS [1011121314]. Thus, it is important to study pediatric SBS despite its low incidence because it is a major cause of intestinal failure with a high mortality rate.
Malnutrition and growth failure are critical problems in the pediatric population. About 54% of SBS patients who finally discontinue PN can achieve enteral autonomy. It has been reported that the length of the small intestine or the etiology is related to enteral autonomy [1314]. Studies on growth outcomes of pediatric SBS patients often show significant increases in height and weight during the follow-up period, although a large number of children remain below average and catch-up [15]. Unfortunately, few studies have evaluated surgical aspects, nutritional aspects, and prognostic factors of SBS [16]. Although remaining bowel length, underlying disease, and preservation of the ICV have been found to be factors correlated with growth and ability to wean from PN, studies have shown inconsistent results [171819].
Thus, this study reviewed pediatric SBS patients from our center, aiming to analyze clinical outcomes including growth and PN dependence based on etiology and anatomical type.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with SBS at Seoul National University Children’s Hospital between January 2004 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. In this study, SBS was defined as the need for PN for more than 60 days after small bowel resection because of gastrointestinal intolerance or a bowel length of less than 25% of bowel length predicted for gestational age [56]. Patients with intestinal failure who underwent only colon resection without small bowel resection and those with intestinal failure due to malabsorption were excluded from this study.
By reviewing medical records, the following data were collected and analyzed: demographics (such as onset age, sex, gestational age, birth weight, and underlying etiology), postoperative follow-up data including surgical procedure, anatomical type of SBS, PN support, growth outcomes, and complications such as CRBSI, PNALD, and mortality. Anatomical types of SBS are classified as follows: (1) type I (small intestine resection and presence of enterostomy), (2) type II (small intestine resection with jejunocolic anastomosis), and (3) type III (small intestine resection with jejunoileal anastomosis and intact colon) [820]. Absolute RSBL was measured during the initial surgery related to SBS. The percentage of expected RSBL was calculated by comparing the measured length with the expected length based on postconceptional age [21]. CRBSI was defined as the identification of bacteria from both peripheral and central line blood cultures, where the same pathogen was detected in both samples [22]. PNALD was defined as a direct bilirubin level of 2.0 mg/dL or higher on laboratory tests after 2 weeks of starting PN, excluding other causes of elevated bilirubin unrelated to PN [23]. Growth outcome was calculated as weight-for-age in z-score according to the World Health Organization growth chart [24]. Data from all patients, including those who died during follow-up, were analyzed until the point of their last available clinical data to minimize bias in outcome assessment.
Distribution of continuous variables is reported as mean and standard deviation. Categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages. Statistical analyses included the Kruskal-Wallis test, chi-square test, and Fisher exact test. Significance was considered when the P-value was less than 0.05. After conducting the Kruskal-Wallis test, post-hoc analysis using Dunn test was performed to compare groups and determine significant differences between specific groups. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows ver. 25.0 (IBM Corp.).
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Hospital (No. SNUH 1809-108-974), and the requirement for informed consent was waived.

RESULTS

Table 1 presents the general demographics of 55 pediatric SBS patients in our center. The most common underlying etiology was NEC, followed by motility disorder, total colonic aganglionosis (TCA), and midgut volvulus. Of these patients, 52.7% were born preterm (<gestational age 37 weeks) and 87.3% were diagnosed with SBS before the age of 1 year. The mean absolute RSBL was 52.4 ± 39.1 cm and the percentage of expected RSBL was 32.2% ± 20.9%. Regarding anatomical types, type I, type II, and type III accounted for 40%, 32.7%, and 27.3%, respectively. Table 2 summarizes the outcomes of all patients. The mean follow-up period was 82.7 ± 64.7 months. At the last follow-up, 21 patients (38.2%) had a weight below the 3rd percentile. The mean weight-for-age (z-score) was -2.00 ± 2.07. The mean duration of PN was 21.0 ± 25.5 months, with 43.6% of patients receiving home PN to continue their nutrition. Twenty-nine patients (52.7%) were weaned off PN. Incidence rates of CRBSI and PNALD were 36.4% and 20.0%, respectively. Two patients in the NEC group died during the follow-up period due to sepsis, at 2 and 15 months of age, respectively. Both were included in the analyses of growth and PN-related outcomes up to their time of death. The early mortality of one patient may have introduced potential survivorship bias when interpreting long-term outcomes. Fig. 1 shows the relationship between underlying etiology and anatomical types. In the NEC group, 66.7% of patients were classified as type II. On the other hand, most (93.3%) motility disorders and all (100%) TCA cases were type I with enterostomy. Midgut volvulus was evenly split between type II and type III, while all atresia cases fell under type III.

