Journal List > Ann Rehabil Med > v.50(1) > 1516094633

TOOLS
Moon: Correction: High-Intensity Interval Training Enhances Cardiovascular and Functional Outcomes Compared With Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Higher-Functioning Chronic Stroke
Erratum

Ann Rehabil Med 2026;50(1):89-90.

Published online: 21 January 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.250098.e

Correction: High-Intensity Interval Training Enhances Cardiovascular and Functional Outcomes Compared With Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Higher-Functioning Chronic Stroke

Hyun-min Moon, PT, PhD1, 2

1Cardiopulmonary Therapy Unit, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Bundang Jesaeng Hospital, Seongnam, Korea

2Applied Physical Therapy Lab, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Future Convergence, Sahmyook University, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence: Hyun-min Moon Applied Physical Therapy Lab, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Future Convergence, Sahmyook University, 815 Hwarang-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01795, Korea. Tel: +82-31-779-6515 Fax: +82-31-779-0635 E-mail: nabuday11@hanmail.net

© 2026 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Ann Rehabil Med 2025;49(6):360-370.
­
Due to the publisher’s omission of the author’s revision request email, editorial errors were introduced into the article.
In the original version of this article, a sentence was inadvertently omitted from the “Sample Size Calculation” section.
The omitted sentence should read as follows:
In the present study, VO2max was operationally treated as the highest oxygen consumption value obtained during the test (i.e., peak VO2); therefore, the VO2peak-based estimate from the prior trial was used for sample size determination.
In addition, in the footnote of Table 1, “One-way ANOVA test.” should be revised to “Independent-samples t-test.”
Table 1 has been corrected accordingly.
The publisher apologizes for any confusion this may have caused.

Table 1.
General characteristics of subjects (N=29)
HG (n=15) MG (n=14) X2/t (p)
Height (cm)a) 165.90±4.96 166.69±5.52 -0.409 (0.685)
Weight (kg)a) 64.13±7.26 66.07±4.74 -0.872 (0.389)
Age (yr)a) 52.53±9.50 50.00±8.75 0.813 (0.422)
MMSE-K (score)a) 28.27±1.22 28.21±1.31 0.128 (0.899)
Onset (mo)a) 31.69±6.42 32.03±6.32 -0.149 (0.883)
Sexb) 0.043 (0.835)
 Male 8 (53.3) 8 (57.1)
 Female 7 (46.7) 6 (42.9)
Diagnosisb) 0.212 (0.645)
 Infarction 12 (80.0) 10 (71.4)
 Hemorrhage 3 (20.0) 4 (28.6)
Affected sideb) 0.032 (0.859)
 Left 9 (60.0) 9 (64.3)
 Right 6 (40.0) 5 (35.7)

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

HG, high-intensity interval training group; MG, moderate-intensity continuous training group; MMSE-K, Mini-Mental State Examination-Korean version.

a) Independent-samples t-test.

b) Chi-square test.

TOOLS
Similar articles