Clinical outcomes according to the etiology of short bowel syndrome

There was no significant difference in follow-up period or age at the last follow-up based on the underlying etiology of SBS (Table 3). Although there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of underweight patients (<3rd percentile), a significant difference was observed in weight-for-age (z-score) (P = 0.020). When comparing by category, the motility disorder group showed a significantly lower z-score than the group with midgut volvulus (-2.64 ± 1.67 vs. -0.21 ± 0.49, P = 0.015). There was a statistically significant difference in PN duration according to etiology (P = 0.001). Patients with NEC and intestinal atresia had shorter PN durations than those with motility disorders (pairwise comparisons: P = 0.009 and P = 0.020, respectively). The rate of weaning off PN and the number of cases of home PN showed statistically significant differences based on etiology. Motility disorder and TCA groups had more cases of not being able to wean off PN and requiring home PN than other groups. While there was a trend of higher incidence of CRBSI among patients with motility disorders, it did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.062).

Clinical outcomes according to the anatomical type of short bowel syndrome

When analyzing outcomes by anatomical type, there was no significant difference in the follow-up period or age at the last follow-up either (Table 4). The weight-for-age (z-score) showed a significant difference by anatomical type (P = 0.047), with type I having a lower z-score than type III (-2.83 ± 2.56 vs. -1.10 ± 1.00, P = 0.044, pairwise comparison). PN duration also showed a significant difference (P < 0.001), with type I having a longer duration of PN than type III (36.1 ± 27.4 months vs. 5.5 ± 9.2 months, P < 0.001). The rate of PN weaning showed a significant difference according to the anatomical type. In type I, only 18.2% succeeded in weaning off PN, whereas 100% achieved successful PN weaning in type III. Likewise, most patients in the type I group received home PN, whereas none in the type III group did.
Fig. 2 shows the distribution of weight percentiles for total patients and by anatomical type at the last outpatient follow-up. Of the total patients, 21 (38.2%) had less than the 3rd percentile and 52 (90.9%) had less than the 50th percentile.

DISCUSSION

SBS is a severe condition characterized by a significant reduction in the small bowel length, often leading to dependence on PN. Over the years, the definition of SBS has evolved, with a shift in focus from bowel length to functionality of the remaining bowel [346]. This trend reflects the recognition that even with a relatively long remnant bowel, some patients may still require prolonged PN due to functional deficits. In our study, the mean expected RSBL was 32.2%, which was longer than the typical SBS definition cutoff of 25%. This might be due to our center’s approach of performing earlier surgical interventions or adopting more conservative bowel resections. However, the rate of the PN weaning was relatively low compared to other studies [1325]. This might indicate that a substantial number of patients still face significant challenges in achieving enteral autonomy despite having more than 25% of expected RSBL. This contrasted with other studies where RSBL was shorter, highlighting variability in patient outcomes depending on different contributing factors such as etiology and anatomical type [13262728].
In our cohort, the most predominant cause was NEC, which aligned with previous reports on the etiology of pediatric SBS [1314]. The difference of the present study compared to other studies was the relatively high proportion of motility disorders such as CIPO [202930]. We also had a few unique cases, such as one patient who developed SBS following bowel perforation during air reduction for intussusception and another patient with superior mesenteric artery injury leading to bowel ischemia during retroperitoneal tumor resection. The distribution of anatomical types also reflected underlying etiologies, with NEC being primarily associated with type II while motility disorders being mostly classified as type I. This anatomical distribution is critical for understanding how different surgical outcomes and postoperative management strategies are necessary according to etiology.
Growth failure remains a significant issue for pediatric SBS patients, even for those who have eventually achieved enteral autonomy [3132]. As shown in Fig. 2, a majority of our patients (90.9%) had growth measurements below the 50th percentile, with 38.2% falling below the 3rd percentile. The overall mean weight-for-age (z-score) for all patients was -2.00 ± 2.07, which was comparable to or lower than growth outcomes reported in other studies [3334]. In the study by McLaughlin et al. [34], the weight-for-age (z-score) at 2 years of age for pediatric SBS was 0.90 ± 1.10. This difference might be attributed to the fact that our cohort data reflected growth outcomes at the last follow-up after a longer-term period, along with higher rates of prematurity and a greater prevalence of motility disorders as an etiology. In the analysis by etiology and anatomical type, lower weight-for-age (z-score) was observed for cases with motility disorders and type I anatomy. Children with motility disorders commonly have high output jejunostomy and often face ongoing gastrointestinal complications, which can hinder their nutritional absorption and growth. This is consistent with a previous study showing that malabsorption, losses through large volumes of stool, recurrent sepsis, and attempts to reduce or discontinue PN due to PNALD could contribute to inadequate growth [32].
Achieving enteral autonomy, defined as independence from PN, remains a primary goal in SBS management. In our study, 52.7% of patients were weaned off PN, which aligned with the results of other studies [2628]. As reported in previous literature, certain factors such as RSBL, the presence of the ICV, and underlying diseases play critical roles in determining whether PN can be successfully discontinued [6142835]. In a study by Kong et al. [36], preservation of the ileum was associated with an increased possibility of PN weaning, which was attributed to the ileum’s greater adaptive potential in nutrition and fluid absorption compared to the jejunum. Our study showed that patients with motility disorders had significantly longer PN durations and prolonged dependency on intravenous nutrition compared to patients with NEC or intestinal atresia. Additionally, patients with type I had longer PN durations than patients with type III. Patients with type I were also less likely to be weaned off PN and more likely to require home PN. These findings could be explained by the loss of ICV in type I patients, along with the fact that they underwent more extensive ileal resection compared to other types, leading to a reduced absorptive capacity. In contrast, type III patients, who have more intact bowel anatomy and a preserved ICV, were better equipped for enteral nutrition, leading to faster PN weaning. In these type I patients with high-output stomas, to support enteral adaptation, our center typically initiates trophic feeding in the early phase to stimulate mucosal adaptation, followed by gradual advancement using elemental enteral formulas (e.g., Neocate [Nutricia], Monowell [Korea Medifood], and Elemental 028 [Nutricia]) based on individual tolerance. Continuous feeding is preferred in these patients to increase mucosal contact and enhance absorption. For selected patients with a distal stoma, refeeding protocols are applied to improve distal bowel adaptation and fluid absorption. Oral intake is actively encouraged in parallel with tube feeding to reduce the risk of oral aversion during prolonged nonoral nutrition.
CRBSI and PNALD are major causes of morbidity and mortality in pediatric SBS patients who require long-term vascular access for PN. In this report, incidence rates of CRBSI and PNALD were 36.4% and 20.0%, respectively, aligning with rates reported in other studies [3738]. Analysis by anatomical type showed the highest incidence of CRBSI and PNALD in type I, although no statistically significant differences were observed between groups, which could be attributed to a retrospective study design and a relatively small sample size. A previous study has shown that the presence of an enterocutaneous stoma is associated with a higher risk of CRBSI due to microbial imbalances and an overabundance of conditional pathogens [39]. Additionally, other research studies have found that ileum resection and enterostomy can block the enterohepatic circulation of bile acids, leading to cholestasis and subsequent liver disease [2728]. The higher burden of infection and cholestasis among patients with enterocutaneous stomas underscores the need for vigilant management and possibly earlier transition to alternative nutritional strategies.
Although stoma-related complications such as dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, stoma prolapse or retraction, and peristomal skin breakdown were not systematically evaluated in this study, they remain important clinical concerns, particularly for patients with type I SBS. However, in our center, elemental formulas and distal stoma refeeding protocols are routinely employed in the management of high-output stomas to reduce fluid and electrolyte loss, enhance nutrient absorption, and mitigate stoma-related morbidity.
Improving outcomes for pediatric SBS requires a comprehensive approach centered on achieving enteral autonomy. Surgical interventions such as bowel lengthening procedures and small intestine transplantation in severe cases can significantly enhance intestinal adaptation [4041]. For patients requiring prolonged PN, extended hospitalization can increase the risk of infections and nutritional complications, potentially diminishing their quality of life. Therefore, effective home PN programs and multidisciplinary management are crucial for supporting near-normal growth and reducing complications. At our center, the home PN program and advanced home-care services can support SBS patients who require long-term PN, with catheter management by a skilled nurse that could help reduce catheter-related infections such as CRBSI [42]. Additionally, developing personalized nutrition plans based on each patient’s underlying etiology and anatomical type might be essential.
This study has several limitations. First, it was a single-center study with a relatively small sample size, which might limit the generalizability of our findings. Second, this study could not fully control potential factors that might influence enteral nutrition regimens, infection occurrences, antibiotics use, and other anthropometric parameters due to its retrospective nature. Third, longitudinal growth data at standardized time points (e.g., 6 months, 1 year, 2 years) were not consistently available, which limited our ability to analyze catch-up growth or growth trajectories over time. Fourth, although this study found that outcomes in SBS patients varied according to etiology or anatomical type, it did not establish their significance as independent predictive factors. Further studies should focus on identifying factors that could predict successful weaning from PN and improving outcomes in pediatric SBS patients. Prospective studies investigating long-term quality of life and functional outcomes in SBS should also be a priority.
In conclusion, this study suggests that clinical outcomes in pediatric SBS patients can vary according to underlying etiology and anatomical type. Findings of this study suggest that tailored interventions based on these factors could potentially enhance patient outcomes. Further research is needed to understand their roles as independent prognostic factors to develop better treatment strategies for SBS.

Notes

Fund/Grant Support: None.

Conflict of Interest: Hee-Beom Yang, a member of the Editorial Board of the Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research, did not participate in the article review process. No other potential conflicts of interest pertinent to this article were reported.

Author Contribution:

  • Conceptualization: DK, HYK.

  • Data curation, Formal analysis, Visualization: HH.

  • Investigation: HH, DK.

  • Methodology, Project administration, Supervision: HYK.

  • Validation: JKY, HBY.

  • Writing – Original Draft: HH.

  • Writing – Review & Editing: All authors.

References

1. Galea MH, Holliday H, Carachi R, Kapila L. Short-bowel syndrome: a collective review. J Pediatr Surg. 1992; 27:592–596. PMID: 1625129.
2. Georgeson KE, Breaux CW. Outcome and intestinal adaptation in neonatal short-bowel syndrome. J Pediatr Surg. 1992; 27:344–350. PMID: 1501009.
3. Cohran VC, Prozialeck JD, Cole CR. Redefining short bowel syndrome in the 21st century. Pediatr Res. 2017; 81:540–549. PMID: 27997531.
4. Kappus M, Diamond S, Hurt RT, Martindale R. Intestinal failure: new definition and clinical implications. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2016; 18:48. PMID: 27447791.
5. Merritt RJ, Cohran V, Raphael BP, Sentongo T, Volpert D, Warner BW, et al. Intestinal rehabilitation programs in the management of pediatric intestinal failure and short bowel syndrome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017; 65:588–596. PMID: 28837507.
6. Wales PW, de Silva N, Kim JH, Lecce L, Sandhu A, Moore AM. Neonatal short bowel syndrome: a cohort study. J Pediatr Surg. 2005; 40:755–762. PMID: 15937809.
7. Wales PW, de Silva N, Kim J, Lecce L, To T, Moore A. Neonatal short bowel syndrome: population-based estimates of incidence and mortality rates. J Pediatr Surg. 2004; 39:690–695. PMID: 15137001.
8. Rintala RJ, Pakarinen MP, Wester T. Current concepts of intestinal failure. Springer;2016.
9. Squires RH, Duggan C, Teitelbaum DH, Wales PW, Balint J, Venick R, et al. Natural history of pediatric intestinal failure: initial report from the Pediatric Intestinal Failure Consortium. J Pediatr. 2012; 161:723–728.e2. PMID: 22578586.
10. O'Keefe SJ, Buchman AL, Fishbein TM, Jeejeebhoy KN, Jeppesen PB, Shaffer J. Short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure: consensus definitions and overview. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006; 4:6–10. PMID: 16431298.
11. Wilmore DW. Factors correlating with a successful outcome following extensive intestinal resection in newborn infants. J Pediatr. 1972; 80:88–95. PMID: 4552656.
12. Fallon EM, Mitchell PD, Nehra D, Potemkin AK, O'Loughlin AA, Gura KM, et al. Neonates with short bowel syndrome: an optimistic future for parenteral nutrition independence. JAMA Surg. 2014; 149:663–670. PMID: 24827450.
13. Demehri FR, Stephens L, Herrman E, West B, Mehringer A, Arnold MA, et al. Enteral autonomy in pediatric short bowel syndrome: predictive factors one year after diagnosis. J Pediatr Surg. 2015; 50:131–135. PMID: 25598109.
14. Spencer AU, Neaga A, West B, Safran J, Brown P, Btaiche I, et al. Pediatric short bowel syndrome: redefining predictors of success. Ann Surg. 2005; 242:403–412. PMID: 16135926.
15. Pierret ACS, Wilkinson JT, Zilbauer M, Mann JP. Clinical outcomes in pediatric intestinal failure: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019; 110:430–436. PMID: 31172170.
16. Salvia G, Guarino A, Terrin G, Cascioli C, Paludetto R, Indrio F, et al. Neonatal onset intestinal failure: an Italian Multicenter Study. J Pediatr. 2008; 153:674–676.e1-e2. PMID: 18589446.
17. Cisler JJ, Buchman AL. Intestinal adaptation in short bowel syndrome. J Investig Med. 2005; 53:402–413.
18. Feldman EJ, Dowling RH, McNaughton J, Peters TJ. Effects of oral versus intravenous nutrition on intestinal adaptation after small bowel resection in the dog. Gastroenterology. 1976; 70(5 PT.1):712–719. PMID: 816699.
19. Peters FB, Bone JN, Van Oerle R, Albersheim S, Casey L, Piper H. The Importance of the ileocecal valve and colon in achieving intestinal independence in infants with short bowel syndrome. J Pediatr Surg. 2022; 57:117–121. PMID: 34696920.
20. Wales PW, Christison-Lagay ER. Short bowel syndrome: epidemiology and etiology. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2010; 19:3–9. PMID: 20123268.
21. Struijs MC, Diamond IR, de Silva N, Wales PW. Establishing norms for intestinal length in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2009; 44:933–938. PMID: 19433173.
22. Pittiruti M, Hamilton H, Biffi R, MacFie J, Pertkiewicz M. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: central venous catheters (access, care, diagnosis and therapy of complications). Clin Nutr. 2009; 28:365–377. PMID: 19464090.
23. Nandivada P, Carlson SJ, Chang MI, Cowan E, Gura KM, Puder M. Treatment of parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease: the role of lipid emulsions. Adv Nutr. 2013; 4:711–717. PMID: 24228202.
24. World Health Organization (WHO). Child growth standards: weight-for-age [Internet]. WHO;2023. cited 2023 Feb 8. Available from: https://www.who.int/tools/child-growth-standards/standards/weight-for-age .
25. Hukkinen M, Mutanen A, Pakarinen MP. Small bowel dilation in children with short bowel syndrome is associated with mucosal damage, bowel-derived bloodstream infections, and hepatic injury. Surgery. 2017; 162:670–679. PMID: 28689603.
26. Khan FA, Squires RH, Litman HJ, Balint J, Carter BA, Fisher JG, et al. Predictors of enteral autonomy in children with intestinal failure: a multicenter cohort study. J Pediatr. 2015; 167:29–34.e1. PMID: 25917765.
27. Tappenden KA. Pathophysiology of short bowel syndrome: considerations of resected and residual anatomy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014; 38(1 Suppl):14S–22S. PMID: 24500909.
28. Kaji T, Nakame K, Machigashira S, Kawano T, Masuya R, Yamada W, et al. Predictors of a successful outcome for infants with short bowel syndrome: a 30-year single-institution experience. Surg Today. 2017; 47:1391–1396. PMID: 28434083.
29. Caporilli C, Giannì G, Grassi F, Esposito S. An overview of short-bowel syndrome in pediatric patients: focus on clinical management and prevention of complications. Nutrients. 2023; 15:2341. PMID: 37242224.
30. Amin SC, Pappas C, Iyengar H, Maheshwari A. Short bowel syndrome in the NICU. Clin Perinatol. 2013; 40:53–68. PMID: 23415263.
31. Matsuo Y, Nezu R, Kubota A, Fukuzawa M, Imura K, Kamata S, et al. Massive small bowel resection in neonates: is weaning from parenteral nutrition the final goal? Surg Today. 1992; 22:40–45. PMID: 1547374.
32. Cole CR, Hansen NI, Higgins RD, Ziegler TR, Stoll BJ. Very low birth weight preterm infants with surgical short bowel syndrome: incidence, morbidity and mortality, and growth outcomes at 18 to 22 months. Pediatrics. 2008; 122:e573–e582. PMID: 18762491.
33. Olieman JF, Tibboel D, Penning C. Growth and nutritional aspects of infantile short bowel syndrome for the past 2 decades. J Pediatr Surg. 2008; 43:2061–2069. PMID: 18970941.
34. McLaughlin CM, Channabasappa N, Pace J, Nguyen H, Piper HG. Growth trajectory in children with short bowel syndrome during the first 2 years of life. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018; 66:484–488. PMID: 28953527.
35. Mutanen A, Wales PW. Etiology and prognosis of pediatric short bowel syndrome. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2018; 27:209–217. PMID: 30342594.
36. Kong W, Wang J, Ying R, Li Y, Jin H, Mao Q, et al. A potential anatomic subtype of short bowel syndrome: a matched case-control study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016; 16:12. PMID: 26822147.
37. Mangalat N, Teckman J. Pediatric intestinal failure review. Children (Basel). 2018; 5:100. PMID: 30037012.
38. Capriati T, Giorgio D, Fusaro F, Candusso M, Schingo P, Caldaro T, et al. Pediatric short bowel syndrome: predicting four-year outcome after massive neonatal resection. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2018; 28:455–463. PMID: 28719916.
39. Santarpia L, Buonomo A, Pagano MC, Alfonsi L, Foggia M, Mottola M, et al. Central venous catheter related bloodstream infections in adult patients on home parenteral nutrition: prevalence, predictive factors, therapeutic outcome. Clin Nutr. 2016; 35:1394–1398. PMID: 27068496.
40. Goulet O, Abi Nader E, Pigneur B, Lambe C. Short bowel syndrome as the leading cause of intestinal failure in early life: some insights into the management. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2019; 22:303–329. PMID: 31338307.
41. Batra A, Keys SC, Johnson MJ, Wheeler RA, Beattie RM. Epidemiology, management and outcome of ultrashort bowel syndrome in infancy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017; 102:F551–F556. PMID: 28866623.
42. Howard L, Ashley C. Management of complications in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition. Gastroenterology. 2003; 124:1651–1661. PMID: 12761723.
Fig. 1

Correlation between etiology and anatomical type. NEC, necrotizing enterocolitis; SMA, superior mesenteric artery.

astr-110-194-g001
Fig. 2

Distribution of weight percentile according to anatomical type.

astr-110-194-g002
Table 1

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of pediatric patients with SBS

astr-110-194-i001

Values are presented as number only, mean ± standard deviation (range), or number (%).

SBS, short bowel syndrome; GA, gestational age; SMA, superior mesenteric artery.

a)Onset age refers to the age at which the patient was diagnosed with SBS and underwent major small bowel resection. b)Type I, small bowel resection with enterostomy; type II, small bowel resection with jejunocolic anastomosis; type III, small bowel resection with jejunoileal anastomosis and intact colon.

Table 2

Clinical outcomes and complications of pediatric patients with short bowel syndrome (n = 55)

astr-110-194-i002

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (range) or number (%).

PN, parenteral nutrition; CRBSI, catheter-related bloodstream infection; PNALD, parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease.

Table 3

Clinical outcomes according to the etiology of SBS

astr-110-194-i003

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number (%).

SBS, short bowel syndrome; NEC, necrotizing enterocolitis; TCA, total colonic aganglionosis; SMA, superior mesenteric artery; PN, parenteral nutrition; CRBSI, catheter-related bloodstream infection; PNALD, parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease.

Table 4

Clinical outcomes according to the anatomical type of SBS

astr-110-194-i004

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number (%).

SBS, short bowel syndrome; PN, parenteral nutrition; CRBSI, catheter-related bloodstream infection; PNALD, parenteral nutritionassociated liver disease.

TOOLS
Similar articles